EPTAlso I see that MUFFINS1 has been banned for 1 week, good job.
The Automated Ban List - Page 349
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
Al Bundy
7257 Posts
Also I see that MUFFINS1 has been banned for 1 week, good job. | ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
Lach_mc was just temp banned for 90 days by KwarK. That account was created on 2010-08-18 17:39:20 and had 18 posts. Reason: Step 1: Get banned. Step 2: Read the part of the ban that says "please don't not try to circumvent this by making a new account or your ban will be lengthened." Step 3: Make a new account. TL.net Bot: This previously banned user registered a new account with the username XXXXXX Step 4: Send mod who banned you the following XXXXXX: it's the internet bro please don't act like you have the ability to manipulate anything i do. amending a Ban PM with "please don't not try to circumvent this by making a new account etc..." any 13 year old with a basic understanding of Dynamic IP addresses i'm sure could bypass your IP filters simply by pulling their plug and for those like me who happen to be more sophisticated understanding of things like Mac address logging, DNS server augmentation.. pathetic! thanks for the ban too. TL won't last much longer at this speed We are the Legion Step 5: Have your ban lengthened. I loved this esp. because of We are the Legion The person both sounded like a stupid bitch and couldn't even pretend to be Anonymous correctly, I am positive that they don't even understand what the phrase "we are legion" actually means, or know that legion can even be used that way. | ||
|
dudecrush
Canada418 Posts
On May 16 2011 07:32 Navillus wrote: I loved this esp. because of The person both sounded like a stupid bitch and couldn't even pretend to be Anonymous correctly, I am positive that they don't even understand what the phrase "we are legion" actually means, or know that legion can even be used that way. I love it even more because he will read us all laughing at him and not be able to post about it.  | ||
|
Divinek
Canada4045 Posts
| ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On May 16 2011 08:03 Divinek wrote: Always lovely seeing lock icons in this thread Oh delicious sweet irony! | ||
|
Archas
United States6531 Posts
On May 16 2011 11:37 TL.net Bot wrote: Bale[3] was just banned by p4NDemik. That account was created on 2011-03-16 11:53:22 and had 9 posts. Reason: ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/p4NDemik/MSpaint/go_toJail.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/SonuvBob/pics/staffabuse.png) | ||
|
57 Corvette
Canada5941 Posts
I call your 200 dollars and raise you a Boardwalk. ![[image loading]](http://foxinthehenhouse.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/boardwalk.gif) On Topic: Great ban p4NDemik. I always cringe when someone with 750+ posts gets permed. You think they'd know better after that many posts, but they go and get themselves banned anyways. | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On May 16 2011 13:04 57 Corvette wrote: I call your 200 dollars and raise you a Boardwalk. On Topic: Great ban p4NDemik. I always cringe when someone with 750+ posts gets permed. You think they'd know better after that many posts, but they go and get themselves banned anyways. I resent that correlated standard or expectancy. Posts =/= Duration of time or understanding of the site. D:< | ||
|
kunstderfugue
Mexico375 Posts
On May 16 2011 11:39 TL.net Bot wrote: Sphnixx2 was just banned by TheMango. That account was created on 2011-05-16 11:34:20 and had 0 posts. Reason: Previously banned user. whoa, that is speedy! gj TL staff | ||
|
Meapak_Ziphh
United States6786 Posts
On May 16 2011 13:09 Torte de Lini wrote: I resent that correlated standard or expectancy. Posts =/= Duration of time or understanding of the site. D:< Case and point eh torte? + Show Spoiler + jk much <3 | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
D:< You're just jealous! | ||
|
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
LMAO, p4ndemik is on a roll~ | ||
|
EmeraldSparks
United States1451 Posts
On May 16 2011 07:32 Navillus wrote: I loved this esp. because of The person both sounded like a stupid bitch and couldn't even pretend to be Anonymous correctly, I am positive that they don't even understand what the phrase "we are legion" actually means, or know that legion can even be used that way. I like to think that all the zero post bans in the next two pages are him. | ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50607 Posts
so are you. | ||
|
oBlade
United States5823 Posts
On May 16 2011 16:22 Azzur wrote: Hot! User was warned for this post On May 16 2011 18:14 Roe wrote: hot! Other people complimented her work, so I think it's the idea of a 1-word post being less effort than a post with 5 words. Or is it a prior infractions' influence sort of warning? | ||
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26782 Posts
You're both jealous. | ||
p4NDemik
United States13896 Posts
On May 16 2011 19:04 oBlade wrote: No complaints right now, Kelly's thread seems to be pretty good. Maybe the trash element has mostly been evicted over the past months' moderating efforts? But there is a small thing, one of these guys wasn't treated the same: Other people complimented her work, so I think it's the idea of a 1-word post being less effort than a post with 5 words. Or is it a prior infractions' influence sort of warning? Its the idea of a 1 word post being the lowest base of effort and one i stop and warn for. And as for the second one: GSTL started at 18:10 KST. I've got better things to do for the time being. The warning can wait. | ||
|
adso
718 Posts
On May 16 2011 19:04 oBlade wrote: No complaints right now, Kelly's thread seems to be pretty good. Maybe the trash element has mostly been evicted over the past months' moderating efforts? But there is a small thing, one of these guys wasn't treated the same: Other people complimented her work, so I think it's the idea of a 1-word post being less effort than a post with 5 words. Or is it a prior infractions' influence sort of warning? probably unadvertised warn Plus i guess, Kelly "hot" is accurate edit: forget i said anything, omg she is hot  ps: love the monopoly show | ||
|
oBlade
United States5823 Posts
On May 16 2011 19:12 p4NDemik wrote: Its the idea of a 1 word post being the lowest base of effort and one i stop and warn for. And as for the second one: GSTL started at 18:10 KST. I've got better things to do for the time being. The warning can wait. It's not a big deal, I wasn't pointing any fingers, just curious. I can read the timestamps too, that's how I noticed the 3post guy who got nuked on the same page so at least someone was watching the thread closely. | ||
|
tenkka
United States89 Posts
| ||
| ||
