I know there have been threads about this in the past (for those who don't know what I'm talking about, this is the game: http://www.bleacheatingfreaks.com/flash/games/popoint.html It is a flash game that tests reflexes and hand eye coordination).

These threads are always fun for everyone to post their best scores.

Anyone got 3.967 beat? I don't recall seeing a sub-4 second one the last time we did one of these, but I would love to see what you all can do! I remember rekrul got like 4.016 or something one time.

http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i62/Aileon/Popoint39.jpg

SonuvBob

Aiur21549 Posts

February 10 2008 05:59 GMT

3.873

I expect someone to get under 2.

Aileon

United States299 Posts

February 10 2008 06:03 GMT

Under 2 would be retarded. You would just have to get an insane break on the blocks. ie have them all line up perfectly.

I don't recall anyone ever getting below 4 last time we did these threads, so I really don't see where the "I expect someone to get 1.xxx" is coming from, but ok.

SonuvBob

Aiur21549 Posts

February 10 2008 06:06 GMT

Well getting under 4 was pretty easy, and I haven't played anything requiring mouse coordination in over a year. Considering this is a forum for a game requiring ridiculous speed and accuracy, I expect some far better scores.

Aileon

United States299 Posts

February 10 2008 06:11 GMT

On February 10 2008 15:06 SonuvBob wrote:
Well getting under 4 was pretty easy, and I haven't played anything requiring mouse coordination in over a year. Considering this is a forum for a game requiring ridiculous speed and accuracy, I expect some far better scores.

I haven't either. I've been playing Dota for the last year and a half (much less speed/accuracy than BW). But a sub-4 score still took me about 15-20 tries to get. And like I said, the last few times I can recall these threads being done, I don't recall scores that were sub-4 seconds. I remember some 4.1s, 4.2s and the like, and we had some really good players doing it. As I said in the original post, rekrul was close to breaking 3.xxx.

But saying someone will get 1.xxx? That is just out of hand. 2.xxx MAYBE. A mid to low 3 would be really impressive, and a 2.9 would be redic. But I really can't see a sub-2 second score.

Zanno

United States1484 Posts

February 10 2008 06:11 GMT

best i did was 4.045 seconds

there's an awful lot of luck involved in getting a really good time, if a sequence is physically close to each other then it's easier to read and takes much less time to click

if anyone is really bent on getting a good time at this you might want to know you can keep clicking even if you get blinded by a misclick

Aileon

United States299 Posts

February 10 2008 06:12 GMT

Yea, sometimes you just have to keep going until you get some good breaks. But it is completely random, so it isn't like we aren't all getting both good and bad breaks.

SonuvBob

Aiur21549 Posts

February 10 2008 06:16 GMT

Aileon

United States299 Posts

February 10 2008 06:17 GMT

Double post

Aileon

United States299 Posts

February 10 2008 06:17 GMT

#10

Well, I think for the best scores you are really looking to just not get a missclick at all. I think my best scores all involved seamlessly going from block to block without clicking wrong or going the wrong way accidentally and having to change direction. At that point, I think it really is just a matter of how the blocks fall to shave of tenths of a second, which is why I am really skeptical of a 1.xxx score.

p4fn2w

383 Posts

February 10 2008 06:18 GMT

#11

Getting a sub 2-second score would be clicking faster than 450 APM...

SonuvBob

Aiur21549 Posts

February 10 2008 06:19 GMT

#12

If my 120apm ass can get 3.33, I'm sure someone can do far better.

Zanno

United States1484 Posts

February 10 2008 06:23 GMT

#13

On February 10 2008 15:18 p4fn2w wrote:
Getting a sub 2-second score would be clicking faster than 450 APM...

someone call nada

clazziquai

6685 Posts

February 10 2008 06:32 GMT

#14

On February 10 2008 15:23 Zanno wrote:

Show nested quote +

someone call nada

ROFL!!

I got 4.7

clazziquai

6685 Posts

February 10 2008 06:34 GMT

#15

Hah never mind, 3.921

SonuvBob

Aiur21549 Posts

February 10 2008 06:36 GMT

#16

On September 27 2005 01:13 a-game wrote:
http://www.bleacheatingfreaks.com/flash/games/popoint.html
post your high

and utilize the colours, white is first 5 blocks, green is next 5, yellow is final 5

Current Time to Beat: 2.899 by Pumpkin

*note, video proof is recommended in case of disputes
click the below link to learn/download a vod making program

http://www.fraps.com/

Aileon

United States299 Posts

February 10 2008 06:45 GMT

#17

Didn't see pumpkins 2.899.

Is there an SS of that one?

SonuvBob

Aiur21549 Posts

February 10 2008 06:51 GMT

#18

On September 28 2005 20:12 Pumpkin wrote:
Sure, i'll try to get the program working tommorow if i have time. With that said, i've broken 3 ! Props to the other guy with 2.988, he wasn't lying about the " You cheat beotch!!!! ". 2.899

I'm almost there: http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/6715/game2907tk9.png

InfeSteD

United States4658 Posts

February 10 2008 06:55 GMT

#19

4 point something I sux! T_T

Zanno

United States1484 Posts

February 10 2008 07:00 GMT

#20

On February 10 2008 15:19 SonuvBob wrote:
If my 120apm ass can get 3.33, I'm sure someone can do far better.

well, peak apm would be a better indicator for this game, remember us slow noobs tends to go several seconds without doing anything useful once the lategame rolls in