|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
I normally just copy the text and then add quote tags. If you want to get fancy you can add bolded tags as well. So that ban we have
orangesunglasses was just banned by HawaiianPig.
That account was created on 2012-01-11 02:44:03 and had 109 posts.
Reason: So a well written and thought out post is equal to single-line unsupported caster bashing? Somehow this makes us FOX news? I don't think you understand how this forum or community works. Get the hell out.
This ban is Fair and Balanced.
|
Copy past the text, then add the ["quote"] tag.
For example:
On December 22 2012 4:42 Navillus wrote:
OMG IT'S THE END OF THE WORLD!!!! I'm sending a message back in time, unfortunately the Mayan warp portal that opened will only let me send messages to Team Liquid in the Automated Ban List Thread. FOR GOD'S SAKE WARN PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!
O.O
|
LOL Toast, you so slow. Why you no post in our mafia game?
|
your Country52797 Posts
On March 07 2012 11:12 TheToast wrote:Copy past the text, then add the ["quote"] tag. For example: Show nested quote +On December 22 2012 4:42 Navillus wrote:
OMG IT'S THE END OF THE WORLD!!!! I'm sending a message back in time, unfortunately the Mayan warp portal that opened will only let me send messages to Team Liquid in the Automated Ban List Thread. FOR GOD'S SAKE WARN PEOPLE!!!!!!!!! O.O
...I just got.. utterly trolled....
On the current topic of best bans:
I would vote for tdot/TI for their incredible persistance, maybe GG.nore because I know exactly how hard it is to do what he did.
|
Although it was already answered, here's a more in depth answer for anyone else. 
You don't actually have to use the quote button to quote someone, you can just copy the text and then add the bolds, time and date and what ever else is needed, and add quote tags either side. You'll end up with a post that looks like this before posting, but which appears as if you quoted it.
[quote][b]pianoo[/b] was just [b]banned[/b] by Hot_Bid.
That account was created on [b]2008-12-28 08:48:24[/b] and had [b]1[/b] posts.
[b]Reason:[/b] You're only temp banned!
[spoiler]lawl tricked you noob
perm[/spoiler][/quote]
+ Show Spoiler [Appears as] +pianoo was just banned by Hot_Bid. That account was created on 2008-12-28 08:48:24 and had 1 posts. Reason: You're only temp banned! + Show Spoiler +lawl tricked you noob
perm
|
Teamliquid bans: The people's choice awards
Introducing Teamliquid bans: The peoples choice awards (TLB).TLB is here to provide eternal, lasting memories of your favourite bans in a dedicated museum of glory. Ever wished you could just send someone a quick link to that outrageously awesome ban from a few months, or even a year back, but it's buried somewhere in the thousands of pages (literally O_O) of the ABL or this thread? Now's your chance to preserve that moment in TLB's The hall of fame shame.
__________________________________________________
How does it work??
Nominees for TLB's hall of shame will be decided by YOU, the community! Want to nominate a Teamliquid ban? Make sure you upvote the nomination of a ban by quoting the original poster who linked/quoted the ban here, responding with the following:
"+1 upvote"
AS WELL as some other content to your post. That of course, can be directed to the ban in the process of nomination or anything else relevant to this thread. We don't want this to be filled with 1-liners now do we?!
Of course a series of linked bans or other special occasion is available for nomination as well. Don't forget to +1 upvote the ban you linked yourself if you'd like to nominate it!
+ Show Spoiler [Example upvote] +On March 07 2012 08:24 Probulous wrote:Finally found what I was looking for, the drunk kennigit spree. These needs and honourable mention on the front page. + Show Spoiler [Spoilered for Safety] +Hawk was just banned by Kennigit.
That account was created on 2007-05-21 09:41:37 and had 6485 posts.
Reason: Hi im kennigit. when i sober up maybe ill unban nitram was just banned by Kennigit.
That account was created on 2004-09-13 10:20:42 and had 3368 posts.
Reason: Hi im kennigit. when i sober up maybe ill unban Frits was just banned by Kennigit.
That account was created on 2003-03-06 16:49:06 and had 5970 posts.
Reason: Hi im kennigit. when i sober up maybe ill unban CaucasianAsian was just banned by Kennigit.
That account was created on 2005-09-20 17:00:33 and had 3904 posts.
Reason: Hi im kennigit. when i sober up maybe ill unban Mynock was just banned by Kennigit.
That account was created on 2002-09-24 23:19:16 and had 4019 posts.
Reason: Hi im kennigit. when i sober up maybe ill unban GrandInquisitor was just banned by Kennigit.
That account was created on 2005-05-22 16:31:17 and had 6377 posts.
Reason: Hi im kennigit. when i sober up maybe ill unban NeoIllusions was just banned by Kennigit.
That account was created on 2002-12-03 05:58:53 and had 4641 posts.
Reason: Hi im kennigit. when i sober up maybe ill unban .kaz was just banned by Kennigit.
That account was created on 2007-01-10 09:20:40 and had 1787 posts.
Reason: Hi im kennigit. when i sober up maybe ill unban Alcohol is hazardhous to your health, especially if Kennigit is drinking it  +1 upvote Is this the first time Kennigit has gone on a drunken banning spree?
If this were to be the case, how many upvotes should it take for a ban to be nominated? I was hoping each season to go for about 2-4 months, giving us no more than 2 or 3 a week on average; I was thinking about 10 or so.
ALTERNATIVE:
Perhaps it would be best if I select the nominees manually and disregard the whole upvoting mechanism all together? This is up to you of course!
+ Show Spoiler [Upvote Poll] +Poll: Upvote count for nomination?Don't do upvotes! Let Grobyc select the nominees manually! (30) 91% 8 (3) 9% <=7 (0) 0% 10 (0) 0% 12 (0) 0% >=13 (0) 0% 33 total votes Your vote: Upvote count for nomination? (Vote): <=7
(Vote): 8
(Vote): 10
(Vote): 12
(Vote): >=13
(Vote): Don't do upvotes! Let Grobyc select the nominees manually!
Upon reaching 8 nominees, a winner will be selected by method of the communities choice as well. I'm terrible at these things, so I'll provide you with a mere 3 selections for the method: Single elimination tournament style via polls, One big poll, & Other (explain your decision of course!).
+ Show Spoiler [Method Poll] +Poll: Hall of shame method selection?Single elimination tournament style (19) 79% One big poll (4) 17% Other (explain please) (1) 4% 24 total votes Your vote: Hall of shame method selection? (Vote): Single elimination tournament style
(Vote): One big poll
(Vote): Other (explain please)
__________________________________________________
The nomination period for season 1 will begin at Monday, Mar 12 3:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00). The decision for the nomination upvote count as well as nominee selection method will be made by me after reviewing the polls and comments to follow the day before.
+ Show Spoiler +Man you people are savages; 5 new pages since my post last night!
GL HF
TEAMLIQUID BANS HWAITING!~!
|
Are these nominations meant only for present and future bans, or can we delve into the early days of the ABL to search for a candidate?
|
Whilst I love the effort (and the fact that quoted the drunken kennigit spree) this seems awefully complicated. Why not just put the first say ten bans that people suggest in the list and then slowly remove and add as you see fit. It is your thread after all. The desire to be democratic is noble but it would probably lead to this thread getting spammed. We just got rid of the banner I don't want it to return.
Thanks Grobyc, you are a gentleman amongst swine. *Oink!*
|
On March 07 2012 11:53 Aeres wrote:
Are these nominations meant only for present and future bans, or can we delve into the early days of the ABL to search for a candidate?
Season 1 will be present bans. Between March 13th and the time it takes to get 8 nominees. I'm thinking we'll have a special season that allows for oldie but goodie bans!
On March 07 2012 11:54 Probulous wrote:
Whilst I love the effort (and the fact that quoted the drunken kennigit spree) this seems awefully complicated. Why not just put the first say ten bans that people suggest in the list and then slowly remove and add as you see fit. It is your thread after all. The desire to be democratic is noble but it would probably lead to this thread getting spammed. We just got rid of the banner I don't want it to return.
Thanks Grobyc, you are a gentleman amongst swine. *Oink!*
Perhaps this is a good idea. The selection process could still be determined by the community with my selecting the nominees along the way. I will add this as an option to the first poll, which would be your suggestion to do away with the whole upvoting thing all together.
|
Yeah that works perfectly well. I don't want to shit on your parade. I love the idea, I hope kennigit's drunken spree gets on the list. I love how he banned all the guys who would never get banned. It's like he had an itch he just had to scratch and only being drunk made it reasonable.
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES49496 Posts
no upvotes man, have a panel of people select the nominees.
|
On March 07 2012 11:20 Probulous wrote:
LOL Toast, you so slow. Why you no post in our mafia game?
First rule of Mafia: we don't talk about Mafia (outside of Mafia).
Besides being a severe infraction of the rules in a non-PM game, this has the annoying potential to start a trend of stalking people on TL outside of Mafia. That is not a good precedent.
+ Show Spoiler +And if you must know I'm watching You Tube and Installing a Linux VM which has my attention a bit too divided for Mafia playing at the moment.
|
Guys I have a suggestion:
Those who nominate, could you please provide a brief summary of the people you nominate. Some of us newbies here may not be familiar with them but would like to participate in the process. For example we might know OpticalShot now and he doesnt seem ban worthy, but there must be a history you shoud explain. And to the others who were before our time who we know just because they are mentioned here often, TI, ggnore, tdot, CM (who? seen no account), etc.
|
On March 07 2012 12:25 Keyboard Warrior wrote:
Guys I have a suggestion:
Those who nominate, could you please provide a brief summary of the people you nominate. Some of us newbies here may not be familiar with them but would like to participate in the process. For example we might know OpticalShot now and he doesnt seem ban worthy, but there must be a history you shoud explain. And to the others who were before our time who we know just because they are mentioned here often, TI, ggnore, tdot, CM (who? seen no account), etc.
CharlieMurphy, a very old very high count poster who was eventually permed for being too bad for too long. (On an interesting aside, when checking that out to confirm that I remembered his name correctly I discovered that I had until now believed that he and Bill Murray, the old time mafia player who was too bad for too long and so was banned from the mafia forum (now unbanned), were the same person. This is apparently not the case.)
|
Edit: I PM'd Wiggles. Please ignore.
|
On March 07 2012 09:24 Chocolate wrote:Show nested quote +On March 07 2012 09:11 Kamais Ookin wrote:On March 07 2012 08:48 Probulous wrote:On March 07 2012 08:34 Aeres wrote:I had the most amazing dream last night. I dreamt I logged onto TL and saw this: + Show Spoiler +On March 06 2012 09:51 dacthehork wrote:
--- Nuked --- Oh god you and me both. One day it will happen, one day. For those unaware take a look at this thread for an example. I'm looking at that thread and I'm seeing a lot of shitty posts that are warn/bannable, and none of them is coming from dacthehork. Maybe this will change your mind, He almost exclusively posts in his own threads haha.
Fucking disgusting, I'm with Aeres on this one.
Mod should cave his face in with a ban hammer so fierce that it would make Hephasto the Armorer jelly.
|
On March 07 2012 12:05 BLinD-RawR wrote:
no upvotes man, have a panel of people select the nominees.
I agree with this. The upvoting thing just seems like it would make this thread even more incomprehensible and cluttered than it already is.
|
Yeah I'm starting to not like it so much now too. Unless I make another thread dedicated to just voting, but meh. Wouldn't be adding any other content to the posts if that was the case, and the amount of low-content/1-liner posts would be overwhelming.
The selection method still needs to be chosen by people though . Could be pretty close between one big poll and a single elim. tourny style.
|
I wish Grobyc's initiative happened about one year ago. I would have had a legit shot at this with my awesome 1000th ABL snipe. BUTTTTT because this is like the first of its kind (although various threads have made attempts to keep track of the awesome bans in the past) the competition is just legendary (GG.NoRe, CM, fanatacist, tdot, TI##, etc.) and I have no chance at the glory. Boo. On the other hand, I might be the only non-permed-one-account-TLer with something worthy to talk about lol.
|
On March 07 2012 14:27 OpticalShot wrote:
I wish Grobyc's initiative happened about one year ago. I would have had a legit shot at this with my awesome 1000th ABL snipe. BUTTTTT because this is like the first of its kind (although various threads have made attempts to keep track of the awesome bans in the past) the competition is just legendary (GG.NoRe, CM, fanatacist, tdot, TI##, etc.) and I have no chance at the glory. Boo. On the other hand, I might be the only non-permed-one-account-TLer with something worthy to talk about lol. Sorry bro, that would be IdrA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
