EPTA lot deformations of that nature due to radiation are from long time exposure of the mother/father whose sex cells were damaged in someway, though not always. Still likely needs a larger amount of exposure then what she was subjected to though.
Lack of attention over Fukushima - Page 2
| Blogs > ETisME |
|
Slaughter
United States20254 Posts
A lot deformations of that nature due to radiation are from long time exposure of the mother/father whose sex cells were damaged in someway, though not always. Still likely needs a larger amount of exposure then what she was subjected to though. | ||
|
nunez
Norway4003 Posts
![[image loading]](http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view1/1369839/godzilla-o.gif) | ||
|
ETisME
12387 Posts
On January 16 2014 17:25 nunez wrote: all you nonchalant, "move along, there's nothing to see" bastards will be the first one to be devoured. lol I am really looking forward to the new godzilla movie. Also did you know the skin of godzilla is made to resemble the Keloid scars on the WW2 atomic bomb survivors | ||
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
| ||
|
Tobberoth
Sweden6375 Posts
| ||
|
ETisME
12387 Posts
On January 16 2014 17:41 lichter wrote: i wish they had gone on to make him look like a gorilla+whale you mean....like this? ![[image loading]](http://fc05.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2011/350/d/e/gorilla_whale_lineart_by_nightlyre-d4jbc3v.jpg) Or ![[image loading]](http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-pVLFFi8CmJQ/T4dnHuF2VyI/AAAAAAAALDQ/sVO2LiMHOtE/s1600/godzilla046.jpg) my vote with the first one, that can be a great sequel to the kingkong vs godzilla movie | ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
| ||
|
nunez
Norway4003 Posts
On January 16 2014 17:38 ETisME wrote: lol I am really looking forward to the new godzilla movie. Also did you know the skin of godzilla is made to resemble the Keloid scars on the WW2 atomic bomb survivors no, i did not know that! that is cool. | ||
|
NeThZOR
South Africa7387 Posts
| ||
|
BoggieMan
520 Posts
On January 16 2014 14:35 hp.Shell wrote: This isn't a problem that is local to Japan, either, like Chernobyl was, because the Fukushima plant was on the ocean. The radiation from Chernobyl reached Finland, Sweden, Germany, Denmark, Poland, Norway, Ukraine etc... | ||
|
JacobShock
Denmark2485 Posts
| ||
|
lantz
United States762 Posts
I will probably send a complaint to the restaurant and hope to get medical payout. Thanks OP | ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50118 Posts
| ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
I'm pretty sure a more appropriate title would be "Wildly overblown concerns regarding Fukushima" | ||
|
ETisME
12387 Posts
First I want to be clear, I am not against nuclear power. (But I am not pro nuclear energy either) I believe in technology but I don't believe in human operations. Secondly, the purpose of this blog is to warn you guys that Japan situation can be a lot worse because of a complete lack of coverage recently. The pacific ocean leak only went on a page 3 on newspaper and quickly dismissed on the next day. If you travel there, please take care. My suggestion is a NO, it's by no means I am going to stop you or give you death threats for going, but I would strongly suggest you not to go. especially if you know someone who is pregnant, please tell her not to go. There is no rush into going there now. Thirdly, Japanese exports, which Hong Kong does import a fair bit, might not even be monitored for radiation. We rarely get any reports from Japan about the current situation. these reports are released usually when things have gone bad. The potential of a leakage into pacific ocean, is actually warned by officials a few months ago. But what made it to the headline? the leak, not the warning. The last time Hong Kong ever received any news about food might be contaminated was this: http://enenews.com/govt-officials-all-japan-risk-food-water-contamination-fukushima-future-land-contaminated-250-kilometers-plant-video The reason why I use the missing ear case is because it reminded me how little we know about the situation. I might be entirely wrong, it might not be this bad. But I just want to give you all a warning since I don't want any of you having problems. Peace? T T | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
Please avoid leaving your house. Sunlight includes harmful radiation that may cause cancer! Or birth defects! Also driving places is pretty risky, so you probably shouldn't do that either. Motor vehicle accidents are one of the leading causes of premature death. I mean, "by no means I am going to stop you or give you death threats" (lol) but you should really avoid going outside or driving because "I don't want any of you having problems". :/ Okay that probably comes across as unecessarily inflammatory and rude, but I'm making a point. Life is dangerous. The idea that the absolutely trivial amount of radiation that you might acquire by visiting japan is remotely relevant is incredibly frustrating because its simple scare tactics and has nothing to do with reality. | ||
|
Hryul
Austria2609 Posts
On January 17 2014 02:54 ETisME wrote: wow I guess I need to clear out a few things: First I want to be clear, I am not against nuclear power. (But I am not pro nuclear energy either) I believe in technology but I don't believe in human operations. Secondly, the purpose of this blog is to warn you guys that Japan situation can be a lot worse because of a complete lack of coverage recently. The pacific ocean leak only went on a page 3 on newspaper and quickly dismissed on the next day. If you travel there, please take care. My suggestion is a NO, it's by no means I am going to stop you or give you death threats for going, but I would strongly suggest you not to go. especially if you know someone who is pregnant, please tell her not to go. There is no rush into going there now. Thirdly, Japanese exports, which Hong Kong does import a fair bit, might not even be monitored for radiation. We rarely get any reports from Japan about the current situation. these reports are released usually when things have gone bad. The potential of a leakage into pacific ocean, is actually warned by officials a few months ago. But what made it to the headline? the leak, not the warning. The last time Hong Kong ever received any news about food might be contaminated was this: http://enenews.com/govt-officials-all-japan-risk-food-water-contamination-fukushima-future-land-contaminated-250-kilometers-plant-video The reason why I use the missing ear case is because it reminded me how little we know about the situation. I might be entirely wrong, it might not be this bad. But I just want to give you all a warning since I don't want any of you having problems. Peace? T T yet, most likely, nothing happens because the dose is so small. Even "tons of irradiated water" are not that big of a deal since the actual dose is so small. please do provide actual evidence before shouting fire. otherwise you are just spreading irrational fear. | ||
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
 On January 17 2014 02:54 ETisME wrote: I might be entirely wrong, it might not be this bad. But I just want to give you all a warning since I don't want any of you having problems. | ||
|
hp.Shell
United States2527 Posts
On January 17 2014 02:54 ETisME wrote: I might be entirely wrong, it might not be this bad. But I just want to give you all a warning since I don't want any of you having problems. This is how I feel about it as well. It seems like it could be bad, and there are videos on youtube of people in the west part of the us with geiger counters showing higher levels. BUT, they could have the switch on the wrong setting, the ocean could in fact be so massive that it poses no real threat, etc. Mostly, I'm a guy who is easily drawn into huge fear in this type of situation, when there are people talking about a huge catastrophe, I'm one who gets really afraid of the worst possibility. So part of me is saying it's just me being overly concerned. I'm also finding it difficult to do actual worthwhile research on the subject. Most of the stuff I find is just people saying what they think someone else said about it. But I mean, when I said Chernobyl was localized (it wasn't of course) I said so as a result of my research. I haven't done any research on that before now, so I've been pretty ignorant. I learned that the government sent in the military to dump a bunch of concrete on it, the idea being to contain it inside a massive piece of earth. So my research methods aren't the best either. Anyway, I'll try to just stop worrying so much about it. I do have a life after all. | ||
|
Zocat
Germany2229 Posts
On January 16 2014 15:12 lichter wrote: This chart is also pretty good at showing how ridiculous most of our 'radiation' concerns are + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://imgs.xkcd.com/blag/radiation.png) Newer numbers: http://ex-skf.blogspot.jp/2013/12/fukushima-i-nuke-plant-tepco-estimates.html | ||
| ||
