EPTThe Automated Ban List - Page 1602
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
| ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On December 26 2012 15:31 dAPhREAk wrote: may be a ban soon if he edited out a warning, or if he originally put the warning in and a mod cares. lol shucknjivee was just temp banned for 1 week by Plexa. That account was created on 2012-12-05 06:48:04 and had 20 posts. Reason: Not only have you faked a mod message, you've also made your own fanclub and gone on a spree of unfathomably shitty posting. Continue this once you get back and you're gone. edit: Plexa cares. =D | ||
|
MountainDewJunkie
United States10344 Posts
On December 26 2012 15:40 Plexa wrote: He "warned" himself. Uhhhhhh right then. Carry on, everyone | ||
|
Slardar
Canada7593 Posts
| ||
|
tomatriedes
New Zealand5356 Posts
On December 26 2012 10:57 Firebolt145 wrote: I don't think personal attacks are allowed any more after the general change in forum etiquette when SC2 was released. Unless you have a Grack pass. On December 26 2012 14:53 Mavvie wrote: Am I the only one surprised that this thread hasn't really yielded any good bans? Seems like a topic that attracts bad posters/balance whiners Not surprising, people are pretty much allowed to balance whine in balance whine threads, it helps to keep the whining out of LR and strategy sections. | ||
|
aRyuujin
United States5049 Posts
On December 26 2012 16:02 Slardar wrote: Hahaha.....major plot twist to end Christmas Day in ABLVille. Warns himself and creates his own fanclub, dude has balls of majestic glorious steel. this is actually one of the better bans we've had recently :D | ||
|
Dubzex
United States6994 Posts
On December 26 2012 15:47 dAPhREAk wrote: lol edit: Plexa cares. =D Oh, this is gold... pure ABL gold. | ||
|
Mataza
Germany5364 Posts
Are contentless posts like this reportable? Omg great writeup I don't actually like the idea of me going around reporting everything posts that might or might not be actual offenses, but on the other hand I was warned for writing 200 words which summed up to tl;dr Don't mind much of the bad or dumb posts, but posts like that get on my nerves. | ||
KwarK
United States43262 Posts
| ||
|
JackDragon
525 Posts
On December 26 2012 23:13 Mataza wrote: Quick question: Are contentless posts like this reportable? I don't actually like the idea of me going around reporting everything posts that might or might not be actual offenses, but on the other hand I was warned for writing 200 words which summed up to tl;dr Don't mind much of the bad or dumb posts, but posts like that get on my nerves. I think that question is better for website feedback. However I my thoughts would be no. It might be "content less" but it is positive. Maybe if the person in question only have a lot of few word posts something would happen. But I don't think anyone would give a warning to such a positive response. (unless of course the "write up" in question happens to be balance whine or flaming or such) | ||
|
Mataza
Germany5364 Posts
I may actually start reporting people now. | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32090 Posts
On December 26 2012 23:13 Mataza wrote: Quick question: Are contentless posts like this reportable? I don't actually like the idea of me going around reporting everything posts that might or might not be actual offenses, but on the other hand I was warned for writing 200 words which summed up to tl;dr Don't mind much of the bad or dumb posts, but posts like that get on my nerves. yeah dude lets report people for giving someone else a nice compliment | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On December 26 2012 23:20 KwarK wrote: You could make a report and have it say something like "take a look through this guy's post history and if all of them are 3 words then give him a warning imo". It is an issue if it's all he does but that post alone isn't actionable. The more informative the report is the easier it is for us. The behavior itself is pretty rampant in community news and similar threads. "Best of luck in the future," kind of posts and the like, I would make the argument it is contextual. A little nudge to say, we expect a bit more content than you otherwise have been posting isn't the worst thing in the world. | ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
| ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
On December 27 2012 01:05 QuanticHawk wrote: yeah dude lets report people for giving someone else a nice compliment That's probably the only thing on TL I would like to see moderated more. The idea of "nice compliments" gets a little out of hand in a community of ten thousand people and most of the threads that announce something positive are completely useless because of that. But I now this is a cultrural thing - most of US-based forums are like that, for example CloudyNights, the world's big astronomy forum is completely flooded with affirmations every time someone posts a picture, whereas on our local astronomical forum, we strictly moderate such posts and encourage people to posts open criticism, becuase it helps others improve, and noone is surprised. | ||
|
Mataza
Germany5364 Posts
It's not about people saying something positive, it's about people not contributing. When your posting history looks something like this omg great writeup Who cares at this point Roflmao JYP gaint a lot of weight I think it's ok to question that. If positivity can excuse that, then I should try it maybe too. On the other hand I prefer posts with substance that one can actually discuss. | ||
|
QuanticHawk
United States32090 Posts
On December 27 2012 02:53 opisska wrote: That's probably the only thing on TL I would like to see moderated more. The idea of "nice compliments" gets a little out of hand in a community of ten thousand people and most of the threads that announce something positive are completely useless because of that. But I now this is a cultrural thing - most of US-based forums are like that, for example CloudyNights, the world's big astronomy forum is completely flooded with affirmations every time someone posts a picture, whereas on our local astronomical forum, we strictly moderate such posts and encourage people to posts open criticism, becuase it helps others improve, and noone is surprised. http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=388669¤tpage=2 look at all these complimentary posts without content!!!! A bunch of horrible posters wrote nice things without any criticism because they don't any clue about sculpting but are appreciative of the effort. This site is in ruins. On December 27 2012 03:21 Mataza wrote: Dear Hawk, It's not about people saying something positive, it's about people not contributing. When your posting history looks something like this I think it's ok to question that. If positivity can excuse that, then I should try it maybe too. On the other hand I prefer posts with substance that one can actually discuss. I would much rather have a poster who writes one line compliments and other short things like that than some mod-wanna-be narc who actually goes through the post histories of people to find something ban worthy. | ||
|
MountainDewJunkie
United States10344 Posts
| ||
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
On December 27 2012 03:49 QuanticHawk wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=388669¤tpage=2 look at all these complimentary posts without content!!!! A bunch of horrible posters wrote nice things without any criticism because they don't any clue about sculpting but are appreciative of the effort. This site is in ruins. Most of those aren't what opisska and Mataza are talking about. Every single post there is longer than six words. But if half of them were Nice job Congrats! Very nice! That might be  | ||
|
Trumpet
United States1935 Posts
On December 27 2012 03:21 Mataza wrote: Dear Hawk, It's not about people saying something positive, it's about people not contributing. When your posting history looks something like this I think it's ok to question that. If positivity can excuse that, then I should try it maybe too. On the other hand I prefer posts with substance that one can actually discuss. God forbid you ever find the TL poster who only used emoticons  | ||
| ||
