Merc Mini 2 - Page 13

On July 13 2011 11:35 Chezinu wrote:
Nisani201 has threaten Chezinu Banking and its loyal members. Failure to comply must be punished.

##Vote Nisani201

On July 13 2011 11:12 chaos13 wrote:
Sorry for my relative lack of activity guys, I've been busy with company all day. I'll be able to post more tomorrow.

First off:
heist, start thinking for yourself. To begin with, Kurumi makes a brief post about how syllo's posting isn't like his town play. With no evidence of how it compares or of how it is scummy, you hop along and agree with it


Now you're doing the same with nisani. Form your own opinions and explain them, or I will be forced to conclude that you are scum.




I also have to support this. Either you're (correctly) getting a town read on me because you are genuinely analyzing my posts, or you are mafia attempting to gain town cred later on. I have to admit that two posts isn't anything to go on, whether you gain a town or a scum read. Step up your game as well.

Chezinu, why should I join your bank group?

On July 13 2011 05:44 OriginalName wrote:


I had weak cases until I found Sandroba, I still have weak cases, I dont like commiting to weak cases because very often weak cases are wrong. I haven't even put a vote down on anyone yet and neither has anyone else. So how can anyone really be called commital yet?

On July 13 2011 05:10 OriginalName wrote:


Meta =/= Scum.

And depending on how items work and such he could be right.

On July 13 2011 05:40 OriginalName wrote:


Please provide evidence because im fairly sure i committed to lynching scummy lurkers over all else day 1 and im even more sure that you are just omgusing me because i decided to push you.

I agree mostly with that list overall though syllogism just hasnt done quite enough yet to warrent that spot.

On July 13 2011 01:57 OriginalName wrote:


I don't like lynching Radfield day 1, hes generally a very good player as such hes been killed N1 of alot of games recently (PYPI was the exception as he picked bulletproof) for good reason.



This is stupid, just because he says hes not good at PM games doesnt mean it takes alot of skill to lay a pm trap. Its just knowing how to play mafia in a reasonable manner, revealing it was a trap in my opinion was the only silly move he did there.

On July 13 2011 01:58 OriginalName wrote:
Also he could be lying about said pm skills to avoid scum shooting by appearing meeker.

On July 13 2011 01:31 OriginalName wrote:


It really depends on the scenario for gaining the item.

I think the system should go something like this,

Do I think the Item is boobied?

If yes - Announce the damned contract

if no - Keep it to yourself.

Otherwise if your really scared about secrecy or weather its announced or not just write it in the contract that said person will announce that he has completed it with another player.

On July 13 2011 04:09 OriginalName wrote:


While this is true in theory, it should be based on such a thing as a Lurker who is posting fairly town or a lurker with weak opinions. We obviously lynch the lurker with weak opinions if there is a person we are on the fence about, that way we can buy ourselves time to look at the scummy active player who may turn out to be town and have solid scumreads for the remainder of the game.

On July 13 2011 05:05 OriginalName wrote:


Because its all mostly gutreads that I honestly have barely any evidence to back up with it. I cant go oh look their 100% after 5 posts from each of them. There has to be patterns. Sure one case can be scummy and look you pointed out my pattern of not really giving evidence. And now im responding because In sands case its mostly the Lynching lurkers for lynching lurkers angle rather than lynching lurkers because they're scummy.

On July 13 2011 19:59 Kurumi wrote:
Sinani said Nisani is a bit experienced, newbie card should be non-existant.

On July 13 2011 00:36 Radfield wrote:


This seems like a risky thing to be posting in public. Surely it makes far more sense for you to be PMing players you have pro-town reads on rather than letting everyone know.

On July 13 2011 17:59 Kurumi wrote:



I would leave Radfield alone. I seriously would if I saw anything redeeming him. There are a couple of things missing in the picture with Radfield's play in this game.
#1: No suspects.
Radfield suspects... noone.
+ Show Spoiler +
Look, this is how Radfield talk about people. "He is town."
"He is town too." "Town too." Pretty easy to say as scum. Radfield literally found 0 scuminess in people so far.
#2: Scum-driven actions.
A) Role fishing.
+ Show Spoiler +
Why the heck would You want to know if someone was blue? To out them? Slip the information? Send PM about someone's role to wrong person? Role fishing IS NOT a Town trait. Town has absolutely no need in knowing who is blue. Everything Town needs to know is who is scum and who is town. You don't search for blues, You search for TOWN! The priority of course is scumhunting, but if someone behaves Town You have one person less to think about.
B) Shady contracts
So let's list what Radfield wanted to buy:
RPG (every town needs one, of course!)
Votes (You know, we have a Mayor election this game)
Bulletproof Vest (hai guise thanks to vest i survived night 1 i am totally not scum thanks to that so don't hit on my scuminess silly boys, my scum bro "sold" me one)
What Radfield sold:
Gave 25,000 Kronos to Chezinu

So let's sit down and think a bit. How good would be to have an excuse for surviving Night 1 as scum? Amazing! BPV fits in the pattern.
Votes? That was searching for SK. The first person to sell his/her vote is likely a SK. How good would be allying with one? How awesome, 2KP! Also we don't know if Radfield speaks truth about noone selling his vote. It is highly likely there's a deal between Radfield and Chezinu.
C) Excuses
+ Show Spoiler +

On July 14 2011 00:14 Nisani201 wrote:

Wrong, this is the second forum game that I've played. The only other Mafia games I've played besides this and RTM are SC2 Mafia games, which have a completely different atmosphere (you can try it if you want, last I checked it was pretty high up in the custom game rankings).

On July 14 2011 02:04 Nisani201 wrote:
OK, I've made my decision.

##Vote: Radfield

On July 13 2011 04:02 heist wrote:
In a game this small I think we have to lynch someone suspicious, not necessarily rad. Lynching a lurker will give us very little information to work on and the lurker still has a good chance of flipping town.

Also Kurumi lemme guess your equipment:

1. standard issue butterfly knife
2. electro sapper

Am I close? What's up with the picture?

On July 13 2011 05:35 heist wrote:
I can definitely give you the benefit of the doubt this early on radfield. I'm just really surprised that Sandroba can completely disregard everything you've done and now he's put you on his no lynch list.

On July 13 2011 05:03 heist wrote:




Sandroba I don't see in any way how Kurumi is more scummy at this point than Radfield based on actions alone. On the contrary, Kurumi is pointing out what exactly makes Radfield our leading suspect (although the BP contradiction is quite bs). role-fishing is one of the scummiest things to do. Isn't it a bit suspicious that radfield folds on his trap after one line of inquiry? That said, is he super-scummy? No but I like his chances at flipping red more than a lurker's.

On July 13 2011 05:46 heist wrote:
I was just going to say, despite that, I agree with Sandroba on Nisani as more likely scum although I'm assuming it's just based on this one post?



Lurkers are not always town. You really shouldn't be making any statement that encourages people to lurk. He does seem eager to lynch someone with very little evidence. I am fully expecting to eat my own words right here because after all this is just one post, but I'm just pointing out that this post does not seem very pro-town at all.

On July 13 2011 04:02 heist wrote:
In a game this small I think we have to lynch someone suspicious, not necessarily rad. Lynching a lurker will give us very little information to work on and the lurker still has a good chance of flipping town.