|
On September 15 2009 22:22 KinosJourney2 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2009 22:03 nayumi wrote:On September 15 2009 21:51 motbob wrote: I think Jaedong has 3 OSLs and Bisu has zero. I also think that Jaedong's worst MU is ZvP and Bisu's best MU is PvZ. Isn't Jaedong's worst MU ZvT; and Bisu's best MU PvP? ... I think you have confused Bisu with Stork, Bisus best MU is PvZ.
What are you talking about? Certainly not, storks best mu is undoubtedly PvT
|
On September 15 2009 22:22 KinosJourney2 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2009 22:03 nayumi wrote:On September 15 2009 21:51 motbob wrote: I think Jaedong has 3 OSLs and Bisu has zero. I also think that Jaedong's worst MU is ZvP and Bisu's best MU is PvZ. Isn't Jaedong's worst MU ZvT; and Bisu's best MU PvP? ... I think you have confused Bisu with Stork, Bisus best MU is PvZ.
Just look at the statistics. Bisu is 80% PvP this year. And nobody is not confused by Bisu>Stork. It was obvious.
|
Bisu's PvZ in 2009 is statistically his worst, I believe. Which shows... nothing, given the timeframe the JD:Bisu stats are covering.
|
In 2009 (an admittedly arbitrary time period), Bisu's PvP has been just over 80%, while his PvZ has been only about 66%, and Jaedong's ZvZ has been 76%.
It is a fact that, nowadays, Bisu's PvP is his best matchup. It is also not a stretch to say that, nowadays, Bisu's PvP is comparable to Jaedong's ZvZ.
|
motbob
United States12546 Posts
|
On September 15 2009 21:52 alffla wrote: jaedong bonjwa ez....
savior overcame map imbalance why cant bisu rofl noob.....
this
|
Interestingly enough, Jaedong is 4:0 vs. Bisu on the "Fair" or "Somewhat Fair" maps, and Bisu's wins occurred on all of the zerg-favored maps, including the infamous neo harmony.
I wouldn't try to extrapolate too much from these map statistics, in other words. Maps obviously play a factor, but there's a lot more going on.
|
As long as they produce good games, who cares who wins... except the fanboys.
|
Ugh people discussing map balance should do everyone a favor and never become scientists because it's all RIDICULOUS.
If a map is 3-9 PvZ it doesn't mean that it's imbalanced. It has probably the most to do with the skill level of the players. People are really quite stupid about this too often. Also you can't read anything into that small size of a sample. Even a couple of hundred games is almost too little to determine map balance only, because so many other factors count.
|
I dont know about just this year but overall, Bisu's PvZ has historically been his best matchup. Not to mention he revolutionized that matchup. Everyone knows Bisu for his PvZ. So please stop trying to say otherwise
|
On September 15 2009 22:29 Dfgj wrote: Bisu's PvZ in 2009 is statistically his worst, I believe. Which shows... nothing, given the timeframe the JD:Bisu stats are covering.
Actually, I think most protoss players have PvZ as their statistically worst matchup lol
Go think about that instead of what maps are being used
|
On September 15 2009 21:52 alffla wrote: jaedong bonjwa ez....
savior overcame map imbalance why cant bisu rofl noob.....
Awesome post.
The reason is that PvZ for any protoss, including Bisu, will always be harder to dominate than ZvT. Both considered the "hard" MU for the respective races.
Not so hard to figure out
|
of course zerg tends to be slightly overpowered vP, just like protoss tends to vT and terran tends to vZ. it's odd of course given that that jaedong tends to have some trouble with players like bisu, stork, and free, but he's the dominant player of our era. sort of silly to start a bonjwa argument while no games are being played after jaedong won a golden mouse
|
Bisu's best MU against JD's "weakest". Also remember the HBR game? Accidently canceled Spire? Doesn't quit reflecets skills. I dont say it shouldn't be counted, but stats like this just aren't saying anything. Better get JD's ZvP stats on these maps against Bisu's PvZ maps. Than cry about how Bisu lost because of the maps. These kind of "statistics" make me sick
|
On September 15 2009 22:53 Foucault wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2009 22:29 Dfgj wrote: Bisu's PvZ in 2009 is statistically his worst, I believe. Which shows... nothing, given the timeframe the JD:Bisu stats are covering. Actually, I think most protoss players have PvZ as their statistically worst matchup lol Pretty much. Not sure how that impacts the points raised in any way, though.
|
Not particular important. But I believe Bisu v Jaedong on Blue Storm was back when it was the OLD Blue Storm. One where you can't defend against mutas, so zergs just rape. And since the new version, PvZ became much easier. So it was actually zerg favored for a while before it became protoss favored. Hence the end TLPD result seemed balanced(one reason I'm glad newer version of maps these days are considered separate in terms of statistics).
On September 15 2009 22:19 7mk wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2009 22:03 nayumi wrote:On September 15 2009 21:51 motbob wrote: I think Jaedong has 3 OSLs and Bisu has zero. I also think that Jaedong's worst MU is ZvP and Bisu's best MU is PvZ. Isn't Jaedong's worst MU ZvT; and Bisu's best MU PvP? ... Well Bisu is most infamous for his PvZ but I still agree with you, he also says he is most comfortable against Zerg, but I don't think it's his best matchup. Show nested quote +On September 15 2009 21:55 Leath wrote: Once again the biased statistics. You cant simply deduce that a map favors a race because it has won more times in it. There are many other factors at work.
Yeah that's true I mean if you look at how Zerg has just completely thoroughly dominated last season, and if you then look at the map pool... it's not like the map pool is so incredibly Zergloving and Protoss hating, certainly also has something to do with for example how 5/6 Dragons just decided to start playing bad.
Weird logic. So you feel it's more likely that 5 very good players decide that they should randomly start sucking at the same time for a long period of time... rather than maps which produced ZvZs everywhere and allowed zergs such as Kwanro and type-b to become near SL winners?
I'm not saying you're wrong, because none of us are close enough to progamers to know the real answer. But it just seems like a weird assumption.
|
On September 15 2009 22:58 Foucault wrote:Show nested quote +On September 15 2009 21:52 alffla wrote: jaedong bonjwa ez....
savior overcame map imbalance why cant bisu rofl noob..... Awesome post. The reason is that PvZ for any protoss, including Bisu, will always be harder to dominate than ZvT. Both considered the "hard" MU for the respective races. Not so hard to figure out
Dominating has nothing to do with 1 player overcoming map imbalance for a time period.
|
I think JD's ZvZ dominance has more merit than Bisu's PvP. PvP is a match were historically the gap between players could be noticed and translated into game results. On the contrary, ZvZ is a MU that before JD it was regarded as a high variance MU. Not a coinflip, but one of the most used strats in PL was sending some Z to snipe an ace zerg. JD has made that strat invalid, at least in his case, and although there have been PvP monsters before with ridiculous PvP win ratios, no one had dominated ZvZ at all, not to mention like JD is doing now.
|
Btw thanks Mr.Hoon for the translation :p
|
Zurich15328 Posts
Can you please also post the map stats with all Jaedong games removed? Should be interesting :-)
|
|
|
|