EPTI mean...
Nope.
Lost for words.
US Politics Feedback Thread - Page 174
| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9766 Posts
I mean... Nope. Lost for words. | ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
On July 28 2018 07:03 Jockmcplop wrote: zlefin dude. I mean... Nope. Lost for words. what? we all know the conclusions to be reached from a poll are far more complicated than what the poll itself says; and we're familiar with the ways in which polls can be inaccurate. | ||
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
84% approve or are neutral when it comes to his moderation. 66% approve of his moderation. Well done Seeker! Good stuff! Still not best mod, that would be me, but you can have 2nd place  edit: added inflammatory statement in there | ||
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37058 Posts
On July 28 2018 07:53 BigFan wrote: So: 84% approve or are neutral when it comes to his moderation. 66% approve of his moderation. Well done Seeker! Good stuff! Still not best mod, that would be me, but you can have 2nd place edit: added inflammatory statement in there Don't make me put up a poll for you too and SHOW YOU who is the real 2nd place mod. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
| ||
|
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On July 28 2018 07:58 Seeker wrote: Don't make me put up a poll for you too and SHOW YOU who is the real 2nd place mod. It would only count if a non-staff person made it but maybe it's best not to, I'd rather not see you lose | ||
|
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
| ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
| ||
|
Aveng3r
United States2411 Posts
On July 28 2018 06:39 zlefin wrote: and now for the hard/fun part: interpreting poll results! we can all see what the numbers are, so what do we consider them to mean, if anything? do we take them as an overall endorsement of quality? it certainly looks like a decent enough overall result. I note that very few people chose slightly approve/disapprove; I forget the statistical term equivalent to polarisation, but that seemed to apply here. we lack any baseline result to compare to, at least that I'm aware of. are there any other polls in TL past that could serve as a basis? edit: oh, and now the number's are changing because more people are seeing the poll and taking a choice, that makes it more confusing. I really don't see the need to over complicate this. The poll asked how people felt about Seeker's moderation, and the results are mostly positive. Done. | ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9766 Posts
| ||
|
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On July 31 2018 00:23 Dangermousecatdog wrote: We are not done. We absolutely need to know if BigFan is best mod or not. LIES! Seeker can't be winning, we all know he's hated around here while I've never banned anyone! | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23581 Posts
I think I deserve an explanation. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
Hmm, how about, “would you rather have xDaunt or zlefin as the new politics moderator?” Or “which one USPOL regular deserves a perm ban?” Sounds like fun! | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23581 Posts
On July 31 2018 04:50 LegalLord wrote: Ooh, is it “loaded poll question day” already? I want to play! Hmm, how about, “would you rather have xDaunt or zlefin as the new politics moderator?” Or “which one USPOL regular deserves a perm ban?” Sounds like fun! I'd be interested if xDaunt and I could come to terms on him not banning me (or what posts would get me banned under his rule). But I feel like it would be easier to navigate at this particular moment. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On July 31 2018 04:58 GreenHorizons wrote: I'd be interested if xDaunt and I could come to terms on him not banning me (or what posts would get me banned under his rule). But I feel like it would be easier to navigate at this particular moment. I generally don't consider your posts to be actionable. The only exception is when you don't let certain things go, which results in the thread getting crapped up. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23581 Posts
On July 31 2018 05:41 xDaunt wrote: I generally don't consider your posts to be actionable. The only exception is when you don't let certain things go, which results in the thread getting crapped up. Then we could probably come to terms, not sure it's a trade I'd be interested in though since it appears I've found a workable common ground with Seeker at the moment. We're a tough crowd, so I should cut him some slack for now. fwiw I still am curious about the duration of thread bans and how those are determined/if people getting them have any idea how long they'll last. Last I remember they were just indefinite with sincere contrition being the key to reentry (rather than any particular length of time) but I could be totally wrong on that. | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
| ||
|
Aveng3r
United States2411 Posts
On July 31 2018 07:26 LegalLord wrote: Historically I have about 90% agreement with xDaunt on matters of who and what is problematic regarding the thread. But interested parties doling our action can never be perceived as fair. has it ever occured to you that YES. THEY. CAN. and maybe just maybe the problem is on your end? These self righteous posts drive me up the wall | ||
|
LegalLord
United States13779 Posts
On July 31 2018 11:48 Aveng3r wrote: has it ever occured to you that YES. THEY. CAN. and maybe just maybe the problem is on your end? No, the thought has never, ever, ever even crossed my mind. | ||
| ||
