EPTand since this should be for those who frequent the ABL thread, the encryption password is perfect
Newbie Mini Mafia XIX
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Myles
United States5162 Posts
and since this should be for those who frequent the ABL thread, the encryption password is perfect | ||
|
Myles
United States5162 Posts
On June 27 2012 06:51 Risen wrote: Damn I wish I had made it in time. QQ /in as a replacement if someone drops Edit (muahahahahahaha): /in as a player too if those last two names on the list are troll names >.> Double Edit (harharharhar): Should update thread title. You're already breaking the rules fool! | ||
|
Myles
United States5162 Posts
| ||
|
Myles
United States5162 Posts
On June 29 2012 07:12 Anacletus wrote: JingleHell makes some extremely valid points. Myles, why are you suddenly trying to defend me? Are you trying to set up and alibi for yourself for if I get killed and turn town? Not really defending you, just wondering why he's taking such a lead when we have nothing to go on. Starting a witch hunt is only going to get innocent people killed me thinks. Also, when did you suggest we start hunting? | ||
|
Myles
United States5162 Posts
And don't people have to post anyways? Are we going to say anyone who makes small or meaningless posts is a lurker? | ||
|
Myles
United States5162 Posts
This is a semi-open setup. You will know which roles may appear in the game but not the number. Well, there is at least one vanilla townie. But that's all you know. When I interpret to mean that there can be more than one Heyoka or Complete Asshole and that there might be multiple roles not filled, am I correct? | ||
|
Myles
United States5162 Posts
| ||
|
Myles
United States5162 Posts
On June 29 2012 08:12 Intact wrote: I know it's a bit early to try and make a read, however my short list of possible scum is topped by Myles atm. Primarily because it seems like he wants to promote inactivity. It's a loose read but someone had to get this started. I guess you can call trying to be a little more selective than randomly picking people to start accusing is promoting inactivity, but I was trying to be a little more prudent. The game started 2 hours ago so it seems a bit early to start accusing people. | ||
|
Myles
United States5162 Posts
| ||
|
Myles
United States5162 Posts
| ||
|
Myles
United States5162 Posts
I see Anacletus in a similar vein. That 6 out of his first 7 posts were jokes threw up red flags for me, and though his latest posts have been relevant and worthwhile for the most part, I'm still a bit leery. As for lurkers, Monk has posted twice, once to defend himself from JH random accusations. BobTheLob has posted twice, neither time saying too much. Blind-Rawr hasn't posted much either, but his posts have been pretty good. Besides that, everyone else has been pretty active. Now back to work. | ||
|
Myles
United States5162 Posts
Anyway, I think Anacletus is still suspicious. Despite that, I'm not ready to vote for him yet because I don't think starting off non-serious is that scummy considering there was pretty much nothing to go on, and we still have over a day before night falls. I'd would like to hear some more from him, though. And Fencer, I don't think you're making yourself look very good either. | ||
|
Myles
United States5162 Posts
| ||
|
Myles
United States5162 Posts
Either way, I've been just as active and contributive as most. If you want inactive/non-contributing look at Monk and BobTheLob. They have 5 and 3 posts, respectively. Actually, the fact that BobTheLob has posted almost nothing, and has posted none of his own thoughts, but hoped on the bandwagon of Anacletus is kind of surprising to have not risen red flags. As far as why I stated I'm leaning towards Fencer, it's because nearly his entire post history has been useless. He's done a whole lot of talking about nothing while Anecletus at least contributed a little bit. They top my list as people who could be mafia, but if Bob doesn't speak up I might put him up there, too. | ||
|
Myles
United States5162 Posts
On July 01 2012 02:09 AmericanUmlaut wrote: Myles: You're right to a certain extent. I was looking at your and Monk's contributions specifically because you were the only two not to have cast a vote. However, just because two players have the same post count doesn't mean they're making the same contribution. The vast majority of your posts so far have been filler that haven't added in any meaningful way to the conversation. For the record, I don't have a scummy read on you, I just feel like you could be contributing more with your posting. JH: Less nuttiness, and more posts like that, please! I for one am persuaded. I still have a scummy read on Anacletus, but actively arguing in favor of a mislynch over no lynch at all is far scummier play than he's demonstrated so far. ##Unvote Anacletus ##Vote Hopeless1der My read on Anacletus isn't changed at this point, though; I still think he's got a good chance of flipping scum. I'm a bit concerned that there might be too many players who will be inactive between now and the lynch, in which case I'll be switching my vote back to Anacletus to prevent a no-lynch. Nearly all of my posts have been about policy or reads, or a question about policy. I still don't see how the are non-contributing. I still wonder why Bob is flying so low below the radar when he's posted nothing expect to bandwagon on Anacletusm, which everyone seemed to ignore. | ||
|
Myles
United States5162 Posts
Fencer is suspicious, but after looking through all his posts some more, seems more newbish than scum. I'm certainly not going to turn a blind eye, but I'll give him the BotD for now. And despite other people not seeming to care, BobTheLob is quite suspicious to me. Lurker extraordinaire and his last post doesn't elicit much confidence imo. ##Vote Analectus | ||
|
Myles
United States5162 Posts
On July 01 2012 03:58 AmericanUmlaut wrote: What is your opinion on JH's read on hopeless1der? Why do you feel that Anacletus is a scummier read? I was suspicious of JH at first because of the seemingly chaotic way he accusing people deciding policy, but I agree now that it was just to get people talking so we could go somewhere rather than seriously accusing people. Hopeless seems like he's trying to make the best decision with the information we have. I agree that lynching just for information is bad if we have nothing else to go on, but given that we have a couple suspects, we should definitely be lynching one of them since relying on scum to slip up and make it obvious seems very unlikely at this point. | ||
|
Myles
United States5162 Posts
On July 01 2012 04:20 Anacletus wrote: Also, why would you hang someone on their birthday? That's just wrong! It's also irrelevant. And I realize there's little someone can say to defend themselves in situations like these, but disappearing for nearly a full day when the FoS is on you doesn't seem to add up. You've given one read on JH, everything else you said was general observations on early mafia games. And your post about people not voting thinking your town doesn't make sense either. If the non-voters were mafia(thus knowing you're town) they would hop on the bandwagon since it was already going strong, and thus not be more suspicious then anyone else. | ||
|
Myles
United States5162 Posts
| ||
|
Myles
United States5162 Posts
| ||
| ||
