On February 02 2012 20:01 Meovin- wrote: This looks like my PvT in ladder, have to kill five terran army's before you finally win, lose one battle and you're out. Well played by Puzzle
The interesting thing is that colossi/archon/ht/stalker actually can kill 5 terran armies.
On February 02 2012 20:01 Headnoob wrote: Looks so hard to play a code s level protoss.
please don't lose to a 1a protoss mma
MMA made several mistakes, despite some exquisite moves. 1) Didn't double check the 3rd of Puzzle, which he faked and pressured, and thus took unnecessary damage. 2) Didn't realize his double drop was spotted by a pylon, and thus Puzzle was able to perfectly divide his army and beat both the drop and the army. 3) Engaged with too low a viking count (you need at least 3 per colossi, and he had roughly 2 in the big battles).
On February 02 2012 20:01 avilo wrote: Ah, and MMA screws up the avilo BC ghost transition by actually attacking ... x_X
did you copyright that?
yes avilo BC ghost lategame transition™
MMA started to do it, then he attacked ... not supposed to attack with your army in stalemate situation. You just turtle and bank money because protoss is doing the same and they have warp-in. He also should have triple/quadruple nuke silo'd that game.
If puzzle wins this series I think MMA advances over either of the other two. If MMA wins I think Oz comes back and wins over both supernova and puzzle. For the sake of slayers, hope puzzle takes it.
On February 02 2012 19:54 SpicyCheese wrote: lol... if MVP is much better then why does he always lose to MMA. Artosis confuses me sometimes
So by your logic polt is better than MMA. but anyone with common sense knows thats not the case.
Umm MMA has played MVP in bo7, bo5, and another bo5 in Geforce ProAM defeating him CONVINCINGLY every time, with the only time that MVP won was at MLG where he was already ahead in extended series anyway.... Also these were all pretty much during MVP's prime. If ur saying MVP was better then he should at least have won some of those sets right? Or at least make them close( which they were all one sided ). The Polt MMA games are pretty much one series of build order, where MMA wasn't even in his prime form and Polt has just sunk into the abyss.
The point is winning head to head doesn't mean you are necessarily the better player.
On February 02 2012 19:54 SpicyCheese wrote: lol... if MVP is much better then why does he always lose to MMA. Artosis confuses me sometimes
So by your logic polt is better than MMA. but anyone with common sense knows thats not the case.
Umm MMA has played MVP in bo7, bo5, and another bo5 in Geforce ProAM defeating him CONVINCINGLY every time, with the only time that MVP won was at MLG where he was already ahead in extended series anyway.... Also these were all pretty much during MVP's prime. If ur saying MVP was better then he should at least have won some of those sets right? Or at least make them close( which they were all one sided ). The Polt MMA games are pretty much one series of build order, where MMA wasn't even in his prime form and Polt has just sunk into the abyss.
On February 02 2012 19:58 Mobius_1 wrote: GSL Ro16 Group B Match 3 Game 2 SlayerS_Puzzle vs SlayerS_MMA Daybreak
0:00 Puzzle spawns P7 MMA spawns T1
Missed the first 15 mins...
Anyway 15:00 MMA on 4 bases vs Puzzle on 3 Marine marauder medivac viking ghost for MMA, 3/3 infantry and 2 air weapons started, as well as another Ghost Academy for nukes <3 <3 <3 MMA pokes at Puzzle's 3rd but Puzzle engages him with 3/3 Chargelot Stalker Colossi, comes out overwhelmingly ahead and expands to the 4th in the centre
20:00 MMA nuking Puzzle's 3rd but no significant damage Ghost vs HT micro arena at Puzzle's 4th MMA engages but Vikings are wiped out with 4 Colossi still standing, a substantial supply lead for Puzzle
25:00 Puzzle attacks into the 4th, pushes through the PF and into the natural MMA GG's!
On February 02 2012 20:02 CaptainTwig wrote: Why does the coach always talk to mma? :/
I think he may be MMA's personal coach. SlayersJessica was saying way back that she intended to innovate by getting personal coaches for key players. Innovate in e-sports obviously; normal sports have those already.
On February 02 2012 20:01 Meovin- wrote: This looks like my PvT in ladder, have to kill five terran army's before you finally win, lose one battle and you're out. Well played by Puzzle
The interesting thing is that colossi/archon/ht/stalker actually can kill 5 terran armies.
On February 02 2012 20:01 Meovin- wrote: This looks like my PvT in ladder, have to kill five terran army's before you finally win, lose one battle and you're out. Well played by Puzzle
The interesting thing is that colossi/archon/ht/stalker actually can kill 5 terran armies.
On February 02 2012 19:56 qwazar wrote: So, let me get this straight, MVP loses MMA 4-1 yet still played better than him, then precedes to lose to him 3-0 in the Blizzard Cup, and therefore is still a better player than MMA.
My brain just exploded.
Polt beat MMA 4-0 in a GSL finals. And then beat him 2-1 in groups stages of Blizz Cup. That means that Polt > MMA right? And therefore, Polt > MVP? No.
Also, Hack beat Polt. Avenge beat Hack.
Therefore, the best player in the world is actually ZenexAvenge (thank you Fionn)
I wonder whether MMA should have been more aggressive in sniping colossi? I mean replenishing Vikings is a little bit faster than Colossi no? Unless you really lose too huge a clump
On February 02 2012 19:56 qwazar wrote: So, let me get this straight, MVP loses MMA 4-1 yet still played better than him, then precedes to lose to him 3-0 in the Blizzard Cup, and therefore is still a better player than MMA.
My brain just exploded.
Polt beat MMA 4-0 in a GSL finals. And then beat him 2-1 in groups stages of Blizz Cup. That means that Polt > MMA right? And therefore, Polt > MVP? No.
Also, Hack beat Polt. Avenge beat Hack.
Therefore, the best player in the world is actually ZenexAvenge (thank you Fionn)