Privilege?
US Politics Feedback Thread - Page 308
Forum Index > Website Feedback |
GreenHorizons
United States22724 Posts
Privilege? | ||
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
| ||
Jealous
10098 Posts
Privilege is something you're born with sweaty, don't be silly~ The real answer is the end of bipartisan politics, in regular legislative doses ![]() | ||
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
On October 07 2020 03:28 Nebuchad wrote: Just there to open the question, really. Getting myself banned from this was one of the best decisions I've made in a while, but I still catch myself reading it from time to time and I never feel better going out than coming in. I can't imagine enjoying this. I can't imagine what you mean. You feel bad after reading a thread on a team liquid? and you continue to do it? If you don't like getting riled up then what are you doing with your life? | ||
Nebuchad
Switzerland11928 Posts
On October 07 2020 10:16 IgnE wrote: I can't imagine what you mean. You feel bad after reading a thread on a team liquid? and you continue to do it? If you don't like getting riled up then what are you doing with your life? You've never done stuff that you feel bad about doing? Teach me your ways ^^' My life is not doing too hot. Bosses are fucking us over right about now, they're being blatant with it too it's kind of funny (except for the people who worked there 30 years I guess). I'm seriously considering telling them to fuck off and trying poker professionally, even though it's very possible I'm not good enough to do that, and Switzerland is still not cheap. I don't know, I'll keep you updated. | ||
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
| ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21368 Posts
On October 08 2020 08:31 Nevuk wrote: From the debate thread.Are we going to have LR thread for the VP debate? Everyone, thank you for participating in the debate thread! Thread will now be locked and USPMT will get unlocked. The debate thread will reopen on October 7 for the VP debate between Mike Pence and Kamala Harris. We'll lock USPMT again on that date. See you all then! | ||
Nouar
France3270 Posts
| ||
![]()
Seeker
![]()
Where dat snitch at?36923 Posts
On October 09 2020 04:07 Nouar wrote: I still feel 48h is too long before the reopening of the USPol main thread. It moves so fast these days that the day after, the topic already is on something else than the debate. Yes, I agree. I will shorten it to 24 hours. | ||
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
On October 07 2020 03:28 Nebuchad wrote: Just there to open the question, really. Getting myself banned from this was one of the best decisions I've made in a while, but I still catch myself reading it from time to time and I never feel better going out than coming in. I can't imagine enjoying this. Ironic considering you was a major contributer to the shitfest that is the USPol thread, with basically borderline harassment. I can't even remember what you got banned for, but apparently, along with others who get banned, you feel the need to drive by and remind people that you no longer post there. If you don't want to post in USPol, it's easy, just don't post there. It's not a herculean effort deserving of praise. | ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Anyways, I doubt that for someone whose "life is not doing too hot", gambling is appropriate advice. | ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
Nebuchad
Switzerland11928 Posts
On October 09 2020 21:44 Dangermousecatdog wrote: Ironic considering you was a major contributer to the shitfest that is the USPol thread, with basically borderline harassment. I can't even remember what you got banned for, but apparently, along with others who get banned, you feel the need to drive by and remind people that you no longer post there. If you don't want to post in USPol, it's easy, just don't post there. It's not a herculean effort deserving of praise. Thanks for your advice | ||
GreenHorizons
United States22724 Posts
| ||
zeo
Serbia6267 Posts
![]() Ive recently been trying to get back into BW casually and its refreshing. The BW part of the forum is so much nicer than general. Even watching Kwark stream he seems so much more likeable when hes not talking about politics | ||
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
| ||
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
On October 25 2020 05:12 Danglars wrote: Actual conversation (paraphrased) That's one of the central contentions in the Russia scandal wars. Can you just abandon standards of evidence because you simply choose to throw everything Trump and deputy departments under Trump in the garbage heap? Is that a fair way to judge the evidence? That's a very legitimate question. If you look at what he's first responding to, it overrelies on reporting that has a clear slant. Perfectly justifiable post. In the replies: Quite the adding to the conversation. Shitposter answers shitposter. Ban them both, ban neither. The past three posts he criticized as "my bubble is more legit than yours." Post from Nevuk alleging Motherjones has broken major stories in ways the Daily Caller has not. That's a bubble opinion. They were first with investigative journalism on McCain angle on spreading the unverified Steele Dossier. The Daily Caller reporter was the first to render aid to an activist shot in Kenosha, and literally drove him to the hospital (mainstream media ignored that act of heroism, by the way. The same Daily Caller reporter was the only one interviewing Kyle Rittenhouse before the shooting later that night. Not the Washington Post reporter on the ground filming, but the Washington Post forced to use Daily Caller filming to write their story. Daily Caller was first to do investigative reporting on the charlatans running a fake Border Wall funding nonprofit. They broke the story of Karen Bass (potential Biden VP pick) having Scientology ties (July 31). Let's just say, they easily clear a Mother Jones threshhold of breaking news. If you want to be informed on both sides of biased reporting on an issue, put DC alongside the best of the mid-high tier news sites from the left. Other two posts were basically contentless shitposts. The parts where Nevuk nails actual problems with Doodsmack is his use of Breitbart. It's a source that can't be relied upon, even the 0.1% of the time where they do break something interesting. I'd additionally fault him for no discernment in responding to the thread's left-wing shitposters. Let them circle jerk the Trump hate, just don't fire back with their level of content: it shits up the thread. A liberal echo chamber firing that kind of content off into the void doesn't require interaction and generates half the shitposts. Wait for the posters that practice higher standards like (usually) Nevuk, Nouar, etc. I'm going to respond to Danglar's latest post in the ABL thread here instead so we don't bog down the other threads with a meta-discussion about source reliability. I'm not terribly familiar with Daily Caller, though I knew enough to know that they were better than Breitbart or Gateway Pundit. MotherJones I don't read religiously or anything, but I remember them very clearly for Romney's 47% tape and some other very deep investigative reporting on private prisons. Biased, definitely, but with a very good track record. I've know I've said some incorrect things about them in the past, as I thought they were still strongly associated with Tucker Calson, etc.I mainly checked a fact checking websites and saw that they had Daily Caller as mixed accuracy rather than high (which is what they MJ as). Upon further review, I now see the site I used has a distinctive label for problematic sites that they gave to Breitbart but not Daily Caller : "Questionable". This is despite the site giving them the same overall rating (though they do note daily caller isn't far from being it), which is why I associated them at first. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mother-jones/ https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-caller/ Anyways, I apologize for initially discarding them out of hand. I will take daily caller slightly more seriously in the future, though that particular story I felt could have been discounted until further verification came (which I still don't believe has) due to the problems I outlined later in the thread concerning the sourcing of the story (which, good for the Daily Caller for being somewhat up front about where it came from). | ||
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
Jealous
10098 Posts
| ||
| ||