|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On May 17 2011 00:36 tenkka wrote: Wow, why is every thread about Kelly full of so much drama? She does a lot for the community, Idk why people seem to hate her so much.
They're afraid of girls.
|
On May 16 2011 07:32 Navillus wrote:Show nested quote +Lach_mc was just temp banned for 90 days by KwarK.
That account was created on 2010-08-18 17:39:20 and had 18 posts.
Reason: Step 1: Get banned. Step 2: Read the part of the ban that says "please don't not try to circumvent this by making a new account or your ban will be lengthened." Step 3: Make a new account. TL.net Bot: This previously banned user registered a new account with the username XXXXXX
Step 4: Send mod who banned you the following XXXXXX: it's the internet bro please don't act like you have the ability to manipulate anything i do. amending a Ban PM with "please don't not try to circumvent this by making a new account etc..."
any 13 year old with a basic understanding of Dynamic IP addresses i'm sure could bypass your IP filters simply by pulling their plug and for those like me who happen to be more sophisticated understanding of things like Mac address logging, DNS server augmentation.. pathetic! thanks for the ban too. TL won't last much longer at this speed
We are the Legion
Step 5: Have your ban lengthened. I loved this esp. because of The person both sounded like a stupid bitch and couldn't even pretend to be Anonymous correctly, I am positive that they don't even understand what the phrase "we are legion" actually means, or know that legion can even be used that way.
The funniest thing is that this guy is trying to make out like he's super smart by dropping terms like "Mac address logging" and "DNS server augmentation", when they make little to no sense in the context. Your MAC address is the address of your local hardware theres no way that changing it would effect anything and DNS server augmentation?! That just makes as little sense a DNS server merely converts http links we type in into IP addresses for our computers, i can't even begin to fathom what he intends to do by 'augmenting' it.
|
On May 17 2011 00:37 chaokel wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2011 07:32 Navillus wrote:Lach_mc was just temp banned for 90 days by KwarK.
That account was created on 2010-08-18 17:39:20 and had 18 posts.
Reason: Step 1: Get banned. Step 2: Read the part of the ban that says "please don't not try to circumvent this by making a new account or your ban will be lengthened." Step 3: Make a new account. TL.net Bot: This previously banned user registered a new account with the username XXXXXX
Step 4: Send mod who banned you the following XXXXXX: it's the internet bro please don't act like you have the ability to manipulate anything i do. amending a Ban PM with "please don't not try to circumvent this by making a new account etc..."
any 13 year old with a basic understanding of Dynamic IP addresses i'm sure could bypass your IP filters simply by pulling their plug and for those like me who happen to be more sophisticated understanding of things like Mac address logging, DNS server augmentation.. pathetic! thanks for the ban too. TL won't last much longer at this speed
We are the Legion
Step 5: Have your ban lengthened. I loved this esp. because of We are the Legion The person both sounded like a stupid bitch and couldn't even pretend to be Anonymous correctly, I am positive that they don't even understand what the phrase "we are legion" actually means, or know that legion can even be used that way. The funniest thing is that this guy is trying to make out like he's super smart by dropping terms like "Mac address logging" and "DNS server augmentation", when they make little to no sense in the context. Your MAC address is the address of your local hardware theres no way that changing it would effect anything and DNS server augmentation?! That just makes as little sense a DNS server merely converts http links we type in into IP addresses for our computers, i can't even begin to fathom what he intends to do by 'augmenting' it.
That ban made me laugh so hard.
"Go ahead and ban me cuz im so 1337 and can change my IP and make new account lol"
ban ban ban ban
Rofl
|
Zurich15313 Posts
On May 17 2011 00:40 PassiveAce wrote:Show nested quote +On May 17 2011 00:37 chaokel wrote:On May 16 2011 07:32 Navillus wrote:Lach_mc was just temp banned for 90 days by KwarK.
That account was created on 2010-08-18 17:39:20 and had 18 posts.
Reason: Step 1: Get banned. Step 2: Read the part of the ban that says "please don't not try to circumvent this by making a new account or your ban will be lengthened." Step 3: Make a new account. TL.net Bot: This previously banned user registered a new account with the username XXXXXX
Step 4: Send mod who banned you the following XXXXXX: it's the internet bro please don't act like you have the ability to manipulate anything i do. amending a Ban PM with "please don't not try to circumvent this by making a new account etc..."
any 13 year old with a basic understanding of Dynamic IP addresses i'm sure could bypass your IP filters simply by pulling their plug and for those like me who happen to be more sophisticated understanding of things like Mac address logging, DNS server augmentation.. pathetic! thanks for the ban too. TL won't last much longer at this speed
We are the Legion
Step 5: Have your ban lengthened. I loved this esp. because of We are the Legion The person both sounded like a stupid bitch and couldn't even pretend to be Anonymous correctly, I am positive that they don't even understand what the phrase "we are legion" actually means, or know that legion can even be used that way. The funniest thing is that this guy is trying to make out like he's super smart by dropping terms like "Mac address logging" and "DNS server augmentation", when they make little to no sense in the context. Your MAC address is the address of your local hardware theres no way that changing it would effect anything and DNS server augmentation?! That just makes as little sense a DNS server merely converts http links we type in into IP addresses for our computers, i can't even begin to fathom what he intends to do by 'augmenting' it. That ban made me laugh so hard. "Go ahead and ban me cuz im so 1337 and can change my IP and make new account lol" ban ban ban ban Rofl You wouldn't believe how many of those internet heroes are out there. The vast majority give up before their 4th account and you'll never hear anything about their 1337 DNS skills again.
|
Netherlands45349 Posts
On May 17 2011 00:36 tenkka wrote: Wow, why is every thread about Kelly full of so much drama? She does a lot for the community, Idk why people seem to hate her so much.
Some people didn't like their casting,
She is a woman.
The internet.
|
OT- Can someone point me in the direction of the thread that Moonglade was banned in? I just want to see the context of the ban.
|
Zurich15313 Posts
For most of today's bans, see the Kelly / FHM thread.
|
On May 17 2011 01:29 zatic wrote: For most of today's bans, see the Kelly / FHM thread. You guys have to like that these threads come about every once and a while. Its like shooting fish in a barrel.
|
On May 17 2011 01:29 zatic wrote: For most of today's bans, see the Kelly / FHM thread.
Thanks
Wow what a clusterfuck. How can people turn a thread that promising into such a flamestorm? Im glad that Moonglade wasn't being mean to Kelly or anything. great pics indeed.
Zatic, you are like a rock in a hurricane of shit ^_^
|
Lalalaland34483 Posts
Is that the real mOOnGLaDe?
Somehow strikes me as a sort of anti-IdrA haha.
|
GGQ was just temp banned for 2 days by Carnac.
That account was created on 2008-07-16 08:01:08 and had 1840 posts.
Reason: not adhering to clearly layed out rules about future spoilers in the GoT TV show thread
This is a really poor ban. He's actively playing in a mafia game and the post he was banned for held no worse spoilers then several other posts in the same thread.
|
On May 17 2011 03:51 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:Show nested quote +GGQ was just temp banned for 2 days by Carnac.
That account was created on 2008-07-16 08:01:08 and had 1840 posts.
Reason: not adhering to clearly layed out rules about future spoilers in the GoT TV show thread This is a really poor ban. He's actively playing in a mafia game and the post he was banned for held no worse spoilers then several other posts in the same thread.
PM a mod, im sure they will be lenient if he's in a mafia game.
|
What's more lenient than 2 days?
|
On May 17 2011 03:59 Torte de Lini wrote: What's more lenient than 2 days?
A warning (depending on whether or not he currently has a list of warnings; if he does, then a warning equals a tempban anyway).
|
On May 11 2011 17:37 Megaliskuu wrote:Show nested quote + platorepublic was just temp banned for 1 week by boesthius.
That account was created on 2011-04-14 10:18:14 and had 164 posts.
Reason: This is too important for stupid TL rules.
I don't think you understand how TL works. I understand it's for a good cause, but you've been banned before for not obeying TL rules for nearly the exact same thing. When you come back please be a little more mindful.
Finally! This guys posting was starting to get annoying >.>
Platorepublic gets back off his ban in 2 days... I really hope he gets himself permabanned soon or leaves >_<
His posts in that Uganda anti-gay bill thread were so ridiculous. The guy is so full of himself.
|
^ Being required to read through SC2 LR's and press the report funcion as much as you can.
On the subject of Kelly-hate in general, especially due to her recent FHM shoot, I think (generalization incoming) it's because a lot of the h@ers are insecure 10-12-14 year olds who are new to posting properly. I say this, with no evidence of course, because it follows that SC2, a very new game, has also attracted a whole new wave of young kids to the community, and seeing from the rampant immaturity in those threads I'd bet they're all pretty petty. Think about the people who send death-threats to Selma Gomez because she's dating Justin Bieber. In my mind same age same maturity, hopefully not same sex tho.
|
On May 15 2011 06:01 Deja Thoris wrote: In worrying news the TL.net bot is down to 6 posts. I wait with trepidation for the countdown to hit zero. I hope sky.TL.net bot is a kind and loving overlord.
Your day will soon arive. We are now down to 5 posts.
|
On May 17 2011 01:41 PassiveAce wrote:Show nested quote +On May 17 2011 01:29 zatic wrote: For most of today's bans, see the Kelly / FHM thread. Thanks Wow what a clusterfuck. How can people turn a thread that promising into such a flamestorm? Im glad that Moonglade wasn't being mean to Kelly or anything. great pics indeed. Zatic, you are like a rock in a hurricane of shit ^_^
thought they were dating or something like that , no suprise he did it
|
On May 17 2011 04:14 BloodNinja wrote:Show nested quote +On May 15 2011 06:01 Deja Thoris wrote: In worrying news the TL.net bot is down to 6 posts. I wait with trepidation for the countdown to hit zero. I hope sky.TL.net bot is a kind and loving overlord. Your day will soon arrive. We are now down to 5 posts.
when I made my account it was at 24. what's going on here?
|
On May 17 2011 04:16 TheBJ wrote:Show nested quote +On May 17 2011 01:41 PassiveAce wrote:On May 17 2011 01:29 zatic wrote: For most of today's bans, see the Kelly / FHM thread. Thanks Wow what a clusterfuck. How can people turn a thread that promising into such a flamestorm? Im glad that Moonglade wasn't being mean to Kelly or anything. great pics indeed. Zatic, you are like a rock in a hurricane of shit ^_^ thought they were dating or something like that , no suprise he did it data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt=""
I assumed the same thing, everyone did/does.
|
|
|
|