Info:
- Main has 10 minerals 1 gas (2 minerals are worth 749 each)
- Nat has 8 minerals 1 gas (6 minerals are worth 2000 each, 2 minerals are worth 749 each)
- Main and Nat is wallable with 2 depot 1 rax
- There is neutral egg at nat to help with sim-city
- Area outside naturals are unbuildable

Downloads:
Melee
Obs

+ Show Spoiler [Version 1.0] +

Gladiator 1.0

Gladiator 1.1

Changes:
1.0 -> 1.1:
- Fixed issue with 2 minerals not mining at 1 o'clock mineral-only
- Fixed issue with 11 o'clock and 5 o'clock mineral-only not being able to have add-ons

Info:
- 4 player map
- Main is wallable with 1 depot 1 rax at ramp
- Nat is wallable with 2 depot 1 rax
- Mineral-only's mineral values are at 1000 each

Downloads:
Melee
Obs

http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/Pholon//OSL_1011.rar (zip of all maps)

Megaliskuu

United States5123 Posts

November 01 2010 06:47 GMT

Omg ILU kona can't wait to play these!

In about 5 seconds, let me just alt-tab

Graham

Canada1259 Posts

November 01 2010 06:49 GMT

Thanks for getting the info on these.

I like the look of Gladiator and Aztec but I'm not sure what I think of Pathfinder yet. :3

Whiplash

United States2928 Posts

November 01 2010 06:51 GMT

All look pretty nice for Protoss, I really hope we can see a protoss win a starleague for the first time in a few years!

JMave

Singapore1802 Posts

November 01 2010 06:51 GMT

pathfinder doesnt seem like it would have long drawn- out games. i think gladiator would be interesting. almost a similar concept to HBR but with the middle being more accessible and more high ground terrain advantage.

seRapH

United States9706 Posts

November 01 2010 06:51 GMT

these maps are REALLY pretty to look at, but i'm kind of worried about the balance of the latter two =\

pred470r

Bulgaria3265 Posts

November 01 2010 06:52 GMT

For a second there my hopes raised that pathfinder would be an island map. Also does having a no-build are outside the nat on pathfinder mean that we won't see any proxy gateways or rax on that map?

moopie

12605 Posts

November 01 2010 06:54 GMT

Wow I am really liking the looks of Pathfinder and Gladiator. Gladiator should be a good P/Z map.

Lightwip

United States5497 Posts

November 01 2010 06:55 GMT

I might find the layout of pathfinder to be problematic. Let's hope there won't be any more Zergliner this time around.

Harem

United States11390 Posts

November 01 2010 06:55 GMT

#10

According to Milkis, Pathfinder rush distance is 31 seconds.

That's like sc2 level. ~_~

Hyde

Australia14568 Posts

November 01 2010 07:04 GMT

#11

I was thinking some of these maps look really weird, then I realised the image was cut off.
I don't like Pathfinder at all, but I do like Aztec
Not sure about Gladiator, looks like it might be fun though.

Snipinpanda

United States1227 Posts

November 01 2010 07:09 GMT

#12

Man I don't know about balance on those latter two. Pathfinder looks like a map pulled out of 2003 or something, with how open it is and that rush distance. Wonder if we're gonna get any "Terran tanks abuse imba" comments that's usually associated with new maps. >_>

There's only 3 maps this time, isn't there usually a 4 map rotation?

lastreason

Romania250 Posts

November 01 2010 07:54 GMT

#13

so many new maps this year , wander why ? , still i love them all, go stork win and msl or osl or both

BLinD-RawR

ALLEYCAT BLUES49496 Posts

November 01 2010 08:02 GMT

#14

What the fuck these maps look scary to play on.1 more PL map should be there,or maybe Dreamliner stays?If it does Flash is not gonna win this season I can tell you that.