EPTUS Politics Feedback Thread - Page 77
| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
|
Ghostcom
Denmark4783 Posts
| ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
| ||
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
| ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
| ||
|
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On August 31 2017 12:12 LegalLord wrote: If there's a post that I thought was actionable that didn't get actioned, I won't be reporting the next instance. But coming in and asking about why it isn't actioned might be warranted. You have to realize that there are different mods that take on reports. One report might be 100% actionable in the eyes of one mod while the same report might look a bit less actionable to another. Obviously, we try and reduce that variance as much as possible. Anyways, my point with my post was that not a single person even reported that post you guys mentioned earlier. | ||
|
Ghostcom
Denmark4783 Posts
It's this post by leporello: http://www.liquidhearth.com/forum/general/383301-us-politics-mega-thread?page=8598#171952 And it was reported by me. When I click the post it gives me the "this post has already been reported". I mainly read the politics thread on the hearthstone page, maybe that's the issue? EDIT: In most cases I would just move on, but when a new line for moderation seems to be set in place I feel it is only reasonable to ask why so that the quality of reporting can improve. That way the moderation team also gets fewer reports to handle. | ||
|
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
edit: the report is on the sister site but it hasn't been actioned yet. Going to have to wait until someone actions it then lol. | ||
|
Ghostcom
Denmark4783 Posts
 EDIT: Maybe it was worth considering? No idea how reasonable a suggestion it is. | ||
|
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On September 01 2017 03:30 Ghostcom wrote: I thought that the shared part of the forums would have shared report systems. Interesting - thanks for the info EDIT: Maybe it was worth considering? No idea how reasonable a suggestion it is. you mean a shared report system? Guessing it'll be rough to do since all that stuff is separate. Not sure of feasibility. R1ch would know more in that case. | ||
KadaverBB
Germany25658 Posts
| ||
|
Ghostcom
Denmark4783 Posts
On September 01 2017 03:38 BigFan wrote: you mean a shared report system? Guessing it'll be rough to do since all that stuff is separate. Not sure of feasibility. R1ch would know more in that case. Nah, merely shared report system for the shared forums (i.e. General) On September 01 2017 03:43 KadaverBB wrote: Take these concerns to Website Feedback please I thought I was in Website Feedback  Do you mean a separate thread? | ||
|
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
Regardless, this is interesting though. Guess it explains why we only get so many SC Pol reports here. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
| ||
|
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
| ||
|
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
Side note, if we aren't sure about whether something is threadworthy or not could we post it here and ask? | ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28873 Posts
I agree that the post from leporello is actionable. I'm on vacation and haven't been reading the thread (1300 unread messages is kind of a mountain to climb), but if I had seen a user complaint about that post, I would've done something - and in general, I'm about the most lenient mod on the site. zlefin, you need to calm down. If you are angry, do not post. This applies to pretty much any type of conversation, both online and offline. It's extremely hard to be reasonable while being angry, and it's very rare for unreasonable posts to spur productive discussion. | ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/general/383301-us-politics-mega-thread?page=8640#172789 "It's a simple idea, and I wish it was purely tautological. If the Left was sane on the issue, it certainly would be. But instead, as demonstrated above, there are countless apologists on the Left for illegal immigration. One would think that there'd be less love for human trafficking and indentured servitude." xdaunt and danglars are again trolling up the thread, on immigration this time. | ||
KwarK
United States44201 Posts
| ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On September 06 2017 00:44 zlefin wrote: It's posts like this which really make it clear that it's not a good faith argument being presented: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/general/383301-us-politics-mega-thread?page=8640#172789 "It's a simple idea, and I wish it was purely tautological. If the Left was sane on the issue, it certainly would be. But instead, as demonstrated above, there are countless apologists on the Left for illegal immigration. One would think that there'd be less love for human trafficking and indentured servitude." xdaunt and danglars are again trolling up the thread, on immigration this time. It doesn't even wiggle the needle of thread norms with regards to pointed argumentation. It's absolutely desirable because people like ChristianS thought the point was tautological, and it obviously wasn't given all the controversy. He learned something. Kwark goes off trolling in his "0% illegal immigration hypothetical" and so do two or three others, which sorta underscores the entire reason for bringing it up. If you have to represent the point in bad faith or talk around the point, chances are it's a tough topic for one ideological bastion. | ||
|
KwarK
United States44201 Posts
We're not refusing to talk about it, on the contrary we're making a much more good faith attempt to discuss it than xDaunt's silly "are you in favour of crime?" deserved. | ||
| ||
