EPTof course new page. yup that's about right.
The Automated Ban List - Page 2864
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
brian
United States9619 Posts
of course new page. yup that's about right. | ||
|
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
| ||
|
Paljas
Germany6926 Posts
he is an excellent poster, and, more importantly, one of the few interesting ones in the us politics thread. mods pls | ||
KadaverBB
Germany25657 Posts
| ||
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37024 Posts
On January 22 2017 12:57 Paljas wrote: zzz, why ban Euphorbus? he is an excellent poster, and, more importantly, one of the few interesting ones in the us politics thread. mods pls If he truly was an "excellent poster" then he wouldn't have gotten himself perm banned  | ||
|
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
| ||
|
Paljas
Germany6926 Posts
On January 22 2017 12:59 KadaverBB wrote: He has 4 previously banned accounts that we can track and admitted to having many more. maybe all of the accounts were good and you are wrong? | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On January 22 2017 13:00 LegalLord wrote: He was a good man for padding my report stats and will be missed. Well, look at it this way: Last four+ times he was permed, he came back on a new account, so I wouldn't worry too much. | ||
|
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
On January 22 2017 16:17 Cascade wrote: Well, look at it this way: Last four+ times he was permed, he came back on a new account, so I wouldn't worry too much. You bring up a fine point my good sir. | ||
|
Laurens
Belgium4542 Posts
This paragraph will forever be remembered as "classic Euphorbus" to me: Just because someone on the internet is Dutch doesn't mean they know more about Dutch politics than I do. And even if they know more, that doesn't mean they are right. You probably know less. And if you actually knew more, I doubt it would save you from being wrong. | ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
On January 22 2017 17:05 Laurens wrote: He lasted all of 1 day after being unbanned, can't say I'm surprised though. This paragraph will forever be remembered as "classic Euphorbus" to me: Well, he has a point here, internet is full of people claiming false credentials. One can only trust people whose points agree with their personal biases. | ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28667 Posts
Then I'm notified of his history and two of his other accounts - and I could in no way contest the banning of those. But I give him a small defense anyway. And then another 10 minutes pass and during this period of time he makes like 4 actionable posts. And then he's warned. And then 15 minutes after the next time he returned, he's back at it. I think it sucks because I really liked his non-antagonizing posts and would love for him to consistently contribute positively - he seems like one of the most knowledgeable political posters on the forum, he's clearly very intelligent, able to formulate an argument, all the good stuff. But then it seems like every time he's involved in an argument, with anyone, it turns personal. And when that consistently happens with one particular poster, it becomes difficult to pretend that the poster in question is not to blame. If he could drop the bottom 20% of his posts/ those antagonizing lines from otherwise good posts, he'd be an amazing poster, but posters who have been banned multiple times in the past don't get this type of leniency. | ||
|
Laurens
Belgium4542 Posts
If you're the one having the discussion, it's a lot less fun. Ad hominems and condescending posts non-stop. I only had 1 discussion with him and his first posts to me contained the following: That's odd. Are you sure you are using the right words? You can insist you used your words correctly, but if you keep using them the way you do, people won't understand what you mean next time you do it. The meaning of my sentence was perfectly clear fwiw. The discussion then continued and after repeatedly calling me stupid he asked for my background, I provided it, he then refused to believe it and called me stupid some more, then he got banned and the discussion ended. All the while he had dodged any questions from myself/Nony about the actual topic and just gone off on ad hominem tangents. I can't tell if he's trolling and baiting or if he genuinely doesn't know how to have a proper discussion. It'd be interesting to know the names of his other accounts, but I assume you can't share that? Either way I'm on the side of good riddance. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain17991 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On January 22 2017 20:09 Acrofales wrote: I am with Drone here. His little flamewar with xDaunt was not okay, but before the ad hominems went flying, he was posting some really good stuff. And xDaunt baited him out like the professional, untouchable troll he is. You give me far too much credit. | ||
|
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
| ||
|
farvacola
United States18826 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain17991 Posts
On January 23 2017 01:41 LegalLord wrote: Skirting the edges of what is banworthy without getting banned, while getting other people banned in the process, is a skill worthy of the gods. Well, xDaunt cheats by having untouchable status. | ||
|
boxerfred
Germany8360 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On January 23 2017 03:24 Acrofales wrote: Well, xDaunt cheats by having untouchable status. I'm highly amused by this myth that I'm untouchable. Just because there's no report button on my posts doesn't mean that I'm neither subject to the rules nor unactionable by mods. PM tofu if you have a problem with my posting. But the bottom line is that my posting is fairly clean because I do make an effort to comply with the rules. It's not my fault that there's an endless number of posters who flagrantly break the rules because they disagree with me. | ||
| ||
