|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
Austria24417 Posts
On July 21 2013 19:22 aZealot wrote:
Hi Mods,
May I request a 30 day ban please? I've got a fair bit of RL stuff to deal with at the moment with more to come and time away from TL is required. All going well, I'll be around a lot less even after I return.
Thanks.
User was temp banned for this post.
 (((((((((((((
Hope everything's alright. God forbid he's got a girlfriend now or something, those are the worst. Steal all your starcraft time.
|
On July 20 2013 00:05 Alaric wrote:Show nested quote +On July 19 2013 23:48 FFW_Rude wrote:Well.... Reading the ABL i think a Dark templar was hidden in the banlings... There is a few weird ban reason witht those ones.
Nitan was just temp banned for 2 days by MoonBear.
That account was created on 2008-09-26 09:02:27 and had 1216 posts.
Reason: Understood
Silentenigma was just temp banned for 2 days by MoonBear.
That account was created on 2009-07-07 05:36:08 and had 1153 posts.
Reason: From the shadows.
TL+ Member
You'd need to read the LR thread for this week's NA LCS in the LoL subforum to understand. + Show Spoiler +After a bunch of people making fun of one player on a team during the ban/pick phase and his choice, this started, of course it more or less happened and this bunch of lovely guys volunteered for the punishment. 
Oh i don't follow lol  I don't really like that game. So... i'll be forever uninformed :p
|
On July 22 2013 14:47 cLAN.Anax wrote:![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/DyA4xlV.jpg) Shock, you devil.... -.-' On-topic: Show nested quote +FreedomMurder was just temp banned for 2 days by KadaverBB.
That account was created on 2011-11-25 10:53:11 and had 151 posts.
Reason: Stop posting the same link over and over again. Show nested quote +fartosis77 was just temp banned for 2 days by KadaverBB.
That account was created on 2013-02-14 19:44:41 and had 253 posts.
Reason: Stop posting bad please. It's handles like these that mesmerize me, cause me to wonder how they came to the conclusion that they shall henceforth be remembered as such for most, if not all, of their time on TL. You'd think they'd go to more thought with their username. And then we see them in the ABL and their names become publicly mocked and scorned. (it's "posting poorly/badly" by the way, Kadaver  )
Fartosis is such an epic name tho!
|
On July 22 2013 19:37 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2013 14:47 cLAN.Anax wrote:Shock, you devil.... -.-' On-topic: FreedomMurder was just temp banned for 2 days by KadaverBB.
That account was created on 2011-11-25 10:53:11 and had 151 posts.
Reason: Stop posting the same link over and over again. fartosis77 was just temp banned for 2 days by KadaverBB.
That account was created on 2013-02-14 19:44:41 and had 253 posts.
Reason: Stop posting bad please. It's handles like these that mesmerize me, cause me to wonder how they came to the conclusion that they shall henceforth be remembered as such for most, if not all, of their time on TL. You'd think they'd go to more thought with their username. And then we see them in the ABL and their names become publicly mocked and scorned. (it's "posting poorly/badly" by the way, Kadaver ) Fartosis is such an epic name tho!
WetFartosis never forget!
|
On July 22 2013 14:47 cLAN.Anax wrote:Shock, you devil.... -.-' On-topic: Show nested quote +FreedomMurder was just temp banned for 2 days by KadaverBB.
That account was created on 2011-11-25 10:53:11 and had 151 posts.
Reason: Stop posting the same link over and over again. Show nested quote +fartosis77 was just temp banned for 2 days by KadaverBB.
That account was created on 2013-02-14 19:44:41 and had 253 posts.
Reason: Stop posting bad please. It's handles like these that mesmerize me, cause me to wonder how they came to the conclusion that they shall henceforth be remembered as such for most, if not all, of their time on TL. You'd think they'd go to more thought with their username. And then we see them in the ABL and their names become publicly mocked and scorned. (it's "posting poorly/badly" by the way, Kadaver )
I would be totally cool with being remembered as Fartosis though.
It's not a Poopfeast420, but it's still good.
|
Moltisanti didnt know he was on an under-water basket weaving site.
|
For those who missed it:
On July 23 2013 06:24 Moltisanti wrote:And who the fuck cares? This is a SC2 site, why would we care for a Casualgame tournament? Its not like MLG failed because it was on the same weekend as Evo... User was temp banned for this post.
|
I always knew Christopher would never have been able to take over the family.
|
Jealous was just temp banned for 1 week by Waxangel. That account was created on 2011-12-17 01:41:28 and had 2460 posts. Reason:Show nested quote +On July 23 2013 03:08 Jealous wrote:
I got a gifted TL+ so now I have been unleashed onto all of you. awful
Hmm...I don't have TL+, am I missing something as to why this is bannable?
|
On July 23 2013 09:03 garbanzo wrote:Show nested quote +Jealous was just temp banned for 1 week by Waxangel. That account was created on 2011-12-17 01:41:28 and had 2460 posts. Reason:On July 23 2013 03:08 Jealous wrote:
I got a gifted TL+ so now I have been unleashed onto all of you. awful Hmm...I don't have TL+, am I missing something as to why this is bannable?
lmao what have I done... he's my irl friend and I gave him TL+ because he hosted a kickass video game tournament yesterday. >.>
|
On July 23 2013 09:12 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2013 09:03 garbanzo wrote:Jealous was just temp banned for 1 week by Waxangel. That account was created on 2011-12-17 01:41:28 and had 2460 posts. Reason:On July 23 2013 03:08 Jealous wrote:
I got a gifted TL+ so now I have been unleashed onto all of you. awful Hmm...I don't have TL+, am I missing something as to why this is bannable? lmao what have I done... he's my irl friend and I gave him TL+ because he hosted a kickass video game tournament yesterday. >.>
I feel like the ole' boys club is something I missed out in joining so late into TL's existence lol.
|
On July 23 2013 09:12 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2013 09:03 garbanzo wrote:Jealous was just temp banned for 1 week by Waxangel. That account was created on 2011-12-17 01:41:28 and had 2460 posts. Reason:On July 23 2013 03:08 Jealous wrote:
I got a gifted TL+ so now I have been unleashed onto all of you. awful Hmm...I don't have TL+, am I missing something as to why this is bannable? lmao what have I done... he's my irl friend and I gave him TL+ because he hosted a kickass video game tournament yesterday. >.>
oo What games? :D
|
On July 23 2013 09:37 Jormundr wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2013 08:52 Danglars wrote:On July 23 2013 06:18 Klondikebar wrote:
“In addition,” Rogers said, defending the enormous cuts to the EPA, “by holding back overly zealous and unnecessary environmental regulations, this bill can have a positive effect on our economy and will help encourage job growth.”
I love the underpants gnome theory at work here.
1. Slash budgets for departments that we don't like.
2. ?????
3. JOBS YALL!
And I'm also tired of the assumption that jobs are this end all be all of economics. They aren't. Improved standard of living is. If we just wanted everyone to be employed we could easily have full employment paying everyone to dig ditches. But we wouldn't cheer for a great economy then.
I guess I don't so much care about the cuts themselves. I am just getting really sick of every bit of legislation being rubber stamped cause somehow it magically creates jobs. The overly zealous and unnecessary regulations are exactly how it works to kill jobs. They seem to believe that the federal government is simply better than individuals at keeping their energy costs low, implementing energy standards and picking for them where to improve efficiency. People on the right have been documenting these things for ages. You don't need to go far to find specific areas that the EPA limits growth and adds costs unnecessarily for little or no gain. Heck, improving the standard of living is hardly the goal here. Lately, you have to question whether the preservation of this or that environmental sector is done for the sake of the environment itself and not people. Health and safety be damned for people, we see this regulation doing this and that for the "environment." Not to mention myriad environmental activist groups sue the EPA (e.g. under CAA and CWA) to then settle the lawsuit for the regulations, taxpayers getting billed for the legal fees and regulation implementation fees, and then companies given unreasonable compliance time-frames. I'm all for vastly cutting their budget to limit the harm. You dumb zionist liberal media propaganda puppet, this is obviously a lie. These laws take away from the necessary freedoms of job creators, thereby hindering their tireless efforts to create jobs. #freemarket2016 P.S. My daddy fought to get rid of you jewish commie sons of bitches in the second world war! User was temp banned for this post.
That ban came fast..lol
|
On July 23 2013 10:10 kmillz wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2013 09:37 Jormundr wrote:On July 23 2013 08:52 Danglars wrote:On July 23 2013 06:18 Klondikebar wrote:
“In addition,” Rogers said, defending the enormous cuts to the EPA, “by holding back overly zealous and unnecessary environmental regulations, this bill can have a positive effect on our economy and will help encourage job growth.”
I love the underpants gnome theory at work here.
1. Slash budgets for departments that we don't like.
2. ?????
3. JOBS YALL!
And I'm also tired of the assumption that jobs are this end all be all of economics. They aren't. Improved standard of living is. If we just wanted everyone to be employed we could easily have full employment paying everyone to dig ditches. But we wouldn't cheer for a great economy then.
I guess I don't so much care about the cuts themselves. I am just getting really sick of every bit of legislation being rubber stamped cause somehow it magically creates jobs. The overly zealous and unnecessary regulations are exactly how it works to kill jobs. They seem to believe that the federal government is simply better than individuals at keeping their energy costs low, implementing energy standards and picking for them where to improve efficiency. People on the right have been documenting these things for ages. You don't need to go far to find specific areas that the EPA limits growth and adds costs unnecessarily for little or no gain. Heck, improving the standard of living is hardly the goal here. Lately, you have to question whether the preservation of this or that environmental sector is done for the sake of the environment itself and not people. Health and safety be damned for people, we see this regulation doing this and that for the "environment." Not to mention myriad environmental activist groups sue the EPA (e.g. under CAA and CWA) to then settle the lawsuit for the regulations, taxpayers getting billed for the legal fees and regulation implementation fees, and then companies given unreasonable compliance time-frames. I'm all for vastly cutting their budget to limit the harm. You dumb zionist liberal media propaganda puppet, this is obviously a lie. These laws take away from the necessary freedoms of job creators, thereby hindering their tireless efforts to create jobs. #freemarket2016 P.S. My daddy fought to get rid of you jewish commie sons of bitches in the second world war! User was temp banned for this post. That ban came fast..lol
...but not hard enough, if you ask me.
|
On July 23 2013 10:18 garbanzo wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2013 10:10 kmillz wrote:On July 23 2013 09:37 Jormundr wrote:On July 23 2013 08:52 Danglars wrote:On July 23 2013 06:18 Klondikebar wrote:
“In addition,” Rogers said, defending the enormous cuts to the EPA, “by holding back overly zealous and unnecessary environmental regulations, this bill can have a positive effect on our economy and will help encourage job growth.”
I love the underpants gnome theory at work here.
1. Slash budgets for departments that we don't like.
2. ?????
3. JOBS YALL!
And I'm also tired of the assumption that jobs are this end all be all of economics. They aren't. Improved standard of living is. If we just wanted everyone to be employed we could easily have full employment paying everyone to dig ditches. But we wouldn't cheer for a great economy then.
I guess I don't so much care about the cuts themselves. I am just getting really sick of every bit of legislation being rubber stamped cause somehow it magically creates jobs. The overly zealous and unnecessary regulations are exactly how it works to kill jobs. They seem to believe that the federal government is simply better than individuals at keeping their energy costs low, implementing energy standards and picking for them where to improve efficiency. People on the right have been documenting these things for ages. You don't need to go far to find specific areas that the EPA limits growth and adds costs unnecessarily for little or no gain. Heck, improving the standard of living is hardly the goal here. Lately, you have to question whether the preservation of this or that environmental sector is done for the sake of the environment itself and not people. Health and safety be damned for people, we see this regulation doing this and that for the "environment." Not to mention myriad environmental activist groups sue the EPA (e.g. under CAA and CWA) to then settle the lawsuit for the regulations, taxpayers getting billed for the legal fees and regulation implementation fees, and then companies given unreasonable compliance time-frames. I'm all for vastly cutting their budget to limit the harm. You dumb zionist liberal media propaganda puppet, this is obviously a lie. These laws take away from the necessary freedoms of job creators, thereby hindering their tireless efforts to create jobs. #freemarket2016 P.S. My daddy fought to get rid of you jewish commie sons of bitches in the second world war! User was temp banned for this post. That ban came fast..lol ...but not hard enough, if you ask me.
Indeed.
|
On July 23 2013 10:26 3FFA wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2013 10:18 garbanzo wrote:On July 23 2013 10:10 kmillz wrote:On July 23 2013 09:37 Jormundr wrote:On July 23 2013 08:52 Danglars wrote:On July 23 2013 06:18 Klondikebar wrote:
“In addition,” Rogers said, defending the enormous cuts to the EPA, “by holding back overly zealous and unnecessary environmental regulations, this bill can have a positive effect on our economy and will help encourage job growth.”
I love the underpants gnome theory at work here.
1. Slash budgets for departments that we don't like.
2. ?????
3. JOBS YALL!
And I'm also tired of the assumption that jobs are this end all be all of economics. They aren't. Improved standard of living is. If we just wanted everyone to be employed we could easily have full employment paying everyone to dig ditches. But we wouldn't cheer for a great economy then.
I guess I don't so much care about the cuts themselves. I am just getting really sick of every bit of legislation being rubber stamped cause somehow it magically creates jobs. The overly zealous and unnecessary regulations are exactly how it works to kill jobs. They seem to believe that the federal government is simply better than individuals at keeping their energy costs low, implementing energy standards and picking for them where to improve efficiency. People on the right have been documenting these things for ages. You don't need to go far to find specific areas that the EPA limits growth and adds costs unnecessarily for little or no gain. Heck, improving the standard of living is hardly the goal here. Lately, you have to question whether the preservation of this or that environmental sector is done for the sake of the environment itself and not people. Health and safety be damned for people, we see this regulation doing this and that for the "environment." Not to mention myriad environmental activist groups sue the EPA (e.g. under CAA and CWA) to then settle the lawsuit for the regulations, taxpayers getting billed for the legal fees and regulation implementation fees, and then companies given unreasonable compliance time-frames. I'm all for vastly cutting their budget to limit the harm. You dumb zionist liberal media propaganda puppet, this is obviously a lie. These laws take away from the necessary freedoms of job creators, thereby hindering their tireless efforts to create jobs. #freemarket2016 P.S. My daddy fought to get rid of you jewish commie sons of bitches in the second world war! User was temp banned for this post. That ban came fast..lol ...but not hard enough, if you ask me. Indeed.
Maybe it's his first post of that kind.
|
On July 23 2013 10:35 SilentchiLL wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2013 10:26 3FFA wrote:On July 23 2013 10:18 garbanzo wrote:On July 23 2013 10:10 kmillz wrote:On July 23 2013 09:37 Jormundr wrote:On July 23 2013 08:52 Danglars wrote:On July 23 2013 06:18 Klondikebar wrote:
“In addition,” Rogers said, defending the enormous cuts to the EPA, “by holding back overly zealous and unnecessary environmental regulations, this bill can have a positive effect on our economy and will help encourage job growth.”
I love the underpants gnome theory at work here.
1. Slash budgets for departments that we don't like.
2. ?????
3. JOBS YALL!
And I'm also tired of the assumption that jobs are this end all be all of economics. They aren't. Improved standard of living is. If we just wanted everyone to be employed we could easily have full employment paying everyone to dig ditches. But we wouldn't cheer for a great economy then.
I guess I don't so much care about the cuts themselves. I am just getting really sick of every bit of legislation being rubber stamped cause somehow it magically creates jobs. The overly zealous and unnecessary regulations are exactly how it works to kill jobs. They seem to believe that the federal government is simply better than individuals at keeping their energy costs low, implementing energy standards and picking for them where to improve efficiency. People on the right have been documenting these things for ages. You don't need to go far to find specific areas that the EPA limits growth and adds costs unnecessarily for little or no gain. Heck, improving the standard of living is hardly the goal here. Lately, you have to question whether the preservation of this or that environmental sector is done for the sake of the environment itself and not people. Health and safety be damned for people, we see this regulation doing this and that for the "environment." Not to mention myriad environmental activist groups sue the EPA (e.g. under CAA and CWA) to then settle the lawsuit for the regulations, taxpayers getting billed for the legal fees and regulation implementation fees, and then companies given unreasonable compliance time-frames. I'm all for vastly cutting their budget to limit the harm. You dumb zionist liberal media propaganda puppet, this is obviously a lie. These laws take away from the necessary freedoms of job creators, thereby hindering their tireless efforts to create jobs. #freemarket2016 P.S. My daddy fought to get rid of you jewish commie sons of bitches in the second world war! User was temp banned for this post. That ban came fast..lol ...but not hard enough, if you ask me. Indeed. Maybe it's his first post of that kind.
It's not.
|
On July 23 2013 10:42 cLAN.Anax wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2013 10:35 SilentchiLL wrote:On July 23 2013 10:26 3FFA wrote:On July 23 2013 10:18 garbanzo wrote:On July 23 2013 10:10 kmillz wrote:On July 23 2013 09:37 Jormundr wrote:On July 23 2013 08:52 Danglars wrote:On July 23 2013 06:18 Klondikebar wrote:
“In addition,” Rogers said, defending the enormous cuts to the EPA, “by holding back overly zealous and unnecessary environmental regulations, this bill can have a positive effect on our economy and will help encourage job growth.”
I love the underpants gnome theory at work here.
1. Slash budgets for departments that we don't like.
2. ?????
3. JOBS YALL!
And I'm also tired of the assumption that jobs are this end all be all of economics. They aren't. Improved standard of living is. If we just wanted everyone to be employed we could easily have full employment paying everyone to dig ditches. But we wouldn't cheer for a great economy then.
I guess I don't so much care about the cuts themselves. I am just getting really sick of every bit of legislation being rubber stamped cause somehow it magically creates jobs. The overly zealous and unnecessary regulations are exactly how it works to kill jobs. They seem to believe that the federal government is simply better than individuals at keeping their energy costs low, implementing energy standards and picking for them where to improve efficiency. People on the right have been documenting these things for ages. You don't need to go far to find specific areas that the EPA limits growth and adds costs unnecessarily for little or no gain. Heck, improving the standard of living is hardly the goal here. Lately, you have to question whether the preservation of this or that environmental sector is done for the sake of the environment itself and not people. Health and safety be damned for people, we see this regulation doing this and that for the "environment." Not to mention myriad environmental activist groups sue the EPA (e.g. under CAA and CWA) to then settle the lawsuit for the regulations, taxpayers getting billed for the legal fees and regulation implementation fees, and then companies given unreasonable compliance time-frames. I'm all for vastly cutting their budget to limit the harm. You dumb zionist liberal media propaganda puppet, this is obviously a lie. These laws take away from the necessary freedoms of job creators, thereby hindering their tireless efforts to create jobs. #freemarket2016 P.S. My daddy fought to get rid of you jewish commie sons of bitches in the second world war! User was temp banned for this post. That ban came fast..lol ...but not hard enough, if you ask me. Indeed. Maybe it's his first post of that kind. It's not.
I looked into his post history before making my statement. If it was his first post of that kind then yeah, a full ban wouldn't really be warranted at that point. A warning/small temp ban if his first offense. But after multiple times? He's on a short rope. I think he might have only another inch or two centimeter left.
There's also always this...
…and this.
|
Was gonna say, that sounds almost too batshit to be legit... I guess it is after all. o0;;
That free market post was hilarious. XD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
