On July 16 2013 23:27 andrewlt wrote: I think R1ch waited all this time so that no other mod has a chance of beating his streak. Streak lasted more than 3 whole pages.
That would definitely explain how many of the accounts he banned were created in 2011/12. ._.
On July 17 2013 04:09 Aerisky wrote: Well technically scarlett only caused the ban this time by beating hero and making that hero fan very sad :c
Yeah, this time it had nothing to do with gender, lol.
On July 16 2013 23:27 andrewlt wrote: I think R1ch waited all this time so that no other mod has a chance of beating his streak. Streak lasted more than 3 whole pages.
That would definitely explain how many of the accounts he banned were created in 2011/12. ._.
On July 17 2013 04:09 Aerisky wrote: Well technically scarlett only caused the ban this time by beating hero and making that hero fan very sad :c
Yeah, this time it had nothing to do with gender, lol.
I dream of a day where all Scarlett bans relate to butthurt teenagers raging online, as opposed to intolerance based on fear of gender issues. It shows we're moving forward as a society.
On July 16 2013 23:27 andrewlt wrote: I think R1ch waited all this time so that no other mod has a chance of beating his streak. Streak lasted more than 3 whole pages.
That would definitely explain how many of the accounts he banned were created in 2011/12. ._.
On July 17 2013 04:09 Aerisky wrote: Well technically scarlett only caused the ban this time by beating hero and making that hero fan very sad :c
Yeah, this time it had nothing to do with gender, lol.
I dream of a day where all Scarlett bans relate to butthurt teenagers raging online, as opposed to intolerance based on fear of gender issues. It shows we're moving forward as a society.
Isn't that already how it is?
Just saying, you're giving them far too much credit in the thinking department.
On July 16 2013 23:27 andrewlt wrote: I think R1ch waited all this time so that no other mod has a chance of beating his streak. Streak lasted more than 3 whole pages.
That would definitely explain how many of the accounts he banned were created in 2011/12. ._.
On July 17 2013 04:09 Aerisky wrote: Well technically scarlett only caused the ban this time by beating hero and making that hero fan very sad :c
Yeah, this time it had nothing to do with gender, lol.
I dream of a day where all Scarlett bans relate to butthurt teenagers raging online, as opposed to intolerance based on fear of gender issues. It shows we're moving forward as a society.
Isn't that already how it is?
Just saying, you're giving them far too much credit in the thinking department.
I always imagined the thought process behind those posts like Homer Simpson's
Muecke was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KadaverBB.
That account was created on 2013-07-06 06:39:09 and had 104 posts.
Reason: You are making us "better" people look bad with your terrible posting. Stop please. We want to enjoy our superiority.
We should just ignore the League of Casual community, we are way better. I would rather kill myself than play this terrible casualgame. Its like comparing a Champions Legue Winner to a 12-yo School-Team.
Axeltoss literally just made a thread about this BS.
We should just ignore the League of Casual community, we are way better. I would rather kill myself than play this terrible casualgame. Its like comparing a Champions Legue Winner to a 12-yo School-Team.
Axeltoss literally just made a thread about this BS.
Preach the love not hate man!
The post was actually in that thread; an irony which I pointed out in the report form.
On July 18 2013 04:17 KaiserKieran wrote: Muecke was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KadaverBB.
That account was created on 2013-07-06 06:39:09 and had 104 posts.
Reason: You are making us "better" people look bad with your terrible posting. Stop please. We want to enjoy our superiority.
We should just ignore the League of Casual community, we are way better. I would rather kill myself than play this terrible casualgame. Its like comparing a Champions Legue Winner to a 12-yo School-Team.
Axeltoss literally just made a thread about this BS.
Preach the love not hate man!
The post was actually in that thread; an irony which I pointed out in the report form.
On July 18 2013 04:17 KaiserKieran wrote: Muecke was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KadaverBB.
That account was created on 2013-07-06 06:39:09 and had 104 posts.
Reason: You are making us "better" people look bad with your terrible posting. Stop please. We want to enjoy our superiority.
We should just ignore the League of Casual community, we are way better. I would rather kill myself than play this terrible casualgame. Its like comparing a Champions Legue Winner to a 12-yo School-Team.
Axeltoss literally just made a thread about this BS.
Preach the love not hate man!
The post was actually in that thread; an irony which I pointed out in the report form.
Lots of people everywhere including at TL confuse tolerance with acceptance, like Mr. Garrison talked about in his big gay speech. But then he got sent to the death camp of tolerance himself so he probably holds a different opinion now than he did then.
The problems is that the US was not only spying on it's enemies, it was spying on it's allies as well.
What's the problem with that?
They aren't a part of the United States, they are foreign independent countries no matter how closely allied to the United States. Not spying on them would be a dereliction of duty imo...
committing even worse atrocities.
I don't think atrocity means what you think it means...
What's next, organizing a few terrorist attacks on their allies so they'll support the war on terror?
That seems... oh hell it's just stupid to say something like that.
Please elaborate on why it would be a dereliction of duty to not spy on our allied nations..
Because if you trust your allies to do what they say, you end up in really bad places when they don't. There are a lot of good examples of this in WW2 when nations just trusted Germany to stop it's forward progress. Trust is good, within reason.
so you want to compare the germany of today with the germany of 1933? Or Angela Merkel with Adolf Hitler?
Germany did it twice in the past 100 years. I think suspicion is justified.
You have to be kidding me. A federal Republic with an extremly strong democratic base, in the European Nation AND the NATO (where the US is, too) and a rotating Member of the UN-Security Council should be met with suspicion? And in case you didn't notice yet: The Germany now is completely different to the Germany back then.
I do not believe for one second that the grandchildren of the Germans of WWII and the great grandchildren of the Germans of WWI are so different that they don't need to be kept in check once in a while. People simply do not change that easily, and it's a "fool me once" type of deal.
The problems is that the US was not only spying on it's enemies, it was spying on it's allies as well.
What's the problem with that?
They aren't a part of the United States, they are foreign independent countries no matter how closely allied to the United States. Not spying on them would be a dereliction of duty imo...
committing even worse atrocities.
I don't think atrocity means what you think it means...
What's next, organizing a few terrorist attacks on their allies so they'll support the war on terror?
That seems... oh hell it's just stupid to say something like that.
Please elaborate on why it would be a dereliction of duty to not spy on our allied nations..
Because if you trust your allies to do what they say, you end up in really bad places when they don't. There are a lot of good examples of this in WW2 when nations just trusted Germany to stop it's forward progress. Trust is good, within reason.
so you want to compare the germany of today with the germany of 1933? Or Angela Merkel with Adolf Hitler?
Germany did it twice in the past 100 years. I think suspicion is justified.
You have to be kidding me. A federal Republic with an extremly strong democratic base, in the European Nation AND the NATO (where the US is, too) and a rotating Member of the UN-Security Council should be met with suspicion? And in case you didn't notice yet: The Germany now is completely different to the Germany back then.
I do not believe for one second that the grandchildren of the Germans of WWII and the great grandchildren of the Germans of WWI are so different that they don't need to be kept in check once in a while. People simply do not change that easily, and it's a "fool me once" type of deal.
[...snip...]
User was temp banned for this post.
This post made me fall off my chair laughing, yesterday I was reading about how Herman Goering's own younger brother spent pretty much all of World War II sneaking Jews out of concentration camps in his truck.
EPT
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/LPhtzvx.gif)
