• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:05
CET 01:05
KST 09:05
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175Evil Geniuses - shutting down20ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier6Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League92
StarCraft 2
General
SC2 Power Rank: epic29 No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.17 How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Evil Geniuses - shutting down
Tourneys
RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) RSL 2026 Offline Finals LCQ Sign-Ups Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Simple Questions/Answers [G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 548 Shining Bright Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror
Brood War
General
Bot on ladder SCHNAIL now supports Remastered Rollback Netcode in Brood War BW General Discussion [Megathread] Daily Funny Videos
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [Women's StarCraft] MonstarZ vs BA 2026-10-30 Star Con San Diego 2026 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Mobile Legends: Bang Bang Armies of Exigo - YesYes? General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread R I P Patrick Stewart Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Football (Soccer) Thread MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8589 users

Let the fun begin. Activision Blizzard suing MBC - Page 24

Forum Index > BW General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 22 23 24 25 26 38 Next All
RumTalk
Profile Joined October 2010
Jamaica135 Posts
October 24 2010 05:06 GMT
#461
It really is amazing how many people cant just think about this matter in a logical manner, Blizzard gains nothing by forcing BW to die, as some have stated previously it is actually better for both of their games to have a healthy pro scene. Blizzard has been trying to talk to KeSPA for years regarding their sale of the broadcasting rights, KeSPA told them where they could shove their IP rights.
What people apparently dont get is that Blizzard owns the game they created it, its their product end of story, if someone else takes that product and tries to profit off of it, without giving the owner their fair due(which is whatever the owner deems it to be) its called stealing.
From the information that has been released to the public Blizzard has been more than accommodating in their demands, which they did not have to do in the first place, and KeSPA has still refused, even flaunting Blizzards authority in starting the proleague when explicitly told not to and of course once again selling the broadcasting rights. Fact of the matter is Blizzard is well within its rights to sue to stop this. The reason that they are suing MBC first is because MBC was at the very least informed that in the owner of the products eyes their broadcasting of BW was illegal and yet they paid the broadcasting fee to KeSPA and starting broadcasting anyways.

p.s. and yes this is a new account and my first post get over it
trulla
Profile Joined February 2010
Chile303 Posts
October 24 2010 05:08 GMT
#462
is this really an "e-sport"?

seems more like an "e-business" in the eyes of blizzard. If BW was ever taken as an e-sport, blizzard would've never done these efforts to shut down BW permanently.
Sea[Shield] !!
nalgene
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada2153 Posts
October 24 2010 05:14 GMT
#463
Anyone notice a lot of 2010 accounts in this thread?
Year 2500 Greater Israel ( Bahrain, Cyprus, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Gaza Strip, West Bank, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Yemen )
Kishkumen
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States650 Posts
October 24 2010 05:19 GMT
#464
On October 24 2010 14:06 RumTalk wrote:
It really is amazing how many people cant just think about this matter in a logical manner, Blizzard gains nothing by forcing BW to die, as some have stated previously it is actually better for both of their games to have a healthy pro scene. Blizzard has been trying to talk to KeSPA for years regarding their sale of the broadcasting rights, KeSPA told them where they could shove their IP rights.
What people apparently dont get is that Blizzard owns the game they created it, its their product end of story, if someone else takes that product and tries to profit off of it, without giving the owner their fair due(which is whatever the owner deems it to be) its called stealing.
From the information that has been released to the public Blizzard has been more than accommodating in their demands, which they did not have to do in the first place, and KeSPA has still refused, even flaunting Blizzards authority in starting the proleague when explicitly told not to and of course once again selling the broadcasting rights. Fact of the matter is Blizzard is well within its rights to sue to stop this. The reason that they are suing MBC first is because MBC was at the very least informed that in the owner of the products eyes their broadcasting of BW was illegal and yet they paid the broadcasting fee to KeSPA and starting broadcasting anyways.

p.s. and yes this is a new account and my first post get over it

As has been mentioned previously, both in this thread and in many others, the problem comes with how Blizzard let the BW scene go along untouched for several years before even contacting kespa. I'm not a lawyer, so I have no real opinion on where the rights lie, but as far as I understand it, there is a legitimate case for kespa.
Weird, last time I checked the UN said you need to have at least 200 APM and be rainbow league to be called human. —Liquid`TLO
mustaju
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Estonia4505 Posts
October 24 2010 05:19 GMT
#465
On October 24 2010 14:14 nalgene wrote:
Anyone notice a lot of 2010 accounts in this thread?

Back off, I've been lurking since at least september 2009.
WriterBrows somewhat high. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndFysO2JunE
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11607 Posts
October 24 2010 05:23 GMT
#466
On October 24 2010 14:14 nalgene wrote:
Anyone notice a lot of 2010 accounts in this thread?


Yes. On both sides. A lot of the more consistent pro-Kespa apologists on this and other threads are also 2010's or 2009's like me. Hard to tell how long people have been lurking or have been involved in Starcraft in other capacities.
ModeratorWake me up when Trump's term is finished. Slava Ukraini.
Railxp
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
Hong Kong1313 Posts
October 24 2010 05:42 GMT
#467
i dont think all the "YEA GO KESPA, FUCK YOU BLIZZARD UR KILLING OUR CHILDHOOD I HOPE YOU DIE AND MAGGOTS EAT YOUR EYEBALLZ" people really understand what is going on. Not that I am way up high with the all seeing eye, but im willing to reserve judgment until later when I know more to see how it plays out.

the fact that shit had to go so far down the drain is sad. Either win is still bad for competitive scbw. Kespa wins, blizzard looks like an asshole. Blizzard wins, there will be a vacuum in audience and srs ramifications for pros in korea.
~\(。◕‿‿◕。)/~,,,,,,,,>
RumTalk
Profile Joined October 2010
Jamaica135 Posts
October 24 2010 05:46 GMT
#468
On October 24 2010 14:19 Kishkumen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2010 14:06 RumTalk wrote:
It really is amazing how many people cant just think about this matter in a logical manner, Blizzard gains nothing by forcing BW to die, as some have stated previously it is actually better for both of their games to have a healthy pro scene. Blizzard has been trying to talk to KeSPA for years regarding their sale of the broadcasting rights, KeSPA told them where they could shove their IP rights.
What people apparently dont get is that Blizzard owns the game they created it, its their product end of story, if someone else takes that product and tries to profit off of it, without giving the owner their fair due(which is whatever the owner deems it to be) its called stealing.
From the information that has been released to the public Blizzard has been more than accommodating in their demands, which they did not have to do in the first place, and KeSPA has still refused, even flaunting Blizzards authority in starting the proleague when explicitly told not to and of course once again selling the broadcasting rights. Fact of the matter is Blizzard is well within its rights to sue to stop this. The reason that they are suing MBC first is because MBC was at the very least informed that in the owner of the products eyes their broadcasting of BW was illegal and yet they paid the broadcasting fee to KeSPA and starting broadcasting anyways.

p.s. and yes this is a new account and my first post get over it

As has been mentioned previously, both in this thread and in many others, the problem comes with how Blizzard let the BW scene go along untouched for several years before even contacting kespa. I'm not a lawyer, so I have no real opinion on where the rights lie, but as far as I understand it, there is a legitimate case for kespa.




That would be relevant if blizzard was suing because KeSPA created or advanced BW as an esport, which they are not. They are suing because KeSPA and also MBC by siding with KeSPA are not respecting their rights, all Blizzard has been saying is hey I created this game I own it and I and i am the ones who is to be selling anything to do with the game unless I have given someone permission. Its the same thing as when u watch a sport and you get the little disclaimer msg saying you may not rebroadcast etc etc without the express written permission of the company, whether that be the nba or nfl whatever.
Ferrose
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States11378 Posts
October 24 2010 05:57 GMT
#469
I don't get it. What did MBC do to instigate Blizzard's wrath?
@113candlemagic Office lady by day, lonely woman at night. | Official lolicon of thread 94273
LaLLsc2
Profile Joined September 2010
United States502 Posts
October 24 2010 05:59 GMT
#470
On October 24 2010 14:06 RumTalk wrote:
It really is amazing how many people cant just think about this matter in a logical manner, Blizzard gains nothing by forcing BW to die, as some have stated previously it is actually better for both of their games to have a healthy pro scene. Blizzard has been trying to talk to KeSPA for years regarding their sale of the broadcasting rights, KeSPA told them where they could shove their IP rights.
What people apparently dont get is that Blizzard owns the game they created it, its their product end of story, if someone else takes that product and tries to profit off of it, without giving the owner their fair due(which is whatever the owner deems it to be) its called stealing.
From the information that has been released to the public Blizzard has been more than accommodating in their demands, which they did not have to do in the first place, and KeSPA has still refused, even flaunting Blizzards authority in starting the proleague when explicitly told not to and of course once again selling the broadcasting rights. Fact of the matter is Blizzard is well within its rights to sue to stop this. The reason that they are suing MBC first is because MBC was at the very least informed that in the owner of the products eyes their broadcasting of BW was illegal and yet they paid the broadcasting fee to KeSPA and starting broadcasting anyways.

p.s. and yes this is a new account and my first post get over it



I completely agree with this.
Live and Let Live
Redux
Profile Joined September 2009
United States21 Posts
October 24 2010 06:01 GMT
#471
I smell a movie scene ending. Where blizzard is forced to create an AI within the "fixed" code and then be pitted against our fellow pro-gamers.
The more you think, the less you know.
gozima
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada602 Posts
October 24 2010 06:02 GMT
#472
The popularity of BW in Korea is stifling sales of SC2 there. Blizzard doesn't give a fuck about e-sports, they make money by selling games, not hosting tournaments.

They probably saw what Boxer in GSL did to spur interest in SC2 in Korea, and decided that getting Flash, JD, and crew to switch over to SC2 asap was in their best interest.
Ferrose
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States11378 Posts
October 24 2010 06:03 GMT
#473
On October 24 2010 15:02 gozima wrote:
The popularity of BW in Korea is stifling sales of SC2 there. Blizzard doesn't give a fuck about e-sports, they make money by selling games, not hosting tournaments.

They probably saw what Boxer in GSL did to spur interest in SC2 in Korea, and decided that getting Flash, JD, and crew to switch over to SC2 asap was in their best interest.


So basically this whole ordeal is saying that people don't have the legal right to broadcast BW games, and that only Blizzard does (I didn't follow the BW pro scene)?
@113candlemagic Office lady by day, lonely woman at night. | Official lolicon of thread 94273
iPlaY.NettleS
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Australia4460 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-24 06:08:54
October 24 2010 06:08 GMT
#474
On October 24 2010 11:05 jayGroove wrote:
Another interview comes from FOMOS. it said that Blizzard "We still have a interest in SC1","We will not stop supporting BW scene"
.

Reminds me of when a company takes over say an american manufacturer and promises to keep making that stuff in their USA factory.

A short while later the factories are closed and relocated to China or Mexico.

There is more money in SC2 thus Blizzard will wind down BW as fast as they can , as simple as that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7PvoI6gvQs
kwkwookw
Profile Joined August 2010
218 Posts
October 24 2010 06:48 GMT
#475
On October 24 2010 14:06 RumTalk wrote:
It really is amazing how many people cant just think about this matter in a logical manner, Blizzard gains nothing by forcing BW to die, as some have stated previously it is actually better for both of their games to have a healthy pro scene. Blizzard has been trying to talk to KeSPA for years regarding their sale of the broadcasting rights, KeSPA told them where they could shove their IP rights.
What people apparently dont get is that Blizzard owns the game they created it, its their product end of story, if someone else takes that product and tries to profit off of it, without giving the owner their fair due(which is whatever the owner deems it to be) its called stealing.
From the information that has been released to the public Blizzard has been more than accommodating in their demands, which they did not have to do in the first place, and KeSPA has still refused, even flaunting Blizzards authority in starting the proleague when explicitly told not to and of course once again selling the broadcasting rights. Fact of the matter is Blizzard is well within its rights to sue to stop this. The reason that they are suing MBC first is because MBC was at the very least informed that in the owner of the products eyes their broadcasting of BW was illegal and yet they paid the broadcasting fee to KeSPA and starting broadcasting anyways.

p.s. and yes this is a new account and my first post get over it


Although I'm not an expert in the details of this case, it is to my knowledge that what you call "whatever the owner (blizzard) deems it to be" was too demanding. I do not know what Blizzard released publicly but KeSPA also publicly released the demands from Blizzard and it claimed that Blizzard wanted full rights to organizing tournaments, teams, etc. in addition to licensing fees.

I agree with you, that since SC is Blizzard's product, they most likely, have the right to decide the terms that go along with the various ways in which the product is used. I'll go as far as to even say that legally, they may have full rights to organizing sc tournaments, teams, etc. But it is people like you, a stickler to law, who fail to realize that laws are imperfect and can be manipulated in such a way that "justice" isn't truly served.

Law is not everything. I'm not saying illegal behavior should be endorsed. But think about the history of Brood War. Who and what were all the factors that allowed SC:BW to mature into what it is today. Based on Blizzard's past handling of tournaments (just in case you're unfamiliar, they failed terribly), think about what would happen if Blizzard had the rights and were to organize tournaments and teams today.

Maybe based on current law, Blizzard has full rights (again, I'm no legal expert so this is pure speculation). What I am almost certain of is that there is probably no law the takes into account and respects what KeSPA has done for the game of SC:BW for the past decade. Sure, they have their own faults. But it was thanks to them that an esports culture was even created. The GSL of today probably wouldn't exist without the cultural institution of esports that KeSPA helped cultivate. The esports culture war a significant reason for the swelling popularity of the SC franchise. But do you see Blizzard even remotely respecting what KeSPA has done for them and for their game?

Indeed, following your logic, Blizzard would have no legal obligation to appreciate and respect KeSPA's accomplishments with their game. But I think anyone with a just conscience can see that Blizzard isn't simply being motivated by "legality" here, unlike what they are constantly stating publicly. Everyone hates hypocrites. And then there are people on these forums wondering why Blizzard receives such hate.
darmousseh
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States3437 Posts
October 24 2010 06:59 GMT
#476
There is no argument here. Blizzard owns the IP copyright and they are allowed to control it's broadcasting. Blizzard not enforcing it for a couple years doesn't mean they still don't own it. Imagine how pissed disney would get if some company went around selling micky mouse stuff for 10 years and then claimed that they owned it since they built a community around it for 10 years. 10 years is a short time and time doesn't matter anyway when it comes to this stuff. Yes kespa helped sc1 become popular, but they did it without the blessing of blizzard and when blizzard came to give them their blessing for a price, they refused and even cancled gretech stuff by forcing the players to not participate.

Blizzard will win, no matter what anyone thinks.
Developer for http://mtgfiddle.com
RumTalk
Profile Joined October 2010
Jamaica135 Posts
October 24 2010 07:07 GMT
#477
On October 24 2010 15:48 kwkwookw wrote:

Although I'm not an expert in the details of this case, it is to my knowledge that what you call "whatever the owner (blizzard) deems it to be" was too demanding. I do not know what Blizzard released publicly but KeSPA also publicly released the demands from Blizzard and it claimed that Blizzard wanted full rights to organizing tournaments, teams, etc. in addition to licensing fees.

I agree with you, that since SC is Blizzard's product, they most likely, have the right to decide the terms that go along with the various ways in which the product is used. I'll go as far as to even say that legally, they may have full rights to organizing sc tournaments, teams, etc. But it is people like you, a stickler to law, who fail to realize that laws are imperfect and can be manipulated in such a way that "justice" isn't truly served.

Law is not everything. I'm not saying illegal behavior should be endorsed. But think about the history of Brood War. Who and what were all the factors that allowed SC:BW to mature into what it is today. Based on Blizzard's past handling of tournaments (just in case you're unfamiliar, they failed terribly), think about what would happen if Blizzard had the rights and were to organize tournaments and teams today.

Maybe based on current law, Blizzard has full rights (again, I'm no legal expert so this is pure speculation). What I am almost certain of is that there is probably no law the takes into account and respects what KeSPA has done for the game of SC:BW for the past decade. Sure, they have their own faults. But it was thanks to them that an esports culture was even created. The GSL of today probably wouldn't exist without the cultural institution of esports that KeSPA helped cultivate. The esports culture war a significant reason for the swelling popularity of the SC franchise. But do you see Blizzard even remotely respecting what KeSPA has done for them and for their game?

Indeed, following your logic, Blizzard would have no legal obligation to appreciate and respect KeSPA's accomplishments with their game. But I think anyone with a just conscience can see that Blizzard isn't simply being motivated by "legality" here, unlike what they are constantly stating publicly. Everyone hates hypocrites. And then there are people on these forums wondering why Blizzard receives such hate.


I agree with some parts of what yoy are saying, I can't bold stuff on my phone though. What you have to remember is that blizzard does respect what KeSPA has done with their game that's why they went to KeSPA first trying to make them be the holders of the ip rights in korea aka being legally allowed to broadcast etc, as long as they pay a certain fee, whether at the time it was a fee for the year or per tournament I don't know, what I do know is KeSPA told them to stick it up their ass. So yes blizzard knows that without bw's success as a game and a esport the past 10 years there would be no GSL today.
The issue is again based on the information we all have access to, blizzard says this is the tournament fee for broadcasting(I can't actually remember the proper number, phone makes it difficult to look it up) and you have to agree that I we(blizzard) own the game and everything to do with it, and you(KeSPA and anyone in the future) need my permission to profit off it.
Xiphos
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada7507 Posts
October 24 2010 07:13 GMT
#478
On October 24 2010 15:59 darmousseh wrote:
There is no argument here. Blizzard owns the IP copyright and they are allowed to control it's broadcasting. Blizzard not enforcing it for a couple years doesn't mean they still don't own it. Imagine how pissed disney would get if some company went around selling micky mouse stuff for 10 years and then claimed that they owned it since they built a community around it for 10 years. 10 years is a short time and time doesn't matter anyway when it comes to this stuff. Yes kespa helped sc1 become popular, but they did it without the blessing of blizzard and when blizzard came to give them their blessing for a price, they refused and even cancled gretech stuff by forcing the players to not participate.

Blizzard will win, no matter what anyone thinks.


Except that Kespa isn't selling SC? O_o
2014 - ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ Raise your bows brood warriors! ᕙ( •̀ل͜•́) ϡ
Coagulation
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States9633 Posts
October 24 2010 07:15 GMT
#479
shame on you blizzard
mprs
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada2933 Posts
October 24 2010 07:17 GMT
#480
I think its important to note that the negotiations are not between Blizzard and Kespa, but between Gretech and Kespa. Having said that, it is actually impossible to be unfair in a negotiation you are not partaking in.

"The negotiation terms that Gretech offered to both of the broadcasting stations are fair, so we want to see the negotiation through as smooth as possible, and be on a good relations. Also, Blizzard has no plan to get any monetary gains through the IP rights negotiation process. Didn't you see in Gretech's announcement, that all monetary gains will be donated to charities? Once again, we want to see StarCraft 1 and StarCraft 2 to exist side-by-side."

"Few years ago, there was a situation when KeSPA demanded broadcasting fee from broadcasting stations, and I remember the fee to be significantly higher than the rumors or current negotiation terms offered. The important fact here is, that KeSPA has no right to demand any money, but they did so, at much higher price. The absolutely true fact is that, few years ago, KeSPA demanded a lot of money, and we think if someone wants to use somebody else's IP, they should be paying a fair price to the IP owner.

As for the sub-licensing, we gave Gretech full rights, so we are not involved with that negotiation. Gretech is a for-profit company, so it seems only right that the negotiation should end with fair pricing for both Gretech and the broadcasting stations.

Once again, Blizzard did not decide on the pricing in the negotiation, and that Gretech will set a fair price for the negotiation. Ultimately, we want to protect our IP rights.

I want to also make a mention about the rumors going around regarding the relationship between Gretech and Blizzard. Gretech is Blizzard's partner. This is based on trust, and Blizzard still trusts and supports Gretech. So, we want to confirm again, clearly, that Blizzard and Gretech are partners who trust and respect each other. Likewise, we want to see new partnerships created with other groups in Korea. To do so, we need to have respect going both ways, but beforehand, we need acknowledgment of the IP rights. Doing broadcasting without getting the license is an act of disrespect." - Paul Sams

/endthread?

Anyway, lets be real for a moment. Kespa didn't do anything for Blizzard. All their work was for their self-interest, and it just happened to benefit Blizzard. These negotiations have been going on for quite a while (years back, not just now). Is it because Blizzard wanted to kill SC2? Maybe, who knows. All we know is that there are companies that have been profiting from someone else's product. Its like me buying a TV and selling it to someone else, except I stole the TV. Not the best analogy, but you get the point. If we're all not respecting IP rights, then Kespa shouldn't ask for a fee from the broadcasting stations since they have the right to play whatever they want. Kespa did ask for fees, implying that they are selling a product (being SC1). But Blizzard can make this same argument Kespa did, and ask a fee for them to use their product.

Anyway, regardless of who is right and who is wrong. I sincerely hope that it gets settled. My best case scenario is Blizzard wins their rightful IP rights, and pro-leagues remain intact. Probably not going to happen but we can hope.
We talkin about PRACTICE
Prev 1 22 23 24 25 26 38 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
08:00
GSL CK 6
CranKy Ducklings41
Liquipedia
OSC
07:00
Masters Cup #151: Group D
davetesta32
Liquipedia
The PiG Daily
05:30
Best Games of SC
herO vs Rogue
GuMiho vs ShoWTimE
Clem vs herO
PiGStarcraft327
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft327
SpeCial 55
EmSc Tv 18
StarCraft: Brood War
ProTech174
910 49
LancerX 16
Dota 2
syndereN865
PGG 230
monkeys_forever165
LuMiX1
League of Legends
JimRising 836
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1316
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox263
Other Games
summit1g9484
FrodaN1554
XaKoH 255
Maynarde116
JuggernautJason37
Organizations
StarCraft 2
WardiTV563
Other Games
gamesdonequick492
BasetradeTV26
StarCraft 2
EmSc Tv 18
EmSc2Tv 18
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 123
• musti20045 24
• RyuSc2 21
• EnkiAlexander 14
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki4
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos4006
• Nemesis3554
• Scarra1158
Other Games
• imaqtpie476
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
9h 55m
WardiTV Invitational
11h 55m
Epic.LAN
12h 55m
IPSL
15h 55m
eOnzErG vs McRibbed
LancerX vs StRyKeR
AI Arena Tournament
16h 55m
OSC
1d 13h
Yamato Cup
1d 14h
IPSL
1d 16h
Artosis vs RiceHat
Kyrie vs Sony
Map Test Tournament
1d 22h
WardiTV Weekly
2 days
[ Show More ]
Ultimate Battle
2 days
Rush vs BeSt
Replay Cast
2 days
Rogue vs Classic
Patches Events
3 days
PiGosaur Cup
4 days
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
KCM Race Survival
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-10-30
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

1xBet Invitational
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.