• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:08
CEST 10:08
KST 17:08
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed18Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Who will win EWC 2025? Heaven's Balance Suggestions (roast me) The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Soulkey Muta Micro Map? BW General Discussion [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 648 users

What to do with mothership? - Page 2

Blogs > kidcrash
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 All
Ryuu314
Profile Joined October 2009
United States12679 Posts
August 25 2010 01:19 GMT
#21
Only way they need to fix carriers is to refine interceptor AI. Make the interceptors actually go back to the carrier to heal rather than flying around aimlessly until it dies. They also need to re-implement carrier micro. It's pretty much impossible to micro carriers now.
SagaZ
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
France3460 Posts
August 25 2010 01:23 GMT
#22
I liked how blizzard aimed to make the mothership a ultimate anti harrasement unit, but they lost the idea somewhere on their way.
IMO, remove the mass recall, make it slower, put an ability to teleport instantly to the nexus, and make it more worth it economically.
with this unit on your field, anyone trying to harras near your nexus would be kinda screwed since they will not see anything, and get the risk of getting sucked in a wormhole. Getting a mothership agaisnt mutaling would be a direct BO counter
I say make it slower cause it should not be an attack unit, only a very powerfull basedefense
Be nice, buy wards and don't feed double buff.
Al Bundy
Profile Joined April 2010
7257 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-25 01:32:40
August 25 2010 01:31 GMT
#23
I think that Blizzard need to:
1. reduce cost to 50/50
2. reduce build time to 15s
3. increase HP to 900
4. increase attack range to 15 and attack speed to 0.15

In my opinion nowadays there is a annoying trend that needs to die. People really need to stop suggesting random balance fixes. You are not a game developper and you don't have the numbers and information to consolidate your suggestions. Throwing random numbers backed by anecdotal evidence is definitely not enough to make your post useful.

What blizzard actually need is feedback. Then they will make fixes and tweak the numbers. Take geno's post. Even if it may not be 100% accurate in every situations, it is straightforward and honest. geno didn't feel the need to play the role of a game designer by suggesting baseless number tweaking. That is actually the kind of post which will help blizzard balance the game more than "reduce x, increase y, remove z".
o choro é livre
Alexstrasas
Profile Joined August 2010
302 Posts
August 25 2010 01:34 GMT
#24
On August 25 2010 10:31 AlBundy wrote:
I think that Blizzard need to:
1. reduce cost to 50/50
2. reduce build time to 15s
3. increase HP to 900
4. increase attack range to 15 and attack speed to 0.15

In my opinion nowadays there is a annoying trend that needs to die. People really need to stop suggesting random balance fixes. You are not a game developper and you don't have the numbers and information to consolidate your suggestions. Throwing random numbers backed by anecdotal evidence is definitely not enough to make your post useful.

What blizzard actually need is feedback. Then they will make fixes and tweak the numbers. Take geno's post. Even if it may not be 100% accurate in every situations, it is straightforward and honest. geno didn't feel the need to play the role of a game designer by suggesting baseless number tweaking. That is actually the kind of post which will help blizzard balance the game more than "reduce x, increase y, remove z".


x2

everyone is a specialist
TedJustice
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Canada1324 Posts
August 25 2010 01:37 GMT
#25
Vortex is not intended to weaken their army.

It's meant to mess with the enemy's positioning, not only screwing up their tank lines and stuff, but making their entire army vulnerable to splash and melee after the vortex is complete. Be sure to march your entire army into the vortex as soon as they march theirs into it (especially when you've got archons). It can also be used as a giant "PAUSE" button, like the forcefield, or it can let you destroy their buildings in peace without any interference.

I would absolutely LOVE it if you could build two motherships, bouncing back and forth between spots with mass recalls, but I can definitely see why you can't do that. They're already incredibly powerful and game changing as it is. The key is that you need a bit of an army to back it up. The mothership is a support unit, after all. But that's not to say that a mothership can't get you out of a huge deficit. It's done it for me numerous times. The only problem is staying alive until you actually get the mothership, which can be a bit tricky because of its long build time. But I don't think it needs any changes. Players just haven't discovered the optimal situations in which to use it.
PulseSUI
Profile Joined August 2010
Switzerland305 Posts
August 25 2010 01:40 GMT
#26
the mothership is to slow.
the price, the fact that is rather squishy and that it does pittyfull damage does not bother me, the abillitys are actualy realy good... it just moves so extremly slow.
kidcrash
Profile Joined September 2009
United States620 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-25 01:57:23
August 25 2010 01:48 GMT
#27
On August 25 2010 10:34 Alexstrasas wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 25 2010 10:31 AlBundy wrote:
I think that Blizzard need to:
1. reduce cost to 50/50
2. reduce build time to 15s
3. increase HP to 900
4. increase attack range to 15 and attack speed to 0.15

In my opinion nowadays there is a annoying trend that needs to die. People really need to stop suggesting random balance fixes. You are not a game developper and you don't have the numbers and information to consolidate your suggestions. Throwing random numbers backed by anecdotal evidence is definitely not enough to make your post useful.

What blizzard actually need is feedback. Then they will make fixes and tweak the numbers. Take geno's post. Even if it may not be 100% accurate in every situations, it is straightforward and honest. geno didn't feel the need to play the role of a game designer by suggesting baseless number tweaking. That is actually the kind of post which will help blizzard balance the game more than "reduce x, increase y, remove z".


x2

everyone is a specialist


Just throwing out some ideas on the issue of toss air diversity. If you think there is no need for discussion than I respect that opinion. The last few posts definitely raised an issue about the mobility of your army when using the mothership and it being too slow. I have seen it used defensively to some extent and I guess I was kind of exegeratting that the unit is a "joke" (it's not completely a waste). What I was trying to say was, the idea of only being able to build one of a unit at a time automatically directs me to believe that it should be used for humiliation tactics similar to nuking someone in SC1.
zergyjames
Profile Joined May 2010
19 Posts
August 25 2010 01:52 GMT
#28
cloaking is harder to detect in sc2(other than terran at least). So I guess that's why mothership isn't that too UP.
OMG! Diamond rank 1!
Al Bundy
Profile Joined April 2010
7257 Posts
August 25 2010 01:58 GMT
#29
@Kidcrash no misunderstanding, I love discussing the game and I love the fact that you suggested ideas like shield regeneration, the only thing that is annoying are "buff x, nerf y, because I feel like it" posts.

the idea of only being able to build one of a unit automatically directs me to believe that it should be used for humiliation tactics similar to nuking someone in SC1.


This is totally legitimate and reasonnable.
o choro é livre
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25980 Posts
August 25 2010 01:59 GMT
#30
Moved to blogs.
Moderator
Fruscainte
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
4596 Posts
August 25 2010 02:01 GMT
#31
Just bring back the arbiter, or just make the Mothership a literal reskin of the Arbiter.
Kigari
Profile Joined August 2010
Bahrain134 Posts
August 25 2010 02:06 GMT
#32
The MS should be able to recall the ENEMY units too.

That would be a fun thing to use. Move your mothership to an island and recall the enemy army there. Uhoh.. Didn't make dropships ? Awwww...
figq
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
12519 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-25 02:14:05
August 25 2010 02:11 GMT
#33
The main problem is that the games are still too "small", not just in number of bases and units, but the tech people can afford to go to. Solution: maps for progaming which stimulate larger macro games. At least it seems Blizzard backs up that direction, even though they'll keep the ladder as more average ground. The larger the games, the more usage of mothership there will be, especially when the field is wide, hard to move through, with many bases, and recall becomes invaluable to break good defenses.

I would love if mothership could cloak itself too, just for a limited time. Say, for 15 seconds, and then the cooldown is like 45 seconds. This could be used to sneak a mothership where you normally wouldn't expect it. And then recall. (ofc, while it's cloaked itself, it disables the auto-cloak of nearby units)
If you stand next to my head, you can hear the ocean. - Day[9]
Kigari
Profile Joined August 2010
Bahrain134 Posts
August 25 2010 02:15 GMT
#34
On August 25 2010 11:11 figq wrote:
The main problem is that the games are still too "small", not just in number of bases and units, but the tech people can afford to go to. Solution: maps for progaming which stimulate larger macro games. At least it seems Blizzard backs up that direction, even though they'll keep the ladder as more average ground. The larger the games, the more usage of mothership there will be, especially when the field is wide, hard to move through, with many bases, and recall becomes invaluable to break good defenses.

I would love if mothership could cloak itself too, just for a limited time. Say, for 15 seconds, and then the cooldown is like 45 seconds. This could be used to sneak a mothership where you normally wouldn't expect it. And then recall. (ofc, while it's cloaked itself, it disables the auto-cloak of nearby units)


Late game being by FAR the most broken and ridiculously imbalanced thing as of now, I don't think making maps specifically geared towards late game & macro play is a very... clever solution :-|
zer0das
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
United States8519 Posts
August 25 2010 04:40 GMT
#35
I think the mothership is fine... I incorporate it into my late game fairly regularly, and it can swing the tide of close games quite effectively. By itself? No... but it isn't meant to.
Prev 1 2 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 52m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 302
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 4212
Larva 626
PianO 294
Dewaltoss 196
Backho 134
Leta 102
Sacsri 41
Bonyth 29
ajuk12(nOOB) 16
NotJumperer 0
Stormgate
NightEnD22
Dota 2
ODPixel647
XcaliburYe524
XaKoH 419
NeuroSwarm102
League of Legends
JimRising 673
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1252
Super Smash Bros
amsayoshi46
Westballz21
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor105
Other Games
summit1g10759
SortOf87
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2393
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH257
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2143
League of Legends
• Rush1669
• HappyZerGling145
Other Games
• WagamamaTV219
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1h 52m
Online Event
7h 52m
BSL 2v2 ProLeague S3
9h 52m
Esports World Cup
2 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
3 days
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.