I purposely took out the players' names in the graph. Here's a challenge -- can you recognize who is who by their win percents?

Answers:
+ Show Spoiler +

Black - Boxer
Green - iloveoov
Pink - Bisu
Red - Jaedong
Brown/Maroon - Flash
Light Brown - Stork
Light Blue - Nada
Purple - Savior LOL

Source:
http://www.fomos.kr/gnuboard4/bbs/board.php?bo_table=mania&wr_id=62238

EvilTeletubby

Baltimore, USA22258 Posts

May 08 2010 06:32 GMT

I was able to guess blue just based on how far out the line went.

Other than that, bleh... and yeah, purple is lol. Nice graph!

KiLL_ORdeR

United States1518 Posts

May 08 2010 06:33 GMT

how exactly is this measured? is just their winrate at that specific game? or is it some prediction, because I'm almost positive (although I'll check right now) that FlaSh doesn't have an over 80% overall win rate. Other than that, it seems pretty accurate, and it's cool to see a comparison of where these great players were at their prime relative to the rest of the competition. Now we really know that FlaSh is the greatest of all time.

prototype.

Canada4215 Posts

May 08 2010 06:33 GMT

Wow,

NaDa played a lot of games.

(Z)

sAviOr's graph is just disappointing...

Milkis

5003 Posts

May 08 2010 06:35 GMT

On May 08 2010 15:33 KiLL_ORdeR wrote:
how exactly is this measured? is just their winrate at that specific game? or is it some prediction, because I'm almost positive (although I'll check right now) that FlaSh doesn't have an over 80% overall win rate. Other than that, it seems pretty accurate, and it's cool to see a comparison of where these great players were at their prime relative to the rest of the competition. Now we really know that FlaSh is the greatest of all time.

Over the last 100 games.

KiLL_ORdeR

United States1518 Posts

May 08 2010 06:36 GMT

ah ok that makes more sense. So at each point in the graph, that is their win rate over the previous 100 games, including that game? that's coo!

gogogadgetflow

United States2583 Posts

May 08 2010 06:40 GMT

good find. thank you!

StylishVODs

Sweden5331 Posts

May 08 2010 06:46 GMT

Nice graph, although I'd really like dates or timephrames (not too detailed) listen on the x line rather than number of games. Would make it more fun to watch;)

So we could watch for example Saviors winratio over the last 100 games compared to a time, for example 08-06.

(unless I'm looking at it wrongly.. i just woke up)

moopie

12605 Posts

May 08 2010 06:49 GMT

On May 08 2010 15:46 StylishVODs wrote:
Nice graph, although I'd really like dates or timephrames (not too detailed) listen on the x line rather than number of games. Would make it more fun to watch;)

So we could watch for example Saviors winratio over the last 100 games compared to a time, for example 08-06.

(unless I'm looking at it wrongly.. i just woke up)

Yeah. having the win% over the course of the past ~8 years would be very interesting. obviously most players won't have data along the majority of the graph, but it would show who was dominating for their respective era.

Still, this graph was entertaining.

dybydx

Canada1764 Posts

May 08 2010 06:51 GMT

#10

holy god? flash had over 80% win rate in the last 100+ games? that is ridiculous...

even though JD got the win rate to be bonjwa class, Flash just made him look like a child.

professorjoak

318 Posts

May 08 2010 06:54 GMT

#11

It's interesting to note that even the very very best players never had much more than a 70% long-term winrate. In this super-competitive era where everyone is thought to be playing close to perfect Starcraft, Flash is the first to push 80% sustained winrate. That's just amazing.

Fx_

503 Posts

May 08 2010 07:01 GMT

#12

Just WOW

bubblegumbo

Taiwan1296 Posts

May 08 2010 07:08 GMT

#13

It wasn't that as hard to guess as I initially thought, it all fits really well.

StylishVODs

Sweden5331 Posts

May 08 2010 07:08 GMT

#14

Its cool to see that Iloveoov was actually the only one who started dominating directly after his debut. He just came in and started owning people left and right...

And nada to a lesser extent..

writer22816

United States5775 Posts

May 08 2010 07:09 GMT

#15

NaDa still hanging in there, what a fucking hero.

TheYango

United States47024 Posts

May 08 2010 07:15 GMT

#16

On May 08 2010 16:09 writer22816 wrote:
NaDa still hanging in there, what a fucking hero.

As much as I like Nada "still hanging in there" is a bit misleading, given that he's played only 4 games since the start of 2010. The way this is set up, he could stop playing altogether, and his curve would look the exact same. This is true of all old gamers, and as such, really isn't a measure of current performance in any way.

Wings

United States999 Posts

May 08 2010 07:49 GMT

#17

LOL Flash...

And Nada. what a fukin baller. don't ever hate on him, he's so f'ing consistent, look at that graph, stayed almost horizontal while everyone else went down.

... everyone else, that is, except Flash, who is going up up up. Ridiculous. He still hasn't hit his peak yet.