|
On May 08 2010 19:36 sungsik- wrote:
Also korean started to call Flash as GOD Young-Ho.(Young-Ho is flash's real name)
What this means is boxer, nada, oov, savior are four BonJwa, which is used to represent players who dominate for long time, and flash is the first God line.
|
Great thread!
Bisu has been my favorite player and I think I started watching pro starcraft right about when he started his rocket-like climb from his first slump to win another MSL and GOM Classic S2... LOL. He needs to do it again. EDIT: And I forgot to mention Bisu's 53 wins in the 2008-2009 Proleague season.
Flash's graph is pretty godlike and Jaedong's high level consistency is extremely impressive.
|
Guessed Flash&Nada correctly, but while Flash is obviously dominating it's also really crazy to see how JD' rate has been consistently high
|
On May 08 2010 20:38 StylishVODs wrote:Show nested quote +On May 08 2010 19:36 sungsik- wrote:
Also korean started to call Flash as GOD Young-Ho.(Young-Ho is flash's real name)
What this means is boxer, nada, oov, savior are four BonJwa, which is used to represent players who dominate for long time, and flash is the first God line.
This means no more "Flash is bonjwa!" thread? Koreans aknowledge him as one step ahead of that, hooray!
|
it's funny cause nada is like ====, flash is like ^^^ and savior is like \/\/\/, really nice graph
|
I hate this horrible and misleading graphs.
I seems like savior has a winratio near to zero just because the stupid graph starts at 40%. They should have used a exponentially function for the ordinate as well, it would have looked even more mind-blowing. That said, the information itself is still very interersting.
|
Oh BTW, the graphs of multiple starleague winners Nal_rA and JulyZerg would have been interesting too.
|
|
|
Stork needs to quit WoW and kick some ass.
|
well i know which one is flash : 3
|
On May 08 2010 21:26 Keniji wrote:
I hate this horrible and misleading graphs.
I seems like savior has a winratio near to zero just because the stupid graph starts at 40%. They should have used a exponentially function for the ordinate as well, it would have looked even more mind-blowing. That said, the information itself is still very interersting.
You hate it because you neglect seeing the facts presented?
You can clearly see the win% in the left.
I could say I hate this graph coz it looks just like random strokes to me :O
|
On May 08 2010 22:01 Slunk wrote:
Stork needs to quit WoW and kick some ass.
Its not WoW anymore, get with the times. He's too busy playing the Korean version of Farmville 
|
On May 08 2010 19:36 sungsik- wrote:
Also korean started to call Flash as GOD Young-Ho.(Young-Ho is flash's real name)
What this means is boxer, nada, oov, savior are four BonJwa, which is used to represent players who dominate for long time, and flash is the first God line.
Haha, I like that name.
|
lol @ savior
holy crap @ flash and nada
|
Man I have always liked savior but seeing that graph makes me a sad panda.
|
God-ho! 
|
On May 08 2010 22:22 StylishVODs wrote:Show nested quote +On May 08 2010 21:26 Keniji wrote:
I hate this horrible and misleading graphs.
I seems like savior has a winratio near to zero just because the stupid graph starts at 40%. They should have used a exponentially function for the ordinate as well, it would have looked even more mind-blowing. That said, the information itself is still very interersting. You hate it because you neglect seeing the facts presented? You can clearly see the win% in the left. I could say I hate this graph coz it looks just like random strokes to me :O
Read my text again. It seems like =! I don't see the facts.
Of course you can see the facts if you look at the graph "in detail", tho on the first view, it looks more dramatically then it actually is. You know there are whole jobs based on "manipulating" statistics with graphs (ie. labeling the ordinate "unusual") so you can trick people in seeing things that are not really there. Not everyone is as smart as you are and not every graph is that easy to see throw like this one, but it's still a problem. There is no problem with starting at 0% (except it wouldn't look so dramatically).
I know it's not a big deal, but I just don't like it showing statistics in a way they not really are.
|
Leesang Taekbang and the bonjwas?
Throw in triple crown and hungry zerg in there =). Although their pattern would probably be just like the other old gamers.
|
On May 09 2010 01:30 Keniji wrote:Show nested quote +On May 08 2010 22:22 StylishVODs wrote:On May 08 2010 21:26 Keniji wrote:
I hate this horrible and misleading graphs.
I seems like savior has a winratio near to zero just because the stupid graph starts at 40%. They should have used a exponentially function for the ordinate as well, it would have looked even more mind-blowing. That said, the information itself is still very interersting. You hate it because you neglect seeing the facts presented? You can clearly see the win% in the left. I could say I hate this graph coz it looks just like random strokes to me :O Read my text again. It seems like =! I don't see the facts. Of course you can see the facts if you look at the graph "in detail", tho on the first view, it looks more dramatically then it actually is. You know there are whole jobs based on "manipulating" statistics with graphs (ie. labeling the ordinate "unusual") so you can trick people in seeing things that are not really there. Not everyone is as smart as you are and not every graph is that easy to see throw like this one, but it's still a problem. There is no problem with starting at 0% (except it wouldn't look so dramatically). I know it's not a big deal, but I just don't like it showing statistics in a way they not really are.
I didn't say you didn't see the facts, just that you neglected seeing them...
Starting with 0% would be useless for the data since no data covers 0% winratio for any player.
Graphs are ment to show the important parts. Like you wouldn't let the y-line, measured in number of titles, continue up to 1000 on a graph that shows how many SL titles each progamer has won simply because there are no data that reaches that many.
I understand what you mean though, but I felt you were abit harsh on the graph...
You could argue that you hate graphs in general
|
Savior
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
