EPTFeatured Streamer List - Page 26
| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
|
S4KuR4
France52 Posts
| ||
|
grheme
Canada6 Posts
| ||
|
Depetrify
978 Posts
On December 06 2011 09:08 Spades wrote: I would like to be re-added to the featured streaming list. I may not be winning alot of tournaments lately, but i am performing well. I am top 20 grandmasters, and high masters on korean server. I reach 100 viewers even unfeatured sometimes I interact with my viewers and hold events through stream chat/mic and social media I was removed before because i was quite inactive streaming, but now i am in the Team Reign house, and will be streaming pretty much 24/7, as well as filming other media and events. Thanks for you're consideration. Spades is a boss. This guy is seriously like the most incredible all around person there is. Spades is an over-achiever in all aspects of life, he is a perfectionist, and a model. (literally) Spades is living in the REIGN house, which is of course a very good thing for Esports in general. We got to support our boi !!! GOGOGOGGOGO SPADES Hes also terran, we need more terran streamers. Demuslims like dead or something. | ||
|
PocketStarcraft29
United States101 Posts
| ||
|
alundra_aiei
United States34 Posts
| ||
|
rhs408
United States904 Posts
And one more note about HasHe's stream, he's one of very few streamers (maybe 2 or 3?) that streams on 1080p. | ||
|
Cecil
United States368 Posts
He was the Terran instructor for the SCDojo in Orlando and he did a phenomenal job. He is doing better and better at tournaments and he is consistently online. Swag. | ||
|
Gyger
Norway18 Posts
- He streams a lot on a regular basis (when he's not in Korea playing in WCG) - He is a top GM on the European ladder - He often commentates his play while playing so the viewers learn a lot about decision making - He all ways goes through replays to see what he could have done diffrent and explains it to the audience - He does well in online tournaments like most resently beating Korean pro Violet 3-0 in Gamecreds and he qualified for the stage 3 IEM qualifiers which is impressiv when players like Sjow and Haypro didn't - He also has a good amount of views for an unfeatured, unknown player (the most when I have been watching is 600+ views) | ||
|
Severe
28 Posts
| ||
|
mizU
United States12125 Posts
| ||
Kiante
Australia7069 Posts
reasons: Pretty much the only Dota 2 caster in the universe right now Casts all the big Dota2 events and gets upwards of 15k+ viewers on some events Stream has really good production quality Is almost always top tier teams playing each other Often has pro's co-commentating with him With people like link/demon/dendi featured for their play, could Tobiwan belong in the "others" category where people like Trump and painuser are featured? he doesn't play himself but he provides a really good stream and when its online its 90% of the time high quality dota2 content. | ||
|
Xinder
United States2269 Posts
| ||
|
Zerker
Canada201 Posts
Is there some sort of unfair bais towards them or what? It really kinda annoys me when i see some people get defeatured when they have put so much into Team Liquid and the community while some random code A play on X korean team gets featured and can only hold 40 Concurrent viewers every time he streams. /end rant. | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On December 10 2011 13:50 Zerker wrote: Question. Why are so many professional korean players featured? If a requirement is to hold a concurrent 350 viewers 4/5th of those pro koreans cannot even come close to doing this. Is there some sort of unfair bais towards them or what? It really kinda annoys me when i see some people get defeatured when they have put so much into Team Liquid and the community while some random code A play on X korean team gets featured and can only hold 40 Concurrent viewers every time he streams. /end rant. They said if you have good tournament results or qualify for GSL code A you get instant feature as it counts which I agree with. It is insanely hard to qualify for Code A so any code A player that qualifies and streams imo should be featured as they are now ^^. | ||
|
Zerker
Canada201 Posts
On December 11 2011 08:09 blade55555 wrote: They said if you have good tournament results or qualify for GSL code A you get instant feature as it counts which I agree with. It is insanely hard to qualify for Code A so any code A player that qualifies and streams imo should be featured as they are now ^^. There lies the problem really, Whos to say that qualifying for a Code A spot is harder that placing Top 8 MLG, or Top 3 IPL, or Top 2 WCG? Where do you draw the line and if it's only for korean tournament (GSL) isn't that biased? | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
| ||
|
brachester
Australia1786 Posts
On December 11 2011 18:56 Torte de Lini wrote: Yes it's bias, but so is the concentration of the greatest players. It's harder to qualify for Code A than Top 8 MLG and Top 3 IPL because of the competition. but i think the qualifier got easier with the new format anyway, still, it's still harder than top 8 MLG imo | ||
|
Zerker
Canada201 Posts
On December 11 2011 23:47 brachester wrote: but i think the qualifier got easier with the new format anyway, still, it's still harder than top 8 MLG imo That's exactly where the argument starts too. Someone says IMO, Code A is harder than MLG top 8, For example, Someone else will disagree. You could argue till the cows come home but at the end of the day, Only having the ability to get featured by playing in GSL is biased. So you got 32 Code S players, 40 Code A players. Every month it's changing so it even increasing the amount of possiblity of GSL players being featured. See IMO its dumb, i'm all for featuring great players and if they deserve because they are amazing at the game I do think they DESERVE to be featured i just think the range of Korean players from the GSL is too large. Can you really disagree? IMO something more fair would like this. Big tournaments can get players featured by placing well. This would also include western tournaments like MLG although placing top 4 for example would be the requirement. So just as an example and take this with a grain of salt. ***EXAMPLE*** MLG top 4 GSL Code S(top 32) WCG Top 2 NASL Top 3 Current GSL TOP 72 IMO that would be fair and unbaised, but what do i know i've only been playing and following the starcraft 2 scene since the first week of beta. | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On December 12 2011 03:14 Zerker wrote: That's exactly where the argument starts too. Someone says IMO, Code A is harder than MLG top 8, For example, Someone else will disagree. You could argue till the cows come home but at the end of the day, Only having the ability to get featured by playing in GSL is biased. So you got 32 Code S players, 40 Code A players. Every month it's changing so it even increasing the amount of possiblity of GSL players being featured. See IMO its dumb, i'm all for featuring great players and if they deserve because they are amazing at the game I do think they DESERVE to be featured i just think the range of Korean players from the GSL is too large. Can you really disagree? IMO something more fair would like this. Big tournaments can get players featured by placing well. This would also include western tournaments like MLG although placing top 4 for example would be the requirement. So just as an example and take this with a grain of salt. ***EXAMPLE*** MLG top 4 GSL Code S(top 32) WCG Top 2 NASL Top 3 Current GSL TOP 72 IMO that would be fair and unbaised, but what do i know i've only been playing and following the starcraft 2 scene since the first week of beta. There is no disagreement unless the person is misinformed. The only thing that makes MLG harder is that there are less spots to get top 4 (only 4) than qualifying for Code A. We can argue all the day, but neither of our perspectives really count. | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On December 11 2011 16:27 Zerker wrote: There lies the problem really, Whos to say that qualifying for a Code A spot is harder that placing Top 8 MLG, or Top 3 IPL, or Top 2 WCG? Where do you draw the line and if it's only for korean tournament (GSL) isn't that biased? If you get top 8 MLG pretty sure you will be featured instantly (just like trimaster got for example and he didn't even make top 8). If you get top 3 IPL I imagine you will to. I would be surprised if TL didn't feature someone who got top 8 mlg/top 3 IPL. | ||
| ||
