Pretty cool to see Blizzard already showing support like this. FYI for those who don't know the Community Managers that work in the WoW forums post/moderate the forum on a regular basis. Now the bnet forums shouldn't be such a mess anymore, and if the Blizz gods allow it we should also get some new tidbits here and there on SC2.
New RTS Community Manager @ Battle.net forums
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Zelniq
United States7166 Posts
Pretty cool to see Blizzard already showing support like this. FYI for those who don't know the Community Managers that work in the WoW forums post/moderate the forum on a regular basis. Now the bnet forums shouldn't be such a mess anymore, and if the Blizz gods allow it we should also get some new tidbits here and there on SC2. | ||
MiniRoman
Canada3953 Posts
lols. | ||
useLess
United States4781 Posts
edit: In the announcement gameplay video the incoming nuke marker was shown as if launched by the player. To other players it will still be shown as a smaller dot very similar to the classic StarCraft nuke. | ||
TheShizno
United States112 Posts
| ||
lololol
5198 Posts
On June 07 2007 23:35 TheShizno wrote: Why does the add-on look a lot like a Physics lab? It's obviously because you can build Battlecruisers from the Barracks with them, so they are more viable than they are now | ||
prOxi.swAMi
Australia3091 Posts
| ||
Pretorian-[DMK]
Netherlands49 Posts
But just the fucking mothership, shieldy rines.... We are going to get a warcraft in space | ||
ArC_man
United States2798 Posts
On June 07 2007 23:44 lololol wrote: It's obviously because you can build Battlecruisers from the Barracks with them, so they are more viable than they are now Oov can already do this, we're now just catching on >_< | ||
useLess
United States4781 Posts
On June 08 2007 00:37 Pretorian-[DMK] wrote: We are going to get a warcraft in space *major facepalm* | ||
lololol
5198 Posts
On June 08 2007 00:47 ArC_man wrote: Oov can already do this, we're now just catching on >_< This was pretty much the only funny thing in the April 1st PimpestPlays | ||
Pretorian-[DMK]
Netherlands49 Posts
Why the facepalm? Is that what you want? A warcraft in space? Well just to quote Artanis, "this is not Warcraft in space, it is much more sophisticated." Just like it isn't. They should call starcraft 2...Cartoonycraft. | ||
DeadVessel
United States6269 Posts
| ||
alffla
Hong Kong20321 Posts
rofl | ||
FatRine
406 Posts
| ||
gravity
Australia1721 Posts
On June 08 2007 02:42 Pretorian-[DMK] wrote: @useless Why the facepalm? Is that what you want? A warcraft in space? Because we're sick of tards proclaiming SC2 to be "Warcraft in space" for trivial reasons (or worse yet, misunderstandings or complete speculation). | ||
vGl-CoW
Belgium8305 Posts
On June 08 2007 00:37 Pretorian-[DMK] wrote: Just a faster option? What happened with the Fastest option? Aaah well I can live with that. That's not what he said at all. Read: "There will still be the faster [than normal speed] game speed settings..." | ||
Naib
Hungary4843 Posts
| ||
lamarine
584 Posts
| ||
lololol
5198 Posts
On June 08 2007 06:23 lamarine wrote: where is the anti-SC2Whiners team????? o_O Reporting in We just need to call a member from Netherlands or the new "slap trough the monitor" feature of SC2 and the blasphemer will be silenced! | ||
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
To me, it looks much more like the flying vehicle that appears in the artwork video at 1:47. Check it out and tell me wat you think. | ||
| ||