EPTThe Automated Ban List - Page 1381
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
sylverfyre
United States8298 Posts
| ||
|
ziggurat
Canada847 Posts
On September 07 2012 17:32 Defacer wrote: Falling, my fucking hero. dvorakftw was one of those guys that never overtly committed a 'bannable' offense, but couldn't learn how to make a point or respond to someone else's post without being a little douchebag about it. Isn't there something wrong with banning someone who hasn't committed a bannable offence? There are lots of terrible posts in that thread and I personally don't see why he was singled out for a ban when so many others are ignored. | ||
KwarK
United States43529 Posts
On September 07 2012 22:11 ziggurat wrote: Isn't there something wrong with banning someone who hasn't committed a bannable offence? There are lots of terrible posts in that thread and I personally don't see why he was singled out for a ban when so many others are ignored. As is often the case with moderation there is more behind it than is immediately obvious to an outside observer. His post history, mod history and the specifics of previous warnings play a role. Rather than make the "other people were doing it" argument report those other people. | ||
|
Zorkmid
4410 Posts
On September 07 2012 19:30 Defacer wrote: Oh man, that's like putting red meat in front of a guy that likes slapping red meat upside the head. LOL. "Gooby plz" to me is the same thing as "Stupid thread". Don't see many warns bans for those 3 or 4 word "in before the lock" type posts. (that thread is an exception) | ||
|
KwarK
United States43529 Posts
On September 07 2012 22:33 Zorkmid wrote: "Gooby plz" to me is the same thing as "Stupid thread". Don't see many warns bans for those 3 or 4 word "in before the lock" type posts. (that thread is an exception) Report them as "back seat moderating/worthless post/bumping up a bad topic" and they should have action taken. If nothing happens then PM them to me and I'll handle them. | ||
|
Sermokala
United States14098 Posts
| ||
|
ShadeR
Australia7535 Posts
On September 07 2012 21:10 tofucake wrote: If you can't contribute enough to become staff you don't deserve to post anywhere on TL see how what you said is the same as being an asshole? I'm sorry I forgot something rather unimportant that happened a couple years ago. I'm even more sorry you're an ass. This post is not modly at all =P | ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
On September 07 2012 17:55 arb wrote: I wonder now that we're thinking of "Banned Until:" did that guy ever get unbanned for talking shit about that movie? (toy story or something i think it was?) The one I remember was somebody getting banned until Bisu wins an OSL. It wasn't Lightwip, either. | ||
|
sylverfyre
United States8298 Posts
On September 08 2012 01:11 andrewlt wrote: The one I remember was somebody getting banned until Bisu wins an OSL. It wasn't Lightwip, either. I had to read that 3 times until I stopped reading dvorakftw was just temp banned for 30 days by Falling. That account was created on 2011-11-11 10:27:36 and had 378 posts. Reason: I'm trying to think what value you bring to political threads, but I'm really falling. | ||
|
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
On September 08 2012 01:11 andrewlt wrote: The one I remember was somebody getting banned until Bisu wins an OSL. It wasn't Lightwip, either. Actually i think he has been now, if you catch my jist. Pity that guy wasn't banned until after the election, but then he would just come back to spill all the stuff that built up in his mind while he was banned, so a shorter ban may be better. | ||
|
KwarK
United States43529 Posts
tofu isn't a mod. He's just a guy that contributes more time and effort to the community than 99.99% of tl ever will. | ||
|
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50607 Posts
On September 08 2012 01:31 Jaaaaasper wrote: Actually i think he has been now, if you catch my jist. sick burn there Gantritor was just temp banned for 30 days by Mig. That account was created on 2011-01-27 18:37:46 and had 107 posts. Reason: 100 posts and you already have 8 warnings/bans. If your posting doesn't improve then TL probably isn't the place for you. must be minor offences because 8 mod action when less than 100 posts is usually grounds for perm but I guess Mig has mercy. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18846 Posts
On September 07 2012 22:11 ziggurat wrote: Isn't there something wrong with banning someone who hasn't committed a bannable offence? There are lots of terrible posts in that thread and I personally don't see why he was singled out for a ban when so many others are ignored. I can understand why you would think that, but I think it is important to note that almost everyone who LR'd the conventions with one liners and snippets has previously posted a great deal of substantive material, some since the beginning of the thread many many months ago. dvorakftw has no such posting history. | ||
|
Mandini
United States1717 Posts
On September 08 2012 01:53 KwarK wrote: tofu isn't a mod. He's just a guy that contributes more time and effort to the community than 99.99% of tl ever will. He also flies spaceships while drunk. But really, telling a blue that they dont deserve to post in a thread is such a stupid thing to do. | ||
|
Cokefreak
Finland8095 Posts
absoluteX was just temp banned for 2 days by GMarshal. That account was created on 2011-12-09 11:02:37 and had 12 posts. Reason: i'd ban that. On September 08 2012 03:34 absoluteX wrote: Id tap that. User was temp banned for this post. He posted this into the Ailuj thread, fail. That thread is really claiming so many mod actions, I knew what would happen the second I saw it pop up. | ||
|
Bibbit
Canada5377 Posts
On September 08 2012 04:38 Cokefreak wrote: He posted this into the Ailuj thread, fail. That thread is really claiming so many mod actions, I knew what would happen the second I saw it pop up. Yup! I kinda feel bad for this guy though: + Show Spoiler + On September 08 2012 03:41 Serimek wrote: Ah ah. Fail. User was warned for this post I think he was saying fail to himself for not realizing Check Six disbanded T_T | ||
|
Cokefreak
Finland8095 Posts
Edit: I have to comment on this ban: SupLilSon was just temp banned for 2 days by vGl-CoW. That account was created on 2011-10-08 10:33:08 and had 1973 posts. Reason: you have been warned a lot of times about ad hominems On September 08 2012 01:19 SupLilSon wrote: You don't actually play this game do you? User was temp banned for this post. I remember when I started seeing this guy post in general, most of his posts used to drive me mad to the point where I pretty much stopped reading general altogether. I mean him no disrespect but he sure as hell can sound like an asshole at times. | ||
|
Chocolate
United States2350 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=366932¤tpage=4#68 Regorr was just temp banned for 1 week by EvilTeletubby. That account was created on 2011-02-23 14:07:16 and had 220 posts. Reason: On September 08 2012 05:29 Regorr wrote: cant wait to see what results see will have. Do not believe anybody else deserves it as much as her! Because hating is cool! Maybe this is just me being daft, but I don't really see why he was banned for this. I assume he meant to say I can't wait to see what results she will have. I don't believe anybody deserves it as much as her! Again, I could just be dumb, but it seemed to me that he was trying to make a well-intentioned compliment. Oh it was probably sarcastic. Duh. Forget about it. | ||
|
Cokefreak
Finland8095 Posts
On September 08 2012 06:56 Chocolate wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=366932¤tpage=4#68 Maybe this is just me being daft, but I don't really see why he was banned for this. I assume he meant to say Again, I could just be dumb, but it seemed to me that he was trying to make a well-intentioned compliment. Actually he was trying to make a stupid joke about her being in Diamond league. | ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
On September 08 2012 06:58 Cokefreak wrote: Actually he was trying to make a stupid joke about her being in Diamond league. When will people understand that teams don't always recruit players for their skills but also for their marketability... Do I agree with this? Not really. Do I understand why the teams do it? Yes. Does it bother me? Again, not really. It's not like she's being seeded into Code S or anything. ~_~ Don't get why this poster got a warning though: On September 08 2012 05:33 Horuku wrote: It should be interesting to note that if a diamond player attempted to join a team that was in the same situation as she is, except that they were male, would they be accepted so easily? They point out that she was the "first female" player on the MLG mainstage, where her play was very suboptimal against Losira (anyone remember how she changed the map view with her left hand o_0 ). If she was a male instead, there wouldn't have been any attention given towards that event and obviously more snowballing into easier team signing. Signing her was done from a PR standpoint. She can try to argue that she has the dedication, but dedication without results doesn't show much. Same thing with maximus'black (he isn't on maximus anymore is he?), they are on teams simply because they provide an entertainment service and PR for their team, but they don't come anywhere near the skill levels of the pros. User was warned for this post Looks to me like he was just explaining the situation. (Which isn't a hard feat in the slightest, it's generally the same situation all the time with this kind of signings, and yet some people don't seem to understand) | ||
| ||
