EPTbut seriously ETT, what the hell.
EDIT: Linked to Website Feedback, since some ABL members may want to input their feelings
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=367056
The Automated Ban List - Page 1382
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
Praetorial
United States4241 Posts
but seriously ETT, what the hell. EDIT: Linked to Website Feedback, since some ABL members may want to input their feelings http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=367056 | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
| ||
|
Kieofire
United States1809 Posts
O Fortuna PLS was just banned by Harem. That account was created on 2012-08-22 18:24:02 and had 17 posts. Reason: yeah, bye Ah good to see my report button help, dude was making no sense at all in the Stephano signs with EG thread. Apparently you can't make $8k a month, win big tournaments, and have self respect all at the same time according to him. | ||
|
Chriscras
Korea (South)2812 Posts
When we make a post and then edit it 10 seconds later, is there anyway the Mods can go back and view the original? Sometimes I post things that might not entirely "meet the spirit" of the TL commandments and then will edit it out right after posting it  | ||
KwarK
United States44272 Posts
On September 08 2012 13:22 Chriscras wrote: Oooh I have a good question! When we make a post and then edit it 10 seconds later, is there anyway the Mods can go back and view the original? Sometimes I post things that might not entirely "meet the spirit" of the TL commandments and then will edit it out right after posting it yes | ||
|
McFeser
United States2458 Posts
On September 08 2012 13:22 Chriscras wrote: Oooh I have a good question! When we make a post and then edit it 10 seconds later, is there anyway the Mods can go back and view the original? Sometimes I post things that might not entirely "meet the spirit" of the TL commandments and then will edit it out right after posting it I believe they can view the last 8 edits made to a post. | ||
|
ShadeR
Australia7535 Posts
On September 08 2012 01:53 KwarK wrote: tofu isn't a mod. He's just a guy that contributes more time and effort to the community than 99.99% of tl ever will. Well then now i can see why the whole thing went to shit. People thought tofu was the mod who made the warning. | ||
|
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES51295 Posts
but the rest of the blues are just people who were rewarded for their excellent work and can't actually take any mod action on their own. | ||
|
fearus
China2164 Posts
On September 08 2012 14:08 McFeser wrote: I believe they can view the last 8 edits made to a post. moral = reedit x 9 | ||
|
scFoX
France454 Posts
Not really. If I was a mod and I saw a 9-times edited one-liner, I would get mightily suspicious. >_> | ||
|
imre
France9263 Posts
On September 06 2012 15:25 Bibbit wrote: Two bans from our friendly neighbourhood Mig, including one on semi-notable user sAsImre! Are they his first bans? How am I semi notable :D ? | ||
|
NEOtheONE
United States2233 Posts
I think it will claim a couple of more bans before likely ending up closed. Case in point this guy below. On September 08 2012 21:48 EvE-1988 wrote: America want to show how big their penis is User was banned for this post. This other guy got several troll posts of this variety before getting caught in some other thread it seems. On September 09 2012 01:01 Pro gamer registerin wrote: Ofcourse! I studied at Fox News college . what the hell is "Singapore" anyway? Pro gamer registerin was just banned by Antoine. That account was created on 2012-08-22 02:02:03 and had 15 posts. Reason: stick to 1 account please | ||
|
ziggurat
Canada847 Posts
On September 07 2012 22:29 KwarK wrote: As is often the case with moderation there is more behind it than is immediately obvious to an outside observer. His post history, mod history and the specifics of previous warnings play a role. Rather than make the "other people were doing it" argument report those other people. You should realize that when you ban people who don't seem to have broken any rules it has a chilling effect on other posters. People can't understand why the ban was imposed so they think that they might also get a ban if a mod disagrees with their opinion. Thoughtful people who have unpopular opinions just don't participate, and you're left with a much less interesting discussion. I am not big on reporting people since I think the best way to get rid of bad posters is just not respond to them (all they really want is attention so if they don't get it they'll leave on their own). But I'll give it a try. | ||
|
Chriscras
Korea (South)2812 Posts
Well then the follow up question is do you ever ban anyone for something they said that was edited out right after it was posted? | ||
|
farvacola
United States18866 Posts
On September 09 2012 01:36 ziggurat wrote: You should realize that when you ban people who don't seem to have broken any rules it has a chilling effect on other posters. People can't understand why the ban was imposed so they think that they might also get a ban if a mod disagrees with their opinion. Thoughtful people who have unpopular opinions just don't participate, and you're left with a much less interesting discussion. I am not big on reporting people since I think the best way to get rid of bad posters is just not respond to them (all they really want is attention so if they don't get it they'll leave on their own). But I'll give it a try. If your argument is that the banning of dvorakftw has lead to a less interesting discussion in the US Election thread, well, you're wrong. The recent good posts from conservatives on the issue of voter conesensus on abortion are proof in the pudding. Are you really confused as to why he was banned? | ||
|
Cokefreak
Finland8096 Posts
On September 08 2012 23:49 zalem95 wrote: Why you mods hate combatex so much, he's hilarious, does he fuck your GF (in case you have one) or what? User was temp banned for this post. zalem95 was just temp banned for 2 days by Chill. That account was created on 2011-01-23 23:52:42 and had 20 posts. Reason: I'd like you to be a little bit more sensitive about Combat-Ex fucking my girlfriend in the future. Epic. | ||
|
solidbebe
Netherlands4921 Posts
Lol a few mods posted after him in that thread before he was banned, I wonder if they were waiting for chill? | ||
|
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
LOL wp chill. | ||
|
KwarK
United States44272 Posts
On September 09 2012 03:12 Chriscras wrote: Well then the follow up question is do you ever ban anyone for something they said that was edited out right after it was posted? Obviously there are posts which would be so bad that I'd just not want to share a site with the poster anymore but as a rule editing it out will protect you. | ||
|
KwarK
United States44272 Posts
On September 09 2012 01:36 ziggurat wrote: You should realize that when you ban people who don't seem to have broken any rules it has a chilling effect on other posters. People can't understand why the ban was imposed so they think that they might also get a ban if a mod disagrees with their opinion. Thoughtful people who have unpopular opinions just don't participate, and you're left with a much less interesting discussion. I am not big on reporting people since I think the best way to get rid of bad posters is just not respond to them (all they really want is attention so if they don't get it they'll leave on their own). But I'll give it a try. It's actually quite difficult to get banned without first earning a considerable mod history. There's no reason to be scared of a ban, if you start fucking up you'll get a gentle reminder to guide you on your way. | ||
| ||
