|
Alright, with a little less than 4 hours until voting is closed, I think we should decide now to choose who to lynch; so that it gives time to players who are away at this moment to see what we're up to. And also it will reduce the amount of people who will switch their vote at the last minute.
Right now, I'm guessing the votes will be either against: jpak or RaGe.
I personally think it would be beneficial to the town if we lynch jpak during Day 1 (Even if it means if we have to wait until Day 2 to lynch RaGe if we really want to), mostly due to that fact that jpak has given nothing at all that is beneficial to the town, while RaGe has at least given us a starting point as to who to lynch.
If I counted correctly, RaGe and jpak both have six votes against them at this time.
|
On April 20 2010 06:12 KF91 wrote: Alright, with a little less than 4 hours until voting is closed, I think we should decide now to choose who to lynch; so that it gives time to players who are away at this moment to see what we're up to. And also it will reduce the amount of people who will switch their vote at the last minute.
Right now, I'm guessing the votes will be either against: jpak or RaGe.
I personally think it would be beneficial to the town if we lynch jpak during Day 1 (Even if it means if we have to wait until Day 2 to lynch RaGe if we really want to), mostly due to that fact that jpak has given nothing at all that is beneficial to the town, while RaGe has at least given us a starting point as to who to lynch.
If I counted correctly, RaGe and jpak both have six votes against them at this time.
You need 20 votes to lynch, and I'm not changing my vote. Also, I would like to thank you for going over older posts and answering questions addressed to you.
|
On April 20 2010 06:11 Bill Murray wrote:Show nested quote +On April 20 2010 04:57 KF91 wrote: Alright, now that we can see that RoL is back and he is trying to catch up on what has been happening, I am changing my vote to jpak. Agreeing with Infun, I believe that RoL can be asset to the town because he is able to give detailed insight.
Jpak on the other hand has not posted anything useful at all. (I think he's only made 4 posts so far post-Day1?) I don't understand this at fucking all. When you are green you have big posts, and I had you written off as green, but your shift towards smaller posts is AWAY from your green meta and really had me thinking that you are red. Let's lynch KF91.Show nested quote +On April 20 2010 04:26 KF91 wrote: I honestly don't really understand why he continues to hate on me for being "annoying" when I (In my point of view) haven't done anything to a far extent to annoy him.
Well, I don't find you annoying, but when you are green you tend to come out and actually accuse people instead of squirming and getting defensive with very short posts. When you are green you craft elaborate posts, and you are not doing that, so therefore you will flip scum when we lynch you.
BM, remember that the micro-mafia game was the "first" mafia game I played in, and it's a completely different setting than this one. Since this game is more active and there are more people than the micro one, I cannot sit down to carefully analyze through each post for each person just for Day 1. There's too much to work with and I personally think that it would be a waste of time.
When it reaches Day 3 or so (We would have about 10 less players than right now), I think it would be more manageable for me to start analyzing and accusing people.
And the reason I have smaller posts at this moment is I really believe that we are going to end with a no lynch on this day if the activity does not stop. The closest we have to a majority at this moment is six votes on RaGe and jpak. So I'm just trying to get people back into the thread to read and post and maybe eventually we'll get that lynch going.
|
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
On April 19 2010 15:21 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On April 19 2010 15:07 tree.hugger wrote:On April 19 2010 13:45 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On April 19 2010 13:44 tree.hugger wrote:On April 19 2010 12:32 Scamp wrote: Fun note: Tree.Hugger didn't read the rules! Oh dammit. I thought they had been put back in for some reason. I double checked, of course. Obviously. Fun note, we had already discussed this earlier in the thread via my own major post. So you failed on two counts. Reading is fun. Yeah, I found that discussion too. But ignored it, forgot it? interesting... Well, I found it after the fact.
So uh... I'm running for mayor?
On April 20 2010 03:40 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On April 18 2010 09:00 jpak wrote: Well I'm excited for this game! this is my first Mafia game, and let's have fun. The only 4 posts he has made this thread (two of which were before game start, 2 after). You have just been auto flagged for worst townie slot. Someone who is excited to play, then a) hasn't posted anything and b) has failed to read the thread either makes you an uncaring/bad townie or obvious Mafia. Your now my vote.
Or just someone disappointed to not get a blue role, or overwhelmed by the amount of posting. Took me a while to get over it too.
On April 20 2010 04:35 Bill Murray wrote:Show nested quote +On April 19 2010 11:25 tree.hugger wrote:For all the talk earlier on about the role of assassins in the town, I think we need to understand that while assassin posting should aim towards prolonging the game; the town can't rely on the the assassins to act on the town's behalf. But here's something for dts to think about. If you role-check an assassin, you should definitely get in contact with them. Remember that: On April 13 2010 11:22 flamewheel91 wrote: Each Assassin will have two role checks to use per game, and two night kills per game.
Which means that finding an assassin can help you find other townies with which you can begin to develop a town circle. Not only that, but since the assassin's objective has absolutely no bearing on the game as a whole, detectives should be able to work in a pro-town way with the assassin. Remember that assassin hits... On April 13 2010 11:22 flamewheel91 wrote: If you manage to kill another Assassin with your night kill, it will be refunded.
... don't count against the assassin's total if they correctly hit another assassin. Therefore, detectives should be able to, if you play your card right, get the assassin to take out some spare mafia as well. Therefore, DETECTIVES:A) Rolecheck an assassin B) Establish contact C) Establish quid-pro-quo D) Provide names, receive names E) Establish more contacts F) Order hits Objections to this plan? Yes, I have an objection to this plan. Let's assume you're a detective: you can't out yourself in the thread or you will die. Let's assume you're another town role: you won't be able to find out who they are Let's assume you're an assassin lying about being a detective: This would really benefit you My objection to this plan is that the only person it would benefit is a lying assassin, which I am labeling you as I have an objection to this plan too. I failed at reading the thread rules, and the entire thing is not possible. But actually, I'm pretty confused, seeing as how you asked earlier:
On April 19 2010 14:40 Bill Murray wrote: sc1 i didnt know u were one of the chosen few to have sc2
Mod: am i allowed to pm if its not about mafia?
And yet you didn't pick up upon this at all in my post.
No reason to bring this back up, unless you're trying to accuse me of something, which, apparently, you are. Might as well just go out and accuse me of being a 'lying assassin' and then be so good as to tell us all what that means. But honestly, your timing makes no sense.
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
Where did this Rage bandwagon come from!? Was his post really that suspicious?
We really need a change of attitude here imo.
I propose a town-wide ban (with lynching if not lived by) on accusations/analysis of previous posts until Day 2, and a lynch of the currently least active, most voted person RebirthOfLegend
Because let's face it, we're not going to be able to have enough of us agree on an already suspicious person to be able to lynch him on day 1, and we're only helping mafia decide which townies to snipe atm.
This would help us focus on getting a decent plan together for the rest of the game.
As far as I can tell, this post helps to focus the town down a road towards a lynch. Voting towards the "least active, most voted person" seems like a sound plan to get a lynch done. Perhaps you folks voting for Rage could elaborate a little more. I realize Caller's already posted a reason, but were that many people suddenly convinced? Caller's argument seemed a bit thin to me.
|
On April 20 2010 06:14 Jugan wrote:Show nested quote +On April 20 2010 06:12 KF91 wrote: Alright, with a little less than 4 hours until voting is closed, I think we should decide now to choose who to lynch; so that it gives time to players who are away at this moment to see what we're up to. And also it will reduce the amount of people who will switch their vote at the last minute.
Right now, I'm guessing the votes will be either against: jpak or RaGe.
I personally think it would be beneficial to the town if we lynch jpak during Day 1 (Even if it means if we have to wait until Day 2 to lynch RaGe if we really want to), mostly due to that fact that jpak has given nothing at all that is beneficial to the town, while RaGe has at least given us a starting point as to who to lynch.
If I counted correctly, RaGe and jpak both have six votes against them at this time. You need 20 votes to lynch, and I'm not changing my vote. Also, I would like to thank you for going over older posts and answering questions addressed to you. Gah, it seems I misread the rule, I thought it meant we couldn't have ties. No way we're gonna get 20 votes...
Still, very pro-town behavior you got there.
|
On April 20 2010 06:23 Radfield wrote:Where did this Rage bandwagon come from!? Was his post really that suspicious? Show nested quote + We really need a change of attitude here imo.
I propose a town-wide ban (with lynching if not lived by) on accusations/analysis of previous posts until Day 2, and a lynch of the currently least active, most voted person RebirthOfLegend
Because let's face it, we're not going to be able to have enough of us agree on an already suspicious person to be able to lynch him on day 1, and we're only helping mafia decide which townies to snipe atm.
This would help us focus on getting a decent plan together for the rest of the game.
As far as I can tell, this post helps to focus the town down a road towards a lynch. Voting towards the "least active, most voted person" seems like a sound plan to get a lynch done. Perhaps you folks voting for Rage could elaborate a little more. I realize Caller's already posted a reason, but were that many people suddenly convinced? Caller's argument seemed a bit thin to me.
On April 20 2010 04:07 RaGe wrote:Show nested quote +On April 20 2010 03:38 Bill Murray wrote:On April 20 2010 02:59 RaGe wrote: We really need a change of attitude here imo.
I propose a town-wide ban (with lynching if not lived by) on accusations/analysis of previous posts until Day 2, and a lynch of the currently least active, most voted person RebirthOfLegend
Because let's face it, we're not going to be able to have enough of us agree on an already suspicious person to be able to lynch him on day 1, and we're only helping mafia decide which townies to snipe atm.
This would help us focus on getting a decent plan together for the rest of the game. you are so red .. thanks? Way to continue your spree of just spreading confusion. If you come up with a reason why this would hurt town I'll happily listen. But you just continue the problem I addressed. Is this really what you're going to do all mafia game? Call people out, offer no reasoning and when people call you out you either whine about being always accused or go "yeah just lynch me i'll be green". Town, we must unite. If my proposition doesn't suit you, shoot it down with reasoning. If we're going to allow any idea to be shot down with 'you are so red' I have no idea how people want to achieve something. If behavior inherently disrupts the town's chances of winning we should not hesitate to banish it.
|
Can somebody kill me tonight? I'm a Detective!. Please kill me.
|
On April 20 2010 06:26 Ace wrote: Can somebody kill me tonight? I'm a Detective!. Please kill me.
So Ace is there some master agenda behind your "be a whiny bitch" plan this game?
|
Yea. I'm playing for myself. I've even created a new PM for myself and set up my own win conditions.
I can use 3 role checks per night and 1 during the day.
I've also got this awesome ability call "bullshit detector". It even comes with an extra super power called "make people bitch when you don't play they way they want you to". So far it looks like it's kicking in.
When the town plays retarded I figure I shouldn't play seriously either.
Assuming God really does have a sick sense of humor and I live tonight, I'll be randomly throwing out names of people that I investigated to be scummy. In fact, some of these players may not even be in the game like L.
|
On April 20 2010 06:24 CynanMachae wrote:Show nested quote +On April 20 2010 06:14 Jugan wrote:On April 20 2010 06:12 KF91 wrote: Alright, with a little less than 4 hours until voting is closed, I think we should decide now to choose who to lynch; so that it gives time to players who are away at this moment to see what we're up to. And also it will reduce the amount of people who will switch their vote at the last minute.
Right now, I'm guessing the votes will be either against: jpak or RaGe.
I personally think it would be beneficial to the town if we lynch jpak during Day 1 (Even if it means if we have to wait until Day 2 to lynch RaGe if we really want to), mostly due to that fact that jpak has given nothing at all that is beneficial to the town, while RaGe has at least given us a starting point as to who to lynch.
If I counted correctly, RaGe and jpak both have six votes against them at this time. You need 20 votes to lynch, and I'm not changing my vote. Also, I would like to thank you for going over older posts and answering questions addressed to you. Gah, it seems I misread the rule, I thought it meant we couldn't have ties. No way we're gonna get 20 votes... Still, very pro-town behavior you got there.
This post is scummy. You get the prize! I'm role checking you tonight.
|
On April 20 2010 03:53 Bill Murray wrote:Show nested quote +On April 20 2010 03:51 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On April 20 2010 03:38 Bill Murray wrote:On April 20 2010 02:59 RaGe wrote: We really need a change of attitude here imo.
I propose a town-wide ban (with lynching if not lived by) on accusations/analysis of previous posts until Day 2, and a lynch of the currently least active, most voted person RebirthOfLegend
Because let's face it, we're not going to be able to have enough of us agree on an already suspicious person to be able to lynch him on day 1, and we're only helping mafia decide which townies to snipe atm.
This would help us focus on getting a decent plan together for the rest of the game. you are so red So is motbob. hurr durr i thought he was blue
This guy is obviously legit. Make sure you don't let him die medics.
|
On April 19 2010 14:40 Jugan wrote:2v2 in SC1 or SC2? note for Qatol: he posted like 2 seconds before i posted mine.
Smartest guy in the thread by far.
|
Better get yourself another tampon, you're bleeding all over the place.
|
On April 20 2010 04:46 Radfield wrote:Show nested quote +On April 20 2010 04:36 CynanMachae wrote: Oh I also forgot to point out that I'm hesitating putting my vote on RoL right now because 3 of those voting for him are among the players I find likely red (IntoTheWow, Rage and TheLardyLooser) Then jump on the jpak bandwagon! We got plenty of room! At least 20 seats! Seriously Pluses: He's almost as inactive as RoL; Already cast a vote so he's out of modkill danger (we won't waste our lynch) Minuses:
wait my bad. This guy is. Don't let him die - only hope for the town to win.
|
On April 20 2010 04:44 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: sorry for my inactivity, I am catching up right now. I am on page 18. I was working a lot all weekend.
Scummy even in real life. Only Mafia have jobs.
|
From: flamewheel91 Subject: Your Fate Date: Some Random Day Welcome to TL Mafia XXII aka kill yourself or live trying!
Your role is: Failure
Every day you will be forced to read the thread full of idiots discussing things that gets them no closer to winning! They will randomly bandwagon each other, call Day 1 a crapshoot and an excuse not to scum hunt and then go down in a big ball of doom.
Powers: You are a Detective! You also have 3 nukes.
PM flamewheel91 if you have any questions about your role or the meaning of life.
|
OK that did made me giggle... But I'm not proud of it.
|
Promised return from inactivity begins now.
My personal two cents on several topics:
1)- Jugan is most likely town. As much as I dislike his aggressive/confrontational playing style, he is playing exactly like he did in Mafia XVI, where he was innocent. In that game, he vehemently disagreed and criticized Citi.zen constantly throughout the entire game. Citi.zen turned out to be right about nearly all of the mafia, and some of Jugan's suggestions as "clearly town" were red, but Jugan flipped green. He's acting the same way right now, and, if he says something suspicious later, we'll have tons and tons of posts to read back over. No point in killing him, especially not right away.
2)- At this point I'm fine with lynching jpak, or any of the other inactives. Day 1 lynch is basically a crapshoot. Realistically speaking, no one has done anything that dead gives them away as red, so why kill someone who is talking, when if they keep talking, they'll give away information about themselves.
3)- All the posters commenting with things like "you guys are useless players", "watching One Piece >>>>>>>>>>> this crap" are annoying as balls. If you don't enjoy playing mafia with new players, why did you sign up for this game. I don't enjoy reading dumb arguments either, but it's a part of the game, and bitching about it isn't going to magically make people less stupid. If someone posts something you think is dumb, pointing out why would be more beneficial to everyone in the game than saying that the thread is crap, and reminiscing about the good old days when mafia games were highly intellectual, coke was 25c a bottle, and you had to walk 20 miles to school uphill both ways. I respect many of the veterans as good players, but the fact that you're a good player shouldn't be cause to be a condescending dick to everyone
|
WELCOME TO ACE'S AUCTION HOUSE!
THE ONLY GAME WITHIN A GAME THAT YOU CAN PLAY IN TOWN! FUCK YEA - IT'S POSSIBLE TO LOSE TWICE WITH ONE SPIN!
Rules
Every player is given some $$ to start with. Being that Ace no longer gives a shit and is actually in debt to some Mexican Escort Agency (aka hooker farm) he needs to pay or die. Alas, the genius Mafia god himself has come up with a brilliant idea! Also not everyone starts with equal amounts of money because that's just life. Deal with it.
As a Detective I will be selling my services! The player that bids highest will get me to rolecheck another player in the game! However don't blow all your $100 too fast! Check out all the offers below!
- Role check - Highest Bidder
- Call someone a bullshitter - $20
- Logic/Scum Logic Translator - $30 (15 if your name is RoL)
- Point out someone is playing like ass - $50
Bidder's List - Cash Available
- Zona - $100
- CynanMachae - $100
- tree.hugger - $75
- d3_crescentia - $50
- KF91 - $100
- iNfuNdiBuLuM - $75
- RebirthOfLegend - $100
- BloodyC0bbler - $200
- Jugan - $30
- Scaramanga - $0 (get a job)
- Bill Murray - $100
- Fishball - $85
- RaGe - $100
- Foolishness - $no
- Scamp - $100
- Abenson - $90
- Caller - $175
- [NyC]HoBbes - $100
- meeple - $120
- Fulgrim - $70
- JadeFist - $100
- Roffles - $100
- krndandaman - $0
- Falcynn - $40
- nbtnbt5 - $60
- IntoTheWow - $100
- Incognito - $25
- love1another - $66
- AcrossFiveJulys - $50
- nAi.PrOtOsS - $0.50
- DarthThienAn - $60
- Radfield - $100
- TheLardyGooser - $80
- Osmoses - $2
- jpak - $21
- motbob - $100
- madnessman - $75
Now I know someone is going to be complete dick and fuck up the business. In the event that this happens I will die with your $$ and there are no refunds. Sometimes shit happens. Oh well.
LET THE BIDDING BEGIN!
|
|
|
|