|
On September 12 2012 12:19 Enders116 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2012 10:18 Funnytoss wrote:On September 12 2012 07:44 B.I.G. wrote: just passing through here, dont know jack shit about china on this matter. I am interested however, because I have heard the mention of mainland china and non mainland(?) china before. Is mainland china like every part of china except for places that have been under colony rule until relatively recently such as Hong Kong? The term "mainland China" is a bit outdated at this point. Back during the Cold War, Taiwan called itself "Free China", and theoretically was set on "retaking the Mainland". Hong Kong was also theoretically part of China, but the UK was sort of renting it until 1997. As such, you had "Mainland" referring to the large Chinese territory, and you had other lands that were also called themselves Chinese. As Hong Kong has been returned to China now, and Taiwan/Republic of China has pretty much renounced its claim on ruling the territory currently controlled by the People's Republic of China, the term "China" means the same thing as "Mainland China". It's outdated in that it only still makes sense if you believe there's a China outside of that, which there isn't. Don't tell me you're going in the direction with this post that I think you are... If Taiwan actually reunites with the mainland, I'm gonna be pissed. I wanted to stay there for the rest of my life. The only other place I'd consider is SG, and it already suffers from overpopulation / overimmigration issues. Back on topic: I'm a pretty bitchy guy sometimes, just like Lu Xun (魯迅), whom I've learned hated basically everything about the traditional culture of China and hated everything about most uneducated Chinese people, and would probably hate modern day Mainland China...
I'm not sure where you think I'm going with this, haha. I much prefer Taiwan the way it is, and I think life would be much worse under CCP rule. What I was trying to say is that Taiwan is pretty much its own thing, and is better off being an independent country, rather than claiming to represent all of China like it used to. That claim is partly to blame for the mess Taiwan finds itself in with China, though of course Chinese nationalism is the primary cause of conflict here.
Lemme know if you end up coming to Taiwan. I'm more of a BW guy, but I'd cheer you on regardless.
|
On September 12 2012 13:48 Funnytoss wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2012 12:19 Enders116 wrote:On September 12 2012 10:18 Funnytoss wrote:On September 12 2012 07:44 B.I.G. wrote: just passing through here, dont know jack shit about china on this matter. I am interested however, because I have heard the mention of mainland china and non mainland(?) china before. Is mainland china like every part of china except for places that have been under colony rule until relatively recently such as Hong Kong? The term "mainland China" is a bit outdated at this point. Back during the Cold War, Taiwan called itself "Free China", and theoretically was set on "retaking the Mainland". Hong Kong was also theoretically part of China, but the UK was sort of renting it until 1997. As such, you had "Mainland" referring to the large Chinese territory, and you had other lands that were also called themselves Chinese. As Hong Kong has been returned to China now, and Taiwan/Republic of China has pretty much renounced its claim on ruling the territory currently controlled by the People's Republic of China, the term "China" means the same thing as "Mainland China". It's outdated in that it only still makes sense if you believe there's a China outside of that, which there isn't. Don't tell me you're going in the direction with this post that I think you are... If Taiwan actually reunites with the mainland, I'm gonna be pissed. I wanted to stay there for the rest of my life. The only other place I'd consider is SG, and it already suffers from overpopulation / overimmigration issues. Back on topic: I'm a pretty bitchy guy sometimes, just like Lu Xun (魯迅), whom I've learned hated basically everything about the traditional culture of China and hated everything about most uneducated Chinese people, and would probably hate modern day Mainland China... I'm not sure where you think I'm going with this, haha. I much prefer Taiwan the way it is, and I think life would be much worse under CCP rule. What I was trying to say is that Taiwan is pretty much its own thing, and is better off being an independent country, rather than claiming to represent all of China like it used to. That claim is partly to blame for the mess Taiwan finds itself in with China, though of course Chinese nationalism is the primary cause of conflict here. Lemme know if you end up coming to Taiwan. I'm more of a BW guy, but I'd cheer you on regardless. Heh. Interestingly the CCP's internal view is that they just want military basing rights on the island. Actually having to take responsibility for the lives of 23 million Taiwanese is something they feel would be a headache, as they are already getting a lot of heat from 7 million HKers even though they don't actually have any direct influence there.
The CCP's actual view is that since 50% of China's GDP is concentrated along its coastal strip, having a Taiwan with tons of cruise missiles and airbases within striking range of all that economic productivity is unacceptable. (Taiwan in the PLA is not referred to not as a country or even an island--just as a "pao tai" or "cannon platform".)
While the emotional impetus for taking back Taiwan is Chinese pride; there are real national security concerns that drive China's policy towards the island.
What I've always thought interesting though is why Taiwan can't just give China the basing rights while getting everything else it wants--indefinite de facto independence; advantageous trade terms; hell, even becoming an offshore gambling mecca like Cuba was for the US in the 1950s. But then again, I have no insight into the mind of the Taiwanese electorate--maybe other TLers can help?
|
On September 13 2012 07:17 Shady Sands wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2012 13:48 Funnytoss wrote:On September 12 2012 12:19 Enders116 wrote:On September 12 2012 10:18 Funnytoss wrote:On September 12 2012 07:44 B.I.G. wrote: just passing through here, dont know jack shit about china on this matter. I am interested however, because I have heard the mention of mainland china and non mainland(?) china before. Is mainland china like every part of china except for places that have been under colony rule until relatively recently such as Hong Kong? The term "mainland China" is a bit outdated at this point. Back during the Cold War, Taiwan called itself "Free China", and theoretically was set on "retaking the Mainland". Hong Kong was also theoretically part of China, but the UK was sort of renting it until 1997. As such, you had "Mainland" referring to the large Chinese territory, and you had other lands that were also called themselves Chinese. As Hong Kong has been returned to China now, and Taiwan/Republic of China has pretty much renounced its claim on ruling the territory currently controlled by the People's Republic of China, the term "China" means the same thing as "Mainland China". It's outdated in that it only still makes sense if you believe there's a China outside of that, which there isn't. Don't tell me you're going in the direction with this post that I think you are... If Taiwan actually reunites with the mainland, I'm gonna be pissed. I wanted to stay there for the rest of my life. The only other place I'd consider is SG, and it already suffers from overpopulation / overimmigration issues. Back on topic: I'm a pretty bitchy guy sometimes, just like Lu Xun (魯迅), whom I've learned hated basically everything about the traditional culture of China and hated everything about most uneducated Chinese people, and would probably hate modern day Mainland China... I'm not sure where you think I'm going with this, haha. I much prefer Taiwan the way it is, and I think life would be much worse under CCP rule. What I was trying to say is that Taiwan is pretty much its own thing, and is better off being an independent country, rather than claiming to represent all of China like it used to. That claim is partly to blame for the mess Taiwan finds itself in with China, though of course Chinese nationalism is the primary cause of conflict here. Lemme know if you end up coming to Taiwan. I'm more of a BW guy, but I'd cheer you on regardless. Heh. Interestingly the CCP's internal view is that they just want military basing rights on the island. Actually having to take responsibility for the lives of 23 million Taiwanese is something they feel would be a headache, as they are already getting a lot of heat from 7 million HKers even though they don't actually have any direct influence there. The CCP's actual view is that since 50% of China's GDP is concentrated along its coastal strip, having a Taiwan with tons of cruise missiles and airbases within striking range of all that economic productivity is unacceptable. (Taiwan in the PLA is not referred to not as a country or even an island--just as a "pao tai" or "cannon platform".) While the emotional impetus for taking back Taiwan is Chinese pride; there are real national security concerns that drive China's policy towards the island. What I've always thought interesting though is why Taiwan can't just give China the basing rights while getting everything else it wants--indefinite de facto independence; advantageous trade terms; hell, even becoming an offshore gambling mecca like Cuba was for the US in the 1950s. But then again, I have no insight into the mind of the Taiwanese electorate--maybe other TLers can help?
I don't presume to speak with utmost confidence about the preferences of the Taiwanese electorate, but I'll share what I can regarding what I've found out both through personal experience and some academic research.
It goes without saying that the PRC worries about Taiwan from a strategic perspective, and the U.S. pretty much acquiesced to China's terms on arms sales. It has been fairly consistent about refusing to provide Taiwan with offensive weapons such as Harpoons and SLAMs that could be used against ground targets, choosing instead to sell primarily air superiority fighters and surface-to-air-missile units. It also shut down the Taiwan nuclear weapon plans, so it's clear that it wants to retain the status quo.
From Taiwan's strategic perspective, it knows that China's military advantage is only going to keep growing. Back in the 80s and 90s, Taiwan would have actually held the upper hand in a potential maritime invasion. China had limited amphibious assault capability, and its air force consisted mostly of 2nd gen fighters with limited range like the J-7 and J-8. But now, with improved ballistic missile technology that threatens to take many of Taiwan's airfields out of commission within minutes (and Taiwan lacking a comprehensive missile defense technology that would be able to take down enough of the incoming missiles), plus the improved composition of China's Air Force (J-10s and J-11s/Su-27s taking up the frontlines) makes playing defense impossible. Taiwan never had the ability to hold off a determined invasion indefinitely, as it is extremely vulnerable to supply interdiction. As such, its goal was originally to hold off for roughly 2 weeks, giving enough time for the U.S. and possibly Japan to intervene. Now it's doubtful Taiwan could hold for even that long, and so there's been more interest in producing weapons of deterrence, which is why Taiwan decided to develop its own cruise missile programs in lieu of U.S. refusal to sell.
Honestly, I feel the CCP doesn't really give a shit about the Taiwanese people, it's all about their own national security and international dickwaving. To be fair, the U.S. does this as well.
There is no way in hell Taiwan will "give" China basing rights, because essentially there's nothing to stop China from taking everything else it wants. Taiwan has absolutely no reason to trust China's word - it's clear from China's international bullying of Taiwan and reducing of space and status that it's a one-sided negotiation. China can't have an independent Taiwan, especially if it will be stationing weapons there, and so the democratic government (and to a certain extent, society and education) would have to go. Trade terms could certainly be arranged.
Fuck gambling. That would just turn Taiwan into a total shithole. It's not like we don't have our own economy and lifestyle - Vegas is an interesting place to visit, but it totally transforms the character and nature of the country.
Taiwan's feelings towards China are somewhat complex. On one hand, there are many who have been taught to feel an emotional connection to "China" - but it should be very clear that this "China" doesn't mean the "People's Republic of China" - rather, the land and the cultural heritage. When the KMT got its ass kicked and had to retreat to Taiwan, it created a conflict between Taiwan and China (part of the Cold War, really) and taught animosity towards the CCP and the "Communist Bandits". Of course, times have changed. China's government is as brutal and intolerant of dissent as ever, but its economic prowess and potential have proved quite alluring to many Taiwanese businesses, and in that realm it's quite clear that many benefit from trade with China.
But the Taiwanese have gone through a lot of shit to get where they are today. The democracy you see now was pretty much forced out of the KMT, which arguably lifted martial law and re-implemented elections due to lack of other viable options. Freedom of speech, free elections (to the extent that money corrupts like it does everywhere else)... many died for these rights, and Taiwan's not going to give them up for nothing. There's no reason to believe that China would just take basing rights, while giving Taiwan everything else. As such, you may as well sell out the entire country and just unify and get it all over with. The current ruling party (KMT) favors closer business relations with China, but it understands that economic integration and political integration do not receive the same amount of support, and that if they directly advocated for unification, it might create a large enough backlash to put the opposition DPP back in power.
My thoughts are that like it or not, Taiwan will probably unify (I really dislike the term "re-unify" because I feel it's historically inaccurate. The PRC has never ruled Taiwan, and the two countries have developed in their own way. Not that one is necessarily better or worse than the other, but there's no reason to lump them together except for nationalist purposes and framing) on China's terms. It won't happen anytime soon, because Taiwan still has enough leverage, but as Taiwan becomes (comparatively) weaker compared to China, it will receive less and less international support, and when even the United States decides that good business relations with China are more important than other things such as human rights and free speech... then Taiwan will be forced to the table to see what it can salvage.
One hopes that China will be a more open and democratic society at that point.
|
On September 13 2012 10:56 Funnytoss wrote:Show nested quote +On September 13 2012 07:17 Shady Sands wrote:On September 12 2012 13:48 Funnytoss wrote:On September 12 2012 12:19 Enders116 wrote:On September 12 2012 10:18 Funnytoss wrote:On September 12 2012 07:44 B.I.G. wrote: just passing through here, dont know jack shit about china on this matter. I am interested however, because I have heard the mention of mainland china and non mainland(?) china before. Is mainland china like every part of china except for places that have been under colony rule until relatively recently such as Hong Kong? The term "mainland China" is a bit outdated at this point. Back during the Cold War, Taiwan called itself "Free China", and theoretically was set on "retaking the Mainland". Hong Kong was also theoretically part of China, but the UK was sort of renting it until 1997. As such, you had "Mainland" referring to the large Chinese territory, and you had other lands that were also called themselves Chinese. As Hong Kong has been returned to China now, and Taiwan/Republic of China has pretty much renounced its claim on ruling the territory currently controlled by the People's Republic of China, the term "China" means the same thing as "Mainland China". It's outdated in that it only still makes sense if you believe there's a China outside of that, which there isn't. Don't tell me you're going in the direction with this post that I think you are... If Taiwan actually reunites with the mainland, I'm gonna be pissed. I wanted to stay there for the rest of my life. The only other place I'd consider is SG, and it already suffers from overpopulation / overimmigration issues. Back on topic: I'm a pretty bitchy guy sometimes, just like Lu Xun (魯迅), whom I've learned hated basically everything about the traditional culture of China and hated everything about most uneducated Chinese people, and would probably hate modern day Mainland China... I'm not sure where you think I'm going with this, haha. I much prefer Taiwan the way it is, and I think life would be much worse under CCP rule. What I was trying to say is that Taiwan is pretty much its own thing, and is better off being an independent country, rather than claiming to represent all of China like it used to. That claim is partly to blame for the mess Taiwan finds itself in with China, though of course Chinese nationalism is the primary cause of conflict here. Lemme know if you end up coming to Taiwan. I'm more of a BW guy, but I'd cheer you on regardless. Heh. Interestingly the CCP's internal view is that they just want military basing rights on the island. Actually having to take responsibility for the lives of 23 million Taiwanese is something they feel would be a headache, as they are already getting a lot of heat from 7 million HKers even though they don't actually have any direct influence there. The CCP's actual view is that since 50% of China's GDP is concentrated along its coastal strip, having a Taiwan with tons of cruise missiles and airbases within striking range of all that economic productivity is unacceptable. (Taiwan in the PLA is not referred to not as a country or even an island--just as a "pao tai" or "cannon platform".) While the emotional impetus for taking back Taiwan is Chinese pride; there are real national security concerns that drive China's policy towards the island. What I've always thought interesting though is why Taiwan can't just give China the basing rights while getting everything else it wants--indefinite de facto independence; advantageous trade terms; hell, even becoming an offshore gambling mecca like Cuba was for the US in the 1950s. But then again, I have no insight into the mind of the Taiwanese electorate--maybe other TLers can help? I don't presume to speak with utmost confidence about the preferences of the Taiwanese electorate, but I'll share what I can regarding what I've found out both through personal experience and some academic research. It goes without saying that the PRC worries about Taiwan from a strategic perspective, and the U.S. pretty much acquiesced to China's terms on arms sales. It has been fairly consistent about refusing to provide Taiwan with offensive weapons such as Harpoons and SLAMs that could be used against ground targets, choosing instead to sell primarily air superiority fighters and surface-to-air-missile units. It also shut down the Taiwan nuclear weapon plans, so it's clear that it wants to retain the status quo. From Taiwan's strategic perspective, it knows that China's military advantage is only going to keep growing. Back in the 80s and 90s, Taiwan would have actually held the upper hand in a potential maritime invasion. China had limited amphibious assault capability, and its air force consisted mostly of 2nd gen fighters with limited range like the J-7 and J-8. But now, with improved ballistic missile technology that threatens to take many of Taiwan's airfields out of commission within minutes (and Taiwan lacking a comprehensive missile defense technology that would be able to take down enough of the incoming missiles), plus the improved composition of China's Air Force (J-10s and J-11s/Su-27s taking up the frontlines) makes playing defense impossible. Taiwan never had the ability to hold off a determined invasion indefinitely, as it is extremely vulnerable to supply interdiction. As such, its goal was originally to hold off for roughly 2 weeks, giving enough time for the U.S. and possibly Japan to intervene. Now it's doubtful Taiwan could hold for even that long, and so there's been more interest in producing weapons of deterrence, which is why Taiwan decided to develop its own cruise missile programs in lieu of U.S. refusal to sell. Honestly, I feel the CCP doesn't really give a shit about the Taiwanese people, it's all about their own national security and international dickwaving. To be fair, the U.S. does this as well. There is no way in hell Taiwan will "give" China basing rights, because essentially there's nothing to stop China from taking everything else it wants. Taiwan has absolutely no reason to trust China's word - it's clear from China's international bullying of Taiwan and reducing of space and status that it's a one-sided negotiation. China can't have an independent Taiwan, especially if it will be stationing weapons there, and so the democratic government (and to a certain extent, society and education) would have to go. Trade terms could certainly be arranged. Fuck gambling. That would just turn Taiwan into a total shithole. It's not like we don't have our own economy and lifestyle - Vegas is an interesting place to visit, but it totally transforms the character and nature of the country. Taiwan's feelings towards China are somewhat complex. On one hand, there are many who have been taught to feel an emotional connection to "China" - but it should be very clear that this "China" doesn't mean the "People's Republic of China" - rather, the land and the cultural heritage. When the KMT got its ass kicked and had to retreat to Taiwan, it created a conflict between Taiwan and China (part of the Cold War, really) and taught animosity towards the CCP and the "Communist Bandits". Of course, times have changed. China's government is as brutal and intolerant of dissent as ever, but its economic prowess and potential have proved quite alluring to many Taiwanese businesses, and in that realm it's quite clear that many benefit from trade with China. But the Taiwanese have gone through a lot of shit to get where they are today. The democracy you see now was pretty much forced out of the KMT, which arguably lifted martial law and re-implemented elections due to lack of other viable options. Freedom of speech, free elections (to the extent that money corrupts like it does everywhere else)... many died for these rights, and Taiwan's not going to give them up for nothing. There's no reason to believe that China would just take basing rights, while giving Taiwan everything else. As such, you may as well sell out the entire country and just unify and get it all over with. The current ruling party (KMT) favors closer business relations with China, but it understands that economic integration and political integration do not receive the same amount of support, and that if they directly advocated for unification, it might create a large enough backlash to put the opposition DPP back in power. My thoughts are that like it or not, Taiwan will probably unify (I really dislike the term "re-unify" because I feel it's historically inaccurate. The PRC has never ruled Taiwan, and the two countries have developed in their own way. Not that one is necessarily better or worse than the other, but there's no reason to lump them together except for nationalist purposes and framing) on China's terms. It won't happen anytime soon, because Taiwan still has enough leverage, but as Taiwan becomes (comparatively) weaker compared to China, it will receive less and less international support, and when even the United States decides that good business relations with China are more important than other things such as human rights and free speech... then Taiwan will be forced to the table to see what it can salvage. One hopes that China will be a more open and democratic society at that point. Mmm, thanks for the response.
This is how I understand the argument against basing rights (and correct me if I'm wrong):
1. Taiwan has accomplished much in terms of developing a functioning democracy 2. Taiwan feels the PRC, if given basing rights, is given de facto control over the country 3. Taiwan feels that the PRC, if given de facto control, would actively try to rollback Taiwan's democratic reforms
Is that correct?
If so, I think the PRC would need to do some fairly active explanatory work on the island, because points 2 and 3 above aren't necessarily true (in the slightest.)
I speak for a large minority of PRC reformers when we say that we look to Taiwan as a good example of what China could become. As I've noted in the Chinese Economy blog, the reform wing in China has substantial economic strength over the statist wing, which will only grow once the privatization/electoral reforms are complete.
In this regard, Taiwan is far different from Hong Kong. Taiwan's democratic systems are battle-tested and proven (unlike HK's mechanisms, which were put in place a mere 6 years before the handover). Furthermore, Taiwan's mechanisms can handle governing a country with multiple urban and rural areas (as opposed to one city-state).
Hence it's unlikely that the PRC would want to roll back Taiwan to the PRC's level of political control; the opposite (the PRC adopting Taiwanese political mechanisms) seems more likely.
Second, basing rights in Taiwan wouldn't necessarily lead to de facto control. Look at Guantanamo Bay (US base in Cuba) and Sevastopol (Russian base in Ukraine) as examples of where basing rights assure the larger country of security without infringing on the sovereignty of the smaller country. PLA planners pretty much only want 4 bases on Taiwan--one naval installation on either side of the island capable of handling subs and aircraft carriers (to give China the ability to cut off Japanese and Korean energy shipping), an airbase capable of handling strategic bombers (to project force out to Okinawa and Guam), and Yangmingshan (the mountain above Taipei) with the current American ELINT/SIGINT installation intact (for intelligence purposes.)
No army bases--much less any military police garrisons like you see in HK.
Why the gentle presence?
Think about it: what does China gain by crushing Taiwan under its boot? Technology? China can get that by trading with Taiwan. Additional security? Military basing rights provide that. Prestige? Chinese top leaders, unlike their counterparts still climbing the greasy pole, don't really need more of that. National harmony/international reputation? How does oppressing 23 million pissed-off, vocal, and internet-savvy people increase China's national harmony/reputation?
Basically, there's no reason for China to oppress Taiwan, or even build the mechanisms to do so. What China wants from Taiwan, Taiwan can give without any abrogation of its rights as a sovereign state. The greatest tragedy, in my opinion (and the opinion of numerous Chinese policymakers) would be if misunderstandings prevent this transaction from occuring.
|
|
|
|