|
I am now following up my old blog and continuing my shameless bragging of my bandwidth, and e-penis, by posting yet another blog with the statistics of my now 22 900 uploaded gigabytes.
Specs:
750GB HD, of which 100-200GB goes to TL torrents.
2x3.0GHz
100/100Mbit connection (paying about 10 euros a month for it)
utorrent 1.8.2
I'm using the RSS feed so that I get on each TL torrent at once. I made a guide on how to get it going in utorrent if anyone is interested in contributing. 
These are the statistics of the TL uploads since 20:th July:
Total uploaded: 22.9 TB
Total downloaded: ~350 GB
Average share ratio: 65
Total running time: 5006 hours = 209 days
Program launched 319 times
Average uptime: 16 h
Uptime ratio: 0.77 = 77%
Average upload speed during uptime: 1.27MB/s
Total Average upload speed: 981 kB/s
Stat window and current speed:
+ Show Spoiler +Note: the download include also movies/TVseries/music/etc that I have all low share ratio on (0-5 in general).
All torrents, sorted by date:
+ Show Spoiler +Note: split in five images. "show image" will only give part of the list. My internet was down over xmas, which explains the pause, and then the high number of downloads the 12:th of january when it came back.  I think I missed some good uploading that period though, with all the TL events over xmas. 
Highest share ratio torrents:
+ Show Spoiler +winner: TLAttack with Mondy, share ratio of 294. same as last time, but with quite a few new downloads. I guess this gave me a high ratio since mondi is a german player, and I get a lot faster connection to germans than I get to most americans.
Most uploaded torrents:
+ Show Spoiler +winner: wfbrood2008 with 569GB uploaded. New winner by a factor 2! O_o Also note the close second place.
All in all, I'm happy to help the great TL community, and spread SC.
  
|
wow this makes me remember how bad australian internet is
|
Awesome job. Thanks for helping out.
|
|
|
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
europeans make me envious of their ISPs lol
|
United States12607 Posts
Congratulations sir! You are a model e-citizen ^^
|
Germany / USA16648 Posts
On April 22 2009 03:55 Kennigit wrote:
europeans make me envious of their ISPs lol
Trust me, it's not like this in all of Europe
|
is awesome32278 Posts
|
On April 22 2009 03:55 Kennigit wrote:
europeans make me envious of their ISPs lol
|
100/100Mbit connection (paying about 10 euros a month for it)
Yarg.
|
Belgium6775 Posts
|
Literally 200 times the upload of my cable connection.
God.. and even fios is magnitudes worse, for more money. Are the connections in Sweden govt. subsidized or something?
|
I have the same speeds, except mine is included in our rent. ^^
Well done!
|
On April 22 2009 03:55 Kennigit wrote:
europeans make me envious of their ISPs lol
Same here. We really need to invest in good infrastructure.
|
On April 22 2009 03:46 Cascade wrote:
100/100Mbit connection (paying about 10 euros a month for it)
I really, really hate you...
|
sweden:
-connection
-awesome metal
-snow
-lower prison terms
texas:
-humid hot weather than changes every 10minutes
-mosquitoes
-shitty 1 story houses
-70%~90% black /hispanic
|
On April 22 2009 04:07 SonuvBob wrote:Yarg.
hey wtf stop protecting little victor
he must be killed by nazgul
|
22.9T uploade ???!!!!????
Dont you have a download/upload limit?
|
Zurich15365 Posts
Here is to my favorite Swedish IP 
Cascade fighting!
|
On April 22 2009 04:25 errol1001 wrote:
Literally 200 times the upload of my cable connection.
God.. and even fios is magnitudes worse, for more money. Are the connections in Sweden govt. subsidized or something?
Fibre cable infrastructure development was heavily subsidized from year 2000 and onward. Municipalities were given generous grants as incentives to start building good internet infrastructure, so that the cable infrastructure wouldn't be prone to monopolization of one or several big companies.
State owned Telia did own most of the infrastructure initially, and had somewhat of a monopoly; but it was abolished and all companies were by law given equal rights to use the existing infrastructure built by the municipalities.
Although I should say there's plenty of private infrastructure. But it's not much of a problem, since there are basically an infinite amount of internet providers available to choose from in any given city.
The speeds the op talks about were common as early as 2002-2003 in most big/average sized cities. Although the upload was a bit lower iirc, 10mbit.
What limits most of the population from having fibre broadband is not the question of availability, but rather cheap land lords and appartment complex owners who don't wanna shell out a couple of thousand dollars to have their buildings connected to the fibre infrastructure. As an example: the appartment opposite to ours (owned by a different company and where my friend lives) have had fibre optic broadband since 2002, but we've had to settle for ADSL2+ because they're too cheap to wanna invest 3k-4k dollars...
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/8398/totalstats.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/6317/42205146.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/5956/13033855.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/9264/47127270.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/9323/65313491.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/2028/75543652.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/1908/bestratio.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/8980/mostuploaded.jpg)
