| Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games |
|
Mereel
Germany895 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/J6HQp.jpg) The first usefull Destination Port. I created some costum Textures to get the original feel of the Map. General: + Show Spoiler + Texture: Tarsonis/Costum Playable: 120x176 Expands: 12 Xel'Naga: 0 Overview: + Show Spoiler + Analyzer Overview: + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/VX1mOl.png) Analyzer: + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/418uSl.png) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/R9tobl.png) Pictures: + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/2XtMYl.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/pvZ8El.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/y2zpcl.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/2M80Ol.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/BxbdNl.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/ZPhhRl.jpg) | ||
The_Templar
your Country52798 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Ha, seriously though, I think the only problem is that the middle is too cramped. Oh, and welcome back ^^ | ||
|
Yoshi Kirishima
United States10382 Posts
I wonder if you should just make the 3 bridges in the middle 1 big area, because there's enough holes and cliffs around that area anyways and mech is already strong due to only needing like 3 sensor towers. And this way Zerg can actually engage better, and bio can't get FF'd and splashed to death. But ofc this is just from looking at it, but these were the problems that someone from ICCUP map making team said that kept destination from being a decent sc2 map. | ||
|
iGrok
United States5142 Posts
| ||
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37103 Posts
On December 10 2011 08:14 Yoshi Kirishima wrote: Nice, but yes i agree the middle is too cramped. Especially in sc2 you got to allow more space so splash doesn't rape everything, and so that FFs don't rape everything neither. I wonder if you should just make the 3 bridges in the middle 1 big area, because there's enough holes and cliffs around that area anyways and mech is already strong due to only needing like 3 sensor towers. And this way Zerg can actually engage better, and bio can't get FF'd and splashed to death. But ofc this is just from looking at it, but these were the problems that someone from ICCUP map making team said that kept destination from being a decent sc2 map. But if u take away those 3 bridges, it's no longer the revered BW Destination :[ | ||
|
LunaSaint
United Kingdom620 Posts
I really want to see some good games on it, see how easy it actually is to cut off the three bridges. | ||
|
Mereel
Germany895 Posts
| ||
|
Yoshi Kirishima
United States10382 Posts
On December 10 2011 08:46 Seeker wrote: But if u take away those 3 bridges, it's no longer the revered BW Destination :[ Hm just make em wider then I guess? idk =/ | ||
FlaShFTW
United States10548 Posts
Overall, good map. I like the addition of one gas in the back bases. | ||
|
a176
Canada6688 Posts
| ||
|
TheAmazombie
United States3714 Posts
I like the overall layout and think that it is definitely a map heading in an interesting direction. | ||
|
-NegativeZero-
United States2142 Posts
On December 10 2011 10:38 FlaShFTW wrote: get rid of those 2 holes in the ground in the middle of the 2 centers of each side. this allows for armies not to get funneled into space half the size. also, considering how this is SC2, make the 3 central ramps into 2 ramps instead. this is so the armies are able to fit, not like in BW where you didn't need that (I remember you could only fit one tank/goon at a time on that bridge) Overall, good map. I like the addition of one gas in the back bases. I agree that the holes should be removed, they seem unnecessary. However, I think the bridges are fine, since the entire point is that they are 3 narrow chokepoints - it's a risk to move your army through and get caught in the middle, but the advantage is that the path is shorter. If you don't want to take that risk, there is the other, wider path around the side of the map... | ||
|
Archas
United States6531 Posts
| ||
|
Yoshi Kirishima
United States10382 Posts
On December 10 2011 11:57 Aeres wrote: Is that the fabled Panda Bear Guy in the center? omg is it??? | ||
|
Antares777
United States1971 Posts
Nah I'm kidding, this map brings back memories of me and my brother playing LAN when we first learned how to play SC. Good times! Leave the three bridges the way they are. Might be the little kid inside me saying that, but I think it could work. | ||
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37103 Posts
The units and pathing is so different for SC2 that BW maps have to be altered so much sometimes ..... and then it's no longer THE BW map :[ | ||
|
eTcetRa
Australia822 Posts
| ||
|
[]Phase[]
Belgium927 Posts
Anyone want to test this on EU? master zerg Phase - 170 | ||
|
Big J
Austria16289 Posts
 ) | ||
|
ArcticRaven
France1406 Posts
On December 10 2011 13:09 Seeker wrote: It really hurts me that BW maps can't really be replicated for SC2 :[ The units and pathing is so different for SC2 that BW maps have to be altered so much sometimes ..... and then it's no longer THE BW map :[ Loki II seems excellent. | ||
| ||
|
|
Escore
IntoTheTV X SOOP
RotterdaM Event
The PiG Daily
BASILISK vs TBD
Serral vs Rogue
Korean StarCraft League
GSL
Replay Cast
WardiTV Weekly
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Afreeca Starleague
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/IRewRl.jpg)
