A Must-See zvt replay.

On March 20 2005 18:22 Q-Tip wrote:
Well i just wasted 10 minutes of my life watching this.

On March 20 2005 18:37 Twitt wrote:


Welcome to the world of being a fucking idiot. :/ That rep was golden.

On March 20 2005 18:48 Q-Tip wrote:


if the world were run by you then this rep would be golden, but it isn't so it sucks.
Here are the reasons why (i guess i have to state them for you because you have
an IQ of 10)

1. Terran was whay too passive, he basically let the zerg get to hive tech expo etc.
2. Going fast hive tech unless your going fast guard is really really stupid.
3. The Zerg was sending all these small attacks that weren't doing ANY damage
what so ever.
4.Terrans marine control was shit.
5.Terrans macro was bad and he made terrible decisions ( i.e not transfering stuff
to save valueable minerals in such a late stage in the came can either make or
break you.)
6.The Zerg just sucks period.Insted of throwing small clumps of units away take the map
and just MASS everything since the Terran is just sitting.

ETC ETC.

also the terran has 3K+ gas later in the game...WHY THE FUCK AREN'T
YOU MASSING VESSELS AND IRRADATE HARASSING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

On March 20 2005 18:56 uhjoo wrote:


Rep has been posted in replay section, it's that good. Thanks to BCloud for pointing out this rep.

Q-tip if you can't enjoy this rep and the skill of both z and t, you're either a perfect player, you're trolling, you're reacting to Twitt's flame, or you're overly critical to be contrarian.

Your comments come close to spoiling the rep so I won't comment further but let me just say this: you're wrong, man. It's ok to be upset on getting flamed but don't dig a deeper hole by making dumb comments. "Fast hive tech unless you're going guards is really really stupid"<-- some newbie might believe you o_o

On March 20 2005 19:10 Q-Tip wrote:


Ok first off Uhjoo Nobody is a perfect player.NOBODY can play a SC game 100% perfect, there
is always some sort of flaw in somebody's play even in your own.I am not trolling because im not
going in here to start a flame war.I've watch the rep twice i can honestly say that
it wasn't that great of a rep.Both sides made some big mistakes which I pointed out earlier.Twitt
is well a twit, enough said.I am entitled to my opinion and my opinion happens to be right here.
These guys are alright, but there's no way in hell this game should have lasted as long as it did.
They're control was good but they had no brains.If they were actually thinking that game would
have been over in a 1/3 of the time.

On March 20 2005 19:27 LetMeBeWithYou wrote:


Oh noes we got a gosu over here somebody smash him and lets call him a noob and point out every single mistake he has made! I can go and watch some VOD of boxer playing and I can correct out some small mistakes so fucking what? zzzzzzzzz

thanks for pointing out the "nobody is perfect" yeah we really didnt know that

Oh yeah shit I cant dl this rep I get bounch of random letters and space, any ideas?

On March 20 2005 19:35 FroZZoR wrote:
I think the real problem is zerg went fucking HYDRA LING with swarm which is totally retarded... save the gas and get ultras... also he has 1/1 so....

On March 21 2005 01:45 SoLaR[i.C] wrote:
The replay is good, but it pisses me off at the same time. The zerg deserved to win that game so much more than the terran. But because terran is a gay race, they won anyway.

On March 21 2005 03:09 Twisted wrote:
Everyone I played that AKARAKA guy I got annoyed by his massive turtling.

It's all he does, and this zerg had a retarded way of losing to it. Hello?! He tried saving his main by nydussing drones to his island! Drones fightingg~!!

Sure, 'nice' rep for people who don't get frustrated by stupid play. I myself thought it was a waste and I agree partly to that qtip guy (or what's his name).

On March 20 2005 20:15 BCloud wrote:
So then q-tip, maybe you can enlighten us with a replay worthy of your time, if you have an even better replay than this i'm sure we would all like to see it, besides you watched a 75 min long replay in 10 mins, thats like 8x speed, and you try to criticize everything of it.

On March 21 2005 02:00 uhjoo wrote:


:D

since the results were spoiled awhile back anyway, i'll agree: i must say i agree that the zerg deserved to win the game 100%. but on the other hand, losing like this is sort of like winning... i know i'll keep an eye out for more evisu replays in the future, whereas akaraka seemed solid but not spectacular. great losses are better than boring victories! (foru on river of flames anyone? )

On March 21 2005 06:17 Q-Tip wrote:


I'd take a boring win over an incredible loss anyday uhjoo.In important games the most important
thing is to win...

On March 21 2005 06:21 ihatett wrote:


I doubt this was an important game.

Sometimes, I would think that an incredible loss is actually better for your reputation.

On March 21 2005 09:35 BCloud wrote:
Maybe you should watch your own posts before flaming mines q-tip, in one post you say that terran was way to passive, that he let the zerg do that, then in another you say that terran HAS to be passive to hold a swarming zerg.
Saying fast hive is only good if you go for fast guards is one of the most retarded things i've ever heard, i think with your superior IQ you can figure why is that.
Sure you can say terran has 3000 gas at one point and troll about WHY THE FUCK AREN'T
YOU MASSING VESSELS AND IRRADATE HARASSING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, well, if you noticed, vessels got scourged everytime zerg had a chance, they were plagued, it was the vessels the ones that were being harassed more likely not the way around.
Now saying ultraling would have won him the game is really easy for you to say, did you notice the upgrades?, did you notice that way after he had gotten the hive, terran had 2-2 m&m while zerg had no upgrades, did you notice how bad was zerg in economy?, ultralisks depend on strong economy, they depend on upgrades, zerg needs more expos than terran to support an ultraling army, but zerg didnt have more expos, zerg was too late, and he wanted to try something different, something that was indeed beautiful, yet you flame it just because it contradicts everything you say is the right thing to do.
His m&m control is crappy, well wtf can terran do when he has plague on his mm, 5 swarms over him vessels to micro against scourge and workers that must be pulled out of the crossfire?.
Saying winning is all that matters is both retarded and offensive, retarded because if that was the truth eveyone would 6 pool and say to hell, i'll get an A on pgtour if i keep doing this, offensive because there is something in this game that is art, something that is called originality, there is someone i think you've heard pretty well of him named boxer, and does he win every single one of his games?, does every game where he does a really good, interesting, astonishing move he wins?, would he be the same boxer if he played the turtle terran just to win every game? the answer is no, and you are just proving your stupidity with every post you make, contradicting yourself, flaming everyone because of their low IQ, which i can bet is 10 times as higher as your's, you are the one that needs to put a little more of brain into this instead of just flaming because you want to..

On March 21 2005 09:53 celix wrote:
Q-Tip post a rep of you doing something like that in the replay. If you cannot, just keep your comments to yourself.

On March 21 2005 10:05 tlstmddn wrote:
i dont get the whole entertaining thing, i jsut found the whole replay stupid and boring most of the time, i mean damn i thought i played pretty defensive tvz but this terran was 10x more. Z was jsut throwing the game away while the terran jsut sat back and laughed at his pathetic attacks, thats jsut how it looked to me.
@BCloud: palying to win is the only thing that matters but saying 6pool is the way to get an A on pgtour shows that u have no idea what ur talking about.

On March 21 2005 10:18 BCloud wrote:
No one of you really read my post did you?, the 6 pool was put in a sarcastic tone, and q-tip stop posting, your increasing number of posts is relative to your increasing stupidity.

On March 21 2005 10:21 taeWook wrote:
qtip, why are you trying to get on everyones nerves today? it seems like your the one trying to create controversy by claiming the replay sucked. honestly, keep your subjective comments to yourself. people can recognize greatness, and this replay demonstrated that. if you have a hard time understanding that, watch it again, and put yourself in the terran's view.

On March 21 2005 10:25 Veigh wrote:
GJ Q-Tip, you did a good job to work on everyone's nerves and besides, you fucking spoiled the replay for the people that didnt watch it with your moronic posts that beg for flames

On March 21 2005 10:42 ronhaak wrote:
Now you are just trolling. Stay on topic

On March 21 2005 10:36 Q-Tip wrote:


if you don't want a replay spoiled then don't read other posts.DL the replay, watch it then post w/e the fuck you think of it.This is what you call a "forum" don't ya know?

On March 21 2005 11:01 MPXMX wrote:
Please pay attention, Q-tip
The game lasted for over an hour, and for most of it it was diffiicult to tell who would win it. It was a close long game, where one of the players used some very unusual tactics effectively, and the other dealt with them impressively.

I don't understand hw you can say the game "sucked". You can point out dumbass mistakes in almost every single replay, be it a "Pimpest Play" or a 3-minute-long 4 pool game. 90% of all games can end much sooner than they do if players make the right decisions at the right times. But they don't, because we play in a fog of war... because concentration is the third resource of SC and there is never enough of it.

The zerg CHOSE to play like he did because he felt it was a strong enough method to win. I felt so too. The fact that it was effective is evidenced by the length of the game (during which the zerg wasn't putting off his death - it was the terran who was trying to stay alive).

So we have a one hour long, high level game full of action, featuring some unusual tactics. What else makes a great game? If this "sucked" show a good game... I'm sure I'll be able to come up with some arrogant comment about how the losing player was a dumbass for not doing _____

If you CHOSE to play like the zerg you are obviously an idiot and have offically lost all credibility with that post.

On March 21 2005 10:46 Q-Tip wrote:


For fuck sakes i'm not trolling, im defending myself.If you want me to stop posting then stop fucking flamming me for my own opinion.

On March 21 2005 11:11 Q-Tip wrote:


If you CHOSE to play like the zerg you are obviously an idiot and have offically lost all credibility with that post.

On March 21 2005 10:58 (s)Wing wrote:
great replay and i wasted 10 min of my life reading qtips posts.

On March 21 2005 11:25 Elvin_vn wrote:


who cares about credibility
grow up

On March 21 2005 12:18 WhizKid77 wrote:
strategically, this game was like 3/10. mechanically, probably 9.5/10.

On March 21 2005 12:49 iamke55 wrote:
I'm guessing Q-Tip's idea of a good game is a 13-minute rape with nada at 400 apm and playing perfectly while his opponent goes fast ultra-crack?

You may not have enjoyed this game, but you'd be a retard for not seeing that this game was extremely gosu. It was clear that evisu's large-scale unit control and macro was near-perfect, and Akaraka knew this and knew that he wouldn't stand a chance in a game of large army vs large army. If he played less passively and rushed out with his huge army when he had a lot of units, I guarantee the zerg would've raped the terran blob every single time.

On March 20 2005 18:48 Q-Tip wrote:

2. Going fast hive tech unless your going fast guard is really really stupid.

On March 21 2005 11:11 Q-Tip wrote:


If you CHOSE to play like the zerg you are obviously an idiot and have offically lost all credibility with that post.

On March 21 2005 15:13 Day[9] wrote:
Gorush plays a very similar style very well. (ie hive to hydra/lurker w/ defiler) There's nothing incredibly wrong with it at all, zerg just needed to wait for slightly larger forces to attack

On March 21 2005 10:04 Q-Tip wrote:
I can post w/e the fuck my opinion is and if you don't like it you can take those 7 posts and stick them where the sun don't shine.

On March 20 2005 18:48 Q-Tip wrote:


if the world were run by you then this rep would be golden, but it isn't so it sucks.
Here are the reasons why (i guess i have to state them for you because you have
an IQ of 10)

1. Terran was whay too passive, he basically let the zerg get to hive tech expo etc.
2. Going fast hive tech unless your going fast guard is really really stupid.
3. The Zerg was sending all these small attacks that weren't doing ANY damage
what so ever.
4.Terrans marine control was shit.
5.Terrans macro was bad and he made terrible decisions ( i.e not transfering stuff
to save valueable minerals in such a late stage in the came can either make or
break you.)
6.The Zerg just sucks period.Insted of throwing small clumps of units away take the map
and just MASS everything since the Terran is just sitting.

ETC ETC.

also the terran has 3K+ gas later in the game...WHY THE FUCK AREN'T
YOU MASSING VESSELS AND IRRADATE HARASSING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

On March 22 2005 18:09 n00bsaibot wrote:
Thats what i get for watching a replay with players ive never heard of. One of the most boring replays i have ever seen. I'll stick to progamer replays only thank you.

On March 21 2005 10:04 Q-Tip wrote:



For the last time im not posting any replays so you idiots can see me play.
I can post w/e the fuck my opinion is and if you don't like it you can take those 7 posts and stick them where the sun don't shine.