| Forum Index > BW General |
|
RattyZ
United States11 Posts
Immediately you should notice that Skyhigh should be at the top of my list, due to his 15 points. My sub total should also be 62. Is there anyone in particular who needs PMd about these issues in the future? (In case my picture doesn't load) ~ RattyZ ~ ▲Main Team▲ Pt Free 0 Guemchi 9 Kal 9 Sea 6 Skyhigh 15 Yellow 5 Woongjin Stars 14 Sub-Total: 53 | ||
|
Subversive
Australia2229 Posts
Edit Also, it lists teams by alphabetical order, not points won. | ||
|
RattyZ
United States11 Posts
On June 21 2010 21:43 Subversive wrote: Also, it lists teams by alphabetical order, not points won. That can't be right, look at Doraemon's Team, It's not at all in Alphabetical order. | ||
|
FaCE_1
Canada6184 Posts
| ||
|
Subversive
Australia2229 Posts
On June 21 2010 21:47 RattyZ wrote: That can't be right, look at Doraemon's Team, It's not at all in Alphabetical order. True, my mistake. | ||
|
catabowl
United States815 Posts
| ||
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26782 Posts
| ||
|
Lucumo
6850 Posts
| ||
|
FaCE_1
Canada6184 Posts
This duo is awesome... now I need some serious help from Action and Classic tomorrow !!! | ||
|
doubleupgradeobbies!
Australia1281 Posts
On June 22 2010 07:58 Lucumo wrote: Thanks to Bisu I made -5 instead of +7 in the ace match. I hope he gets crushed next time :/ Serves you right for having bisu on your anti I hope he crushes some more anti teams next time  | ||
|
Jackal03
Brazil7469 Posts
awesome | ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17727 Posts
Wouldn't it be better to not give points for lineup appearance at all and just +1 for ace match? Also, 0 points for loss instead of -1. Result would be the same point-wise but there would be much less counting involved... | ||
|
Subversive
Australia2229 Posts
On June 22 2010 22:02 Manit0u wrote: One thing that always bugged me... Why the hell are there 'line-up appearance' points? Wouldn't it be better to not give points for lineup appearance at all and just +1 for ace match? Also, 0 points for loss instead of -1. Result would be the same point-wise but there would be much less counting involved... When lineups were posted ahead of time it meant you got points for a player who was slated for game 4 even if it ended 0-3. 3-0. Only now would it be the same to implement the changes you suggest. | ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17727 Posts
On June 22 2010 23:01 Subversive wrote: When lineups were posted ahead of time it meant you got points for a player who was slated for game 4 even if it ended 0-3. 3-0. Only now would it be the same to implement the changes you suggest. Still, why wasn't it changed? We've had several changes to the point assignment in the past, making it simpler for this round would only be beneficial. | ||
|
mkchoi0801
Canada125 Posts
| ||
|
doubleupgradeobbies!
Australia1281 Posts
On June 22 2010 23:25 Manit0u wrote: Still, why wasn't it changed? We've had several changes to the point assignment in the past, making it simpler for this round would only be beneficial. I don't think they were sure exactly when matchups would be released. There was a chance that they would just reveal all 4 players at the start of the match making the old(current) system useful. Once they realised we weren't going to know who's playing until they actually get sent out, they just couldn't be bothered changing the scoring scheme mid season. | ||
|
Subversive
Australia2229 Posts
Anyone who is actually certain I'd love some more information. | ||
|
Kyuukyuu
Canada6263 Posts
On June 23 2010 15:21 Subversive wrote: On that note, the players lineups are already predetermined right? I hear a lot of people asking for certain players to be sent out, but as I understood the new rules, the coaches submit their lineups to the KeSPA officials before the first match no? Anyone who is actually certain I'd love some more information. No, not as far as I know. The teams probably decide amongst themselves beforehand who goes on what map, and they might make switches based on who remains on the other team, but they don't send in lineups before the first match. | ||
|
Subversive
Australia2229 Posts
 | ||
|
catabowl
United States815 Posts
On June 24 2010 02:24 Subversive wrote: Bumb because I'm still coming 1st. This thread needs more love It's only a matter of time before I get ya | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney Dota 2  108637Calm  5251EffOrt 1521Horang2 1428Mini 575ggaemo 430BeSt 310firebathero  272ToSsGirL 246Last 161[ Show more ] League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games singsing1996 B2W.Neo1521 Beastyqt492 Mlord454 DeMusliM281 XaKoH  228mouzStarbuck165 Fuzer  65Hui .56 |
|
Ladder Legends
IPSL
JDConan vs TBD
Aegong vs rasowy
BSL
StRyKeR vs rasowy
Artosis vs Aether
JDConan vs OyAji
Hawk vs izu
CranKy Ducklings
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
Afreeca Starleague
Bisu vs Ample
Jaedong vs Flash
Monday Night Weeklies
RSL Revival
Afreeca Starleague
Barracks vs Leta
Royal vs Light
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
