The Automated Ban List - Page 1502

On November 13 2012 13:27 Souma wrote:
xDaunt surprisingly bites the dust. o.O ... when the election is over, no less.

On November 13 2012 13:14 DrowSwordsman wrote:



I saw his real bnet account that he linked when he posted replays in another thread in the strategy section. Probably a pathological liar or someone who loves to troll, he's lied about where he lives in his profile, has made untrue comments about WC3 metagame, said he was living in London yet has an NA account and plays during normal US hours, made untrue comments about every tournament Idra won was funded by Blizz so he influenced the balance changes, telling people that he was master's and that Filter's guide was bad was definitely the nail in the coffin though.

On November 13 2012 20:01 monk. wrote:
Hmm what was the meme I missed?

Jarzai was just temp banned for 2 weeks by EvilTeletubby.

That account was created on 2011-12-07 12:21:13 and had 609 posts.

Reason: You just came off a temp ban (after a couple warnings already) for shitty posting in the KMD thread.

On November 13 2012 19:04 Jarzai wrote:
Show nested quote +


Mother of Pearl, do you just exist to submit one line posts? Is your goal just to see how many times you can get in on one page? My brain doesn't even begin to comprehend the buffoonery. I feel like the universe is playing some kind of sick joke on me, It's placing you and your garbage in my path just to see how irked i can become.


This gem isn't helping you.

doltuku was just banned by ToKoreaWithLove.

That account was created on 2012-11-14 00:36:32 and had 1 posts.

Reason: Hi, you are being banned because we have noticed a disturbing lack of personality in your post(s). Being as discriminating as it may, cyborgs, robots and other forms of AIs are not welcome at TL.net.

Djzapz was just temp banned for 2 weeks by KwarK.

That account was created on 2009-08-16 07:53:38 and had 5274 posts.

Reason: No. That is not how it works.
Firstly you don't dispute mod actions in random topics, always, ALWAYS website feedback.
Secondly, when a mod is forgiving enough to actually post in the topic to politely remind you of this rule you don't post reply to it and talk more about mod actions to make sure you get the last word.

You're taking the piss.

On November 14 2012 03:21 Djzapz wrote:
I got warned earlier for making fun of some guy who talked about investors in a communist regime (what the hell?). Apparently I was "taking the easy way out of an argument". I thought it was self explanatory. Oh well, so disappointed.

On November 14 2012 03:28 Falling wrote:
Take issues with moderation to website feedback.

On November 14 2012 03:42 Djzapz wrote:
This thread is full of divergences of opinions which are fine, I just wish people who spew outright falsehoods and demonstrate an obvious lack of understanding of the positions they're arguing for would also get their fingers slapped. I know mods can't fact check everything but when someone displays such a gross lack of understanding of something as obvious as that, it's fine to get a few giggles. Being condescending is mean but ffs, I have teachers who are condescending when students say dumb things, myself included. Nothing like 10 masters students and a PhD making fun of my dumb comments to get me to pick up a book and learn wtf I'm talking about. Investors in communism... come on.

I guess others have picked apart his comments properly whereas I just sighed. I'll use more words next time.

User was temp banned for this post.

On November 14 2012 03:50 EvilTeletubby wrote:
Djzapz. You know you're my bro, but you're in the wrong, and being a bit disingenuous at that. Why don't you post the full warning, eh?





Is what your entire post consisted of - a very condescending statement with no content or backup.





And here is the warning (IN FULL) that you were given because of it. I don't see anything wrong with it other than you trying to take one part of a single sentence out of context.

If you have any more questions about it, feel free to PM me.