EPT
What if Sc2 was released first?
| Blogs > JoelE |
|
JoelE
United States112 Posts
| ||
|
wilsonreis
Brazil97 Posts
edit: typo | ||
|
JoelE
United States112 Posts
On December 28 2011 05:15 wilsonreis wrote: I mommy was a he, i would have 2 dads. Good point. | ||
|
Kanil
United States1713 Posts
| ||
|
floor exercise
Canada5847 Posts
| ||
|
butchji
Germany1531 Posts
| ||
|
juked
United States691 Posts
ex. Boxing 100 unis compared to 12 And I agree with floor exercise. | ||
|
Aruno
New Zealand748 Posts
| ||
|
Jedclark
United Kingdom903 Posts
31st March 1998: Starcraft 1 is released, but without Dragoons, Stalkers instead. It featured all the SC2 units, not SC1 units. 30th November 1998: Brood War is released, but without Lurkers and Medics and all that good stuff. Zerg gained the Viper, Terran gained the Shredder, etc. Fastforward to July 27th 2010: Starcraft 2 is released, but this time without Stalkers, but Dragoons. It features the SC1 units. Sometime 2012: Heart of the Swarm is released, this time with Lurkers and Medics, and it comes with all the annoyances of the BW/SC1 engine. I'd like to see if people would still be lauding SC2 over BW. | ||
|
XsebT
Denmark2980 Posts
| ||
|
JoelE
United States112 Posts
On December 28 2011 05:44 XsebT wrote: Do you guys honestly think the only reason we play bw is because of nostalgia? Who said that? | ||
|
Kanil
United States1713 Posts
On December 28 2011 05:32 juked wrote: SC2 would most likely win because it has so many things (mechanically wise) that makes it easier and seems like it should be there. ex. Boxing 100 unis compared to 12 And I agree with floor exercise. Aw cmon, marketing would spin 12 unit control groups as increasing the mechanical demands to further push those insane Korean robots with 500 APM. The fanboys would eat it up. The newer game is sure to win, because it's newer! | ||
|
SaYyId
Portugal277 Posts
Bio must have been shit >.< | ||
|
apm66
Canada943 Posts
On December 28 2011 05:14 JoelE wrote: Whenever I read another sc1 vs sc2 argument threads, the thought that pops into my head is what would happen if sc2 was released first, and then sc1 was released second. What kind of reaction would people have to the downgrade in graphics? Soviet Russia | ||
|
SagaZ
France3460 Posts
| ||
|
Sm3agol
United States2055 Posts
On December 28 2011 05:44 XsebT wrote: Do you guys honestly think the only reason we play bw is because of nostalgia? Yes. If BW came out right now, and Sc2 was "SC1"...would you play it? | ||
|
Newbistic
China2912 Posts
I'd troll the shit out of that pompous limey King Arthur too if that was how my life was going to be. | ||
|
Kanil
United States1713 Posts
On December 28 2011 05:53 Sm3agol wrote: Yes. If BW came out right now, and Sc2 was "SC1"...would you play it? If he's still playing a 12 year old game, it's probably because he likes it... so I'd imagine he'd still like it. | ||
|
Amanebak
Czech Republic528 Posts
| ||
|
XsebT
Denmark2980 Posts
On December 28 2011 05:53 Sm3agol wrote: Yes. If BW came out right now, and Sc2 was "SC1"...would you play it? I only played bw since late 2007/early 2008, so I don't have any nostalgic feelings for it. I was so pumped about the release of sc2 (as was pretty much everybody you see supporting bw today by the way), and so disappointed when I found that it couldn't replace bw for me. | ||
| ||
