| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
Pwnzer
United States617 Posts
On April 08 2012 19:32 JOJOsc2news wrote: Yeah... it was well intentioned but unnecessary. Shit like that should just be nuked and forgotten. When a post says "nuked" does that mean a mod completely removed it? | ||
|
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
On April 10 2012 09:38 TheKefka wrote: Lol how was I supposed to know that people are so sensitive about their holes. that was my defence too On April 10 2012 10:01 Pwnzer wrote: When a post says "nuked" does that mean a mod completely removed it? yes, usually only for posts that are advertising or especially offensive. | ||
|
TheToast
United States4808 Posts
On April 10 2012 10:01 turdburgler wrote: yes, usually only for posts that are advertising or especially offensive. Also used when people who use multi accounts maliciously, like the TI guy. | ||
|
CyDe
United States1010 Posts
| ||
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On April 10 2012 11:46 CyDe wrote: Can you get nuked without getting banned? I don't think so. | ||
|
TheToast
United States4808 Posts
Well I suppose you could just go through and manually edit someone's posts.... | ||
|
OpticalShot
Canada6330 Posts
| ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
On April 10 2012 12:32 OpticalShot wrote: What happens when someone reports a post, then the original poster edits out the offensive part before any mod is able to read the report? I assume mods can see all edits of any post, so they can go back to see what it was originally. Or maybe only TL admins can do that, I'm not really sure. | ||
|
TheAmazombie
United States3714 Posts
On April 10 2012 12:35 Dodgin wrote: I assume mods can see all edits of any post, so they can go back to see what it was originally. Or maybe only TL admins can do that, I'm not really sure. Yeah, I am pretty sure there is a record of edits. It would only make sense. People think they are smarter than the system sometimes. | ||
|
BobTheLob
Canada362 Posts
On April 10 2012 12:54 TheAmazombie wrote: Yeah, I am pretty sure there is a record of edits. It would only make sense. People think they are smarter than the system sometimes. Ya this was brought up a while ago either in this thread or the ask TL staff anything one, they used to only be able to see 2 edits back but they can see the whole history now. | ||
|
marttorn
Norway5211 Posts
| ||
Kiett
United States7639 Posts
On April 10 2012 12:32 OpticalShot wrote: What happens when someone reports a post, then the original poster edits out the offensive part before any mod is able to read the report? The report comes with a copy of the post, so even if it's edited out, the offensive part is still there in the report ^^ | ||
|
Boiler Bandsman
United States391 Posts
On April 10 2012 13:51 Kiett wrote: The report comes with a copy of the post, so even if it's edited out, the offensive part is still there in the report ^^ Assuming it was mod-worthy to begin with, would it still be likely to attract a ban/warning? One would like to think they edited because they realized it was a mistake...I'm curious what the approach would be to that. | ||
motbob
United States12546 Posts
On April 10 2012 14:21 Boiler Bandsman wrote: Assuming it was mod-worthy to begin with, would it still be likely to attract a ban/warning? One would like to think they edited because they realized it was a mistake...I'm curious what the approach would be to that. It depends. Sometimes it attracts a ban/warning despite the edit and sometimes it does not. Certainly it makes it less likely that a ban/warning will be given. | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
On April 10 2012 14:21 Boiler Bandsman wrote: Assuming it was mod-worthy to begin with, would it still be likely to attract a ban/warning? One would like to think they edited because they realized it was a mistake...I'm curious what the approach would be to that. I think they would be able to see if it was a mistake, It's unlikely that if it was moderation worthy you would be able to do a simple edit and make it look like an accident. If they can see timestamps for an edit if it was like 10 seconds after the first post It's probably not going to get a warn or ban unless it's really bad because they never intended for anyone to see the post. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On April 10 2012 14:24 motbob wrote: It depends. Sometimes it attracts a ban/warning despite the edit and sometimes it does not. Certainly it makes it less likely that a ban/warning will be given. i've always wondered why this guy got away with going into the Trayvon Martin thread and calling the kid that was shot a "nigger." no mod action was taken despite the report. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=324498¤tpage=33#647 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=324498¤tpage=33#648 | ||
bkrow
Australia8532 Posts
On April 10 2012 12:32 OpticalShot wrote: What happens when someone reports a post, then the original poster edits out the offensive part before any mod is able to read the report? Back in the good old days mods couldn't see more than the most recent edit (i think at least) so if you edited your post multiple times they could only see the last one. But if the report comes with a copy of the original then meh, guess you are screwed :p The solution must be to not post like shit in the first place  StorkHwaiting was just temp banned for 1 week by KwarK. That account was created on 2009-10-22 13:34:21 and had 2977 posts. Reason: All your posts make me not want to share this site with you but any long ban for a single one of them will look disproportionate so I want to build up some more moderation history so I can eventually perm you. Stop being a dick. What a fantastic ban reason | ||
|
Pwnzer
United States617 Posts
That account was created on 2012-03-14 22:45:23 and had 0 posts. Reason: Placebo Bearing Underwear What does this even mean? Haha. | ||
|
FlyingToilet
United States840 Posts
On April 10 2012 10:01 turdburgler wrote: that was my defence too yes, usually only for posts that are advertising or especially offensive. I am kinda glad i went back and edited my response to that guys post, it was pretty immature of me and i wouldn't be surprised if i got warned for it. but its whatever as long as most people didn't get to see the crap that guy laid on his keyboard! | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
On April 10 2012 15:38 Pwnzer wrote: Haziroth2 was just banned by GMarshal. That account was created on 2012-03-14 22:45:23 and had 0 posts. Reason: Placebo Bearing Underwear What does this even mean? Haha. Fancy way of saying PBU, or Previously Banned User. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
GSL
Rogue vs Percival
Zoun vs Solar
Replay Cast
GSL
Cure vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs Bunny
KCM Race Survival
Big Gabe
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
Escore
OSC
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
