EPT(nubbie to the rescue)
Should be fun, never played this style of Mafia before
Newbie Mini Mafia XXXVIII
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
(nubbie to the rescue) Should be fun, never played this style of Mafia before | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
On March 06 2013 07:53 WaveofShadow wrote: So, we're policy lynching Krafla right? Sounds like a plan | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
 | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
On March 07 2013 08:01 Krafla wrote: Oh wait, you said Kafia. Yeah sure, lynch that person whoever they are. I heard they suck! Nah, just forgot to capitalise the I still Lynching KrafIa <3 | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
 I know it's my first game so I'm still learning but I don't think we should just lynch Krafla without reason, even if it would be fantastically ironic. Your post Omni seems pretty reasonable and a good basis to work on ^_^ | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
On March 07 2013 12:27 Rainbows wrote: ##vote: MLuneth random lynching you will be even tastier. -Wants to lynch people who want to reason -Likes Random Lynching And if that isn't enough to make you ##vote: Rainbows -he has an scv as his icon </3 | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
| ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
| ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
well Aus fighting ~' | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
First time playing this sort of mafia so I'm not really sure what strategies work in which ways | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
If he doesn't, vote away~ | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
Would be very surprised if it doesn't change | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
On March 07 2013 17:13 MeatlessTaco wrote: Take a stand. Are you going to side with me trying to lynch someone acting suspicious or side with nobodywonder trying to lynch a lurker who can't defend themselves? This is TL Mafia which is serious stuff. You aren't allowed to be Switzerland. While I believe that nobodywonder's actions have been suspicious and that his case is less than stellar, I feel that it is foolish to lynch someone who has made an addition to the game (albeit at this point small) should not be lynched over a person that has simply lurked for 2 days straight. I feel I need to point out that Frogon, as well as Krafla and Matriarch (to a lesser extent) have all input a similar amount of information as nobodywonder. At this stage with so little info to go on I can only flip a coin on whether to vote Artic Daishi or bduddy | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
Coin said ##Vote: Arctic Daishi | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
I will be able to answer questions in 2-3 hours. I will also explain my stance on NW/Daishi when I get back. ty for your patience | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
Considering changing vote to one of several people When will Arctic Daishi be replaced if he doesn't respond? | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + To put it simply my Vote was a pressure vote to try and get Arctic to speak up (I'm saying this now because I believe that Arctic Daishi will stay afk). My vote on Diashi was a coin flip between Daishi/BDuddy/ChewOnStu because none had made posts at this point. My view of NW at the time + Show Spoiler + At this time I was more interested in getting everyone talking. I also felt that while NW's actions were potentially scummy that they could be explained by being a newbie and making a foolish mistake (I mean, it's not the brightest thing to do to introduce yourself by sheeping someone else's attack on a lurker). I was content at that point to simply remain suspicious of NW rather than straight up voting for him. My view on Lynching Lurkers vs Active people that seem scummy at the time + Show Spoiler + At this point in time there were multiple people who hadn't made any posts while others (NW, Matiarch TheRavensName etc had made very few. My goal at this point was to force more posts rather than try and kill NW. My view at the was and still remains is that unless I am confident that there is a high chance of an active person being scum I will Vote for an inactive scummy Lurker This explains my stance/view on these matters at the time of posting this + Show Spoiler + While I believe that nobodywonder's actions have been suspicious and that his case is less than stellar, I feel that it is foolish to lynch someone who has made an addition to the game (albeit at this point small) should not be lynched over a person that has simply lurked for 2 days straight. I feel I need to point out that Frogon, as well as Krafla and Matriarch (to a lesser extent) have all input a similar amount of information as nobodywonder. At this stage with so little info to go on I can only flip a coin on whether to vote Artic Daishi or bduddy I will move on to address current questions (Would I Vote NW now etc) after a half hour break | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
My view at the time was and still remains is that unless I am confident that there is a high chance of an active person being scum I will Vote for an inactive scummy Lurker | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
This vote is basically the result suspiciously targeting lurkers but more importantly the lack of an acceptable coherent defence. Rainbow, it strikes me as odd that while you have accused/pressured people to find out their position on certain matters but your position is not clear. In what circumstances would you lynch a lurker? | ||
|
MLuneth
Australia557 Posts
| ||
| ||
