• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:01
CEST 14:01
KST 21:01
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles4[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?14FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event22
StarCraft 2
General
Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event WardiTV Mondays Korean Starcraft League Week 77
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
i aint gon lie to u bruh... BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Summer Games Done Quick 2024!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 697 users

Communicating Science

Blogs > Blazinghand
Post a Reply
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
September 24 2014 18:19 GMT
#1

Communicating Science





I was lucky. I grew up in a neighbourhood populated by scientists, engineers, and university professors. My friends in school were the children of thinkers and learners and intellectuals. I missed out on some experiences and my friend group was pretty homogenous in certain dimensions, but from a certain perspective we were diverse. Though my upbringing lacked in some ways, "got a decent exposure to science" was not one of them.

This isn't the case for many. Scientists are percieved as callous and indifferent, or aloof, by many in society. Whether or not it's true, there's a certain sense amongst my friends that this isn't a good thing. The things we make are gradually growing more complex and having bigger impacts on society. Radio, Television, and Internet all significantly changed the way we gather information. People like to throw "web 2.0" around a lot, but it's noteworthy that the way content is produced and shared on the internet has changed as well. With a transition from devices with keyboards to devices without keyboards, we also see a change in how computers work. Tablets and smartphones do a good job of providing users with input methods, but when your device is 90% screen and you have no physical keyboard, it's obviously optimized for recieving, not sending, information. Another change. Well, I'm getting off topic so here's the deal: scientists need to get public engagement higher. It doesn't have to be like, big, there just needs to be more of it than there is now.

Unfortunately, scientists are not seen as warm communicators (link). For example, bus drivers are evidently warmer communicators than scientists (except in New Jersey-- yet another reason not to move there). Fiske and Dupree mention more in their recent publication in PNAS (link)

In the bottom left—low-warmth, low-competence, “disgust” corner—appear prostitutes, garbage collectors, dishwashers, and fast-food workers. They are rated low on both dimensions and higher on disgust and contempt than other groups are. That is, they are neither trusted nor respected.

The remaining corners of the space are ambivalent in the sense of having mixed images, scoring high on one dimension and low on the other. The ambivalent, high-warmth, low-competence, “pity” quadrant (upper left in Fig. 2) is empty in this dataset, perhaps being reserved for the unemployed (who land there in other datasets), because the current data points all involve groups that have a job.

The fourth corner lists the ambivalently perceived high-competence, low-warmth, “envied” professions: lawyers, chief executive officers, engineers, accountants, scientists, and researchers. They earn respect but not trust. Being seen as competent but cold might not seem problematic until one recalls that communicator credibility requires not just status and expertise (competence) but also trustworthiness (warmth). People report envy and jealousy toward groups in this space. These are mixed emotions that include both admiration and resentment (23, 24). Science communicators arguably need to know about this possible type of response to them.


Check out the rest when you have a chance.

When I think about the portrayal of scientists and engineers in fiction media, it's a mixed bag. Tony Stark is clearly some kind of engineer since he makes robot suits, and he comes off as a well-rounded troubled but growing protagonists in Iron Man. He's got a lot of moxie and isn't a villain or a cringing nerd. Not bad! Then I think about The IT Crowd, one of my favourite shows, and I feel like the treatment of scientists is a bit worse there. Of course, that's needed to make the show excellent, but the show's excellence doesn't change the fact that the characters protrayed come off as utterly unrelateable in some ways. Strictly speaking, better than a lot of shows, but not great.

Scientists don't really get shafted that much in the media, but science is fairly important. Currently, we're doing better that New Jersey Bus Drivers, but I think we'll need to do better than that if we want people to listen when it matters. It's not meaningful to demand that film companies and TV shows stop doing something that's funny and makes them money, but increasing civic engagement and doing your best to support non-terrible representations of scientists in the media may be a start. Some of the coldness is deserved, too, since "skill at PR" is not one of the traits that helps you get a PhD or a job in software engineering. We all know the truth to the joke about engineers and shoes-- that you can tell which engineers are outgoing because when they talk to you they look at your shoes rather than their own. I've also definitely met "that guy" at a couple of jobs. You know that guy. So there's work to be done on that front as well, though I can't possibly imagine what you could do to make that guy better.

On the other hand, this may not be a modern universal. Hu Jintao was an engineer, and Xi Jinping was at least trained as one. Maybe it's a cultural thing? I'm not saying that politicians should be scientists, just that the fact Hu Jintao was an engineer shows that there are different thoughts in some places about the general competence of scientists. I doubt that Bill Gates would have any sort of shot of winning major office in the US (and this would also be a waste of his time).

What do you think? Is the perception of scientists in the media bad or good in your country? Is it something that would be valuable to change?

**
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
sorrowptoss
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
Canada1431 Posts
September 24 2014 18:55 GMT
#2
Well I'm not going to venture into talking about Hu Jintao

When I read your post I immediately think of the counter-example of Neil DeGrasse Tyson. He hosts debates which are open to listen to, and hosted Cosmos (the show is really well done) which aired on national TV, both in Canada and the US (and that's just a fraction of what he does for public outreach). If that isn't a positive reinforcement of the image of scientists, or an incentive to make kids want to pursue science I don't know what is

In Canada afaik scientists are well seen. In the University I go to we pride ourselves mainly in the scientific contributors that graduated from it (chemists, physiologists/cardiologists, and a few astronauts and nobel prize laureates hehe).

I agree that the technological advances made thanks to science have benefited societies wholly, but what I think is even more fundamental to the place of science is the mindset it promotes: a constant questioning of facts, rigorous verification and repetition, and utmost transparency. This is imo by far the most precious thing we could learn from science because it transcends the various disciplines that make up what we call "science programs" in institutions. Of all things, this I think is what should be stressed in science and its communication!

Thanks for reading <3
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
September 24 2014 19:14 GMT
#3
Oh yeah, to be clear I'm not making any sort of statement on Hu Jintao's quality as a leader (or as an engineer, for that matter). I'm just noting that he was both.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Djzapz
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada10681 Posts
September 24 2014 22:43 GMT
#4
I just stumbled on this thread I was getting ready to read a small/simple essay on science but I changed my mind because today beat me up completely and I can't figure out how I would structure it.

So instead I'll just say this: I have a MASSIVE amount of respect for the people who take it upon themselves to popularize science. I don't know if using this word makes sense in English but here we have Hubert Reeves, an astrophysicist, who "vulgarizes" science and he's one of the last few people who still today try to get people interested in science when all we hear about anymore is going to school to get a degree that pays like business and engineering, acquiring a ****ing trade and then generating income fast.

Hubert Reeves is our local version of the likes of Carl Sagan and Neil DeGrasse Tyson mentioned previously in this thread and I wish I could just listen to these people talk about science all day, and I wish I could understand more of it. I still watch Carl Sagan's explanation of the 4th dimension and I wish like hell I could wrap my mind around this concept. But at least I'm asking questions, and it's a shame that so few people will be willing to do the work after our current generation of geniuses go. Sure, we'll have some, but it's harder because "we have stopped dreaming" as NDT said so eloquently. We have stopped giving these people decent wages when their work is so incredibly important.
"My incompetence with power tools had been increasing exponentially over the course of 20 years spent inhaling experimental oven cleaners"
419
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Russian Federation3631 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-24 23:06:38
September 24 2014 23:01 GMT
#5
. Scientists are percieved as callous and indifferent, or aloof, by many in society.

I don't know about that. There's a large subset of people who don't know the first thing about science, except that being perceived as liking science is a proxy for being perceived as intelligent.

see: I fucking love science, the zealous defenders of NDT
?
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
September 25 2014 00:27 GMT
#6
--- Nuked ---
419
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Russian Federation3631 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-25 01:36:53
September 25 2014 01:21 GMT
#7
those who have respect for science and the peer-review process

those who are overly skeptical of leading scientific theories

you know these are not necessarily mutually exclusive right?

"You disagree with me, therefore you must be anti-science and thus irrational / illogical" strikes me as pretty dogmatic and zealous. I also like the elevation of peer-review process as near-synonymous with science. It is the better of a number of bad options for verifying reproducibility of results, still subject to human flaws. It is not a sacrament.

It would be nice if people could be convinced of truth independent of their emotions (which let's be clear should still temper their actions)

yeah, look at those rubes who can't separate emotions from the truth. Good thing that could never happen to me with my superior grasp of reality and logic.
?
FiWiFaKi
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Canada9858 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-25 02:02:38
September 25 2014 01:51 GMT
#8
Hello, Engineer and Economist here.

As an engineer, I have an ethical responsibility to create what I create for the benefit of society, and not for my own gain. Whenever creating anything, I should think about how it will contribute to society, instead of simple looking at how much money it will make me. Given where I live in Canada, I think it's fair to say, that to an extent this is the case for most engineers. Science is a bit different, as the application of what is being created is not always so clear, and true uses of inventions are sometimes realized even decades later.

Many people I am surrounded by believe that the world should be ran by engineers and scientists (engineers specifically), as to most people, the world is a black box. People don't know how a car works, they just know there are cylinders, explosions, and a car moves. People don't know how information is stored on a CD, most people don't even know how electricity is generated from a spinning turbine. And because people don't understand their surrounding, they should not make decisions about their world. It's a convincing argument, and it has proven in the past that people are clueless in solving problems when it comes to government decisions.

But here is my argument, and why I believe scientists should not be in charge: Technology is not autonomous... Technology is decided for society, and technology is shaped by society. At the end of the day, regardless of what happens, society chooses what technology will exist, and then once it exists, it exerts an influence on the society (not before being decided by the people though).

It's as simple as that, people create needs in the world, and scientists and engineers are there to meet those demands, create what hasn't been based on the desire of the people, not based on the desire of science. An engineer doesn't say "hey, I'm going to go build a bridge today", society must create a need. That is the number one differentiation that needs to be made, and I've actually taken a course in this topic. Why should we get to control a world where we aren't the ones making the decisions?

The system works very well when society decides the technology, safe and desired technology is picked, the rest is discarded... However the issue that arises is the free market. When society is not able to make the decisions, because economics is influencing decisions too much, that's when we have issues. That's why a free market makes the environment go to shit for example, because it's the economy making the decisions, and not the people. So what I propose is the need for an assembly of scientists, engineers, sociologists, geologists, politicians, economists not affiliated to the economic gains of a certain project to create decisions about whether this or that should happen. To make it so that society decides, and not the economy.

Remember, technology does not have a mind of it's own, it does not grow by itself, it is a contained force, controlled by external forces, all of which we have control over, some that we simply choose to ignore.

edit: Also keep in mind, in general people interested in numbers want to stay away from things that aren't quantifiable and absolute, and it's a very natural perspective for scientists to simply think:

"The effort to change the world is too much"
"I'll live my life where the government will leave me alone, and I don't care what happens afterwards"
"I can solve this problem more effectively than anyone else, the laws of the universe judged me, not my peer"

And of course an understanding of politics is probably the least important skill a scientist/engineer needs for his career. However if you're an economist, a journalist, a teacher, sociologist, artist... Your field will naturally involve a bit of a political component, while if I was an engineer in fascist Germany, in USA, or under Stalin, my job would be the same regardless.
In life, the journey is more satisfying than the destination. || .::Entrepreneurship::. Living a few years of your life like most people won't, so that you can spend the rest of your life like most people can't || Mechanical Engineering & Economics Major
FiWiFaKi
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Canada9858 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-25 02:14:24
September 25 2014 02:11 GMT
#9
Looking at trust of jobs is interesting, because generally, at least myself, the number one way you look at if you trust someone is their intentions.

"Do they have anything to gain from trying to convince me of this"?... And a teacher, family doctor, school adviser don't, not in terms of economic benefit. Though when a Hair Stylist tries to tell me that I should cut my hair more often, and it'll be healthier, there is an obvious clear reason for distrust, as she gains the benefit of me coming for a hair cut more often... More money. Same goes for financial bankers, engineers, politicians, lawyers, etc.

(sidenote: As a tip, that's the # one way to know whether what something someone says is true or not. If they have nothing to gain, then you can be more certain of the truth, but when they have something to gain, the information can be false, and further research should be pursued. That's why school is so nice, you get information in which nobody trying to mislead you (well the government to an extent), so you can gain the "truth" to build your idea of a world, and then you can detect when people are full of bullshit, or trying to help you).

But I think it's natural this to be the case for most high ranking jobs where a large salary is involved. I don't think it's a problem of being in science. What you must do is present yourself as a honest and sincere individual. Sometimes you can pick up what's bullshit, and when it looks legit... That's a matter of your communication skills - your tone, your motives, your gestures, your formality, your choice of words... And engineer can come off as a trust worthy person. People simply find dumb people warm, because they aren't smart enough to take advantage of them, while others are. That's why it's important to identify peoples' intentions as a professional, because simply by ones' profession, you cannot say what kind of person you will be.

I figure I'm looping in my points a bit, but in the end - a scientist can come off just as warm as anyone else (maybe not when wearing a lab coat though). It's all about the interpersonal skills.
In life, the journey is more satisfying than the destination. || .::Entrepreneurship::. Living a few years of your life like most people won't, so that you can spend the rest of your life like most people can't || Mechanical Engineering & Economics Major
opisska
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Poland8852 Posts
September 27 2014 04:32 GMT
#10
An important thing to note is that this perception is likely not very universal. To some extent it is related to what fiwifaki (sorry man, I will not try to make that capitalization ) said just above - the salary. In out country, science is definitely not a "high ranking job where a large salary is involved" - scientists are generally underpaid and are percieved as such. I would say that this perception is even a little exagerated, because it has some inertia: the salaries are not that gravely low anymore, but they are still low enough that the main issue for science is keeping people from fleeing to business because they want to make more money. This has a fundamental effect on the perception of scientists, because they are widely seen as someone who sacrifices monetary gain for his passion. The same goes with doctors, nurses, teachers - all these professions are terribly underpaid (much more than actual scientists) and it gives them a very strong aura of "I do it for you, you ungracious piece of shit".

On a personal note, I fully agree that we need to engage anyone as much as possible and I have been lucky to get a lot of opportunities to work on that as my close colleague is very good in coming up with things we should do as outreach. It is not very easy to spread the word about particle physics, as the concepts beyond "omg a particle without which nothing would be heavy" are pretty difficult to discuss with laymen, but we are trying - and also being the "Departement of Astroparticle Physics", we can (and do) always switch to being astronomers, when we need something simpler
"Jeez, that's far from ideal." - Serral, the king of mild trashtalk
TL+ Member
Randomaccount#77123
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States5003 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-28 13:16:21
September 28 2014 13:12 GMT
#11
--- Nuked ---
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Sparkling Tuna Cup
10:00
Weekly #96
ShoWTimE vs YoungYakovLIVE!
Mixu vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings275
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Harstem 278
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 23489
Calm 8785
Rain 7402
Bisu 3714
Jaedong 2726
Horang2 1718
Hyuk 1095
BeSt 734
GuemChi 718
Pusan 652
[ Show more ]
Larva 433
firebathero 392
Rush 372
EffOrt 300
Mini 276
ToSsGirL 209
PianO 187
Hyun 165
ajuk12(nOOB) 82
scan(afreeca) 78
Snow 69
Mind 46
Soulkey 44
JulyZerg 44
JYJ41
Aegong 35
Sharp 28
Free 24
HiyA 22
yabsab 20
soO 20
Icarus 19
Movie 18
Barracks 17
Sacsri 16
GoRush 13
IntoTheRainbow 11
Bale 9
ivOry 4
Dota 2
Gorgc8731
qojqva1064
XcaliburYe358
League of Legends
singsing1434
Dendi937
Counter-Strike
x6flipin511
byalli184
Other Games
tarik_tv20490
gofns16278
B2W.Neo1186
shahzam515
DeMusliM347
crisheroes308
Liquid`RaSZi308
Lowko155
Mew2King78
ArmadaUGS41
hiko22
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick28267
StarCraft 2
angryscii 6
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV209
Upcoming Events
WardiTV European League
3h 59m
MaNa vs sebesdes
Mixu vs Fjant
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs goblin
Gerald vs Babymarine
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
PiGosaur Monday
11h 59m
The PondCast
21h 59m
WardiTV European League
23h 59m
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 3h
Replay Cast
1d 11h
RSL Revival
1d 21h
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
FEL
4 days
CSO Cup
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 20
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.