|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
Day 2![[image loading]](http://youoffendmeyouoffendmyfamily.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/brothel_big.jpg) Ooooh, you sexy ladies
Zesh Irdra and JigglyBum were making out on the sofa. Zesh's body was pressed up against Jiggly's, and the warmth they were making filled the room. And a good job too, because the heating had stopped working earlier that evening. Naturally, some lady-on-lady action was the remedy to that situation.
They never got this kind of intimacy and affection with their clients; to them they were just pieces of meat to be used and discarded on the trash can.
Unfortunately, they were not alone in their throes of passion. Through a hole in the wall, a menacing eye glared. Well, I say glared, I mean looked on pervily. Eventually the eye in the wall felt a little guilty at intruding in on the scene.
What's the only solution to guilt? Death! DEATH! He took out his poisoned darts and shot them into Zesh Irdra and JigglyBum's necks. Except he missed JigglyBum completely, oh well. That'll teach 'em to have hot woman sex.
Sonic Death Monkey, as Zesh Irdra, the Scary Slut, was killed!
It is now Day 2. You have a little under 48 hours to decide the next lynch. Flavour is just flavour.
|
for the record, I got a pm from marv saying I was roleblocked
|
So this mean there probably is no sk right?
I can see scenarios where scum or sk got blocked, or they both nk the same person. But until we actually see evidence of SK we should treat this game like there is no sk.
|
On September 21 2012 09:15 thrawn2112 wrote:
for the record, I got a pm from marv saying I was roleblocked
What are you implying with this post?
|
On September 21 2012 09:19 RemedySC wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2012 09:15 thrawn2112 wrote:
for the record, I got a pm from marv saying I was roleblocked What are you implying with this post?
I think he's implying that he got roleblocked.
|
I don't think it proves anything but I believe his roleblock claim. It seems risky to lie about something like that.
|
On September 21 2012 09:21 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2012 09:19 RemedySC wrote:On September 21 2012 09:15 thrawn2112 wrote:
for the record, I got a pm from marv saying I was roleblocked What are you implying with this post? I think he's implying that he got roleblocked.
I lol'd
On September 21 2012 09:15 kushm4sta wrote:
So this mean there probably is no sk right?
I can see scenarios where scum or sk got blocked, or they both nk the same person. But until we actually see evidence of SK we should treat this game like there is no sk.
No... I have never played with or seen a SK played before so I am in the deep as regards to how he would play. Sharrant seems to know it well though and I would like him to elabarate considering what he said seemed to happen. However we probably should play normaly until we see signs of an Sk anyway. (at least until day three)
Also farewell Sonic, I hope you live your ghosthood as you lived your life. (or something...)
|
Okay, I don't think mafia got lucky in killing a blue.
Looks like other than the Sharrant read, Sonic's biggest read was Atreides-, Debears, and Killing.
All three have had good arguments made against them. Possibly they they thought Sonic might have more info.
|
EBWOP - I mean I think Mafia got lucky that Sonic was a blue.
|
He was a blue? Wow that is actually worse than I thought... (early mornings aren't my thing) But yeah I would also agree it might be luck. Assuming sharrent was protected, he was the most town player.
|
WTF he was blue... i didn't even notice because this flavor text is such a cluster fuck... something about idra..
He's was our JK.
|
When the jk gets killed does his rb still go through?
|
For me it was more the colour of the text, while it was blue so was the line under it. So I saw slut and assumed it was just the statement mod colour.
|
On September 21 2012 10:28 kushm4sta wrote:
When the jk gets killed does his rb still go through?
Yes.
|
I had meant to post this afternoon but internet went out.. posting from my phone for now.
After the post where I voted cubu I went to a school event with the intention of coming back an hour before lynch. I come back to find that lynch time is almost here and start skimming the recent posts. I knew it was too late to do analysis and impact the lynch in any way, and ended up posting that one liner.
If I was mafia and lurking the whole time, I would have posted a while earlier (or not at all), and I wouldve at least changed my vote ffs. I guess you could make the argument that I faked being afk to earn some "town cred" but that's a stretch because there's little to gain from that and there were so many easy plays available.
Now I see why my 2nd post after lynch was kinda bad mistake. It was hasty and based on the fact that drazak got so many votes so fast.
|
On September 21 2012 07:40 kushm4sta wrote:#fos thrawnK guys I did the legwork on this monster of a filter. Tell me what you think. 1 Being active when he said he'd be lurkingShow nested quote +On September 14 2012 07:26 thrawn2112 wrote:
i do have internet, i just have to walk/ride a long ass time to get it. Thrawn was quite reluctant to join this game. Before the game started he warned us that he would be lurking more than usual. Except that hasn't happened. In fact, he has been extremely active. Imagine this, thrawn, in his 4th game, finally gets mafia, the role he has dreamt of ever since he learned about the game. That is something that could spur activity. Obviously regardless of my alignment I am in a position to be posting up the same amount that's been my meta so far. I did not think I would have computer access this game but that has changed. Your argument is basically that before the game even started I lied about how much posting I could do somehow knowing or hoping against odds that I would be mafia and I could use that to trick people into making a false meta read.Well I don't know the specifics of your situation. I'm assuming some brokeback mountain type scenario, in which you can get to a computer if you really want to but it's kind of a bother. A mafia roll might give you that nudge to make you put in the extra effort to be more active.2 His multitude of paper thin cases.These are his accusations throughout the game so far. 1 fos sonic for making a survey That happened at the very start of the game. Of course any accusation at that point is going to be weak. The accusation was based on me seeing a simialar action from when he was scum in our last game. I didn't see the point of the surveys. Last game as scum he proposed that people make read lists which I thought that was a scummy tactic. He was scum that game leading me to think he was doing a similar thing in this one.When bringing up these cases, I didn't focus on any in particular. That is because it's not the cases themselves that are really suspect. It's how freely you accuse so many different people, and most of your cases are based on very little.2 fos killing for saying he doesn't like FOS I didn't fos him for him saying he didn't like FOS. I fos'd him for coming into the thread at a point when people were alread makking and sharing reads and he made a fluff post.3 vote sharrant for saying a bunch of different stupid shit bunch of stupid shit = making a vote for debears based on a paragraph of reasoning and saying he wants to force debears to role claim. Later I stuck to my vote because he was talking about a secret plan that he wasn't willing to share with us. I assumed he was suggesting he was a blue role and I even tried to think through what possible things a blue player could do in that situation and I came up with nothing so his claim that he had a plan seemed like a complete lie.
Although I disagree with it, I do not think that suspecting sharrant was scummy. Definitely your most justified read.Yet debears does not earn an fos even though he gives them out like candy... then d2 4 fos debears for copying his arguments (d1 it was ok d2 it's not?) First you say i am supicisous for not fosing debears and when I do it makes me suspicious?It's that you did fos him n1 for doing the same thing he did d1. Why not fos him d1 then?5 atreides he tells me I need to look at for being confused about no lynch I don't see what's scummy about thatI looked this over and I understand your argument better now. Correct me if I'm wrong but he said he was afk yet he was there 1 minute after lynch. Is that it? And I do see the scumhunt logic in that.6 remedy who is suddenly out of no where his TOP scumread. Thrawn's case: he made a commented on a stupid scumteam thought I had. Also he didn't vote for a bandwagon d1. And that's his "biggest read"... I've already told you that my case on remedy isn't because he agreed with a stupid post. here and also read my post right after it.
About your case against remedy: I disagree that voting for me is a scumtell. As for the second part of your argument, are you saying that his one comment about the probably scumteam means that he was willing to lynch 2 confirmed town? I do not see the connection. Just because he comments on the plausibility of a scumteam doesn't team he's ready to lynch all of them.Here is him yelling at killingtime for making a thin case: Show nested quote +On September 19 2012 02:06 thrawn2112 wrote:On September 19 2012 01:56 KillingTime wrote:
I like sonic's last post on Debears though - For now my feeling is that Debears is mafia trying to blend into the thread. Debears who do you think is scum?
For now:
##Vote:debears Killing are you for real? You make a post devoid of content which I call you out for, then in your next post you actually start talking about current discussion but then you make a vote for someone based on a single sentence of justification? But less than an hour earlier thrawn makes a case also based on only 1 sentence of justification: Show nested quote +On September 19 2012 01:16 thrawn2112 wrote:On September 19 2012 00:35 KillingTime wrote:
I don't understand the point of FoS'ing on day 1 ##Fos KillingTimeNice contribution to the thread. Do you really think that's something worth talking about when there are already lots of other discussions going on? Yes it's hypocritical but that doesnt mean scum
So if it added to your suspicion of killingtime, why can't it add to my suspicion of you? Pointing out a scumtrait in someone else does not make you immune to being accused for that trait.3 His total lapse of logic after sharrant role claims.Show nested quote +On September 20 2012 06:57 thrawn2112 wrote:
So, I don't know if I should trust this mason claim or not, but what does everyone think about this plan:
So maybe we should lynch cubu, and if cubu flips mason well then at least we have a confirmed town player (sharrant) and we haven't lost a useful poster. If Cubu doesn't flip mason then we atuo lynch sharrant D2.
What does everyone think about this plan huh? Well what I think is that you are fishing to see if town will follow this madness. Cubu is basically confirmed town and you want to lynch him anyway. I didn't try to push it much further than that. I think it was stutters who pointed out what the worst possible outcome of that plan was and I dropped it after that and started contributing to the lurker lynch discussionOf course you wouldn't push it more than that. You wanted to see how willing town was to go along with it. When you realized we weren't willing, you dropped it immediately.4 the real story of d1Thrawn is on my ass about a redirection of a killing lynch onto drazak. Well that did not happen. The real redirection, which no one has even talked about, is from debears to sharrant. Where did I accuse you of redirecting from killing to drazak?You accused me of voting for drazak even though I admitted to killing being the better lynch. Not exactly redirection though, you're right.Debears had a majority vote. Thrawn defends debears, pushes sharrant, and suddenly sharrant has the majority vote. That's an association case so it's assuming that at bare minimum, debears is confirmed scum in order for me to be scum.Remember the first game we played together? Shadysands got town to change their vote from mafia to town. I'm suggesting you may have done something similar. It's just that we had a majority on debears, and then for some reason that majority just disappeared, and I'm wondering why.
|
I just want to update the thread on my thoughts since I'm going to be pretty afk for a while (sleep then class then work).
Thrawn: im waiting for other people's input. I have to say though claiming roleblock like that seems pretty town to me. 1 I dont think it's a lie and 2 why would scum share that information. I don't know what to think about it honestly.
Debears: I read through this guy's filter, tried to expand my case against him to be more than just "thrawn copycat," but I came up with nothing to say. I mean his recent play doesn't impress me but it doesn't set off any whistles either.
There are a lot of people who have been very off my radar and I need to give them a closer look. Killingtime mainly but there are others.
|
Has stutters posted once tonight?
On September 21 2012 08:22 Stutters695 wrote:
I brought up the no lynch because Sharrant mentioned he was one vote away from being hammered (I think that's what l1 means) and when I checked the rules post on voting it didn't say anything about a no-vote which is essential to know should we hit mylo and I'd rather not risk noticing it now but not asking until it's relevant since we might not get an answer instantly. I'll be periodically phone posting tonight and back on my pc tomorrow (real time EST).
Once, I was going at him before considering pre game he said he would be super active and he isn't...
however more importaintly. The thrawn debears situation. I doubt they are both mafia due to thrawn mentioning a role block and the fight seems genuine. However thrawn has made a few mistakes in logic recently (most notabily the miss step in times that he posted) and I still think his case on Atreides at least considering the last minute post isn't sound. Atreides did post strange after the flip I admit though.
Anyhow, The misstep in times is more likely to be done by town than mafia in my opinion because as mafia you would want to be absolutely sure of when everything happened where as town are more likely to read filters and make assumptions. (imo anyway) For example a scum wouldn't point out that He copied Debears assuming the idea wasn't original. (in the case of thrawn being scum)
Because of this I Think debears is more of a target than thrawn but also more of a target than Atreides. However both Stutters and Remedy need to post more, stutters I can't get a solid read on it's more a feel read(because he doesn't post a lot) and Remedy just isn't really here.
|
Oh and can I just say the text inside of text with colours better not continue past this point... it's already confusing enough to read as it it.
|
On September 21 2012 11:42 kushm4sta wrote:
I just want to update the thread on my thoughts since I'm going to be pretty afk for a while (sleep then class then work).
Thrawn: im waiting for other people's input. I have to say though claiming roleblock like that seems pretty town to me. 1 I dont think it's a lie and 2 why would scum share that information. I don't know what to think about it honestly.
Debears: I read through this guy's filter, tried to expand my case against him to be more than just "thrawn copycat," but I came up with nothing to say. I mean his recent play doesn't impress me but it doesn't set off any whistles either.
There are a lot of people who have been very off my radar and I need to give them a closer look. Killingtime mainly but there are others.
It doesn't set off any whistles as such but the likelyhood of thrawn and him to be scum together is low, I think thrawn is more town than scum however looking from it purely from the view point that thrawn is scum it is possible that debears read the previous posts and had a crush on thrawn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
