|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On May 19 2015 07:40 Deathstar wrote:
There was a rape scene in the show and he's commenting on the rape scene... not like he was randomly making rape comments in other threads. oh well rip
I so disappointed about the rape scene
This is a fucked up sentence.
Then it ends with
Sansa's sweet moaning face.
That meets and exceeds the creepy quota for a GoT rape scene, even by GRR Martin standards.
|
that was a pretty creepy post.
did that "scene" happen in the book? i dont remember it.
|
On May 19 2015 08:55 dAPhREAk wrote:
that was a pretty creepy post.
did that "scene" happen in the book? i dont remember it.
Book spoilers obviously.
+ Show Spoiler +Kinda. In the books Sansa is off with Littlefinger, and Ramsay marries Jeyne Poole who was forced to masquerade as Arya instead. And the stuff Ramsay does to Jeyne Poole mostly happens off screen, though it's somewhat different, since Ramsay forces Theon to participate.
|
On May 19 2015 13:09 ZigguratOfUr wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2015 08:55 dAPhREAk wrote:
that was a pretty creepy post.
did that "scene" happen in the book? i dont remember it. Book spoilers obviously. + Show Spoiler +Kinda. In the books Sansa is off with Littlefinger, and Ramsay marries Jeyne Poole who was forced to masquerade as Arya instead. And the stuff Ramsay does to Jeyne Poole mostly happens off screen, though it's somewhat different, since Ramsay forces Theon to participate.
+ Show Spoiler +pretty sure it involves ramsey saying she is bone dry, Reek if she isnt sopping wet by the time I get undressed I am cutting your tongue out....etc Sansa never goes to Winterfell in the books, Jeyne gets destroyed
|
On May 19 2015 16:32 PostNationalism wrote:
what does teamliquid think about nationalism?
Nationalism is a belief, creed or political ideology that involves an individual identifying with, or becoming attached to, one's nation. Nationalism involves national identity, by contrast with the related construct of patriotism, which involves the social conditioning and personal behaviors that support a state's decisions and actions.[1]
From a political or sociological perspective, there are two main perspectives on the origins and basis of nationalism. One is the primordialist perspective that describes nationalism as a reflection of the ancient and perceived evolutionary tendency of humans to organize into distinct groupings based on an affinity of birth. The other is the modernist perspective that describes nationalism as a recent phenomenon that requires the structural conditions of modern society in order to exist.[2]
User was banned for this post.
Another idea, banned forever from TL.
|
gosh, George Orwell continues to be so poignant.
|
On May 20 2015 00:13 ThomasjServo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2015 16:32 PostNationalism wrote:
what does teamliquid think about nationalism?
Nationalism is a belief, creed or political ideology that involves an individual identifying with, or becoming attached to, one's nation. Nationalism involves national identity, by contrast with the related construct of patriotism, which involves the social conditioning and personal behaviors that support a state's decisions and actions.[1]
From a political or sociological perspective, there are two main perspectives on the origins and basis of nationalism. One is the primordialist perspective that describes nationalism as a reflection of the ancient and perceived evolutionary tendency of humans to organize into distinct groupings based on an affinity of birth. The other is the modernist perspective that describes nationalism as a recent phenomenon that requires the structural conditions of modern society in order to exist.[2]
User was banned for this post. Another idea, banned forever from TL.
This guy was a strange poster. That same post, again and again... like an adbot trying to recruit people into its sociological cult.
|
Canada11607 Posts
Guys! Guys! But what do you REALLY think about postnationalism?
|
On May 20 2015 01:20 Yoav wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2015 00:13 ThomasjServo wrote:On May 19 2015 16:32 PostNationalism wrote:
what does teamliquid think about nationalism?
Nationalism is a belief, creed or political ideology that involves an individual identifying with, or becoming attached to, one's nation. Nationalism involves national identity, by contrast with the related construct of patriotism, which involves the social conditioning and personal behaviors that support a state's decisions and actions.[1]
From a political or sociological perspective, there are two main perspectives on the origins and basis of nationalism. One is the primordialist perspective that describes nationalism as a reflection of the ancient and perceived evolutionary tendency of humans to organize into distinct groupings based on an affinity of birth. The other is the modernist perspective that describes nationalism as a recent phenomenon that requires the structural conditions of modern society in order to exist.[2]
User was banned for this post. Another idea, banned forever from TL. This guy was a strange poster. That same post, again and again... like an adbot trying to recruit people into its sociological cult.
Have you heard the good news about Post Nationalism?
|
cheers Zealously. thanks for doing us all a favor.
|
On May 20 2015 02:17 brian wrote:cheers Zealously. thanks for doing us all a favor.
holy fucking shit
|
Today I read an article by someone called "Shamas." It felt very odd.
|
your Country52798 Posts
On May 20 2015 03:40 Heartland wrote:
Today I read an article by someone called "Shamas." It felt very odd.
You can't just say that and not tell us what the article was about.
|
On May 20 2015 02:17 brian wrote:cheers Zealously. thanks for doing us all a favor.
I can't agree more.
|
Thank you for asking him/her/it to seek help.
+ Show Spoiler +Sadly, banning her/him/it doesn't help.
|
"them" is a perfectly acceptable and vastly more succinct pronoun even as a singular term.
|
this is from yesterday but no one's posted it and I think it deasevers to be seen. put it in spoilers because its a bit vulgar
+ Show Spoiler +On May 19 2015 05:49 l3loodraven wrote:
if i were ever to encounter p6 irl i would flame him until he cried then i would fuck his 6/10 gf thats no front gentlesirs thats a promise
User was temp banned for this post.
|
On May 20 2015 04:53 Sn0_Man wrote:
"them" is a perfectly acceptable and vastly more succinct pronoun even as a singular term.
If it's good enough for Shakespeare its good enough for me.
|
On May 20 2015 04:39 fluidrone wrote:Thank you for asking him/her/it to seek help. + Show Spoiler +Sadly, banning her/him/it doesn't help.
so untrue. it's already helping me.
|
+ Show Spoiler +On May 20 2015 04:56 brian wrote:so untrue. it's already helping me.
I'm sure. Do note that it was it/him/her I was mentioning not getting better...
On May 20 2015 01:21 Falling wrote:Guys! Guys! But what do you REALLY think about postnationalism?
I feel sad for people who consider their country out of sol III context.
In any given semantic field, a truck load of History (note the "H" not "h") knowledge is required. Nationalism purposefully rejects "outside" History, making it about as useful as a cell phone in a couscous (you know, for taste...).
Patriotism will be harder to defeat than nationalism, but both must be squashed back to the 19th century where/when they belong.
I'm a frog, that just means my mum's uterus was in france when it kicked me out. Of course that is part of me, but nowhere near an important/defining part.
On May 20 2015 04:53 Sn0_Man wrote:
"them" is a perfectly acceptable and vastly more succinct pronoun even as a singular term.
To properly gauged someone (allow "them" enough consideration before you start passing judgement upon them), it helps that it takes longer to talk/type/read the word representing him / her / it. Brevity is not for all occasions, certainly not when you reject someone "wrong/sick" upon somewhere/someone else.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
