US Politics Feedback Thread - Page 311
Forum Index > Website Feedback |
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
| ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21369 Posts
On November 03 2020 02:15 Nebuchad wrote: No, he doesn't. The electoral college doesn't vote until Dec 14th? and the votes are not officially tallied until Jan 6th before Congress.Fair enough, he'll have to say whether he accepts the results or not pretty soon tho, correct? For the rest, keep me out of this bs please. So until jan 6th there is technically no result to accept. Normally ofcourse no one waits that long because the results are obvious pretty shortly after the election itself but hey, this is Trump. Edit, hm didn't realise this was the feedback thread. sorry. | ||
Nebuchad
Switzerland11928 Posts
On November 03 2020 02:20 Gorsameth wrote: No, he doesn't. The electoral college doesn't vote until Dec 14th? and the votes are not officially tallied until Jan 6th before Congress. So until jan 6th there is technically no result to accept. Normally ofcourse no one waits that long because the results are obvious pretty shortly after the election itself but hey, this is Trump. Edit, hm didn't realise this was the feedback thread. sorry. Thanks for the information. | ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
![]()
FlaShFTW
United States10033 Posts
Other than that, I think the rest of the argument we had about "good or bad sides" was opinion based. Sure, I think his opinion in that discussion of voter rights was really bad and the argument is clearly shifted in favor of the side of the Democrats, but even if I think he's being incredibly ignorant of the idea and equivocating two unequivocal arguments, it wasn't worthy of a ban. | ||
Blitzkrieg0
United States13132 Posts
| ||
![]()
FlaShFTW
United States10033 Posts
On November 03 2020 08:29 Blitzkrieg0 wrote: If your impression of Danglars is that he thinks courts don't make policy instead of courts shouldn't make policy then you should probably reread what you're arguing. Thankfully, the courts aren't filled with these kind of huckster arguments, and legitimately weigh interests like running an "orderly, efficient election and in giving citizens (including the losing candidates and their supporters) confidence in the fairness of the election" and " federal judges do not possess special expertise or competence about how best to balance the costs and benefits of potential policy responses to the pandemic, including with respect to elections." idk man, seems like he's saying courts arent filled with judges that make policy. Pretty clear to me what he and I are arguing. | ||
Sent.
Poland9105 Posts
| ||
Lmui
Canada6210 Posts
On November 03 2020 09:41 Sent. wrote: Having Danglars banned on the election night is very mean. He should be allowed to go on temporary parole. Agreed tbh. We're missing a part of the discussion, valuable or not on probably the most important politics day(s) of the year. Give him a delayed sentence or something to be served starting next tuesday or whenever. | ||
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9348 Posts
On November 03 2020 09:41 Sent. wrote: Having Danglars banned on the election night is very mean. He should be allowed to go on temporary parole. Sorry to just +1 but I also agree with this. Bring him back for the day! | ||
![]()
tofucake
Hyrule18980 Posts
| ||
Artisreal
Germany9234 Posts
Against the obvious trolls and alts. | ||
![]()
FlaShFTW
United States10033 Posts
On November 03 2020 18:24 Artisreal wrote: Would it make sense to prevent people registered today from posting in the election thread? Against the obvious trolls and alts. I'd also be in favor of that. 6399 was the latest example, though im sure there exists some people who lurk and never make an account/post and just not want to contribute. | ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21369 Posts
May I ask why? | ||
![]()
micronesia
United States24579 Posts
| ||
NewSunshine
United States5938 Posts
| ||
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
| ||
ChristianS
United States3187 Posts
| ||
![]()
KwarK
United States41993 Posts
I’m involved so I won’t make a unilateral mod decision but I second LegalLord’s suggestion. This is as good an example as any of a use case for a containment topic so that the main topic can get back on track. | ||
![]()
Liquid`Drone
Norway28559 Posts
But good luck making the OP to such a thread. I'd be seriously impressed with someone capable of making an informative OP that does not trigger 'either side'. ![]() | ||
| ||