|
United States22154 Posts
Vote count
DeepBlu2 (1) Palmar
stefftastiq (1) VisceraEyes
GiygaS(2) DeepBlu2 Mataza
GiygaS Leading with two votes, day ends in a little under 10 hours, remember to vote or be modkilled
EDIT: Also, no personal insults, attack the argument, not the person please.
|
YES guys. ##Unvote stefftastiq
The fact of the matter is that Mataza, while appearing guilty at first, had never really done anything OVERTLY anti-town. He suspected me of course, being one of the loudest voices opposing him...but that's only natural right? While I don't consider him "innocent as a newborn baby", I don't consider him guilty either. This is why I retracted my FoS on him and why I decided to instead cast my vote for an inactive to generate discussion. Luckily, yous guys didn't need my help as the discussion was obviously NOT generated by me, but rather by analysis and rationale. Kudos team.
Honestly I don't care if that looks scummy or not. It had the desired effect. Now to analyze. Thanks to your diligence, I have lots to go back and read. Expect a full report soon. *salute*
|
((OOC: Sorry about the idiot comment, I will keep it cleaner))
On May 18 2011 01:14 Karshe wrote: Then, his most eye raising act, he then takes it upon himself to defend Mataza, the town's biggest point of discussion, while pointing a completely random finger away from Mataza. And I mean, he really defends Mataza.
Hell yes I did!
I'd do it again... and you know what: I'm going to!
@Mataza
- Regarding Giyg
I don't think he's mafia, and I don't think you are either. You're obviously the more experienced player of you two, and at least your posts make sense, something I haven't been able to decode from Giyg's posts.
I really do think you're just two townies randomly pointing fingers at each other while the true scum sits back and enjoys the show. But this is just my gut feeling though, I don't have any evidence to back it up. Perhaps because I really just can't make anything useful out of Giyg's posts
I mean, the logic is quite simple:
Either he's spammy town or bad mafia. If he's bad mafia he's an easy lynch later on, and might even reveal more connections in the coming days. If he's spammy town... well then he's just spammy town.
So yeah, if he's mafia, then he's actually so bad that we can use it against them.
But I really don't think he is, I think the mafia lurks amongst the less active or moderately active players.
But then again... maybe lynching him is worth just getting rid of the shitstorm of useless posts he conjures...
|
My vote on Giygas is half cold, hard speculation and half policy lynch. He hurts town with posts that are inconclusive and badly written.
So @Palmar, why exactly do you want to keep him. He knows we are on to him. Even if he is bad mafia he will keep quiet now. While if he is gone he doesn´t distract us further.
Common sense: Active mafia will try to disrupt town conversation. Bad town might do that as well. Both are bad for town.
I am convinced that Giygas is the best lynch for today.
|
I want to keep him because I'm not afraid of him.
What I'm afraid of is going into day two with very little or no information about half the players in the game. How on earth are you going to analyse who is mafia amongst the people that have hardly said anything so far in the game?
Any information is better than no information. This is why I don't want to just let everyone bandwagon you in the first place, and then Gyig now. I want one of the people that aren't contributing against the wall.
On May 18 2011 02:01 Mataza wrote: Common sense: Active mafia will try to disrupt town conversation. Bad town might do that as well. Both are bad for town.
This is very much true. But I'd rather have to filter through tons of bad information injected by mafia, than having no information at all and just playing a guessing game. Actually, here's a promise for you, if everyone comes into the thread, contributes and makes good analysis of the situation, I will switch my vote to GiygaS and help you get him lynched.
Just so you know how I think in this game. Karshe recently posted an analysis on me, and accused me of being red. This only reduced the chance of me going after him, because he is at least trying to contribute.
|
Hello town! First I must apoligize for my absence. I have been quite busy lately, and this is the first time i'm home since the game started. I realize there is not much left of the first day.
Mataza is quite active, but I do not think he is a mafia, and I do not find his behaviour suspicious. He is asking questions that I think are well placed.
##Vote Giygas
|
Hello lynch canididate number 2.
Paraphrased: "I have a weak excuse. Don´t modkill me."
What is more probable: "I agree with the guy blaming my partner in crime. That makes me look innocent" or "I agree with the guy who was suspected the most during the day. I don´t think any of the scummy things he said were scummy, because I like to believe."
If Giygas flips scum, I´d say he is our target for day 2.
|
@Skrammen
Hi, could you please, in a very short while, provide A LOT more content for us to analyze? I was kinda hoping you would get modkilled.
|
Hi Skrammen,
We're glad you were able to make it, but we need you to post more information.
If you're thinking you will not be able to play as a result of real life, you can request a replacement.
Otherwise, we will need you to post more analysis and not just bandwagon... or you risk being lynched as a result of being a non-helpful townie.
|
Not enough discussion today, getting worried.
To reiterate what Palmar has said,
On May 18 2011 02:23 Palmar wrote: But I'd rather have to filter through tons of bad information injected by mafia, than having no information at all and just playing a guessing game.
and my own stance on Day 1:
On May 17 2011 01:53 Karshe wrote: Inactives are a mixed bag for me. I agree that lynching them isn't the wisest choice because there's a low chance they are mafia... but inactives also irritate me to no end. I understand that RL > TL and things come up, but why join the game if you're not going to play? It just ruins the spirit of the game for me and I have low tolerence/patience for inactives.
I have a low tolerance for inactive players. I am still very suspicious of Mataza, but I would much rather have him in the game and posting consistantly compared to someone who posts once in this thread and once in the vote thread.
Lynching an inactive poster may not give us very much information on Day 2, but I believe it will help us in the long run because we will have more information to dissect from active players in future days.
So, my intetion is to vote for an inactive as we get closer to night time. I'm allowing more time for those inactive to post some analysis, or request a replacement.
|
Sorry, few spelling errors in there... I really hate not being able to edit. =P
But my stance has been made.
|
Maybe we cracked down too much on people trying to create drama 'cause I have to agree with Karshe that there is too little discussion going on.
So I'm asking everybody (and that include you, person who is reading this now) to post who they would like to get lynched on day2 in case they themselves will get assassinated during the night. I think that I might be a target (hoping for a cute nurse to help me out though!) so this is probably quite relevant. This will be great for town, we can have you analytical skills readily available for day2 even if you get killed during the night!
So let me say that I've cracked down a bit on the active people, but in the end I think I am going to vote for an inactive player because the evil you don't know is far more scary than the evil you do know! This will most likely only be for day1 though and I'm sure the scums already know that. So if they eliminate me it will be because they might be afraid that I will try to rally people to kill off someone who I think is a scum, and who is active.
People who fit this description according to my posts so far are VisceraEyes and GiygaS, I said that if they turned on each other they would most likely be one scum, one good guy. So if I happen to get mafia killed on first night I think these are people you should really watch out for, but probably only one of them is scum!
So what about you people, if you had to write a testament to the town today, what would it say?
And by the way, I am going to write a vote post in around an hour, so it will be up before two hours.
((OOC: Oh and Palmar, no hard feelings about the "idiot" thing ))
|
I will write my testament at night, after we know the result of todays lynch. I have a small hitlist already, pretty sure scum are in there. By the way, the lynchvotes are unstable. I hope we get some votes in the last hours, because if we stay under 3 votes, scum can just all vote on a townie and we waste our lynch. Hell they don´t even need to all vote. They just need to ensure a mislynch with 1 or 2 votes.
People vote!
|
If no vote means modkill, this game will be over in 4 hours.
Right now only 4 people voted. You can´t be serious.
|
My thoughts on this post are in BOLD
On May 17 2011 21:48 prplhz wrote:Yo people I see that people have started voting now, around 16 hours before deadline. This is not good people. Unvoting is very suspucious and there is still plenty of time for people to provide material to analyze. Of course some claim to do it for the sake of discussion but I still think that this is very bad. In addition to this I do not think that any of these votes are currently well founded, they are wild accusations at best. First of all, in my opinion, having perfect conviction and unerring foresight are NOT prerequisites to being a good townie. In fact, if people have it in their minds that unvoting is suspicious, they won't vote until someone tells them it's the right thing to do. People should make up their own minds and vote according to what they think is right for the town. And if that changes, that's totally fine. Unvoting isn't suspicious...what's suspicious is the TIMING of unvoting.I also think that it is bad that people have removed focus from Mataza. While he might not be scum this town has him very much under control. He is very active and has agreed to answer every question directed at him. These are very useful qualities for town to find in a player, no matter if he is scum or townie. We should have tried to use these qualities to hunt scum. So wait...is it bad or is it good that people have removed focus? You appear to have nothing against Mataza from this passage, aside from the fact that people aren't focusing on him anymore.I would love to have waited with this post until GiygaS next post but lets just go ahead and do some analysis. I do not think that Mataza is harmful for this town just yet. He is under control so far, I would like him to be more harmful for the Mafia though. So I ask this: @Mataza : With the information available to you now, who would you lynch if you should lynch the player you think is most likely to be Scum? Further evidence that you're okay with Mataza...asking his advice as you feel he has qualities you can use to hunt scum.So I'm going to go ahead and do something that VisceraEyes has done several time. Point fingers at some random person for the sake of discussion. And this random person is going to be VisceraEyes himself. Some reasons (so it's not entirely random who I am pointing fingers at) for this: 1. He was the first person who point fingers at others. While he might have done this for the sake of discussion, I think that mostly scum would do this early on in the game. Townies would consider how the other person might be a townie and how unfounded accusations might harm the town, even if you made it clear that they are unfounded. While this is a game of finger pointing, and we can't all do it simultaneously...being the FIRST to point fingers shouldn't really be a scum-tell...SOMEONE is going to be first, and there's no reason to believe that it will be scum.2. He is often analyzing his own actions. This is something I think you would (should) mainly do when you are scum. There is nothing to fear as a townie, only thing you have to consider is how the town can benefit the most from your actions. While we would all like to survive this game I think this is done best by being honest and only analytical of the actions of potential scum. I'm not sure what you mean by 'analyzing my own actions', but I've been nothing but honest and forthright with everyone from the beginning. Obviously there's no way to prove that, but I've also given you no reason to doubt me.3. He has just something I would deem crazy to do if you were a townie. He suddenly said "this guy I have been bashing all game long, maybe he's not scum so I'm just gonna vote for someone and provide very limited rationale for this". This is not only very scum-like in my eyes, it is also harmful to the town. Okay, speaking to this...I had a scummy feeling about Mataza from the beginning, and I FoS'd him. I didn't 'bash' anyone 'all game long'. Not only that, but I shifted my focus OFF of someone you've spent a lot of this post BUILDING UP as someone useful for town. I fail to see how me NO LONGER SUSPECTING someone you feel is trustworthy would indicate scumminess.@VisceraEyes : Do you think that it is beneficial for the town that you suddenly make a 180 in letting Mataza off the hook and go full force against stefftastiq? Off the hook? But...you....you said you....but...Guy, these contradictions are getting palpable.Another player who has struck me as harmful to the town is Palmar. He has recently used some very questionable rhetorics to defend Mataza, and while it might be good that Mataza is not lynched, questionable rhetorics are always harmful to town. But on the other hand he also appears to be a very strong player who the town can make good use of later on, so maybe it is just a question of getting him under control @Palmar : Why do you think Mataza is "innocent as a newborn baby"? Gutfeeling is not an acceptable answer Think that was it for now. I will try to vote around 4 hours before deadline. Finals notes on what I think all townies should currently be aware of: Lurking townies make it possible for scum to play lurker style too. I think everybody should get up and post some analysis, if you are a townie this is absolutely the best thing you can do. We still missing a couple of you but this is making the game very much harder for town! I would consider any of the prospective modkills (Skrammen, Wunder) showing up in the nick of time to cast crucial votes for the lynching VERY suspicious. Even if they decide to show up now I think they will be very harmful to town if they don't post a lot in a very short amount of time. It is very good to have people under control; the more they post the more we can ask questions and the more we can make ourselves sure that someone is scum/townie. We will probably have two modkills but maybe it will be beneficial to town to lynch one of the least active players, to set an example, to make the game more fun, to maybe hit a lurking scum! Oh yeah and GiygaS; my nick is "purple haze" without any vowels or spaces
You talk a lot about being "In Control" of people...you don't control anyone my friend. And neither does the town. It is for this attitude and the thoughts posted in the quote above that I now FoS: prplhz
|
As for my vote, I still intend to vote for an inactive for reasons I've already stated, but I wanted to give as much time as possible to allow for them to speak up.
I feel like we've got some scum lurking and waiting to put in a last minute vote to bandwagon whoever the town has decided on.
|
Hello everyone!
On the subject of me having 3 votes, I'm more worried about who could slip by. Namely Skrammen.
Skrammen hasn't posted at all until suddenly, he burst on the scene: Announcing his business the last few days very vaguely, Then jumps on the current trend of voting for me, without any reasoning behind doing so. This seems very dangerous to me, so I'm going to vote for him for the same reason that prplhz has reasoned: an evil unknown is far greater then a known one.
##Vote Skrammen
|
Also, if he posts with some more lgit content I`ll probably unvote and move to another last minute bandwagon jumper
|
EBWODP:
Also, you say that you're going to vote for an inactive this lynch, yet you're suspicious of me for doing that very thing...for that very reason. I'm so confused it's ridiculous, and inciting confusion is something scummy people LOVE to do.
|
Yea I'm gonna go ahead and vote now.
##Vote Skrammen
Reason for this is that he just comes in 8 hours before day1 ends, casts and vote with 2 paragraphs of resonable and does not respond to our pleas that he post some more content. I am going to be honest with you and say that maybe he's not the one who is most likely to be scum but I think he's the most harmful for the town right now.
If I should have voted for most likely to be scum I would vote for VisceraEyes for reasons I have already stated. Also his latest post is not really convincing me of anything else either.
To answer the post VisceraEyes just made, the one that was mainly about me; No I don't control anybody Other than that I can't seem to find anything in your post I should need to comment on because mostly you're just saying that you disagree with what I said.
|
|
|
|