| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Aileon
United States299 Posts
These threads are always fun for everyone to post their best scores. Anyone got 3.967 beat? I don't recall seeing a sub-4 second one the last time we did one of these, but I would love to see what you all can do! I remember rekrul got like 4.016 or something one time. http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i62/Aileon/Popoint39.jpg | ||
|
SonuvBob
Aiur21552 Posts
I expect someone to get under 2. | ||
|
Aileon
United States299 Posts
I don't recall anyone ever getting below 4 last time we did these threads, so I really don't see where the "I expect someone to get 1.xxx" is coming from, but ok. | ||
|
SonuvBob
Aiur21552 Posts
| ||
|
Aileon
United States299 Posts
On February 10 2008 15:06 SonuvBob wrote: Well getting under 4 was pretty easy, and I haven't played anything requiring mouse coordination in over a year. Considering this is a forum for a game requiring ridiculous speed and accuracy, I expect some far better scores. I haven't either. I've been playing Dota for the last year and a half (much less speed/accuracy than BW). But a sub-4 score still took me about 15-20 tries to get. And like I said, the last few times I can recall these threads being done, I don't recall scores that were sub-4 seconds. I remember some 4.1s, 4.2s and the like, and we had some really good players doing it. As I said in the original post, rekrul was close to breaking 3.xxx. But saying someone will get 1.xxx? That is just out of hand. 2.xxx MAYBE. A mid to low 3 would be really impressive, and a 2.9 would be redic. But I really can't see a sub-2 second score. | ||
|
Zanno
United States1484 Posts
there's an awful lot of luck involved in getting a really good time, if a sequence is physically close to each other then it's easier to read and takes much less time to click if anyone is really bent on getting a good time at this you might want to know you can keep clicking even if you get blinded by a misclick | ||
|
Aileon
United States299 Posts
| ||
|
SonuvBob
Aiur21552 Posts
![[image loading]](http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/6916/game3331wi2.png) | ||
|
Aileon
United States299 Posts
| ||
|
Aileon
United States299 Posts
| ||
|
p4fn2w
401 Posts
| ||
|
SonuvBob
Aiur21552 Posts
| ||
|
Zanno
United States1484 Posts
On February 10 2008 15:18 p4fn2w wrote: someone call nadaGetting a sub 2-second score would be clicking faster than 450 APM... | ||
|
clazziquai
6685 Posts
On February 10 2008 15:23 Zanno wrote: someone call nada ROFL!! I got 4.7 | ||
|
clazziquai
6685 Posts
| ||
|
SonuvBob
Aiur21552 Posts
![[image loading]](http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/1740/game3143ah0.png) On September 27 2005 01:13 a-game wrote: http://www.bleacheatingfreaks.com/flash/games/popoint.html post your high and utilize the colours, white is first 5 blocks, green is next 5, yellow is final 5 Current Time to Beat: 2.899 by Pumpkin *note, video proof is recommended in case of disputes click the below link to learn/download a vod making program http://www.fraps.com/ | ||
|
Aileon
United States299 Posts
Is there an SS of that one? | ||
|
SonuvBob
Aiur21552 Posts
On September 28 2005 20:12 Pumpkin wrote: Sure, i'll try to get the program working tommorow if i have time. With that said, i've broken 3 ! Props to the other guy with 2.988, he wasn't lying about the " You cheat beotch!!!! ". 2.899 ![[image loading]](http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/2879/28992hb.jpg) I'm almost there: http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/6715/game2907tk9.png | ||
|
InfeSteD
United States4658 Posts
| ||
|
Zanno
United States1484 Posts
On February 10 2008 15:19 SonuvBob wrote: well, peak apm would be a better indicator for this game, remember us slow noobs tends to go several seconds without doing anything useful once the lategame rolls inIf my 120apm ass can get 3.33, I'm sure someone can do far better. | ||
| ||
|
|
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
The PondCast
Online Event
Korean StarCraft League
Afreeca Starleague
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
BSL Open Qualifier
Sparkling Tuna Cup
IPSL
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
