|
On February 02 2012 20:03 Monsen wrote:They do when you park your 15+ vikings over your infantry where they get archon splashed.
Plus, MMA chose the worst possible to engage.
|
On February 02 2012 20:03 mizU wrote:Show nested quote +On February 02 2012 20:02 clusen wrote:On February 02 2012 20:01 Meovin- wrote: This looks like my PvT in ladder, have to kill five terran army's before you finally win, lose one battle and you're out. Well played by Puzzle The interesting thing is that colossi/archon/ht/stalker actually can kill 5 terran armies. The reverse can also be said for MMM/ghost/viking i dont think so...wasnt that what mma just used?
|
On February 02 2012 20:02 Bagi wrote: Games like these really make me wish terran had some better lategame tech to throw at protoss.
Because even though they dominate early and mid game unless toss goes all in they should also dominate late game even though they can play 50/50 late game v toss. Thats like saying you want to play zerg with stim and medivacs for your roaches
|
On February 02 2012 20:02 Nibbler89 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 02 2012 20:02 McBengt wrote: Colossus/Archon/Zealot/Storm/Stalker is pretty good I hear. He didn't even have storm, he a moved after everything got sniped / emped.
To be fair though, MMA messed up with his vikings, they were getting roasted by archons and popped by the stalkers really quick. But yeah, late game TvP is hard, no question.
|
why not nuke and drop marauder at the same time to target down the nexus?
|
On February 02 2012 20:03 SpicyCheese wrote:Show nested quote +On February 02 2012 19:55 Olinimm wrote:On February 02 2012 19:54 SpicyCheese wrote: lol... if MVP is much better then why does he always lose to MMA. Artosis confuses me sometimes So by your logic polt is better than MMA. but anyone with common sense knows thats not the case. Umm MMA has played MVP in bo7, bo5, and another bo5 in Geforce ProAM defeating him CONVINCINGLY every time, with the only time that MVP won was at MLG where he was already ahead in extended series anyway.... Also these were all pretty much during MVP's prime. If ur saying MVP was better then he should at least have won some of those sets right? Or at least make them close( which they were all one sided ). The Polt MMA games are pretty much one series of build order, where MMA wasn't even in his prime form and Polt has just sunk into the abyss. They were all pretty close games. Mostly build order wins for MMA, lots of back and forth, a few base races. Also, the Geforce tournament was 3-2 actually..
|
whats that song they play during breaks in the match
|
On February 02 2012 20:03 mizU wrote:Show nested quote +On February 02 2012 20:02 clusen wrote:On February 02 2012 20:01 Meovin- wrote: This looks like my PvT in ladder, have to kill five terran army's before you finally win, lose one battle and you're out. Well played by Puzzle The interesting thing is that colossi/archon/ht/stalker actually can kill 5 terran armies. The reverse can also be said for MMM/ghost/viking This is simply not true..... MMM/Ghost/Viking does not have the staying power of a protoss army. It can kill one army maybe, and that often wins the game, but you will never see the raw efficiency of a protoss death ball.
|
|
On February 02 2012 20:03 Whatson wrote:Show nested quote +On February 02 2012 20:02 Witten wrote:On February 02 2012 20:00 Teoita wrote:On February 02 2012 19:58 Whatson wrote:On February 02 2012 19:56 qwazar wrote: So, let me get this straight, MVP loses MMA 4-1 yet still played better than him, then precedes to lose to him 3-0 in the Blizzard Cup, and therefore is still a better player than MMA.
My brain just exploded. Polt beat MMA 4-0 in a GSL finals. And then beat him 2-1 in groups stages of Blizz Cup. That means that Polt > MMA right? And therefore, Polt > MVP? No. Also, Hack beat Polt. Avenge beat Hack. Therefore, the best player in the world is actually ZenexAvenge (thank you Fionn) + Show Spoiler +And IdrA beat Avenge!
Oh wait... and coLCruncher beat IdrA! Therefore coLCruncher is the best player in the world ^^ And Deezer beat Cruncher, so Deezer is best.
|
oh my god rofl tastosis in the dark
|
|
On February 02 2012 20:03 avilo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 02 2012 20:02 Fishgle wrote:On February 02 2012 20:01 avilo wrote: Ah, and MMA screws up the avilo BC ghost transition by actually attacking ... x_X did you copyright that? yes avilo BC ghost lategame transition™ MMA started to do it, then he attacked ... not supposed to attack. You just turtle and bank money because protoss is doing the same and they have warp-in.
Maybe he didn't do it exactly the way you do it because he's never heard of you? Just a guess.
|
On February 02 2012 20:04 Fubi wrote: This is why Terran has to win before it gets to late game, it's like so impossible once Protoss gets max'd out with the composition he wants
Nah, it really isn't. I wont dispute in a head to head fight the terran player requires more micro, but it is still perfectly winnable for either party in the late game
|
|
On February 02 2012 20:05 IgnE wrote: whats that song they play during breaks in the match
Might be the X-men theme song.
|
On February 02 2012 20:03 SpicyCheese wrote:Show nested quote +On February 02 2012 19:55 Olinimm wrote:On February 02 2012 19:54 SpicyCheese wrote: lol... if MVP is much better then why does he always lose to MMA. Artosis confuses me sometimes So by your logic polt is better than MMA. but anyone with common sense knows thats not the case. Umm MMA has played MVP in bo7, bo5, and another bo5 in Geforce ProAM defeating him CONVINCINGLY every time, with the only time that MVP won was at MLG where he was already ahead in extended series anyway.... Also these were all pretty much during MVP's prime. If ur saying MVP was better then he should at least have won some of those sets right? Or at least make them close( which they were all one sided ). The Polt MMA games are pretty much one series of build order, where MMA wasn't even in his prime form and Polt has just sunk into the abyss.
MVP has beat millions of other players who has beaten MMA. Just because MMA beats MVP in head to head confrontations dosen't make MVP the weaker overall player. Achievements don't lie. MVP status as best player should not be debated until he shows poor form for a few months and someone else takes over.
|
On February 02 2012 20:03 SpicyCheese wrote:Show nested quote +On February 02 2012 19:55 Olinimm wrote:On February 02 2012 19:54 SpicyCheese wrote: lol... if MVP is much better then why does he always lose to MMA. Artosis confuses me sometimes So by your logic polt is better than MMA. but anyone with common sense knows thats not the case. Umm MMA has played MVP in bo7, bo5, and another bo5 in Geforce ProAM defeating him CONVINCINGLY every time, with the only time that MVP won was at MLG where he was already ahead in extended series anyway.... Also these were all pretty much during MVP's prime. If ur saying MVP was better then he should at least have won some of those sets right? Or at least make them close( which they were all one sided ). The Polt MMA games are pretty much one series of build order, where MMA wasn't even in his prime form and Polt has just sunk into the abyss. Polt hasn't sunk anywhere he's likely the second best terran in the world at the moment.
|
On February 02 2012 20:03 mizU wrote:Show nested quote +On February 02 2012 20:02 clusen wrote:On February 02 2012 20:01 Meovin- wrote: This looks like my PvT in ladder, have to kill five terran army's before you finally win, lose one battle and you're out. Well played by Puzzle The interesting thing is that colossi/archon/ht/stalker actually can kill 5 terran armies. The reverse can also be said for MMM/ghost/viking
sure, maybe if protoss move commands instead of attack commands
|
That was such a great match, I wonder who will win this?
|
|
|
|