|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On July 23 2013 09:40 MasterOfPuppets wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2013 09:12 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On July 23 2013 09:03 garbanzo wrote:Jealous was just temp banned for 1 week by Waxangel. That account was created on 2011-12-17 01:41:28 and had 2460 posts. Reason:On July 23 2013 03:08 Jealous wrote:
I got a gifted TL+ so now I have been unleashed onto all of you. awful Hmm...I don't have TL+, am I missing something as to why this is bannable? lmao what have I done... he's my irl friend and I gave him TL+ because he hosted a kickass video game tournament yesterday. >.> oo What games? :D
Pokemon Puzzle League, SSB64, and SSB Melee 
|
On July 23 2013 10:51 Emzeeshady wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2013 15:41 DarkLordOlli wrote:On July 21 2013 19:22 aZealot wrote:
Hi Mods,
May I request a 30 day ban please? I've got a fair bit of RL stuff to deal with at the moment with more to come and time away from TL is required. All going well, I'll be around a lot less even after I return.
Thanks.
User was temp banned for this post.  ((((((((((((( Hope everything's alright. God forbid he's got a girlfriend now or something, those are the worst. Steal all your starcraft time. I tried to put the two together but I couldn't get my GF into SC2 Even worse she likes LOL -_-
I know the feeling bro, I know the feeling...
EDIT: I'm a dota player though, so yeah
90% of our arguments were about LoL/Dota
EDIT2: (that may have been though because we didn't argue much about anything else)
|
On July 23 2013 11:02 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2013 09:40 MasterOfPuppets wrote:On July 23 2013 09:12 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On July 23 2013 09:03 garbanzo wrote:Jealous was just temp banned for 1 week by Waxangel. That account was created on 2011-12-17 01:41:28 and had 2460 posts. Reason:On July 23 2013 03:08 Jealous wrote:
I got a gifted TL+ so now I have been unleashed onto all of you. awful Hmm...I don't have TL+, am I missing something as to why this is bannable? lmao what have I done... he's my irl friend and I gave him TL+ because he hosted a kickass video game tournament yesterday. >.> oo What games? :D Pokemon Puzzle League, SSB64, and SSB Melee
Oh man...all great games. Haven't played Puzzle League since I was in middle school 
|
On July 23 2013 10:46 3FFA wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2013 10:42 cLAN.Anax wrote:On July 23 2013 10:35 SilentchiLL wrote:On July 23 2013 10:26 3FFA wrote:On July 23 2013 10:18 garbanzo wrote:On July 23 2013 10:10 kmillz wrote:On July 23 2013 09:37 Jormundr wrote:On July 23 2013 08:52 Danglars wrote:On July 23 2013 06:18 Klondikebar wrote:
“In addition,” Rogers said, defending the enormous cuts to the EPA, “by holding back overly zealous and unnecessary environmental regulations, this bill can have a positive effect on our economy and will help encourage job growth.”
I love the underpants gnome theory at work here.
1. Slash budgets for departments that we don't like.
2. ?????
3. JOBS YALL!
And I'm also tired of the assumption that jobs are this end all be all of economics. They aren't. Improved standard of living is. If we just wanted everyone to be employed we could easily have full employment paying everyone to dig ditches. But we wouldn't cheer for a great economy then.
I guess I don't so much care about the cuts themselves. I am just getting really sick of every bit of legislation being rubber stamped cause somehow it magically creates jobs. The overly zealous and unnecessary regulations are exactly how it works to kill jobs. They seem to believe that the federal government is simply better than individuals at keeping their energy costs low, implementing energy standards and picking for them where to improve efficiency. People on the right have been documenting these things for ages. You don't need to go far to find specific areas that the EPA limits growth and adds costs unnecessarily for little or no gain. Heck, improving the standard of living is hardly the goal here. Lately, you have to question whether the preservation of this or that environmental sector is done for the sake of the environment itself and not people. Health and safety be damned for people, we see this regulation doing this and that for the "environment." Not to mention myriad environmental activist groups sue the EPA (e.g. under CAA and CWA) to then settle the lawsuit for the regulations, taxpayers getting billed for the legal fees and regulation implementation fees, and then companies given unreasonable compliance time-frames. I'm all for vastly cutting their budget to limit the harm. You dumb zionist liberal media propaganda puppet, this is obviously a lie. These laws take away from the necessary freedoms of job creators, thereby hindering their tireless efforts to create jobs. #freemarket2016 P.S. My daddy fought to get rid of you jewish commie sons of bitches in the second world war! User was temp banned for this post. That ban came fast..lol ...but not hard enough, if you ask me. Indeed. Maybe it's his first post of that kind. It's not. I looked into his post history before making my statement. If it was his first post of that kind then yeah, a full ban wouldn't really be warranted at that point. A warning/small temp ban if his first offense. But after multiple times? He's on a short rope. I think he might have only another inch or two centimeter left. There's also always this...…and this.
The free market does weird things to people.
Seriously though he's one of those angry commies who makes you very happy the Reds lost, he'd be the kind of commissar who'd send you and your whole family off to Siberia because you looked at him cross-ways.
|
On July 23 2013 12:45 DeepElemBlues wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2013 10:46 3FFA wrote:On July 23 2013 10:42 cLAN.Anax wrote:On July 23 2013 10:35 SilentchiLL wrote:On July 23 2013 10:26 3FFA wrote:On July 23 2013 10:18 garbanzo wrote:On July 23 2013 10:10 kmillz wrote:On July 23 2013 09:37 Jormundr wrote:On July 23 2013 08:52 Danglars wrote:On July 23 2013 06:18 Klondikebar wrote:
“In addition,” Rogers said, defending the enormous cuts to the EPA, “by holding back overly zealous and unnecessary environmental regulations, this bill can have a positive effect on our economy and will help encourage job growth.”
I love the underpants gnome theory at work here.
1. Slash budgets for departments that we don't like.
2. ?????
3. JOBS YALL!
And I'm also tired of the assumption that jobs are this end all be all of economics. They aren't. Improved standard of living is. If we just wanted everyone to be employed we could easily have full employment paying everyone to dig ditches. But we wouldn't cheer for a great economy then.
I guess I don't so much care about the cuts themselves. I am just getting really sick of every bit of legislation being rubber stamped cause somehow it magically creates jobs. The overly zealous and unnecessary regulations are exactly how it works to kill jobs. They seem to believe that the federal government is simply better than individuals at keeping their energy costs low, implementing energy standards and picking for them where to improve efficiency. People on the right have been documenting these things for ages. You don't need to go far to find specific areas that the EPA limits growth and adds costs unnecessarily for little or no gain. Heck, improving the standard of living is hardly the goal here. Lately, you have to question whether the preservation of this or that environmental sector is done for the sake of the environment itself and not people. Health and safety be damned for people, we see this regulation doing this and that for the "environment." Not to mention myriad environmental activist groups sue the EPA (e.g. under CAA and CWA) to then settle the lawsuit for the regulations, taxpayers getting billed for the legal fees and regulation implementation fees, and then companies given unreasonable compliance time-frames. I'm all for vastly cutting their budget to limit the harm. You dumb zionist liberal media propaganda puppet, this is obviously a lie. These laws take away from the necessary freedoms of job creators, thereby hindering their tireless efforts to create jobs. #freemarket2016 P.S. My daddy fought to get rid of you jewish commie sons of bitches in the second world war! User was temp banned for this post. That ban came fast..lol ...but not hard enough, if you ask me. Indeed. Maybe it's his first post of that kind. It's not. I looked into his post history before making my statement. If it was his first post of that kind then yeah, a full ban wouldn't really be warranted at that point. A warning/small temp ban if his first offense. But after multiple times? He's on a short rope. I think he might have only another inch or two centimeter left. There's also always this...…and this. The free market does weird things to people. Seriously though he's one of those angry commies who makes you very happy the Reds lost, he'd be the kind of commissar who'd send you and your whole family off to Siberia because you looked at him cross-ways.
wat
And wasn't he the one insulting the communists?
|
On July 23 2013 13:52 SilentchiLL wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2013 12:45 DeepElemBlues wrote:On July 23 2013 10:46 3FFA wrote:On July 23 2013 10:42 cLAN.Anax wrote:On July 23 2013 10:35 SilentchiLL wrote:On July 23 2013 10:26 3FFA wrote:On July 23 2013 10:18 garbanzo wrote:On July 23 2013 10:10 kmillz wrote:On July 23 2013 09:37 Jormundr wrote:On July 23 2013 08:52 Danglars wrote:[quote] The overly zealous and unnecessary regulations are exactly how it works to kill jobs. They seem to believe that the federal government is simply better than individuals at keeping their energy costs low, implementing energy standards and picking for them where to improve efficiency. People on the right have been documenting these things for ages. You don't need to go far to find specific areas that the EPA limits growth and adds costs unnecessarily for little or no gain. Heck, improving the standard of living is hardly the goal here. Lately, you have to question whether the preservation of this or that environmental sector is done for the sake of the environment itself and not people. Health and safety be damned for people, we see this regulation doing this and that for the "environment." Not to mention myriad environmental activist groups sue the EPA (e.g. under CAA and CWA) to then settle the lawsuit for the regulations, taxpayers getting billed for the legal fees and regulation implementation fees, and then companies given unreasonable compliance time-frames. I'm all for vastly cutting their budget to limit the harm. You dumb zionist liberal media propaganda puppet, this is obviously a lie. These laws take away from the necessary freedoms of job creators, thereby hindering their tireless efforts to create jobs. #freemarket2016 P.S. My daddy fought to get rid of you jewish commie sons of bitches in the second world war! User was temp banned for this post. That ban came fast..lol ...but not hard enough, if you ask me. Indeed. Maybe it's his first post of that kind. It's not. I looked into his post history before making my statement. If it was his first post of that kind then yeah, a full ban wouldn't really be warranted at that point. A warning/small temp ban if his first offense. But after multiple times? He's on a short rope. I think he might have only another inch or two centimeter left. There's also always this...…and this. The free market does weird things to people. Seriously though he's one of those angry commies who makes you very happy the Reds lost, he'd be the kind of commissar who'd send you and your whole family off to Siberia because you looked at him cross-ways. wat And wasn't he the one insulting the communists?
i thought he was mocking the likes of danglars, and to good effect it seems looking at this nested quote.
|
On July 23 2013 13:52 SilentchiLL wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2013 12:45 DeepElemBlues wrote:On July 23 2013 10:46 3FFA wrote:On July 23 2013 10:42 cLAN.Anax wrote:On July 23 2013 10:35 SilentchiLL wrote:On July 23 2013 10:26 3FFA wrote:On July 23 2013 10:18 garbanzo wrote:On July 23 2013 10:10 kmillz wrote:On July 23 2013 09:37 Jormundr wrote:On July 23 2013 08:52 Danglars wrote:[quote] The overly zealous and unnecessary regulations are exactly how it works to kill jobs. They seem to believe that the federal government is simply better than individuals at keeping their energy costs low, implementing energy standards and picking for them where to improve efficiency. People on the right have been documenting these things for ages. You don't need to go far to find specific areas that the EPA limits growth and adds costs unnecessarily for little or no gain. Heck, improving the standard of living is hardly the goal here. Lately, you have to question whether the preservation of this or that environmental sector is done for the sake of the environment itself and not people. Health and safety be damned for people, we see this regulation doing this and that for the "environment." Not to mention myriad environmental activist groups sue the EPA (e.g. under CAA and CWA) to then settle the lawsuit for the regulations, taxpayers getting billed for the legal fees and regulation implementation fees, and then companies given unreasonable compliance time-frames. I'm all for vastly cutting their budget to limit the harm. You dumb zionist liberal media propaganda puppet, this is obviously a lie. These laws take away from the necessary freedoms of job creators, thereby hindering their tireless efforts to create jobs. #freemarket2016 P.S. My daddy fought to get rid of you jewish commie sons of bitches in the second world war! User was temp banned for this post. That ban came fast..lol ...but not hard enough, if you ask me. Indeed. Maybe it's his first post of that kind. It's not. I looked into his post history before making my statement. If it was his first post of that kind then yeah, a full ban wouldn't really be warranted at that point. A warning/small temp ban if his first offense. But after multiple times? He's on a short rope. I think he might have only another inch or two centimeter left. There's also always this...…and this. The free market does weird things to people. Seriously though he's one of those angry commies who makes you very happy the Reds lost, he'd be the kind of commissar who'd send you and your whole family off to Siberia because you looked at him cross-ways. wat And wasn't he the one insulting the communists?
His posts are sarcastic mockeries of people he disagrees with.
|
ishyishy was just temp banned for 90 days by Plexa.
That account was created on 2011-02-26 05:20:00 and had 826 posts.
Reason: Ban dodging.
Ban dodging seems kinda impossible. Profiles don't exactly have their ban button dodging the mouse pointer :p
|
Austria24420 Posts
On July 23 2013 10:51 Emzeeshady wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2013 15:41 DarkLordOlli wrote:On July 21 2013 19:22 aZealot wrote:
Hi Mods,
May I request a 30 day ban please? I've got a fair bit of RL stuff to deal with at the moment with more to come and time away from TL is required. All going well, I'll be around a lot less even after I return.
Thanks.
User was temp banned for this post. ((((((((((((( Hope everything's alright. God forbid he's got a girlfriend now or something, those are the worst. Steal all your starcraft time. I tried to put the two together but I couldn't get my GF into SC2 Even worse she likes LOL -_-
My "it's complicated" likes to watch me play every now and then. Says she finds it fascinating how much is going on at once and how fast you have to be to keep up with your thinking. I played one LoL game in my life with her, she said she'd get a seizure from all the flashes and stuff.
Needless to say she's awesome
|
I like that one, the original post was: "If you don't laugh you can kill me". (How do I cite from other threads?)
imyourancestors was just temp banned for 2 days by Plexa.
That account was created on 2013-04-09 00:48:11 and had 1 posts.
Reason: Killed.
|
|
|
On July 23 2013 17:07 Sandermatt wrote:
I like that one, the original post was: "If you don't laugh you can kill me". (How do I cite from other threads?)
It depends how realistic you want it to look. You can just add [quote] tags around it or you can copy the formatting too and even find the time the post was made and add that too. If it's not a closed thread then simply quote (to reply) and then copy/paste what the site generated in your reply.
The one you quoted could be made to look like a real quote by just writing this in:
[quote][B]On July 23 2013 17:04 TL.net bot wrote:[/B]
[B]imyourancestors[/B] was just [B]temp banned for 2 days[/B] by Plexa.
That account was created on [B]2013-04-09 00:48:11[/B] and had [B]1[/B] posts.
[B]Reason:[/B] Killed.[/quote]
|
|
|
On July 23 2013 21:24 Emzeeshady wrote:
Is it possible to ban someone from only 1 thread?
If so I would like to be banned from the balance discussion thread as it brings out the worst in me but it is so tempting to post in.
Don't think it is, only from specific forums. You'll just have to handle it in some way.
|
Germany25657 Posts
Yup, you've got to use self control 
|
|
|
At least make it good so we'll have something interesting to talk about here.
|
The b.net forums might be a good way to release some balance discussion steam *snickers*
|
|
|
On July 23 2013 06:42 farvacola wrote:
I always knew Christopher would never have been able to take over the family.
He was always too impulsive, and emotional. Then with the drugs, fahgettaboudit. I love that username. XD
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
