• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:55
CEST 13:55
KST 20:55
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL21Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task30[ASL19] Ro4 Recap : The Peak15
Community News
Weekly Cups (May 19-25): Hindsight is 20/20?0DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack8[BSL20] RO20 Group Stage2EWC 2025 Regional Qualifiers (May 28-June 1)17Weekly Cups (May 12-18): Clem sweeps WardiTV May3
StarCraft 2
General
The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports? Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN Can anyone explain to me why u cant veto a matchup Karma, Domino Effect, and how it relates to SC2.
Tourneys
Last Chance Qualifiers for OlimoLeague 2024 Winter [GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO12 - Group B DreamHack Dallas 2025 EWC 2025 Regional Qualifiers (May 28-June 1) [GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO12 - Group A
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void Mutation # 472 Dead Heat
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans? Battle.net is not working Practice Partners (Official)
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] RO20 Group D - Sunday 20:00 CET [BSL20] RO20 Group B - Saturday 20:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Monster Hunter Wilds Beyond All Reason Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread
Dota 2
lawless labs myosarm sarm yk-11 Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia: Generative Agents Showdown Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread All you football fans (soccer)! European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL.net Ten Commandments
Blogs
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Yes Sir! How Commanding Impr…
TrAiDoS
Poker
Nebuchad
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
SECOND COMMING
XenOsky
WombaT’s Old BW Terran Theme …
WombaT
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 14079 users

Chvrches - The Bones Of What You Believe

Blogs > Larkin
Post a Reply
Larkin
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
United Kingdom7161 Posts
September 12 2013 17:15 GMT
#1
http://larkinmusic.wordpress.com/2013/09/12/flash-review-chvrches-the-bones-of-what-you-believe/

Hey TL, review number 5. This one is slightly different in that it's about half the length of the others I've done so far. It's also my first review of new music rather than something that I've already had for a long time.

As per usual, comments/complaints/criticisms welcome, and if you could, please give my blog a follow. It'd mean the world to me. <3


Flash Review – Chvrches – The Bones Of What You Believe

Chvrches are a Scottish electropop trio, consisting of frontwoman Lauren Mayberry, bleeps and bloops composer Iain Cook, and beatmaker Martin Doherty, though they all contribute to each element of song production. The Bones Of What You Believe is their first full length LP, having released several singles and an EP, Recover, since their inception in 2011.

There can be comparisons drawn between them and kings of female vocalist synthpop The Knife, or electropop star Robyn, and really Chvrches sit somewhere in between, offering a blend of easily accessible synthesised sound and more adventurous angles and less pop-focused lyrics (we have two f-bombs in the first two songs).

The record opens with a single released in the months coming up to the release, “The Mother We Share”. Definitely their strongest song, and a great way to introduce the album. Lauren’s voice is sampled to form a part of the beat, offering an element of creativity, but really it is just an extremely capable, well produced electropop song.

Chvrches approach a pretty conventional genre of music with a bresh of fresh air, and their music moves between very simple and conventional stylings (such as the opening to “Gun”) with a bit more adventure (the end to “We Sink”). Both of those tracks are very strong and the album’s strong start really does continue.

“Gun” featured on the Recover EP, generally considered to be stronger than the title track. The competence of the synths and beats is very clear, as they steer the track along from verse to chorus with a ridiculously catchy hook. Lauren’s vocals lilt on top of it all, though she sometimes gets drowned out by the instrumentation.

It’s hard not to talk about Chvrches without mentioning Lauren, who seems mostly responsible for the band’s swelling fanbase (no pun intended). The fact she may be the most adorable human being on the planet likely does have some impact on why Chvrches have exploded in popularity in recent months, but that isn’t to take away from her musical ability – she does have a lovely voice, and contributes to the synths as well. She herself has said it is startling how many people make the assumption she just sings and the guys do all the work, and it isn’t fair to any of them, the production on the songs really is a team effort in every aspect.

“Tether” is a far slower track than the opening three, with a slow guitar chord progression that rings of influence from the primetime of synthpop in the 80s. Like most of their songs it is something that doesn’t do anything wrong – the lyrics are fine, the instrumentation well applied, the production clean and intelligent – but it doesn’t really ‘wow’. That is, until the break in the middle of the song that leads into a frankly delightful synth melody sweetened by drums samples straight out of the 80s. It is a fantastic and unexpected end to the song.

Enter another single, “Lies”, their first release. It is kind of a disappointment that they would have so many songs already released featuring on the album (“Recover” features too) but they are the strongest songs the band have really produced. “Lies” is a good song no doubt, but it is very much a first single – the other hits on the record are more mature, more carefully constructed, more intricate. Don’t take anything away from “Lies” however, it too has some delightful vocal sampling in a break, and were Lauren’s voice replaced by that of Bernard Sumner it wouldn’t sound too unlike a New Order track from their later works.

The end of “Lies” however is filled darker and grittier synths, which continue into “Under the Tide”, the first track on the record not sung by Lauren, as Martin Doherty takes over. As the song writing is, like most things, a communal effort from the band, it shows their ability to be diverse, and the track is very different from the bouncy pop heard earlier – it has more “feel” to it. More comparisons with The Knife (especially Deep Cuts) can be drawn here, as they too share male and female vocals.

“Recover” opens with quickly pausing vocals that are a little abrasive, but what follows is pure electropop brilliance. It is almost unbearably catchy. As the synths deepen Lauren’s extremely short verses become less hard on the ears, and before you know it we’re back in the rich synths of the chorus. Unfortunately the song fades away before it really feels over, leaving a slightly disappointed taste in our…ears?

Many electropop bands can produce a few great hits and proceed to have the rest of the album as filler – and with so many existing acclaimed tracks on the album this isn’t far from the truth. “Night Sky” is an example of filler. But compared to some records, where the weaker tracks are so much worse than the stronger ones – The Knife’s first effort and Deep Cuts can be accused of this – most of Chvrches’ filler tracks are still excellent. This is one of them.

“Science/Visions” takes another different approach, with echoing vocals and a muted synth line that leads the bass to become the focal point of the track. There are more links to all kinds of 80s bands here – Gary Numan, The Human League, New Order again, Reflex, Depeche Mode… this is their most authentic original synthpop sounding track for sure. But it is also one of the weakest. The sci-fi soundtrack style is great, and something that would be interesting to see experimented with further, but compared to the rest of the tracks it is weaker.

“Lungs” offers a more personal side to Lauren’s vocals, less metaphorical than earlier tracks, far more straight-shooting. Her voice is modified to prevent it from being swamped in sound as it can be, and so she becomes her own instrument in it, which makes it another different and interesting song. The synths offer stronger bass and guitar too, which makes it ring of some tracks from Sleigh Bells’ excellent debut.

“By the Throat” is the penultimate track on the album, which is a bit surprising in itself, the time has flown by. For an album of 48 minutes, it does not feel remotely that long – tracks like “Recover” and “The Mother We Share” really end too soon. There is nothing wrong with “By The Throat”, but it is a filler track – it doesn’t really stand out from the crowd around it, but it’s one hell of a good crowd regardless.

The record ends with another slower track, “You Caught the Light”, with more 80s-esque beats that sound almost like John Maus. Doherty returns to the mic which is in all honesty a disappointment. Doherty’s singing is fine, but the image of the band and the band’s best songs come with Mayberry at the helm. “You Caught the Light” does have a lovely gritty sounding synth line with some powerful bass, but it trickles off as kind of an anti-climax to the record, which is a shame.

Chvrches really seem at their strongest when they focus on pop hooks – it is hard to take them too seriously, they are a ‘light’ band without much emotional depth, but as a pop band they are absolutely brilliant. Their production is first class, technical ability is remarkable for a new band, and they have a frontwoman who has already achieved some sort of cult hero status online. This is a band that is genuine, fun and catchy – there really isn’t anything to dislike, and plenty of things to really really enjoy.

The Mother We Share – 89%
We Sink – 84%
Gun – 87%
Tether – 78%
Lies – 79%
Under the Tide – 76%
Recover – 86%
Night Sky – 82%
Science/Visions – 75%
Lungs – 77%
By The Throat – 74%
You Caught the Light – 73%

Overall Score – 80% – Very Good

DISCLAIMER – THESE SCORES ARE NOT AN ASSESSMENT OF THE OBJECTIVE QUALITY OF THE MUSIC. THEY ARE REFLECTIVE PURELY OF HOW MUCH I ENJOYED EACH SONG, WITH A GUIDELINE AS TO WHAT THAT MEANS TO ME.

0-10% – Awful
10-20 – Incredibly poor
20-30 – Missable
30-40 – Below average
40-50 – Not great
50-60 – Average
60-70 – Better than average
70-80 – Good
80-85 – Very good
85-90 – Exceptional
90-95 – Must listen
95-100 – Seminal, masterpiece

https://www.twitch.tv/ttalarkin - streams random stuff, high level teamleague, maybe even heroleague
Djzapz
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada10681 Posts
September 12 2013 17:43 GMT
#2
I love the song 'The Mother We Share' but the other songs really don't work for me. Also Lauren is super adorable, it's funny because it seems like those three kind of got tossed into a certain level of fame and they've had to adjust really really fast. Lauren looks so incredibly uncomfortable all the time!

Hopefully she gets used to it!
"My incompetence with power tools had been increasing exponentially over the course of 20 years spent inhaling experimental oven cleaners"
MysteryMeat1
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States3291 Posts
September 12 2013 17:57 GMT
#3
It would probably help to include a link to their music video of the song. Or even just a link to the song. I feel that would enhance the quality of the post a ton if you put it at the top.
"Cause ya know, Style before victory." -The greatest mafia player alive
andyrau
Profile Joined December 2010
13015 Posts
September 12 2013 18:43 GMT
#4
/mu/tants on tl!

for me, Lauren's vocals actually leave something to be desired imo but she's qt as hell so I guess that complaints a total wash

I liked Recover the most, followed by Night Sky, and I feel the rest of the album was pretty forgettable save for the first & third tracks.
"Zai is legitimately not as good as bulba." | kaipi ti3 champions
KristofferAG
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
Norway25712 Posts
September 12 2013 19:14 GMT
#5
Apparently Lauren's vocals aren't the greatest live, but I still can't wait to check that out for myself in a month or so. They've definitely got that hook that you listen for in these kind of electropop tracks.

I just love how they seemingly get inspirations from all over the last couple of decades.
@KristofferAG | http://vestkyststoy.bandcamp.com | last.fm/user/KristofferAG
Larkin
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
United Kingdom7161 Posts
September 12 2013 19:16 GMT
#6
On September 13 2013 02:57 MysteryMeat1 wrote:
It would probably help to include a link to their music video of the song. Or even just a link to the song. I feel that would enhance the quality of the post a ton if you put it at the top.


Listening to music on YouTube is silly, the quality is so much worse.

But here, just for you:


On September 13 2013 03:43 andyrau wrote:
/mu/tants on tl!

for me, Lauren's vocals actually leave something to be desired imo but she's qt as hell so I guess that complaints a total wash

I liked Recover the most, followed by Night Sky, and I feel the rest of the album was pretty forgettable save for the first & third tracks.


If you've been on the blog you may notice the /mu/ tags, heh.

I mean it's not like you can expect the greatest voice of all time from music like this, but I think it complements it perfectly. I also feel her vocals are quite restrained, like she's not willing to really sing - but it wouldn't exactly work with what they make at the moment for her to have an absolute belter.
https://www.twitch.tv/ttalarkin - streams random stuff, high level teamleague, maybe even heroleague
Fishgle
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
United States2174 Posts
September 12 2013 20:35 GMT
#7
So much /mu/core on your blog :D (I added you o Last.fm btw. I'm GnozL) - I wasn't a big fan of this album, tbh. I might listen to it every now and then, but only about 3 tracks were really strong and memorable. I'm not a fan of overly saccharine music, I guess.

CRITIQUE: I'm not a big fan of track by track reviews. I prefer reviews that ignore the minutia and review the album as a singular artistic piece. Like, the most important and useful things you said in your review were in the second and final paragraphs. Other important points were the 80s revivalism and comparisons to Knife, Numan, etc. For someone who's already heard the record, the track descriptions don't really need to be there, as I've already heard the songs. If you could escape the rote 'track 1', 'track 2', 'track 3' organization, you could focus more on themes and overall tone and quality. Your reviews will probably end up being much much shorter but the actual content will be much more condensed. For instance, look at how short and to the point this review is: http://www.sputnikmusic.com/review/58804/Chvrches-The-Bones-of-What-You-Believe/

Lastly, I'm not really sure why you use a 100 point gradient. Is there really a significant difference between a 74% and a 73%?
aka ChillyGonzalo / GnozL
Larkin
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
United Kingdom7161 Posts
September 12 2013 21:30 GMT
#8
On September 13 2013 05:35 Fishgle wrote:
So much /mu/core on your blog :D (I added you o Last.fm btw. I'm GnozL) - I wasn't a big fan of this album, tbh. I might listen to it every now and then, but only about 3 tracks were really strong and memorable. I'm not a fan of overly saccharine music, I guess.

CRITIQUE: I'm not a big fan of track by track reviews. I prefer reviews that ignore the minutia and review the album as a singular artistic piece. Like, the most important and useful things you said in your review were in the second and final paragraphs. Other important points were the 80s revivalism and comparisons to Knife, Numan, etc. For someone who's already heard the record, the track descriptions don't really need to be there, as I've already heard the songs. If you could escape the rote 'track 1', 'track 2', 'track 3' organization, you could focus more on themes and overall tone and quality. Your reviews will probably end up being much much shorter but the actual content will be much more condensed. For instance, look at how short and to the point this review is: http://www.sputnikmusic.com/review/58804/Chvrches-The-Bones-of-What-You-Believe/

Lastly, I'm not really sure why you use a 100 point gradient. Is there really a significant difference between a 74% and a 73%?


Cool, thanks for the add, glad to see we are compatible I'm doing mostly /mu/core things to begin with before I start to branch out more, I've got The Knife, Death Grips, The Antlers lined up.

I do just have a soft spot for charming fun electropop. I see from your last.fm most listened that you prefer more traditional instrumentation, so we may just differ in taste there.

I understand where you're coming from, but I don't want to do the same kind of review that everyone else does, if that makes sense. I feel like a lot of the times I read/watch a review the reviewer misses out parts of the album I loved - the amount of times a Pitchfork or Fantano review doesn't mention my personal favourite part of an album is too many to count. I try to offer a very in depth analysis of what I thought about each track, each part, linked in to my thoughts of the album as a whole.

For this type of review I just didn't say as much because not everyone wants to read a 2000 word essay. And for albums that are less track focused (things like Godspeed, ambient albums etc) I will probably not do a track by track thing. But especially for giving a score the way I do I feel a track by track rating is necessary.

In my opinion, yes, 74% means I enjoyed something to a good degree, slightly moreso than a 73%. They're both good tracks, but if I had to pick one, I'd go for the 74. I feel using a 100% scale gives me more precision when scoring things. Plus it helps when getting the average, having a good scale, and not copying anyone elses' system.

But as I said in my Loveless review I don't think scoring really means that much. It's just a guideline, there are gonna be faults with it.
https://www.twitch.tv/ttalarkin - streams random stuff, high level teamleague, maybe even heroleague
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Road to EWC
10:00
Asia Closed Qualifiers
RotterdaM883
CranKy Ducklings157
3DClanTV 66
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 883
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 23151
Calm 10258
Rain 7667
Bisu 4885
Shuttle 2008
Mini 326
EffOrt 230
Stork 216
ZerO 94
Killer 85
[ Show more ]
ToSsGirL 76
Rush 66
Aegong 53
Mind 45
NaDa 30
sSak 27
GoRush 23
Icarus 20
SilentControl 19
IntoTheRainbow 15
Hm[arnc] 12
Noble 12
Barracks 11
Shinee 11
ajuk12(nOOB) 8
Movie 5
Dota 2
Dendi3827
XcaliburYe654
qojqva297
Fuzer 225
Counter-Strike
allub243
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor183
Other Games
singsing1364
B2W.Neo948
XBOCT624
Happy445
DeMusliM407
crisheroes277
XaKoH 243
Mew2King122
KnowMe117
ArmadaUGS70
QueenE44
ZerO(Twitch)7
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 78
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2117
• WagamamaTV762
• lizZardDota2335
League of Legends
• Stunt917
Upcoming Events
Road to EWC
10h 5m
Road to EWC
21h 5m
Road to EWC
1d 4h
BSL Season 20
1d 6h
Sziky vs Razz
Sziky vs StRyKeR
Sziky vs DragOn
Sziky vs Tech
Razz vs StRyKeR
Razz vs DragOn
Razz vs Tech
DragOn vs Tech
Online Event
1d 16h
Clem vs ShoWTimE
herO vs MaxPax
Road to EWC
1d 21h
BSL Season 20
2 days
Bonyth vs Doodle
Bonyth vs izu
Bonyth vs MadiNho
Bonyth vs TerrOr
MadiNho vs TerrOr
Doodle vs izu
Doodle vs MadiNho
Doodle vs TerrOr
Replay Cast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-05-28
DreamHack Dallas 2025
Calamity Stars S2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL Season 17: Qualifier 1
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLAN 2025
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.