• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:40
CEST 21:40
KST 04:40
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou7Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four0BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET6Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO85.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)80
StarCraft 2
General
RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" DreamHack Open 2013 revealed The New Patch Killed Mech! Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy
Tourneys
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 INu's Battles #13 - ByuN vs Zoun Tenacious Turtle Tussle Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $1,200 WardiTV October (Oct 21st-31st)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers
Brood War
General
The Lose More Card Is there anyway to get a private coach? BW General Discussion BSL Season 21 OGN to release AI-upscaled StarLeague from Feb 24
Tourneys
300$ 3D!Community Brood War Super Cup #4 [ASL20] Semifinal B Azhi's Colosseum - Anonymous Tournament [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Roaring Currents ASL final [I] TvZ Strategies and Builds [I] TvP Strategies and Build Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Dawn of War IV ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread The Chess Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Men's Fashion Thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Series you have seen recently... Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023 2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Certified Crazy
Hildegard
The Heroism of Pepe the Fro…
Peanutsc
Rocket League: Traits, Abili…
TrAiDoS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 3684 users

Men are not what they used to be... - Page 3

Blogs > YanGpaN
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Hittegods
Profile Joined April 2007
Stockholm4641 Posts
September 04 2008 14:58 GMT
#41
This blog is shit on all levels.
This neo violence, pure self defiance
OverTheUnder
Profile Blog Joined November 2004
United States2929 Posts
September 04 2008 15:04 GMT
#42
On September 04 2008 16:45 travis wrote:
No, I still agree with inky.

I feel no need to defend this statement.


hmm, i'm pretty lost now too.
Honor would be taking it up the ass and curing all diseases, damn how stupid can people get. -baal http://puertoricanbw.ytmnd.com/
nA.Inky
Profile Blog Joined October 2004
United States794 Posts
September 04 2008 15:08 GMT
#43
Wow, this thread derailed massively. I'm still happy to talk about the original topic, but I also feel I should say more about citations.

I specifically spoke about MY politics and philosophy surrounding citations. If you place your faith in citations, that's your call.

I believe the idea of citations is to save work. If I'm writing something, rather than proving a million different premises of my argument to you, I can just say (so and so et al) did this work for me, and I'm using their facts as part of my argument.

This serves a society of specialization. We can't all be physicists, biologists, philosophers, chemists, etc. So people rely on the work of other experts, and in cooperation they build huge networks of information.

This is great if you believe that all the experts genuinely want to serve Truth. The thing is, when I "did some drugs and got all weird," I started to believe that maybe science is not, and never can be divorced from POLITICS, and as I pointed out, ideology and metaphor. Do you realize how much science is funded by commercial or government interests? Does Pfizer want to develop a new anti-depressant at VERY HIGH COST and then do research that proves it doesn't work?

So here is the deal... if you want to research something, nothing is stopping you from researching it. I think it would be relatively easy to pursue information on testosterone and homosexuality. Maybe studies on it don't exist, but it would be fairly easy to pursue that information. But I think that much of the time, a citation serves to say "I, the author, looked into this problem, and found the relevant research to prove my point, so you can believe me when I say X is true." And this is how we go forward in our research now. We say "so and so took care of that for me, so I don't need to." And then much goes unquestioned.

So, like I said, this serves technocracy (society led by specialized experts). The same way in the past it was only for an elite priest class to interpret the absolute word of god, now it is for those with 01928401980 years of school to produce truth, and it is for nobodies like us to cite those truth's in our little arguments.

And I reject that system. I reject the ENORMOUS amount of faith that goes into it! Ironic that lay-scientists - ie many on TL.net - will badmouth the faith of Christians and other religious folks, yet have so much faith in the work of scientists - work that they do not understand, and scientists that they do not know. Given that we definitely do live in a technocracy, and that many people function in the ways I've described above, what incentive do people have NOT to lie with citations? What incentives do the experts have not to mislead you?

Some recommendations for you then! Look into Edward Bernays. Study the PR industry (Trust US, We're Experts! is a good one). Study Plato's Republic. Study Noam Chomsky (Manufacturing Consent). Look into how corporations set up third party think tanks/research groups to produce scientific facts.

I wish the movie The Matrix were fiction.

In short, specialization necessitates technocracy and the practice of citing "facts" This method of organization produces powerful technology and science, but it also creates a lot of room for experts to mislead and manipulate, and I believe this is very much a part of society today. And since I am a believer that politics aren't something one should merely talk about, they are something one should embody, the way I speak and act is a reflection of my rejection of technocratic methods.
Email (use instead of PM): InkMeister at aol dot com AIM: InkMeister
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
September 04 2008 17:22 GMT
#44
[image loading]
nA.Inky
Profile Blog Joined October 2004
United States794 Posts
September 04 2008 18:10 GMT
#45
Or, what Travis said

As for men changing, again, sure, it's happening. What I see is people being transformed into machines to be programmed, tested, graded, certified, degreed, accepted, rejected, employed, paid, guided, directed, etc. People in general are docile and unsure of themselves. The quest for normalcy is paramount. And so I'm not surprised to see men acting a bit insecure. IT has nothing to do with masculinity and a lot to do with a superficial, power-draining society.
Email (use instead of PM): InkMeister at aol dot com AIM: InkMeister
Chef
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
10810 Posts
September 04 2008 18:14 GMT
#46

Just kidding. Anyway lol my mom was pointing this out to me over the summer, how men nowadays are acting all sissy and indecisive, wearing pink shirts and can't do any sports or anything athletic. She then says she's very glad that I'm not following this trend.

Explain 10 billion 'workout' threads on a nerdy internet forum like this then. Your mom is silly =/ People still believe in healthy mind, healthy body. Not everyone wants to look like Arnold Schwarshenegger, but we want our muscles to be apparent, and our weight under control. I mean... Why else would everyone be so fucking self-conscious about their looks ahha? I've met guys that are sissy and indecisive, but play more sports than me... Being decisive is more of a modern day quality than a 'strong men of the past' quality. Being sissy and indecisive is just a weak quality. It's not akin to either gender.

I guess one could observe that lots of guys are concerned with fashion these days... but it's been like that for at least a century now. Look at fashion trends and tell me guys stayed put? It's gone from wearing suits everyday with a stylish hat, to ripping your own jeans right when you get them, to buying them preworn, and now to dress shirts and well fit jeans. I don't really follow fashion trends myself, because A: I don't want to all of a sudden look like I had a complete makeover and B: I don't really know what they are to begin with. But that doesn't stop every one of my friends from being trendy. Just like they're worried about their clothes, they're more worried about working out than I am too. I'm just an apathetic individual, and it's probably not a good quality even if it does make me fit some weirdo's idea of gritty.
LEGEND!! LEGEND!!
Ancestral
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
United States3230 Posts
September 04 2008 18:34 GMT
#47
Testosterone doesn't matter. Did you realize all astronauts have been gay? And Jesus was gay? And gay men have been shown to have IQs 25% higher than straight men? Every world leader is gay.

Gay men are able to control physical objects by pure thought.
The Nature and purpose of the martial way are universal; all selfish desires must be roasted in the tempering fires of hard training. - Masutatsu Oyama
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
September 04 2008 18:35 GMT
#48
ancestral, rofl
CapO
Profile Blog Joined March 2007
United States1615 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-09-04 19:20:07
September 04 2008 19:19 GMT
#49
does your definition of being a man include a dirty smelly guy wearing shitty clothes with unshaved hair everywhere?

that shit is old, and most men are no longer like that. now days, there has been an increase in men's desire to look better by getting facial skin cares, wearing nice designer clothes (cheap clothes don't properly fit most people), shaving certain areas, putting on nice colognes, working out to get in shape, and becoming more feminine when it comes to being stylish and clean.

simply, being metro sexual is the new era.
i think this is the definition of a man, who knows how to take care of himself.
SNSD fan
Klockan3
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
Sweden2866 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-09-04 19:48:27
September 04 2008 19:41 GMT
#50
On September 05 2008 00:08 nA.Inky wrote:
And I reject that system. I reject the ENORMOUS amount of faith that goes into it! Ironic that lay-scientists - ie many on TL.net - will badmouth the faith of Christians and other religious folks, yet have so much faith in the work of scientists - work that they do not understand, and scientists that they do not know. Given that we definitely do live in a technocracy, and that many people function in the ways I've described above, what incentive do people have NOT to lie with citations? What incentives do the experts have not to mislead you?

However, I understand the work of the scientists since I am one myself...

And I can say to you that citations are not there to prove a fact wrong or right, but to show the basis on what grounds you argue and what your theories are based on. Facts is only what you can feel with your own senses, science is built upon facts but it do not proclaim that theories are facts. Instead science is all about making theories to describe how an event will happen based on observed facts in the past, this is what leads us forward, but nowhere do theories supercede facts in science.

If you say that gay penises are larger you got to have read a study about it or done one yourself. Since the chances that you have done a study about penis sizes are so close to 0% that we can take it for a fact that you haven't, then you must have read about it. Now since you posted that as a pure fact you obviously believed in it and as such you are a hypocrite if you say that citations are useless since you yourself use such facts in your argumentations no matter if you put the citation in or not.
On September 04 2008 13:45 nA.Inky wrote:
Did you know that on average, gay men have both MORE testosterone and BIGGER dicks than straight men? I'm not joking. And if you add more testosterone to a gay man, he does not become hetero - he becomes MORE gay.

These are not the words by someone who doubts the results of scientific studies, instead this are the words done by someone who neglects the basis of the study and just tries to convince people that he has more proof than he can show.
On September 04 2008 13:45 nA.Inky wrote:
Look, so much of this stuff is cultural. It used to be very normal in Europe for men to kiss each other full on the lips. IN ancient Greece, what we call homosexuality was VERY common (perhaps valued over heterosexuality).

What told you these facts? Probably doubtful sources since all of these stuff comes originally from scientific papers....
On September 04 2008 13:45 nA.Inky wrote:
There are just soooooooo many assumptions in this blog that it troubles me.... It implies that it is womanly to be insecure, docile, openly emotional, etc, and manly to be bold, decisive, etc.... This is cultural stuff.

This is even the biggest hypocrisy of them all! You yourself attack others for making assumptions when you refuse to prove that what you say is anything but assumptions. Maybe if you did not hold such double standards people would listen to you more.

Now, I will conclude with the words that I believe that all this blabbering about "Science is probably corrupt" is more to save your face than an ideology you live by.
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
September 04 2008 20:14 GMT
#51
On September 05 2008 04:41 Klockan3 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 05 2008 00:08 nA.Inky wrote:
And I reject that system. I reject the ENORMOUS amount of faith that goes into it! Ironic that lay-scientists - ie many on TL.net - will badmouth the faith of Christians and other religious folks, yet have so much faith in the work of scientists - work that they do not understand, and scientists that they do not know. Given that we definitely do live in a technocracy, and that many people function in the ways I've described above, what incentive do people have NOT to lie with citations? What incentives do the experts have not to mislead you?

However, I understand the work of the scientists since I am one myself...

And I can say to you that citations are not there to prove a fact wrong or right, but to show the basis on what grounds you argue and what your theories are based on. Facts is only what you can feel with your own senses, science is built upon facts but it do not proclaim that theories are facts. Instead science is all about making theories to describe how an event will happen based on observed facts in the past, this is what leads us forward, but nowhere do theories supercede facts in science.

If you say that gay penises are larger you got to have read a study about it or done one yourself. Since the chances that you have done a study about penis sizes are so close to 0% that we can take it for a fact that you haven't, then you must have read about it. Now since you posted that as a pure fact you obviously believed in it and as such you are a hypocrite if you say that citations are useless since you yourself use such facts in your argumentations no matter if you put the citation in or not.


you are hardly the only scientist here.

I don't think any part of his argument was riding on whether or not his statement that gay penises are larger(or whatever he said) is correct. That is completely beside the point, and I doubt he cared about it at all.


Show nested quote +
On September 04 2008 13:45 nA.Inky wrote:
Did you know that on average, gay men have both MORE testosterone and BIGGER dicks than straight men? I'm not joking. And if you add more testosterone to a gay man, he does not become hetero - he becomes MORE gay.

These are not the words by someone who doubts the results of scientific studies, instead this are the words done by someone who neglects the basis of the study and just tries to convince people that he has more proof than he can show.


No, these are the words of someone trying to illustrate a point, a concept. There are any number of varying statements he could have made to illustrate this concept. The accuracy of his statement has very little to do with the concept he was trying to convey.



Show nested quote +
On September 04 2008 13:45 nA.Inky wrote:
There are just soooooooo many assumptions in this blog that it troubles me.... It implies that it is womanly to be insecure, docile, openly emotional, etc, and manly to be bold, decisive, etc.... This is cultural stuff.

This is even the biggest hypocrisy of them all! You yourself attack others for making assumptions when you refuse to prove that what you say is anything but assumptions. Maybe if you did not hold such double standards people would listen to you more.


1.) He attacked no one.
2.) Clearly he was stating his interpretation, one I agreed with.
3.) Innocent until proven guilty. If someone wants to know if one of his statements are true or false, shouldn't they do, say, 2 minutes of research on google and find out for theirselves? Where is the double standard? How are statements of opinion comparable to statements of fact?


Now, I will conclude with the words that I believe that all this blabbering about "Science is probably corrupt" is more to save your face than an ideology you live by.


wtf are you talking about
YPang
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
United States4024 Posts
September 04 2008 20:37 GMT
#52
this is not where i expected this blog will be... lol
sMi.Gladstone | BW: B high| SC2: gold T_T
Jibba
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States22883 Posts
September 04 2008 21:04 GMT
#53
Travis loves to have sex with 15 men in the morning and then swallow their feces, as they shower him in their urine.

Innocent until proven guilty (whatever that means in this context)

+ Show Spoiler +
BTW, Inky's statements were false (1984 study by Columbia neurobiologist Heino Meyer-Bahlburg found no correlation between testosterone levels and sexual orientation) but since he doesn't "believe" in "technocracy" or "facts" or "logic" he will never admit it.
ModeratorNow I'm distant, dark in this anthrobeat
Folca
Profile Blog Joined October 2006
2235 Posts
September 04 2008 21:21 GMT
#54
YER GAY
Dea : one time when he was playing vs the comps he asked me "how do I make that flying unit that makes the other stuff invisible" and I reply "ur playing terran zomg"
Deleted User 3420
Profile Blog Joined May 2003
24492 Posts
September 04 2008 21:21 GMT
#55
Jibba is one of those men.
kpcrew
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
Korea (South)1071 Posts
September 04 2008 21:35 GMT
#56
dude
men in korea and many places in europe use handbags
WTF IS THAT?
wear a fucking backpack or something

ive seen guys on korean college campuses that have more style than most of the women
Clan Lzuruha
nA.Inky
Profile Blog Joined October 2004
United States794 Posts
September 04 2008 21:55 GMT
#57
Jibba and Klackon, I'll concede that it's a matter of degree, and I've been too hasty and sloppy in my statement on citations. In other words, true, we all refer to other work and other ideas. I'm not arguing that we throw out all information and act based only on our personal experience. At the same time, I think I would advocate treating non-personal experience (most information) as something other than truth..... I would treat such information in a framework beyond truth/falsehood. I would work with such information within a purely political framework, as in "what are the political implications of these ideas IN EXPERIENCE." This is not a justification for my particular statement about testosterone and cocks (Jibba, I think I was reading about the study you mentioned - I think I got confused and that it is that testosterone is even among gay/straight folks and that adding more doesn't change sexual orientation), but I will say that when I made that statement, I was less interested in the "absolute truth" of the statement and more interested in its political implication to the argument (I was dishonest though, I could have and should have stated that in the same post - this is where I was hasty and sloppy - in retrospect, I wish I had put it in question form, and then mentioned that I had read something that mentioned such an idea).

In short, I concede - Jibba, Klackon, you are right about my specific statement. I should have provided a citation or softened my words. What happened is I jumped on Jibba's comment as an excuse to talk about my concerns about technocracy - and I absolutely stand by my words on that matter, and think that whole argument stands. I could have been less sloppy about it.

It's good that you guys are critical of me here. But it is too easy (I'm not complaining); I'm not a credentialed expert, and I don't pretend to be. Any strong statement by me stands out like a sore thumb. How many people apply the same time to critical thought/activity when a credentialed expert makes a statement or quotes previous work? SOME undoubtedly do, particularly if you are an expert in the same field, and wish to look into other research. But I would contend that MOST do not. There are many Dawkins fans here. How many follow his endnotes/citations to the original source to verify Dawkin's claims about biology? Probably a very, very small percentage. Why? Because Dawkins is a known name, people take him seriously, he's an expert, and because research he mentions is probably technical, difficult, and boring.

My whole point in a nutshell is that people take experts too seriously, and this is dangerous.

Nick
Email (use instead of PM): InkMeister at aol dot com AIM: InkMeister
nA.Inky
Profile Blog Joined October 2004
United States794 Posts
September 04 2008 22:04 GMT
#58
A quick pre-emptive post - I said: "I'm not arguing that we throw out all information and act based only on our personal experience. At the same time, I think I would advocate treating non-personal experience (most information) as something other than truth." And and mentioned treating the information politically, and hinted at treating it hypothetically.

Klackon or someone else might jump on this and say "DUH! This is what science already does! Hence the difference between theory and fact!" Possibly true.... In theory that is how science works. But again, I am interested in the political implications of ideas, and I would contend that most people, particularly non-scientists, do not treat science in this way. And the problem arises outside of science as well, when experts are involved. It is for non-experts to just accept the facts of science and experts, and I think they often do. Again, technocracy is dangerous! Taking experts so seriously is dangerous. The scientific model works well in theory, but it assumes the experts are interested in Truth. When you throw politics into the equation, things can get massively skewed.

Who funds most research?
Email (use instead of PM): InkMeister at aol dot com AIM: InkMeister
[X]Ken_D
Profile Blog Joined May 2005
United States4650 Posts
September 05 2008 00:02 GMT
#59
[image loading]
[X]Domain - I just do the website. Nothing more.
[X]Ken_D
Profile Blog Joined May 2005
United States4650 Posts
Last Edited: 2008-09-05 00:16:41
September 05 2008 00:09 GMT
#60
I can confirm inky's comment on Greece since there is a MMW course that goes into it detail at UCSD. As for the homos with large assets, no idea.
[X]Domain - I just do the website. Nothing more.
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 20m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 772
Clem_sc2 514
BRAT_OK 116
UpATreeSC 113
JuggernautJason38
Railgan 22
MindelVK 22
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 19680
EffOrt 428
Shuttle 410
Mini 232
Dewaltoss 99
Soulkey 89
Aegong 31
scan(afreeca) 18
Movie 13
NaDa 9
Dota 2
Gorgc4536
Counter-Strike
fl0m1329
pashabiceps450
byalli329
Stewie2K136
ScreaM18
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu425
Other Games
Grubby2565
FrodaN1584
B2W.Neo684
KnowMe143
Skadoodle128
C9.Mang0126
ArmadaUGS102
ToD99
Trikslyr65
Pyrionflax46
QueenE44
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL356
Other Games
BasetradeTV82
StarCraft 2
angryscii 34
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 14
• Reevou 3
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota236
League of Legends
• TFBlade804
Other Games
• imaqtpie1197
• Shiphtur200
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Monday
4h 20m
Replay Cast
14h 20m
OSC
20h 20m
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
1d 3h
The PondCast
1d 14h
OSC
1d 16h
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
Online Event
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Snow vs Soma
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
CrankTV Team League
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
CrankTV Team League
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
CrankTV Team League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS2
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.