|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On December 25 2012 05:57 Emzeeshady wrote:Show nested quote +On December 25 2012 05:29 monk. wrote:On December 25 2012 03:27 Emzeeshady wrote:Well I just got unbanned today and I must say that this site was more important to me then I thought data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt="" . I will have to be more careful in the future although I am still unsure why my first ban was two weeks :/ Should have been extended tbh since you tried to ban dodge. Fair enough, I will try and post better. I have rage issues when it comes to balance whiners data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt=""
I feel you there xD. Just want to call them so many names because that's what they are
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36920 Posts
On December 25 2012 06:17 Firebolt145 wrote: Relax Seeker! You made a mistake without any malicious intent, you got punished, you won't make the same mistake again. You're nowhere near the level of most people that get banned. Chin up ^_^ Haha. Believe me. Drama phase is over. I feel retarded for even getting so worked up in the first place. Now I'm just going to move on and maybe take a nap
|
Yeah it was just one post. If you think about the ratio of even NON-LR posts to bannable posts of yours, it still qualifies as an anomaly.
EDIT: grammarzzz
EDIT: Hmm, read your blog... very uhh.... hmm...
|
Yay for admitting when we make mistakes.
|
On December 25 2012 07:12 HollowLord wrote: Yay for admitting when we make mistakes. What kind of pussy shit is this? Admitting... mistakes? I'm taking your Man Card away. #eBadass
|
On December 25 2012 07:37 jdseemoreglass wrote:Show nested quote +On December 25 2012 07:12 HollowLord wrote: Yay for admitting when we make mistakes. What kind of pussy shit is this? Admitting... mistakes? I'm taking your Man Card away. #eBadass
Hmm? I'm curious, will that turn him into a girl, since he doesn't have a man card now? I prefer blonde tbh, but ones that are born as women.
|
On December 25 2012 10:17 Unshapely wrote:Show nested quote +On December 25 2012 07:37 jdseemoreglass wrote:On December 25 2012 07:12 HollowLord wrote: Yay for admitting when we make mistakes. What kind of pussy shit is this? Admitting... mistakes? I'm taking your Man Card away. #eBadass Hmm? I'm curious, will that turn him into a girl, since he doesn't have a man card now? I prefer blonde tbh, but ones that are born as women.
?? i dont know what you mean, mr.susie is a girl
|
On December 25 2012 06:14 MountainDewJunkie wrote: No forgiveness. Never. You must be shamed forever... Forever is over, hello Seeker. never forget, never forgive. =D
+ Show Spoiler +On December 04 2012 12:26 MountainDewJunkie wrote: Well, believing you should have been born another gender or paying large sums of money on surgery and pills to mutate your body into something it's not to make you happy seems mentally unhealthy to me.
Preparing for wave of angry straw liberals.
User was temp banned for this post.
|
I got banned by Naz almost 2 years ago and haven't had a non-requested ban since, if that cheers you up Seeker.
|
On December 25 2012 10:33 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +On December 25 2012 06:14 MountainDewJunkie wrote: No forgiveness. Never. You must be shamed forever... Forever is over, hello Seeker. never forget, never forgive. =D + Show Spoiler +On December 04 2012 12:26 MountainDewJunkie wrote: Well, believing you should have been born another gender or paying large sums of money on surgery and pills to mutate your body into something it's not to make you happy seems mentally unhealthy to me.
Preparing for wave of angry straw liberals.
User was temp banned for this post. Low blow, DP Especially when you left me to fight a battle on my own in that one blog... even though you're of the same background.
EDIT: Also, I regret nothing
|
On December 25 2012 13:58 MountainDewJunkie wrote: EDIT: Also, I regret nothing See, this is a man who has retained his Man Card.
|
|
Rossie was just temp banned for 2 weeks by monk..
That account was created on 2012-11-25 07:25:38 and had 42 posts.
Reason: You obviously have no clue what you're talking about, have not listened to anything anyone here has said, and have no intention of listening. No more strategy forum posting for you.
and the post had
On December 25 2012 21:56 Rossie wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On December 25 2012 19:51 ktimekiller wrote: At this point, I believe everyone can soundly agree Rossie has absolutely no fucking clue what he is talking about. Come on. I wasn't insisting it would work; I was just offering one particular suggestion and asking why it wouldn't work. So far only one or two people have given a valid reason (which turns out to be more of a "maybe" than a knock-down argument). I have no intention of responding point-by-point to every insulting post in the thread. In fact, this will probably be my last post. But just as an example of a general trend we're seeing, I'd like to demonstrate that you don't give a single valid reason why the build wouldn't work, and there's nothing to your post but content-free posturing and browbeating intimidation tactics. On December 25 2012 19:51 ktimekiller wrote:1. Speed will never finish during the all in We're not talking about attacking stimmed marines, but units with relatively low DPS, or rate of fire in the case of immortals. And they're still faster than sentries even without speed. And as has observed by another commenter, even A-move with banes and lings (without the follow-up with roaches) has been known to work against fairly good players. On December 25 2012 19:51 ktimekiller wrote:2. Due to the cost inefficiencies of bane against all toss units in early stages of the game minus sentry, the toss has to simply FF his own sentries, thus HIGHLY minimizing the need to preemptively FF in any complicated manner. As long as FFs cover sentries, even if the banes connect, it is in the toss' favor. No. Dumb argument. Roach/ling isn't just cost inefficient, but massively cost inefficient against a well-microed sentry-immortal. And generally speaking if Toss loses all his sentries or force field energy then the push fails. And a simple bit of arithmetic suggests that Zerg can afford banelings + zerglings + a good amount of roaches for the same cost in worker production (i.e. converting the excess gas to minerals) as teching to spire and getting mutas. On December 25 2012 19:51 ktimekiller wrote:3. You are spending extra resources on a tech structure when zerg would already be stressed on resources to hold the all in. By that logic, mutas would be a no-go. And that puts you in opposition with every Code S and grandmaster Zerg who seriously entertains mutas as a counter. 4. banes are simply expensive, and not worth getting simply to bait FF and die. For which you give no argument. It stands to reason that if force fields tend to increase the cost effectiveness of an army (and they most definitely do), then they have a value in resources in any particular battle. Maybe banes are worth the trade; who knows? You don't give any reason why not. You don't give any arithmetic or even claim to have done the experiment. I happily defer to the experience of anyone who has actually tried the strategy of using bane/ling to deplete sentry energy and following up with roach/ling to finish the job. That's very different from being put off by armchair theorists who browbeatingly pound their fists on the coffee table whenever someone doesn't appear to be fully convinced. User was temp banned for this post.User was temporarily forum banned for this post. What does this mean? Does it mean that this annoying kid is banned for 2 weeks, then even after he comes back, he can't post in strategy forum until... a mod gives permission again at whatever timing? I don't care or rather I hope he doesn't come back ever, but just wondering how it works.
|
On December 25 2012 14:31 jdseemoreglass wrote:Show nested quote +On December 25 2012 13:58 MountainDewJunkie wrote: EDIT: Also, I regret nothing See, this is a man who has retained his Man Card. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt="" The yolo club is recruiting
|
On December 25 2012 23:27 Orek wrote:Show nested quote + Rossie was just temp banned for 2 weeks by monk..
That account was created on 2012-11-25 07:25:38 and had 42 posts.
Reason: You obviously have no clue what you're talking about, have not listened to anything anyone here has said, and have no intention of listening. No more strategy forum posting for you.
and the post had Show nested quote +On December 25 2012 21:56 Rossie wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On December 25 2012 19:51 ktimekiller wrote: At this point, I believe everyone can soundly agree Rossie has absolutely no fucking clue what he is talking about. Come on. I wasn't insisting it would work; I was just offering one particular suggestion and asking why it wouldn't work. So far only one or two people have given a valid reason (which turns out to be more of a "maybe" than a knock-down argument). I have no intention of responding point-by-point to every insulting post in the thread. In fact, this will probably be my last post. But just as an example of a general trend we're seeing, I'd like to demonstrate that you don't give a single valid reason why the build wouldn't work, and there's nothing to your post but content-free posturing and browbeating intimidation tactics. On December 25 2012 19:51 ktimekiller wrote:1. Speed will never finish during the all in We're not talking about attacking stimmed marines, but units with relatively low DPS, or rate of fire in the case of immortals. And they're still faster than sentries even without speed. And as has observed by another commenter, even A-move with banes and lings (without the follow-up with roaches) has been known to work against fairly good players. On December 25 2012 19:51 ktimekiller wrote:2. Due to the cost inefficiencies of bane against all toss units in early stages of the game minus sentry, the toss has to simply FF his own sentries, thus HIGHLY minimizing the need to preemptively FF in any complicated manner. As long as FFs cover sentries, even if the banes connect, it is in the toss' favor. No. Dumb argument. Roach/ling isn't just cost inefficient, but massively cost inefficient against a well-microed sentry-immortal. And generally speaking if Toss loses all his sentries or force field energy then the push fails. And a simple bit of arithmetic suggests that Zerg can afford banelings + zerglings + a good amount of roaches for the same cost in worker production (i.e. converting the excess gas to minerals) as teching to spire and getting mutas. On December 25 2012 19:51 ktimekiller wrote:3. You are spending extra resources on a tech structure when zerg would already be stressed on resources to hold the all in. By that logic, mutas would be a no-go. And that puts you in opposition with every Code S and grandmaster Zerg who seriously entertains mutas as a counter. 4. banes are simply expensive, and not worth getting simply to bait FF and die. For which you give no argument. It stands to reason that if force fields tend to increase the cost effectiveness of an army (and they most definitely do), then they have a value in resources in any particular battle. Maybe banes are worth the trade; who knows? You don't give any reason why not. You don't give any arithmetic or even claim to have done the experiment. I happily defer to the experience of anyone who has actually tried the strategy of using bane/ling to deplete sentry energy and following up with roach/ling to finish the job. That's very different from being put off by armchair theorists who browbeatingly pound their fists on the coffee table whenever someone doesn't appear to be fully convinced. User was temp banned for this post.User was temporarily forum banned for this post. What does this mean? Does it mean that this annoying kid is banned for 2 weeks, then even after he comes back, he can't post in strategy forum until... a mod gives permission again at whatever timing? I don't care or rather I hope he doesn't come back ever, but just wondering how it works. Wow, he really got up on his soap box in those posts. My understanding is what you said, two week ban and potentially kept off the strategy forum for longer, it depends on Monk's conditions.
|
Nadacambia was just temp banned for 30 days by monk..
That account was created on 2012-05-03 20:50:56 and had 138 posts.
Reason: Player bashing in his fanclub. Last warning before perm. Apparently he doesn't want to be on TL much longer, he has a warning and a ban prior to this for bashing people in their fan clubs... + Show Spoiler +On October 25 2012 02:30 Nadacambia wrote: Didn't like his appearance on ITG. Didn't like Idra Destiny and Wheat either so whatever.
User was warned for this post + Show Spoiler +On November 04 2012 22:29 Nadacambia wrote:Show nested quote +On November 04 2012 03:20 whereismymind wrote:On November 03 2012 23:25 Nadacambia wrote:On November 03 2012 23:23 AbideWithMe wrote:On November 03 2012 23:19 Freeman87 wrote:On November 03 2012 23:15 AbideWithMe wrote:On November 03 2012 22:55 Lasbike wrote:Well, if we're talking about money, and only money, Stephano did a good move playing in ESWC instead of MLG. In order to make more than 8000$ at MLG, he would have had to finish 2nd or 1st ( http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2012_MLG_Pro_Circuit/Fall/Championship )...With players like Life, Rain, Leenock, Polt, TaeJa, Violet.. I think it would have been really difficult. Edit : He's going to get the 4th place in all time earned money. http://sc2earnings.com/ Amazing how somebody who has won that much is not able to pay his dearest assistants. Jesus... What do you want? Did he and Nokhs have an agreement? Did Nokhs was Stephano's employee? Did they have contract of any sort? I guess not. What do you want to achieve by writing such posts? Say it once and it's enough. Say it "I think Stephano is a jerk and you all should think the same because of this and that...". "I think Stephano is a jerk huge asshole and you all should think the same because after making that much money he doesn't pay his dearest helper who's in need a minuscule amount of money. That's all. Thinking you know somebody when you don't kinda makes you a jerk. You sound like someone who would vote for Romney. On November 02 2012 02:42 gds wrote: Maybe Nokhs finally realised that he invested so much time working like a slave for free while Stephano on the other side made a massive amount of cash and never respected him anyway. It's so sad that people don't see that marketing is everything today. With special representation of Starcraft 2 player, making his fanclub look professional, getting the latest information and updating fan club for his fans, gains more and more supporters. And supporters in e-sports are most valuable people. Without supporters White-Ra would die. Stephano is selfish in this case, he could've give some amount of money for further work on this, since this is nothing than marketing. And marketing involves time, dedication,.. In this case even skill in other areas(graphic design),... You don't need contract for this. It shows what kind of person you are. And Stephano proved again who he is. I never liked Stephanos attitude, no matter how good his skill is in SC2. It doesn't mean if you are popular and good at something, that you can be douche to other people(look in the case of OJ Simpson). But nowadays it doesn't matter I guess, because money is power. And If person makes money for you, he can make whatever he wants and he can behave however he wants. The suspension from EGs side did not come from moral side, but because they were afraid for sponsors(you can learn a lot from Destinys cases). I am not pleased with what happened with maeh, his long-time coworker, but every smart person knows what Stephano really is. We all know what happened in past and what will happen. Some people never change. You are a waste of human life, you don't know stephano and you don't understand the situation with Nokhs so please stop acting like you understand it. You are really dellusional about how thinks work in this world. User was temp banned for this post. + Show Spoiler +On December 22 2012 05:49 Nadacambia wrote: that was awful dude, i don't like you
User was temp banned for this post and previous history. And now he just got off the latest ban for bashing XlorD and he goes and does it again, let's see if 30 days will make a difference.
On December 26 2012 05:52 Nadacambia wrote: this guy is a total douchebag
User was temp banned for this post.
Also Merry Christmas ABL!
|
United Kingdom3482 Posts
On December 26 2012 06:16 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +Nadacambia was just temp banned for 30 days by monk..
That account was created on 2012-05-03 20:50:56 and had 138 posts.
Reason: Player bashing in his fanclub. Last warning before perm. Apparently he doesn't want to be on TL much longer, he has a warning and a ban prior to this for bashing people in their fan clubs... + Show Spoiler +On October 25 2012 02:30 Nadacambia wrote: Didn't like his appearance on ITG. Didn't like Idra Destiny and Wheat either so whatever.
User was warned for this post + Show Spoiler +On November 04 2012 22:29 Nadacambia wrote:Show nested quote +On November 04 2012 03:20 whereismymind wrote:On November 03 2012 23:25 Nadacambia wrote:On November 03 2012 23:23 AbideWithMe wrote:On November 03 2012 23:19 Freeman87 wrote:On November 03 2012 23:15 AbideWithMe wrote:On November 03 2012 22:55 Lasbike wrote:Well, if we're talking about money, and only money, Stephano did a good move playing in ESWC instead of MLG. In order to make more than 8000$ at MLG, he would have had to finish 2nd or 1st ( http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2012_MLG_Pro_Circuit/Fall/Championship )...With players like Life, Rain, Leenock, Polt, TaeJa, Violet.. I think it would have been really difficult. Edit : He's going to get the 4th place in all time earned money. http://sc2earnings.com/ Amazing how somebody who has won that much is not able to pay his dearest assistants. Jesus... What do you want? Did he and Nokhs have an agreement? Did Nokhs was Stephano's employee? Did they have contract of any sort? I guess not. What do you want to achieve by writing such posts? Say it once and it's enough. Say it "I think Stephano is a jerk and you all should think the same because of this and that...". "I think Stephano is a jerk huge asshole and you all should think the same because after making that much money he doesn't pay his dearest helper who's in need a minuscule amount of money. That's all. Thinking you know somebody when you don't kinda makes you a jerk. You sound like someone who would vote for Romney. On November 02 2012 02:42 gds wrote: Maybe Nokhs finally realised that he invested so much time working like a slave for free while Stephano on the other side made a massive amount of cash and never respected him anyway. It's so sad that people don't see that marketing is everything today. With special representation of Starcraft 2 player, making his fanclub look professional, getting the latest information and updating fan club for his fans, gains more and more supporters. And supporters in e-sports are most valuable people. Without supporters White-Ra would die. Stephano is selfish in this case, he could've give some amount of money for further work on this, since this is nothing than marketing. And marketing involves time, dedication,.. In this case even skill in other areas(graphic design),... You don't need contract for this. It shows what kind of person you are. And Stephano proved again who he is. I never liked Stephanos attitude, no matter how good his skill is in SC2. It doesn't mean if you are popular and good at something, that you can be douche to other people(look in the case of OJ Simpson). But nowadays it doesn't matter I guess, because money is power. And If person makes money for you, he can make whatever he wants and he can behave however he wants. The suspension from EGs side did not come from moral side, but because they were afraid for sponsors(you can learn a lot from Destinys cases). I am not pleased with what happened with maeh, his long-time coworker, but every smart person knows what Stephano really is. We all know what happened in past and what will happen. Some people never change. You are a waste of human life, you don't know stephano and you don't understand the situation with Nokhs so please stop acting like you understand it. You are really dellusional about how thinks work in this world. User was temp banned for this post. + Show Spoiler +On December 22 2012 05:49 Nadacambia wrote: that was awful dude, i don't like you
User was temp banned for this post and previous history. And now he just got off the latest ban for bashing XlorD and he goes and does it again, let's see if 30 days will make a difference. Show nested quote +On December 26 2012 05:52 Nadacambia wrote: this guy is a total douchebag
User was temp banned for this post. Also Merry Christmas ABL!
I think that would require him to actually learn something from his mistakes which he has shown no evidence of being capable of yet. I'm guessing he will get permed shortly after this ban ends.
|
At least he won't be permed during the holidays. Happy holidays ABL!
|
I'm still waiting for someone from CNN try to register on TL to do a story on StarCraft leading kids to commit violent crimes and then being repeatedly banned every 10 minutes.
|
On December 26 2012 09:38 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: I'm still waiting for someone from CNN try to register on TL to do a story on StarCraft leading kids to commit violent crimes and then being repeatedly banned every 10 minutes.
Teehee, you're giving the PBU's great ideas. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt=""
URLateral was just temp banned for 2 days by heyoka.
That account was created on 2012-10-08 02:27:02 and had 15 posts.
Reason: Hey! This isn't the BNet forums don't go around calling people retards repeatedly.
Baaaahahahahaha!! I remember putting my time into the Battle.net forums. That place is like the illegitimate child conceived by the balance rage of IdrA, with a "negligent drunken father" version of TL's moderation. + Show Spoiler +whereas actual TL moderation is like a cooperative, supportive father who celebrates his child's successes, and is generous, but firm, in polite reprimands data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
|
|
|
|