• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:40
CEST 21:40
KST 04:40
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou7Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four0BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET6Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO85.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)80
StarCraft 2
General
RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" DreamHack Open 2013 revealed The New Patch Killed Mech! Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy
Tourneys
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 INu's Battles #13 - ByuN vs Zoun Tenacious Turtle Tussle Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $1,200 WardiTV October (Oct 21st-31st)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers
Brood War
General
The Lose More Card Is there anyway to get a private coach? BW General Discussion BSL Season 21 OGN to release AI-upscaled StarLeague from Feb 24
Tourneys
300$ 3D!Community Brood War Super Cup #4 [ASL20] Semifinal B Azhi's Colosseum - Anonymous Tournament [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Roaring Currents ASL final [I] TvZ Strategies and Builds [I] TvP Strategies and Build Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Dawn of War IV ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Chess Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Men's Fashion Thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Series you have seen recently... Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023 2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Certified Crazy
Hildegard
The Heroism of Pepe the Fro…
Peanutsc
Rocket League: Traits, Abili…
TrAiDoS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 3669 users

Men are not what they used to be... - Page 4

Blogs > YanGpaN
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 All
KaasZerg
Profile Joined November 2005
Netherlands927 Posts
September 05 2008 00:43 GMT
#61
Those men are Emo's. Not to be confused with gay homo or Emu's. It's is a genetical mutation, the spiritual balls don't drop down from their soul. Empty man-shell.
Mooga
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States575 Posts
September 05 2008 01:22 GMT
#62
travis uses the same logic as a typical creationist. At first I thought travis was just another troll, but after reading some of his many posts... I'm starting to see a pattern of logic failure. EPIC logic FAILURE.
Klockan3
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
Sweden2866 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-09-05 02:05:05
September 05 2008 01:52 GMT
#63
On September 05 2008 06:55 nA.Inky wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
Jibba and Klackon, I'll concede that it's a matter of degree, and I've been too hasty and sloppy in my statement on citations. In other words, true, we all refer to other work and other ideas. I'm not arguing that we throw out all information and act based only on our personal experience. At the same time, I think I would advocate treating non-personal experience (most information) as something other than truth..... I would treat such information in a framework beyond truth/falsehood. I would work with such information within a purely political framework, as in "what are the political implications of these ideas IN EXPERIENCE." This is not a justification for my particular statement about testosterone and cocks (Jibba, I think I was reading about the study you mentioned - I think I got confused and that it is that testosterone is even among gay/straight folks and that adding more doesn't change sexual orientation), but I will say that when I made that statement, I was less interested in the "absolute truth" of the statement and more interested in its political implication to the argument (I was dishonest though, I could have and should have stated that in the same post - this is where I was hasty and sloppy - in retrospect, I wish I had put it in question form, and then mentioned that I had read something that mentioned such an idea).

In short, I concede - Jibba, Klackon, you are right about my specific statement. I should have provided a citation or softened my words. What happened is I jumped on Jibba's comment as an excuse to talk about my concerns about technocracy - and I absolutely stand by my words on that matter, and think that whole argument stands. I could have been less sloppy about it.

It's good that you guys are critical of me here. But it is too easy (I'm not complaining); I'm not a credentialed expert, and I don't pretend to be. Any strong statement by me stands out like a sore thumb. How many people apply the same time to critical thought/activity when a credentialed expert makes a statement or quotes previous work? SOME undoubtedly do, particularly if you are an expert in the same field, and wish to look into other research. But I would contend that MOST do not. There are many Dawkins fans here. How many follow his endnotes/citations to the original source to verify Dawkin's claims about biology? Probably a very, very small percentage. Why? Because Dawkins is a known name, people take him seriously, he's an expert, and because research he mentions is probably technical, difficult, and boring.

My whole point in a nutshell is that people take experts too seriously, and this is dangerous.

Nick



And @ Travis: Relax, this is not a fight of any kind, I just cleared the mess up because it had gone a bit out of control which is obvious when you see such large disparities in views between the first post and the last. If you want to fight then post your own views on your own blog, do not humiliate yourself trying to defend someone who broke his own logic.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-09-05 02:01:07
September 05 2008 01:58 GMT
#64
On September 05 2008 10:22 Mooga wrote:
travis uses the same logic as a typical creationist. At first I thought travis was just another troll, but after reading some of his many posts... I'm starting to see a pattern of logic failure. EPIC logic FAILURE.


Actually, I use plenty of logic.

Where's yours?
Klockan3
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
Sweden2866 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-09-05 02:15:51
September 05 2008 02:12 GMT
#65
On September 05 2008 05:14 travis wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On September 05 2008 04:41 Klockan3 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 05 2008 00:08 nA.Inky wrote:
And I reject that system. I reject the ENORMOUS amount of faith that goes into it! Ironic that lay-scientists - ie many on TL.net - will badmouth the faith of Christians and other religious folks, yet have so much faith in the work of scientists - work that they do not understand, and scientists that they do not know. Given that we definitely do live in a technocracy, and that many people function in the ways I've described above, what incentive do people have NOT to lie with citations? What incentives do the experts have not to mislead you?

However, I understand the work of the scientists since I am one myself...

And I can say to you that citations are not there to prove a fact wrong or right, but to show the basis on what grounds you argue and what your theories are based on. Facts is only what you can feel with your own senses, science is built upon facts but it do not proclaim that theories are facts. Instead science is all about making theories to describe how an event will happen based on observed facts in the past, this is what leads us forward, but nowhere do theories supercede facts in science.

If you say that gay penises are larger you got to have read a study about it or done one yourself. Since the chances that you have done a study about penis sizes are so close to 0% that we can take it for a fact that you haven't, then you must have read about it. Now since you posted that as a pure fact you obviously believed in it and as such you are a hypocrite if you say that citations are useless since you yourself use such facts in your argumentations no matter if you put the citation in or not.


you are hardly the only scientist here.

I don't think any part of his argument was riding on whether or not his statement that gay penises are larger(or whatever he said) is correct. That is completely beside the point, and I doubt he cared about it at all.


Show nested quote +
On September 04 2008 13:45 nA.Inky wrote:
Did you know that on average, gay men have both MORE testosterone and BIGGER dicks than straight men? I'm not joking. And if you add more testosterone to a gay man, he does not become hetero - he becomes MORE gay.

These are not the words by someone who doubts the results of scientific studies, instead this are the words done by someone who neglects the basis of the study and just tries to convince people that he has more proof than he can show.


No, these are the words of someone trying to illustrate a point, a concept. There are any number of varying statements he could have made to illustrate this concept. The accuracy of his statement has very little to do with the concept he was trying to convey.



Show nested quote +
On September 04 2008 13:45 nA.Inky wrote:
There are just soooooooo many assumptions in this blog that it troubles me.... It implies that it is womanly to be insecure, docile, openly emotional, etc, and manly to be bold, decisive, etc.... This is cultural stuff.

This is even the biggest hypocrisy of them all! You yourself attack others for making assumptions when you refuse to prove that what you say is anything but assumptions. Maybe if you did not hold such double standards people would listen to you more.


1.) He attacked no one.
2.) Clearly he was stating his interpretation, one I agreed with.
3.) Innocent until proven guilty. If someone wants to know if one of his statements are true or false, shouldn't they do, say, 2 minutes of research on google and find out for theirselves? Where is the double standard? How are statements of opinion comparable to statements of fact?


Now, I will conclude with the words that I believe that all this blabbering about "Science is probably corrupt" is more to save your face than an ideology you live by.


wtf are you talking about


Ok, I will do this anyway...

The thing is that I did not attack the logic of his first post or the logic of his last post. I attacked the crystal clear lack of coherence in his thoughts about science because it were causing a ton of unnecessary arguing since he obviously did not argue on his own terms either at first or he were going to extreme with his later posts. Any of those being true would both clear up this mess.

I do not say that the first post or the last post is wrong, just that he himself should be a bit more careful with his extremes.
SiegeTanksandBlueGoo
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
China685 Posts
September 05 2008 02:17 GMT
#66
Not sure if this is too relevant but I'll just throw this out.

It's been widely reported and studied that the estrogen that women use in birth control pills etc. tend to either get poured down the drain or otherwise removed down the drain by bodily processes. Our water treatment plants in the USA are not prepared to treat this at all, so especially if you get your groundwater underwater, you are getting higher doses of estrogen than normal (especially if you get water from a stream or something, a lot of waste just gets treated and dumped back into the water.) It's been shown that this is what's causing a lot of amphibians to become mostly female with very few males.

Just gonna throw some science in there.
What does the scouter say about his macro level? It's Over 9000 minerals!
nA.Inky
Profile Blog Joined October 2004
United States794 Posts
September 05 2008 04:14 GMT
#67
SiegeTanksandBlueGoo - yes, this is my understanding as well. It's almost funny that you mention it here, since it has nothing to do with really anything here, and yet it's kind of welcome, since this thread has aready been derailed to the point of insanity.

But yes, I'm very concerned about this sort of thing too. Antibiotics and other meds are an issue as well - not just hormones from bc and such. Our societies are incredibly foolish.
Email (use instead of PM): InkMeister at aol dot com AIM: InkMeister
ahrara_
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
Afghanistan1715 Posts
September 05 2008 05:05 GMT
#68
I'm very glad Inky toned down his rhetoric. Thank you for proving to be a reasonable dude, which I always felt you were.

Any strong statement by me stands out like a sore thumb. How many people apply the same time to critical thought/activity when a credentialed expert makes a statement or quotes previous work? SOME undoubtedly do, particularly if you are an expert in the same field, and wish to look into other research. But I would contend that MOST do not. There are many Dawkins fans here. How many follow his endnotes/citations to the original source to verify Dawkin's claims about biology? Probably a very, very small

Most people would not question the expert, it's true. But anyone who does and who isn't familiar with the field is an idiot. For example, if someone were to write a textbook on how it's possible to create an infinite source of energy, and he has no credentials in physics, I would skim the book at laugh his face. If Albert Einstein did the same, I would give it serious consideration. We should leave the debating up to the experts. If we disagree with an idea strongly, we should study the field and come to our own conclusions.

I will concede that I agree with inky on the fallibility of experts. But I don't agree that "thinking for ourselves" will create a better world. Groupthink and outside influence is just as likely if not more likely with new schools of thought. I've noticed that in "alternative" media outlets, whether they're regarding politics or health, tend to be philosophically similar. Scientists, on the other hand, tend to often disagree with each other on substantial issues.

As an (angry and very annoyed) aside, I find it ironic that travis, who used citation after citation in his 9/11 blog and lambasted others when they couldn't come up with counter-citation and counter-citation, is now agreeing with inky. This is an unbelievable double standard. Somehow the arguments of groupthink don't apply to his own field of experts. And frankly, I hate arguing with this guy, because he is just a brick wall that doesn't give. He has never demonstrated anything more than a shallow understanding of anything he argues. I don't know what the hell he majored in, but it isn't philosophy or engineering. In this thread he consistently posts claim after claim, rarely bothering to make any warrants. Which works to his advantage because it is impossible to respond well to all his arguments. He seems to work under the belief that if you poke one hole in someone else's case, everything falls apart. In the realm of science and inductive logic, that is not true. I would just like it if he would try to substantiate his arguments. As it stands, all he does is point out the possibility of error, without making the case for error.
in Afghanistan we have 20% literacy rate
ahrara_
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
Afghanistan1715 Posts
September 05 2008 05:07 GMT
#69
uh to clarify since the edit link isn't working:

i meant to say here:

If we disagree with an idea strongly, we should study the field and come to our own conclusions.

that we should study the field and become *experts* ourselves. too many people glance over the literature and develop incorrect conclusions from a shallow understanding of the field.
in Afghanistan we have 20% literacy rate
nA.Inky
Profile Blog Joined October 2004
United States794 Posts
September 05 2008 15:37 GMT
#70
Well, Ahrara, it would seem we agree and disagree, then. I am not saying the world would be a utopian paradise if we all thought for ourselves and did for ourselves. (I think it would be an improvement, but I wouldn't stake my life on it). I come down against technocracy because ultimately it is my belief that we should make our own decisions for ourselves. I think it is dangerous when we have experts that make decisions that are supposedly in our interest, but aren't necessarily.

This problem extends far back in time. Plato was a technocrat and argued for a highly technocratic society. Jump far forward and we have the Comte's who think that people are something like machines, or planetary bodies, that can be understood and controlled for the benefit of society. We have people like Edward Bernays and Walt Lippman, who think that people are insane and need to be guided by experts. We have the communist experiments in extreme social engineering. And we have a strong technocratic societies today. Here in America, the vast majority of decisions regarding production, policy, etc, have nothing to do with the individual, but the decisions are made by experts, and all this is justified by media and teachers and churches....

And I reject that. I don't want to be tested, graded, certified, assigned, judged, etc. I'll make my own decisions.

I realize that we may be talking about separate situations - you are talking about the simple situation of scientific debate, and I'm talking about a society that places faith in experts. I think the two are connected, but I'm emphasizing different.
Email (use instead of PM): InkMeister at aol dot com AIM: InkMeister
Klockan3
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
Sweden2866 Posts
September 05 2008 19:39 GMT
#71
On September 06 2008 00:37 nA.Inky wrote:
We have people like Edward Bernays and Walt Lippman, who think that people are insane and need to be guided by experts.

People are always following something, at least in my opinion it is better that they follow an expert than a fool. Individuals might be smart, but group dynamics makes every mass of people extremely gullible.

Edward Bernays more or less proved that people are easily controlled with the invention of PR. The difference between him and the Nazis was that Bernays control led to stability and prosperity while the Nazis went insane and started WW2, otherwise they used exactly the same methods and those methods are still used in every country today in order to keep the stability/gain votes/build prosperity and in some rare cases to promote war.

Anyway, someone has to lead the people. If not the experts, then who should do it? They can't lead themselves, people in general have no sense in what is good for them or their country instead their opinions are shaped by the media which yet again is a group of experts ruling the masses.

On September 06 2008 00:37 nA.Inky wrote:And I reject that. I don't want to be tested, graded, certified, assigned, judged, etc. I'll make my own decisions.

You know that today you have way more freedom than people have had in any other age? And you still complain? Technocracy gives a ton of freedom to the individuals which they never had before, if you are pro individualism then you are also pro technocracy.

Or maybe I have misunderstood you? In what way do you want society to change, from the position we are in today? You want people to trust educated persons less, then who should they put their trust in instead?

The problem is that the masses are always easy to manipulate, thats a fact you can not ignore. The thing is that the masses do not even notice that they are manipulated but instead thinks that its their own free will to want to do the things they do while in fact they are just a part of the changed probability distributions created by manipulating the way the world is shown to them.
Fontong
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States6454 Posts
September 05 2008 20:34 GMT
#72
On September 05 2008 04:19 CapO wrote:
does your definition of being a man include a dirty smelly guy wearing shitty clothes with unshaved hair everywhere?

that shit is old, and most men are no longer like that. now days, there has been an increase in men's desire to look better by getting facial skin cares, wearing nice designer clothes (cheap clothes don't properly fit most people), shaving certain areas, putting on nice colognes, working out to get in shape, and becoming more feminine when it comes to being stylish and clean.

simply, being metro sexual is the new era.
i think this is the definition of a man, who knows how to take care of himself.


This post especially applies to asian men, as far as my experience goes. At the high school I recently graduated from male fashion, esp. in the somewhat more fobby circles could really be defined as going more in a 'pretty' direction than in a 'manly' direction. They really don't get shit from anyone for it and it isn't like they are all feminine. Seriously, some of the Korean fobs from my school, even though a lot of them are really 'pretty boy' looking, just spend the entire lunch pushing each other around and punching each other.

Same trend goes for asians in asia(as opposed to US). I was recently visiting some relatives in Hong Kong and they was a lot of the same thing going on. Most stores I went into were selling at least a few pink/purple shirts for guys. I bought some shirts while I was there and even though they weren't pink they were still quite tight-fitting, even though I'm really thin.

I say male femininity, at least in fashion, is just a trend. Lol...visual kei.

I have to agree with the OP though, when men act feminine it really gets on my nerves. Despite people talking about how it's bad to stereotype that men should be 'manly' in a tradition sense, I really don't want to be in a world where men act like women. Although men and women should be equal in legal and social terms, that really doesn't mean that they should be the same. There should be a difference between men and women besides just looks. It just makes me crazy when I meet a completely wishy-washy guy who is completely indecisive and can't say yes or no. Even worse is guys are are all into anime and want to act 'cute' all the time and speak in 'cute' voices.

Seriously, there is not such a thing as a woman born in a man's body. If your born a man just accept it.
[SECRET FONT] "Dragoon bunker"
Dark.Carnival
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
United States5095 Posts
September 05 2008 21:19 GMT
#73
On September 04 2008 13:31 Ancestral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 04 2008 13:29 ScarFace wrote:
Yeah, men should act like men, and women like women. I don't care what your sexual preference is, but its not at all related to your personal actions and personality. Simply put, fairy men and beastly women are completely and utterly unacceptable, just as unacceptable as transvestites- who I am sorry, are mentally ill. I'm a man trapped in a women's body. Honestly what kind of society but the most PC [ours] would not think, immediately "oh this person has a chemical imbalance, we should provide him with help before he mutilates himself and undergoes constant social degradation". Jeez.

I think people can make weird life decisions, but the idea of being "born the wrong sex" is completely ridiculous, I agree.

I however, like hygiene (shave dark areas with hair) and it helps mentally with bicycle racing (you think you're faster when your legs are shaved). But I still act "like a man" I guess.

Fairy men can be entertaining sometimes though.


Chemical imbalance? Is that the auto-write off for anything someone doesn't understand? I realize it's hard to comprehend something you will never go through, so to have empathy for them is beyond your capabilities, but to simply say 'you have a chemical imbalance let me fix you" is really ignorant and insensitive to that person. How do you know what they are feeling? Is it so hard to understand that someone doesn't feel comfortable in the body they were born with?

As for men not being 'men' anymore, that's a load of crap. There are still masculine men and feminine women, but there are also masculine woman and feminine males. As society has grown and become less attached to older notions of what makes a man a man and a woman a woman, the social contraints that held people from being what they want have slowly lifted, which allows for more diversity. We're starting to become less attached to 'well you should act this way' to 'be who you are' and that is a much healthier approach at things.
@QxGDarkCell ._.
Brett
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
Australia3820 Posts
September 06 2008 00:36 GMT
#74
On September 05 2008 09:43 KaasZerg wrote:
Those men are Emo's. Not to be confused with gay homo or Emu's. It's is a genetical mutation, the spiritual balls don't drop down from their soul. Empty man-shell.

hahahahah

That post and ancestral's made this thread worth my time.
SiegeTanksandBlueGoo
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
China685 Posts
September 06 2008 01:12 GMT
#75
I guess science wasn't really what this post was looking for.
What does the scouter say about his macro level? It's Over 9000 minerals!
Prev 1 2 3 4 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 20m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 772
Clem_sc2 514
BRAT_OK 116
UpATreeSC 113
JuggernautJason38
Railgan 22
MindelVK 22
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 19680
EffOrt 428
Shuttle 410
Mini 232
Dewaltoss 99
Soulkey 89
Aegong 31
scan(afreeca) 18
Movie 13
NaDa 9
Dota 2
Gorgc4536
Counter-Strike
fl0m1329
pashabiceps450
byalli329
Stewie2K136
ScreaM18
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu425
Other Games
Grubby2565
FrodaN1584
B2W.Neo684
KnowMe143
Skadoodle128
C9.Mang0126
ArmadaUGS102
ToD99
Trikslyr65
Pyrionflax46
QueenE44
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL356
Other Games
BasetradeTV82
StarCraft 2
angryscii 34
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 14
• Reevou 3
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota236
League of Legends
• TFBlade804
Other Games
• imaqtpie1197
• Shiphtur200
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Monday
4h 20m
Replay Cast
14h 20m
OSC
20h 20m
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
1d 3h
The PondCast
1d 14h
OSC
1d 16h
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
Online Event
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Snow vs Soma
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
CrankTV Team League
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
CrankTV Team League
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
CrankTV Team League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS2
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.