Just because you are 120 apm over a 30-60 minute game doesn't mean you are slow for the 3-5 seconds that this game takes.
Popoint Flash game - Page 2
Forum Index > General Forum |
Aileon
United States299 Posts
Just because you are 120 apm over a 30-60 minute game doesn't mean you are slow for the 3-5 seconds that this game takes. | ||
SonuvBob
Aiur21549 Posts
| ||
Aileon
United States299 Posts
On February 10 2008 16:13 SonuvBob wrote: Apm doesn't really mean anything here, I was joking about that :p. But my accuracy is shit and I've gotten near the "record". <2 seconds may not happen, but I'm sure someone w/better accuracy can at least get under 2.5 on a lucky board. Yea. The issue is you have to be consistent as well. I am sometimes less accurate than optimal, so sometimes I will get like a 4.3 or something and be like "fuck, that was a retarded break, I could have had sub 3 there." I have yet to crack below 3.6 though. Out of curiousity, what kind of mouse are you using? I am using a Razer Diamondback. I'm not sure it makes a whole lot of difference, but I would imagine with a 400 DPI mouse or something it would be much more difficult than with a gaming mouse such as one of Razer's products that has 1600-2000 dpi | ||
SonuvBob
Aiur21549 Posts
Clearly this was a good use of my time. http://rapidshare.com/files/90589373/bob_popoint_2_808.avi.html (For whatever reason, the circles don't show up right in the recording with Camstudio) | ||
B1nary
Canada1267 Posts
| ||
fusionsdf
Canada15390 Posts
wooo 4.6 | ||
SonuvBob
Aiur21549 Posts
On February 10 2008 16:33 B1nary wrote: sigh... this is like playing starcraft. I somehow always manage to click on everything except what I intended to click. Try going slow for a few, just trying to be accurate, then ramp it up to crazy speed. | ||
Aileon
United States299 Posts
Shrug, I guess they are better than a random microsoft mouse. I would probably kill myself trying to play that game with a standard microsoft mouse (although I guess nowadays they are starting to make some pretty solid optical mice) or even worse a trackball. | ||
Aileon
United States299 Posts
Well played sir, well played. | ||
Aileon
United States299 Posts
| ||
SonuvBob
Aiur21549 Posts
| ||
Jonoman92
United States9101 Posts
| ||
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
Blind
United States2528 Posts
On February 10 2008 16:53 Jonoman92 wrote: What exactly makes you think that you need a new mouse though? SonuvBob seems to have done fine with an "old, semi-broken MX500 (at either 400 or 800dpi)."This makes me think I need a new mouse, or i'm just hella slow either one. My best was 4.582 but my accuracy is pretty terrible. My best time was 3.9~ with a really old logitech mini. I am slow though. Nice video by the way SonuvBob. That was insane. | ||
artofmagic
United States1951 Posts
you probably process the number with the aid of the color.. there are 3 set of colors.. -initially you find 1 and take note on its color.. you use that color to zone out only to that color and find the next number.. -repeat starting with the next smallest integer. my highest score is 3~.. ( dont have a good mouse and 3 hour over my normal bedtime) | ||
chicken`
Germany3478 Posts
| ||
MasterOfChaos
Germany2896 Posts
| ||
liosama
Australia843 Posts
word of advice to the geeks, im not saying that i am great, it is a sarcastic comment. I do not claim superior paint skills. | ||
merz
Sweden2760 Posts
| ||
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
| ||
| ||