|
Alright, beta's been out for quite a while now and it's still a pretty stupid game. It's becoming increasingly obvious that this will never be good enough to become a competitive game. Blizzard is completely mismanaging everything from design to art to UI to battle.net to balance itself.
Right now zerg is unbelievably strong against protoss. There's literally no way to win against mutalisks. The only viable option is the 4warp gate all in attack that, if it fails, you're completely fucked. This is not good game design. Zerg is the only race that can quickly expand which, since their tier 1 units are the cheapest and most efficient tier 1 units in the game, is no risk at all. And expansions in SC2 don't function the same way as Brood War; Zerg, with their ridiculously overpowered spawn larva function (holy shit who actually believes this is even remotely balanced??) they can saturate mineral lines instantly and larva stops becoming a resource. So, Zerg immediately takes a ridiculous advantage.
Protoss is by and large the weakest race, despite the whining and bitching of the unskilled players currently in the beta. I'd be too humble if I said I wasn't really damn good at this game. I'd be cocky if I said I was one of the best, though. My point is, there is a very low skill ceiling in this game. Once you get to point x on the skill level, there is no factor other than current balance bullshit to who wins or loses. PvZ? Once he gets mutas you've already lost the game. PvT? It seems like the only viable option now that immortals got nerfed (more on that in a second) is void ray harass, and if you do well enough at that (which you should cause it's easy) you can expand and win the game. PvT's a boring ezfest. PvP's boring phoenix fest. Until they nerf phoenixes, which they will int he next patch, I'll put 21 esports dollars on it, if you don't have phoenixes in your army you've lost the game.
LOL THEY NERFED IMMORTALS? are you fucking kidding me? Why do the whiny bitches, the terrible wow and wc3 players always get what they want? Anyone with half a fucking brain can see that our tech 2 units cost 250/100 and 4 fucking supply should beat your cheap ass tier 1 roaches and marauders. Man, it's not that difficult to comprehend that. Immortals were completely balanced before the patch and now, completely useless, take way too long to build and still cost an exorbitant amount of resources.
I am capable, unlike most of the people currently beta testing, of looking at this game as a whole and saying, objectively, that this or that is probably not entirely balanced. I thought colossus were way too strong before they got nerfed, now they're pretty alright. Viking range is way too long, storm is so USELESS now, not because the spell itself is bad, but because the investment into templar tech is NOT WORTH THE SPELL. It doesn't do enough damage, it's too small and way too easily dodged with the unlimited control group bullshit. And that's if you're LOL LUCKY enough to feedback the ghosts before they've insta-emp'd your entire army.
That's right.
Instant EMPs.
Who thought this was a good fucking idea.
Let's talk for a second about scouting. Terran sends an scv into protoss base, gets to scout until the first chronoboosted stalker comes out. Don't know the timings for this but shit you just wasted a chrono boost on a stalker AND he got to scout your base. Zerg sends a drone into protoss base, gets to scout until the stalker/sentry comes out. Damn. Your opponent gets to see your opening tech every single game! That's pretty damn reasonable to me, as keeping a scout alive requires some decent multitask.
But protoss? Protoss can't scout fuck all. UNUPGRADED ZERGLINGS MOVE FASTER THAN PROBES OFF OF CREEP. How has this oversight gone so long in this beta? Would it be that hard to lower unupgraded ling speed by the tiniest percentage so that a probe could stay alive against unfuckingmicro'd zerglings? Seriously, Protoss can't scout but the other races can worker scout for free.
Who in their right mind thinks this game is fucking balanced? If you think this game is well designed, balanced, if you think it's gonna be the next esport or big publicized item...
you're fucking delusional. This game is trash, it will make blizzard a fucking ton of money on day 1, and it will die in less than a year. I wish blizzard would just cancel the motherfucking thing and let Brood War reign as THE PERFECT GAME.
Sigh. Fucking zerg is overpowered.
Sigh. That's just balance issues! You can't connect to other gateways, turning what was once a global gaming community and the ENTIRE REASON for blizzard's continuing financial success, into a cloistered, antisocial experience.
 
|
Calgary25986 Posts
On April 30 2010 02:22 Eiserne wrote:
Right now zerg is unbelievably strong against protoss. There's literally no way to win against mutalisks.
Stopped reading here because you're terrible at the game and hence I don't value your opinion.
|
|
|
Close this joke of thread please.
|
if this is a joke, pretty funny
|
On April 30 2010 02:24 Chill wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:22 Eiserne wrote:
Right now zerg is unbelievably strong against protoss. There's literally no way to win against mutalisks. Stopped reading here because you're terrible at the game and hence I don't value your opinion.
Bo5 any time man.
|
I sense much anger in you.
On April 30 2010 02:25 Eiserne wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:24 Chill wrote:On April 30 2010 02:22 Eiserne wrote:
Right now zerg is unbelievably strong against protoss. There's literally no way to win against mutalisks. Stopped reading here because you're terrible at the game and hence I don't value your opinion. Bo5 any time man.
gogogogo
|
On April 30 2010 02:25 Eiserne wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:24 Chill wrote:On April 30 2010 02:22 Eiserne wrote:
Right now zerg is unbelievably strong against protoss. There's literally no way to win against mutalisks. Stopped reading here because you're terrible at the game and hence I don't value your opinion. Bo5 any time man.
i thought chill already beat a scrub for TL
|
On April 30 2010 02:24 Chill wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:22 Eiserne wrote:
Right now zerg is unbelievably strong against protoss. There's literally no way to win against mutalisks. Stopped reading here because you're terrible at the game and hence I don't value your opinion.
too bad, it gets funnier
|
protoss the weakest race :'), I really hope this is a joke :p
|
On April 30 2010 02:26 Sfydjklm wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:24 Chill wrote:On April 30 2010 02:22 Eiserne wrote:
Right now zerg is unbelievably strong against protoss. There's literally no way to win against mutalisks. Stopped reading here because you're terrible at the game and hence I don't value your opinion. too bad, it gets funnier
Really? I stopped after that sentence too, maybe I should resume...
|
On April 30 2010 02:25 Eiserne wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:24 Chill wrote:On April 30 2010 02:22 Eiserne wrote:
Right now zerg is unbelievably strong against protoss. There's literally no way to win against mutalisks. Stopped reading here because you're terrible at the game and hence I don't value your opinion. Bo5 any time man.
OH SHIT SON. IT'S ON.
Betting 100$ on Chill, real money.
|
On April 30 2010 02:22 Eiserne wrote:
I'd be too humble if I said I wasn't really damn good at this game. I'd be cocky if I said I was one of the best, though.
Eh, so what's your league/rank/score/wins/losses then?
|
On April 30 2010 02:33 spinesheath wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:22 Eiserne wrote:
I'd be too humble if I said I wasn't really damn good at this game. I'd be cocky if I said I was one of the best, though.
Eh, so what's your league/rank/score/wins/losses then?
Rank 1 platinum division 40 1500 elo (haven't had time to mass game beyond that.)
|
On April 30 2010 02:22 Eiserne wrote:
Right now zerg is unbelievably strong against protoss. There's literally no way to win against mutalisks.
really? close this please :/
|
United States24718 Posts
Strange how most other top players completely disagree with you isn't it lol
This includes both top bw players who are now top sc2 players and people from other games who came over for sc2 and worked hard and are very good. You and orb should start a club though. Apparently sc2 is fucking terrible and all of us who like it right now are just stupid.
|
On April 30 2010 02:34 TArujo wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:22 Eiserne wrote:
Right now zerg is unbelievably strong against protoss. There's literally no way to win against mutalisks. really? close this please :/
Go make your own website if you wanna moderate, thanks. This is a blog, not a strategy thread. If you didn't realize, blogs are commonly about opinions. so if you have one of your own, there's a link next to your name at the top, and go make your own blog. Thanks.
|
On April 30 2010 02:28 lew wrote:
protoss the weakest race :'), I really hope this is a joke :p
Uhm.. It is the weakest race.
Surprisingly, As insane and crazy as it makes me feel, I really agree with the OP on a lot of stuff here.
Phoenixes dont need a nerf. They are certainly not OP. If anything, they need a slight buff.
One of the things I disagree with his how you predict SC2 will progress. I know it'll never compare to BW, but at least give it a chance... and by chance, I mean give it more time than just BETA.
Edit: Apologized for being a douche
|
On April 30 2010 02:29 spinesheath wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:26 Sfydjklm wrote:On April 30 2010 02:24 Chill wrote:On April 30 2010 02:22 Eiserne wrote:
Right now zerg is unbelievably strong against protoss. There's literally no way to win against mutalisks. Stopped reading here because you're terrible at the game and hence I don't value your opinion. too bad, it gets funnier Really? I stopped after that sentence too, maybe I should resume...
Ya, same, that is exactly where I stopped reading lol.
|
On April 30 2010 02:35 micronesia wrote:
Strange how most other top players completely disagree with you isn't it lol
This includes both top bw players who are now top sc2 players and people from other games who came over for sc2 and worked hard and are very good. You and orb should start a club though. Apparently sc2 is fucking terrible and all of us who like it right now are just stupid.
This entire community is on this ridiculous delusional high of 'OMG SC2 WE'VE WAITED 12 YEARS FINALLY IT'S HERE.'
Soon it will become, "Yeah, it sucks just like we always predicted. fuck. BW anybody?"
|
On April 30 2010 02:37 TwilightStar wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:28 lew wrote:
protoss the weakest race :'), I really hope this is a joke :p Uhm.. It is the weakest race. I know the OP posted out of rage for sucking horribly, he does bring up a _few_ good points...
If you think you're better than me, Bo5 right now and when I 3-0, you can apologize.
|
United States24718 Posts
On April 30 2010 02:37 Eiserne wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:34 TArujo wrote:On April 30 2010 02:22 Eiserne wrote:
Right now zerg is unbelievably strong against protoss. There's literally no way to win against mutalisks. really? close this please :/ Go make your own website if you wanna moderate, thanks. This is a blog, not a strategy thread. If you didn't realize, blogs are commonly about opinions. so if you have one of your own, there's a link next to your name at the top, and go make your own blog. Thanks.
So if someone made a very similar blog about sc1 it would be okay? It wouldn't be so ridiculous that mods could just be like "what is this stupid shit lol CLOSED"? Obviously we are allowed to disagree but you have gone way too far with this blog and a lot of people are simply calling you out on it.
|
On April 30 2010 02:39 micronesia wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:37 Eiserne wrote:On April 30 2010 02:34 TArujo wrote:On April 30 2010 02:22 Eiserne wrote:
Right now zerg is unbelievably strong against protoss. There's literally no way to win against mutalisks. really? close this please :/ Go make your own website if you wanna moderate, thanks. This is a blog, not a strategy thread. If you didn't realize, blogs are commonly about opinions. so if you have one of your own, there's a link next to your name at the top, and go make your own blog. Thanks. So if someone made a very similar blog about sc1 it would be okay? It wouldn't be so ridiculous that mods could just be like "what is this stupid shit lol CLOSED"? Obviously we are allowed to disagree but you have gone way too far with this blog and a lot of people are simply calling you out on it.
Have I gone way too far? Let me know if there's a specific point you disagree with. the difference between this blog and a similar one about BW is that we've had 12 years to realize BW is perfect. This game, being very young, is the farthest thing from. It's evident in the design and ongoing balance that this game will never live up to the same standards as Brood War.
I'm more than happy to play against you and or discuss actual points but I can't really say much to 'lol you're wrong'
|
SC2 is not terrible at all its preety much better than most of the RTS out there and 2nd best after BW. I doubt it will even get close to the orignal but 2nd is ok i guess.
For me i havent tried SC2 nor plan to play it much because im too old to learn new games and its not BW. BW got everything i need from a game and i dont plan to change something that doenst need changing.
|
i wanted to take you seriously but you said phoenix were too op.
|
Genius way to get Chill to play with you
|
|
|
BW is that we've had 12 years to realize BW is perfect. This game, being very young, is the farthest thing from. It's evident in the design and ongoing balance that this game will never live up to the same standards as Brood War.
You do know at one point during the SC Betas Reavers did 250 damage... that got changed, give SC2 more beta time and see where the balance changes are going, they did a recent content patch, the big balance patch is going to be soon and by big I mean 3-5 changes.
|
"this game sucks because i'm bad at it."
|
Hahaha, this is comedy gold. I love SC2 whining threads disguised as blogs.
|
On April 30 2010 02:42 da_head wrote:
i wanted to take you seriously but you said phoenix were too op.
That's not what I said at all because I find them distinctly unusable in PvZ and PvT, I mean that currently they only way to play PvP is with phoenixes. I've tried everything from void rays to 3warpgate blinkstalkers and nothing works. It's not about early harassment either, it's that when you get to a certain army size, about 15-20 units, if your opponent has 5 phoenixes in his army and you don't, you're going to lose. Every single time, hands down. I've played a dozen or two PvPs with this concept in mind and I think that currently you are required to play stargate tech which is just kinda disappointing.
|
On April 30 2010 02:44 shindigs wrote:
"this game sucks because i'm bad at it."
Like I tell everyone else that just wants to talk random shit and not back it up, Bo5 whenever you're ready.
|
|
|
On April 30 2010 02:34 Eiserne wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:33 spinesheath wrote:On April 30 2010 02:22 Eiserne wrote:
I'd be too humble if I said I wasn't really damn good at this game. I'd be cocky if I said I was one of the best, though.
Eh, so what's your league/rank/score/wins/losses then? Rank 1 platinum division 40 1500 elo (haven't had time to mass game beyond that.)
To be honest, this doesn't qualify you as "really damn good" yet.
|
On April 30 2010 02:44 Kralic wrote:Show nested quote +BW is that we've had 12 years to realize BW is perfect. This game, being very young, is the farthest thing from. It's evident in the design and ongoing balance that this game will never live up to the same standards as Brood War. You do know at one point during the SC Betas Reavers did 250 damage... that got changed, give SC2 more beta time and see where the balance changes are going, they did a recent content patch, the big balance patch is going to be soon and by big I mean 3-5 changes.
Unfortunately, this game doesn't have that long to wait. Think about modern gaming and how it's different from gaming 12 years ago. We would be much more patient in a beta 12 years ago, in a SC beta, when we didn't have something else to compare it to. It's hardly fair to blizzard but that's not my problem either. They don't have 5 years to balance this game, people will move on from it. Is what I'm saying clear? I'm not wording it very well.
|
Agree Sc2 sucks but not because of your reasons. Balance is a stupid reason to hate the game cause its not even established yet
|
United States24718 Posts
On April 30 2010 02:40 Eiserne wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:39 micronesia wrote:On April 30 2010 02:37 Eiserne wrote:On April 30 2010 02:34 TArujo wrote:On April 30 2010 02:22 Eiserne wrote:
Right now zerg is unbelievably strong against protoss. There's literally no way to win against mutalisks. really? close this please :/ Go make your own website if you wanna moderate, thanks. This is a blog, not a strategy thread. If you didn't realize, blogs are commonly about opinions. so if you have one of your own, there's a link next to your name at the top, and go make your own blog. Thanks. So if someone made a very similar blog about sc1 it would be okay? It wouldn't be so ridiculous that mods could just be like "what is this stupid shit lol CLOSED"? Obviously we are allowed to disagree but you have gone way too far with this blog and a lot of people are simply calling you out on it. Have I gone way too far? Let me know if there's a specific point you disagree with. the difference between this blog and a similar one about BW is that we've had 12 years to realize BW is perfect. This game, being very young, is the farthest thing from. It's evident in the design and ongoing balance that this game will never live up to the same standards as Brood War. I'm more than happy to play against you and or discuss actual points but I can't really say much to 'lol you're wrong'
Here are some points I disagree with:
Alright, beta's been out for quite a while now and it's still a pretty stupid game.
It's becoming increasingly obvious that this will never be good enough to become a competitive game.
Blizzard is completely mismanaging everything from design to art to UI to battle.net to balance itself.
Right now zerg is unbelievably strong against protoss.
There's literally no way to win against mutalisks.
Zerg, with their ridiculously overpowered spawn larva function (holy shit who actually believes this is even remotely balanced??) they can saturate mineral lines instantly and larva stops becoming a resource. So, Zerg immediately takes a ridiculous advantage.
Protoss is by and large the weakest race
I'd be too humble if I said I wasn't really damn good at this game.
there is a very low skill ceiling in this game
PvZ? Once he gets mutas you've already lost the game.
PvT? It seems like the only viable option now that immortals got nerfed (more on that in a second) is void ray harass
PvT's a boring ezfest
PvP's boring phoenix fest
Anyone with half a fucking brain can see that our tech 2 units cost 250/100 and 4 fucking supply should beat your cheap ass tier 1 roaches and marauders
Man, it's not that difficult to comprehend that
Immortals were completely balanced before the patch and now, completely useless, take way too long to build
I am capable, unlike most of the people currently beta testing, of looking at this game as a whole and saying, objectively, that this or that is probably not entirely balanced.
Viking range is way too long
storm is so USELESS now
the investment into templar tech is NOT WORTH THE SPELL.
And that's if you're LOL LUCKY enough to feedback the ghosts before they've insta-emp'd your entire army.
Protoss can't scout fuck all
Protoss can't scout but the other races can worker scout for free.
If you think this game is well designed, balanced, if you think it's gonna be the next esport or big publicized item...you're fucking delusional
This game is trash
Fucking zerg is overpowered
Parts I agree with at least 50%:
Sigh. That's just balance issues! You can't connect to other gateways, turning what was once a global gaming community and the ENTIRE REASON for blizzard's continuing financial success, into a cloistered, antisocial experience.
|
Your blog post talks about how Blizzard is mismanaging design, art, UI, battle.net and balance. But you seem to mostly be displeased about how you are not winning games as protoss because of apparent balance issues judging by all the paragraphs of balance ranting.
Personally I think they've done a decent job of all of the above. Designing a game that is better than BW from scratch is not an easy task, and I think it would be good if people didn't expect SC2 to be BW's superior little brother.
|
On April 30 2010 02:48 micronesia wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:40 Eiserne wrote:On April 30 2010 02:39 micronesia wrote:On April 30 2010 02:37 Eiserne wrote:On April 30 2010 02:34 TArujo wrote:On April 30 2010 02:22 Eiserne wrote:
Right now zerg is unbelievably strong against protoss. There's literally no way to win against mutalisks. really? close this please :/ Go make your own website if you wanna moderate, thanks. This is a blog, not a strategy thread. If you didn't realize, blogs are commonly about opinions. so if you have one of your own, there's a link next to your name at the top, and go make your own blog. Thanks. So if someone made a very similar blog about sc1 it would be okay? It wouldn't be so ridiculous that mods could just be like "what is this stupid shit lol CLOSED"? Obviously we are allowed to disagree but you have gone way too far with this blog and a lot of people are simply calling you out on it. Have I gone way too far? Let me know if there's a specific point you disagree with. the difference between this blog and a similar one about BW is that we've had 12 years to realize BW is perfect. This game, being very young, is the farthest thing from. It's evident in the design and ongoing balance that this game will never live up to the same standards as Brood War. I'm more than happy to play against you and or discuss actual points but I can't really say much to 'lol you're wrong' garbage post Parts I agree with at least 50%:
Instead of just copy pasting, try qualifying any of your statements? Your post count does not grant you the right to post inanely.
|
On April 30 2010 02:49 stenole wrote:
Your blog post talks about how Blizzard is mismanaging design, art, UI, battle.net and balance. But you seem to mostly be displeased about how you are not winning games as protoss because of apparent balance issues judging by all the paragraphs of balance ranting.
Personally I think they've done a decent job of all of the above. Designing a game that is better than BW from scratch is not an easy task, and I think it would be good if people didn't expect SC2 to be BW's superior little brother.
I got a little tired of typing after the balance portion, but I could go back to the rest at some point.
SC2 logically should be a superior game. Why would we expect anything less from a sequel?
|
United States24718 Posts
On April 30 2010 02:50 Eiserne wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:48 micronesia wrote:On April 30 2010 02:40 Eiserne wrote:On April 30 2010 02:39 micronesia wrote:On April 30 2010 02:37 Eiserne wrote:On April 30 2010 02:34 TArujo wrote:On April 30 2010 02:22 Eiserne wrote:
Right now zerg is unbelievably strong against protoss. There's literally no way to win against mutalisks. really? close this please :/ Go make your own website if you wanna moderate, thanks. This is a blog, not a strategy thread. If you didn't realize, blogs are commonly about opinions. so if you have one of your own, there's a link next to your name at the top, and go make your own blog. Thanks. So if someone made a very similar blog about sc1 it would be okay? It wouldn't be so ridiculous that mods could just be like "what is this stupid shit lol CLOSED"? Obviously we are allowed to disagree but you have gone way too far with this blog and a lot of people are simply calling you out on it. Have I gone way too far? Let me know if there's a specific point you disagree with. the difference between this blog and a similar one about BW is that we've had 12 years to realize BW is perfect. This game, being very young, is the farthest thing from. It's evident in the design and ongoing balance that this game will never live up to the same standards as Brood War. I'm more than happy to play against you and or discuss actual points but I can't really say much to 'lol you're wrong' garbage post Parts I agree with at least 50%: Instead of just copy pasting, try qualifying any of your statements? Your post count does not grant you the right to post inanely.
Calling my post a garbage post certainly isn't a good way to get off on the right foot. You specifically asked me if there were any points I disagreed with; I picked the ones that I did. Ideally you would go through them and see if maybe you want to make any modifications to your points before I actually try to explain what things you are right/wrong about so we don't waste time but continuing to be horribly condescending to everyone is more entertaining in the short term I guess.
edit: Unless you stand by all your accusations of things being garbage, retarded, requiring not mental capabilities in order to understand, etc, in which case I won't argue it with you for the same reason why most other people are just writing you off.
|
On April 30 2010 02:47 Eiserne wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:44 Kralic wrote:BW is that we've had 12 years to realize BW is perfect. This game, being very young, is the farthest thing from. It's evident in the design and ongoing balance that this game will never live up to the same standards as Brood War. You do know at one point during the SC Betas Reavers did 250 damage... that got changed, give SC2 more beta time and see where the balance changes are going, they did a recent content patch, the big balance patch is going to be soon and by big I mean 3-5 changes. Unfortunately, this game doesn't have that long to wait. Think about modern gaming and how it's different from gaming 12 years ago. We would be much more patient in a beta 12 years ago, in a SC beta, when we didn't have something else to compare it to. It's hardly fair to blizzard but that's not my problem either. They don't have 5 years to balance this game, people will move on from it. Is what I'm saying clear? I'm not wording it very well.
Blizzard is never in a rush to release a game. I don't know why you think they are. They make their money when they release the product. They aren't bleeding money by keeping this game in beta, sure they are paying the development team but they have a lot of money stockpiled to sustain this for a very long time. The shareholders are all about the profits is true, too bad they have a gem like WoW to keep those shareholders very happy.
The sucess of e-sports doesn't rely on the game 100%. Blizzard can pump enough money into tournaments that grab the attention of the best players in the world that they will get sponsors who want their name on the tournaments. It can be called a "garbage" game by a few or a lot of people but if the money is there the game will go on.
|
On April 30 2010 02:39 Eiserne wrote:
If you think you're better than me, Bo5 right now and when I 3-0, you can apologize.
No one will take you seriously if all you say is this. I agree with you on a lot of points, just your attitude needs some re-adjustment (so did my first post in here, my apologies)
|
On April 30 2010 02:53 micronesia wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:50 Eiserne wrote:On April 30 2010 02:48 micronesia wrote:On April 30 2010 02:40 Eiserne wrote:On April 30 2010 02:39 micronesia wrote:On April 30 2010 02:37 Eiserne wrote:On April 30 2010 02:34 TArujo wrote:On April 30 2010 02:22 Eiserne wrote:
Right now zerg is unbelievably strong against protoss. There's literally no way to win against mutalisks. really? close this please :/ Go make your own website if you wanna moderate, thanks. This is a blog, not a strategy thread. If you didn't realize, blogs are commonly about opinions. so if you have one of your own, there's a link next to your name at the top, and go make your own blog. Thanks. So if someone made a very similar blog about sc1 it would be okay? It wouldn't be so ridiculous that mods could just be like "what is this stupid shit lol CLOSED"? Obviously we are allowed to disagree but you have gone way too far with this blog and a lot of people are simply calling you out on it. Have I gone way too far? Let me know if there's a specific point you disagree with. the difference between this blog and a similar one about BW is that we've had 12 years to realize BW is perfect. This game, being very young, is the farthest thing from. It's evident in the design and ongoing balance that this game will never live up to the same standards as Brood War. I'm more than happy to play against you and or discuss actual points but I can't really say much to 'lol you're wrong' garbage post Parts I agree with at least 50%: Instead of just copy pasting, try qualifying any of your statements? Your post count does not grant you the right to post inanely. Calling my post a garbage post certainly isn't a good way to get off on the right foot. You specifically asked me if there were any points I disagreed with; I picked the ones that I did. Ideally you would go through them and see if maybe you want to make any modifications to your points before I actually try to explain what things you are right/wrong about so we don't waste time but continuing to be horribly condescending to everyone is more entertaining in the short term I guess. edit: Unless you stand by all your accusations of things being garbage, retarded, requiring not mental capabilities in order to understand, etc, in which case I won't argue it with you for the same reason why most other people are just writing you off.
If you saw that post you wrote posted by someone with sub-100 posts on another thread, you'd expect them to be banned. It was a stupid post, basically just spam, without content, and demeaning. I qualified my statements. You just said I was wrong. Why is it ME that should make modifications to points that are uncontested? you've not contributed anything to the dialogue, so how it me that's being condescending? Again, your post count doesn't (read: shouldn't) grant you the right to post like a troll and demand respect.
|
On April 30 2010 02:55 TwilightStar wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:39 Eiserne wrote:
If you think you're better than me, Bo5 right now and when I 3-0, you can apologize. No one will take you seriously if all you say is this. I agree with you on a lot of points, just your attitude needs some re-adjustment (so did my first post in here, my apologies)
Lol man, you tell me -I- suck at this game, despite having never seen me play or knowing anything about my play at all, and you tell me my attitude needs re-adjustment? You should check that high horse you're riding. If you want to talk shit to somebody in their thread, at least have the balls to back it up. It's very common recently to talk shit to random people and then just disappear. I'm calling you out on it. If you wanna tell me I suck, prove it. Until you do, you're just another trash poster brought on by the wave of SC2 bandwagoneers.
Seriously, if you can't understand the irony and hypocrisy of your own statements...... well I just don't know what else to say.
|
On April 30 2010 02:55 Kralic wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:47 Eiserne wrote:On April 30 2010 02:44 Kralic wrote:BW is that we've had 12 years to realize BW is perfect. This game, being very young, is the farthest thing from. It's evident in the design and ongoing balance that this game will never live up to the same standards as Brood War. You do know at one point during the SC Betas Reavers did 250 damage... that got changed, give SC2 more beta time and see where the balance changes are going, they did a recent content patch, the big balance patch is going to be soon and by big I mean 3-5 changes. Unfortunately, this game doesn't have that long to wait. Think about modern gaming and how it's different from gaming 12 years ago. We would be much more patient in a beta 12 years ago, in a SC beta, when we didn't have something else to compare it to. It's hardly fair to blizzard but that's not my problem either. They don't have 5 years to balance this game, people will move on from it. Is what I'm saying clear? I'm not wording it very well. Blizzard is never in a rush to release a game. I don't know why you think they are. They make their money when they release the product. They aren't bleeding money by keeping this game in beta, sure they are paying the development team but they have a lot of money stockpiled to sustain this for a very long time. The shareholders are all about the profits is true, too bad they have a gem like WoW to keep those shareholders very happy. The sucess of e-sports doesn't rely on the game 100%. Blizzard can pump enough money into tournaments that grab the attention of the best players in the world that they will get sponsors who want their name on the tournaments. It can be called a "garbage" game by a few or a lot of people but if the money is there the game will go on.
the fact that they have enough money to throw at the game doesn't mean they're designing a good game. And I guarantee you Blizzard wants to get this game on the market asap. I would be surprised if it came out later than the end of june. HIGHLY surprised.
|
On April 30 2010 02:34 Eiserne wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:33 spinesheath wrote:On April 30 2010 02:22 Eiserne wrote:
I'd be too humble if I said I wasn't really damn good at this game. I'd be cocky if I said I was one of the best, though.
Eh, so what's your league/rank/score/wins/losses then? Rank 1 platinum division 40 1500 elo (haven't had time to mass game beyond that.)
rofl. I was a 1700 platinum div 28 terran and I'm terrible. Go whine somewhere else please.
|
On April 30 2010 02:58 Eiserne wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:55 TwilightStar wrote:On April 30 2010 02:39 Eiserne wrote:
If you think you're better than me, Bo5 right now and when I 3-0, you can apologize. No one will take you seriously if all you say is this. I agree with you on a lot of points, just your attitude needs some re-adjustment (so did my first post in here, my apologies) Lol man, you tell me -I- suck at this game, despite having never seen me play or knowing anything about my play at all, and you tell me my attitude needs re-adjustment? You should check that high horse you're riding. If you want to talk shit to somebody in their thread, at least have the balls to back it up. It's very common recently to talk shit to random people and then just disappear. I'm calling you out on it. If you wanna tell me I suck, prove it. Until you do, you're just another trash poster brought on by the wave of SC2 bandwagoneers. Seriously, if you can't understand the irony and hypocrisy of your own statements...... well I just don't know what else to say.
Mmk, I'm not even going to bother with someone as ridiculously retarded as you. You had a few good points, but you are just too fucking idiotic to get them across effectively.
|
What terrible? SC2 is a good game..
|
On April 30 2010 03:02 TwilightStar wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:58 Eiserne wrote:On April 30 2010 02:55 TwilightStar wrote:On April 30 2010 02:39 Eiserne wrote:
If you think you're better than me, Bo5 right now and when I 3-0, you can apologize. No one will take you seriously if all you say is this. I agree with you on a lot of points, just your attitude needs some re-adjustment (so did my first post in here, my apologies) Lol man, you tell me -I- suck at this game, despite having never seen me play or knowing anything about my play at all, and you tell me my attitude needs re-adjustment? You should check that high horse you're riding. If you want to talk shit to somebody in their thread, at least have the balls to back it up. It's very common recently to talk shit to random people and then just disappear. I'm calling you out on it. If you wanna tell me I suck, prove it. Until you do, you're just another trash poster brought on by the wave of SC2 bandwagoneers. Seriously, if you can't understand the irony and hypocrisy of your own statements...... well I just don't know what else to say. Mmk, I'm not even going to bother with someone as ridiculously retarded as you. You had a few good points, but you are just too fucking idiotic to get them across effectively.
Right, that's the best way to prove you're smarter or better than someone, call them ridiculously retarded and too fucking idiotic because you... don't have anything left to say? Really? I'm waiting on bnet 2.0. Feel free to post your id and I'll prove my rank to you. Remember, you came in here talking shit about me, not the other way around.
|
On April 30 2010 02:59 Eiserne wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:55 Kralic wrote:On April 30 2010 02:47 Eiserne wrote:On April 30 2010 02:44 Kralic wrote:BW is that we've had 12 years to realize BW is perfect. This game, being very young, is the farthest thing from. It's evident in the design and ongoing balance that this game will never live up to the same standards as Brood War. You do know at one point during the SC Betas Reavers did 250 damage... that got changed, give SC2 more beta time and see where the balance changes are going, they did a recent content patch, the big balance patch is going to be soon and by big I mean 3-5 changes. Unfortunately, this game doesn't have that long to wait. Think about modern gaming and how it's different from gaming 12 years ago. We would be much more patient in a beta 12 years ago, in a SC beta, when we didn't have something else to compare it to. It's hardly fair to blizzard but that's not my problem either. They don't have 5 years to balance this game, people will move on from it. Is what I'm saying clear? I'm not wording it very well. Blizzard is never in a rush to release a game. I don't know why you think they are. They make their money when they release the product. They aren't bleeding money by keeping this game in beta, sure they are paying the development team but they have a lot of money stockpiled to sustain this for a very long time. The shareholders are all about the profits is true, too bad they have a gem like WoW to keep those shareholders very happy. The sucess of e-sports doesn't rely on the game 100%. Blizzard can pump enough money into tournaments that grab the attention of the best players in the world that they will get sponsors who want their name on the tournaments. It can be called a "garbage" game by a few or a lot of people but if the money is there the game will go on. the fact that they have enough money to throw at the game doesn't mean they're designing a good game. And I guarantee you Blizzard wants to get this game on the market asap. I would be surprised if it came out later than the end of june. HIGHLY surprised.
But you are saying that they are making a bad game, I was saying they aren't rushing it because they never rush a game. I wouldn't be surprised if your stab at the release date is correct. Remember what we see in beta is 1/4 of the game. To some this is 100% of the game, to most of the world this is 1/4 of the game to them. The game will be very polished and complete. They have their vision if it does not corespond to yours then don't buy it and play it. Singleplayer is actually important to a lot of people. E-sports is just a sport if you throw enough money at it with a base of a true sport people will follow it.
|
On April 30 2010 03:05 Kralic wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2010 02:59 Eiserne wrote:On April 30 2010 02:55 Kralic wrote:On April 30 2010 02:47 Eiserne wrote:On April 30 2010 02:44 Kralic wrote:BW is that we've had 12 years to realize BW is perfect. This game, being very young, is the farthest thing from. It's evident in the design and ongoing balance that this game will never live up to the same standards as Brood War. You do know at one point during the SC Betas Reavers did 250 damage... that got changed, give SC2 more beta time and see where the balance changes are going, they did a recent content patch, the big balance patch is going to be soon and by big I mean 3-5 changes. Unfortunately, this game doesn't have that long to wait. Think about modern gaming and how it's different from gaming 12 years ago. We would be much more patient in a beta 12 years ago, in a SC beta, when we didn't have something else to compare it to. It's hardly fair to blizzard but that's not my problem either. They don't have 5 years to balance this game, people will move on from it. Is what I'm saying clear? I'm not wording it very well. Blizzard is never in a rush to release a game. I don't know why you think they are. They make their money when they release the product. They aren't bleeding money by keeping this game in beta, sure they are paying the development team but they have a lot of money stockpiled to sustain this for a very long time. The shareholders are all about the profits is true, too bad they have a gem like WoW to keep those shareholders very happy. The sucess of e-sports doesn't rely on the game 100%. Blizzard can pump enough money into tournaments that grab the attention of the best players in the world that they will get sponsors who want their name on the tournaments. It can be called a "garbage" game by a few or a lot of people but if the money is there the game will go on. the fact that they have enough money to throw at the game doesn't mean they're designing a good game. And I guarantee you Blizzard wants to get this game on the market asap. I would be surprised if it came out later than the end of june. HIGHLY surprised. But you are saying that they are making a bad game, I was saying they aren't rushing it because they never rush a game. I wouldn't be surprised if your stab at the release date is correct. Remember what we see in beta is 1/4 of the game. To some this is 100% of the game, to most of the world this is 1/4 of the game to them. The game will be very polished and complete. They have their vision if it does not corespond to yours then don't buy it and play it. Singleplayer is actually important to a lot of people. E-sports is just a sport if you throw enough money at it with a base of a true sport people will follow it.
I'll concede that the single player is important and I'll be buying the game for that aspect certainly. and I'll probably enjoy custom maps but barring so really groundbreaking balance patches in the coming months, the multiplayer is not good enough to have a professional scene! Can you imagine if BW had some of the balance issues that this game has? It would never have been successful in the first place.
|
On April 30 2010 02:41 SkelA wrote:
For me i havent tried SC2 nor plan to play it much because im too old to learn new games and its not BW. BW got everything i need from a game and i dont plan to change something that doenst need changing.
This is pretty much how I feel about it too.
I hope the OP is right so BW is still played by foreigners.
Especially if the people who cam fro SC2 went to BW.
|
Calgary25986 Posts
I should have listened to my heart when I closed this the first time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
