EPTDQs: Yosh, RiboRibo, Scan, Mercury - Page 4
| Forum Index > TSL2 Forum |
Carnac
Germany / USA16648 Posts
| ||
|
Bosu
United States3247 Posts
| ||
Chill
Calgary25987 Posts
On December 13 2009 14:32 KwarK wrote: You know what, this actually makes me feel pretty vindicated. I got so much random crap thrown at me because I purposefully sought out players I knew I could beat and farmed them but not once did I consider asking someone to throw a game or utilising one of my other B+ accounts to throw myself games. These are what actual abusers look like. Let's see how the mob treats their heroes now. Thanks Kwark. When I entered this thread the first thing I wondered was "How does this affect Kwark?" Thankfully you posted within the first 10 replies to let us all know. | ||
|
beefhamburger
United States3962 Posts
On December 13 2009 14:53 Superiorwolf wrote: Lol wtf? I can't believe TSL is disqualifying yosh. That is ridiculous. And from what I can tell, it is an ambiguous two games that would still leave him at the top 12 even if he did not have those games. What rank were those games at? And was the IP for the second account matching yosh? People calling him a scammer and abuser are really misinformed, first of all even if those two games WERE abuse he was still top 12 and even then I don't think he abused. I hope TSL reconsiders their decision. Why should it matter how good you are or where you're ranked? Are you saying that the top players should be allowed to abuse as long as it doesn't give them THAT many points? The point of TSL is fair competition and he did not uphold that. | ||
|
FragKrag
United States11552 Posts
On December 13 2009 14:58 IdrA wrote: oh goody superiorwolf is defending someone thats always entertaining Edit: I can't understand how anybody could possibly defend yosh after what he did. -_- Abuse is abuse, even if it doesn't affect others that much (which wasn't even the case here!). He played on that account and beat other players, jeopardizing their chances at the top 48 or top 12 etc. | ||
|
Liquid`Nazgul
22427 Posts
On December 13 2009 14:58 Superiorwolf wrote: Well it's a double standard if someone else flamed A2 and F91 and then defended Sherwin, but I didn't flame either of them. please don't do this.. you're not seriously asking to allow someone to play TSL after abusing.. | ||
KwarK
United States43202 Posts
On December 13 2009 15:01 Chill wrote: Thanks Kwark. When I entered this thread the first thing I wondered was "How does this affect Kwark?" Thankfully you posted within the first 10 replies to let us all know. Thanks Chill. When I made that post I couldn't help thinking "What does Chill think about my post?". Thankfully you saw it and replied to let us all know. | ||
GTR
51496 Posts
On December 13 2009 15:00 Bosu wrote: I wonder how much abuse happened in other league ladders like GOM and ASL. I don't think they payed this close of attention to abuse. I am sure it was rampant. well there wasn't as much coverage or prize money on the line compared to this. | ||
|
John49ers
United States237 Posts
As for Scan, when you listen to that much K-pop you can expect brain rotting, retardation and ladder abuse/cheating. | ||
|
Chill
Calgary25987 Posts
On December 13 2009 14:53 Superiorwolf wrote: Lol wtf? I can't believe TSL is disqualifying yosh. That is ridiculous. And from what I can tell, it is an ambiguous two games that would still leave him at the top 12 even if he did not have those games. What rank were those games at? And was the IP for the second account matching yosh? People calling him a scammer and abuser are really misinformed, first of all even if those two games WERE abuse he was still top 12 and even then I don't think he abused. I hope TSL reconsiders their decision. Are you seriously this retarded? It's evidence against this: I don't think he abused WOW WHICH WILL I CHOOSE? Evidence or Superiorwolf's arbitrary character analysis? Hmmmm. | ||
|
Bosu
United States3247 Posts
On December 13 2009 15:03 GTR wrote: well there wasn't as much coverage or prize money on the line compared to this. Thats not really the point. | ||
|
Chill
Calgary25987 Posts
On December 13 2009 15:03 KwarK wrote: Thanks Chill. When I made that post I couldn't help thinking "What does Chill think about my post?". Thankfully you saw it and replied to let us all know. Here's the difference, Kwark. I comment on the topic and people's replies. You always, always enter a thread to talk about yourself. It's getting so tired. | ||
|
FortuneSyn
1826 Posts
| ||
|
FragKrag
United States11552 Posts
maybe they are inferior to the TSL then? | ||
|
phase
United States399 Posts
I did not know about this rule: No multiple or shared TSL accounts. You may have another ICCup account without a TSL tag, but that account cannot play games against TSL tagged players. I'm curious as to how many more people will get DQd because of this, if TSL + iccup staff keep checking people like that (I feel like this number is going to be in the 10s...) | ||
|
IdrA
United States11541 Posts
he didnt cheat nearly as bad as these guys the world must know | ||
|
AdreN
United States9 Posts
| ||
|
sutureself
United States192 Posts
Hate cheaters. Dirty rotten cheaters. Good riddance. Love TL, for being as thorough as they can to maintain the integrity of the event. This thing has got to be a clusterfuck and I don't envy the detectives on the case. Looking forward to the next rounds.  | ||
|
eshlow
United States5210 Posts
| ||
|
blue_arrow
1971 Posts
because honestly, these ppls abuse strategies are pretty half-assed and stupid... it's pretty much common knowledge that your IPs can be found and matched up and whatnot by any decent admin/mod/webmaster etc of the sites you use and visit im thinking the admin peeps arent even through 10% of their abuse-detection work, and with 6 people caught already, i dont think setting a maragin of 60 players is enough, sadly =((((( | ||
| ||
