|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
|
|
On August 24 2012 16:50 TheKefka wrote:Lol it's even moving now...... What's next,a neon sign? + Show Spoiler +
Then it will be flying monkeys holding up that neon sign.
I'm quite certain I'm going to regret suggesting this here. But some people just want to watch the world burn once in a while.
|
On August 24 2012 13:13 TheToast wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2012 13:10 Aerisky wrote:
Actually PBU doesn't equate to an autoban, if that's what you're thinking. There are a lot of PBUs running around by the grace of the TL admins (myself included). The term doesn't necessarily imply that they are always automatically banned upon being discovered or identified. Megaliskuu is another one, there was an account revealed as fanatacist or something and there are lots more but I can't recall all of them. Some of them just request to come back after a while has gone by and are pretty good posters, all things considered. I'm beginning to realize that half the ABL "regulars" are PBUs. Blind-Rawr, anacletus, you, Opshot (pretty sure), Shady Sands...
Nope, this is my first and only TL account =D
I did have a couple temp bans... but I try to stay tame most of the time.
|
Glad to see that people have calmed down in the rape thread, it was pretty ugly earlier. Also I'm probably not the best example to say this, but we should take the off topic to pm's and irc, that's what they are there for. When you have a red mod note scrolling across the page its a good sign that the mods are getting tired of our off topicness.
|
I for one, have also appreciated the Rape Thread bans, although I contest this warninig!
On August 23 2012 15:54 arb wrote:
wen ur with ur honey and ur feelin her up and shes lik no dont touch my nono square then you keep doing it anyway
and you 1a2a3a into the vajayjay
User was warned for this post
arb's opening discourse on interpersonal relationships could have evolved into a beautifully eloquent treatise on the degradory effects of inebriety. Masterfully capturing the subject matter, in such a raw form, is worthy of a blue back-ground, or at least a prize for 'Thug Lyf Prose'.
That, and, who'se gonna stay up and spam to snipe first on page 1337?
|
On August 24 2012 22:08 bITt.mAN wrote:I for one, have also appreciated the Rape Thread bans, although I contest this warninig! Show nested quote +On August 23 2012 15:54 arb wrote:
wen ur with ur honey and ur feelin her up and shes lik no dont touch my nono square then you keep doing it anyway
and you 1a2a3a into the vajayjay
User was warned for this post arb's opening discourse on interpersonal relationships could have evolved into a beautifully eloquent treatise on the degradory effects of inebriety. Masterfully capturing the subject matter, in such a raw form, is worthy of a blue back-ground, or at least a prize for 'Thug Lyf Prose'. That, and, who'se gonna stay up and spam to snipe first on page 1337?
Yeah I think far more than banning people for having bad viewpoints in that thread you should temp ban for posts like that.
Imagine that same tone occurring in a thread about Violet's death or even a balance thread. Rape is a serious topic, imo
|
That new mod note...is...beautiful. In fact the only way it could be made better is if horses were pulling it along.
|
Aw highways :/ I didn't even see that post until after the fact. You have to be more tactful when voicing an opinion on the game.
|
On August 24 2012 14:03 Shady Sands wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2012 14:00 BLinD-RawR wrote:On August 24 2012 13:56 Shady Sands wrote:On August 24 2012 13:10 Aerisky wrote:
Actually PBU doesn't equate to an autoban, if that's what you're thinking. There are a lot of PBUs running around by the grace of the TL admins (myself included). The term doesn't necessarily imply that they are always automatically banned upon being discovered or identified. Megaliskuu is another one, there was an account revealed as fanatacist or something and there are lots more but I can't recall all of them. Some of them just request to come back after a while has gone by and are pretty good posters, all things considered. Who were you? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=Z3kk Referring to Aerisky. I remember your post claiming you were Z3kk. Surprised you haven't figured out who I used to be yet.
Goddamn I love being right. ABL thread is the ultimate in PBU detection. Anyone who finds this thread and starts posting regularly within a month or two of joining is 99.99999% sure to be a PB&U. Especially when they start playing PBU mafia and watching for "ban traps".
On August 24 2012 13:30 jpak wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2012 13:13 TheToast wrote:On August 24 2012 13:10 Aerisky wrote:
Actually PBU doesn't equate to an autoban, if that's what you're thinking. There are a lot of PBUs running around by the grace of the TL admins (myself included). The term doesn't necessarily imply that they are always automatically banned upon being discovered or identified. Megaliskuu is another one, there was an account revealed as fanatacist or something and there are lots more but I can't recall all of them. Some of them just request to come back after a while has gone by and are pretty good posters, all things considered. I'm beginning to realize that half the ABL "regulars" are PBUs. Blind-Rawr, anacletus, you, Opshot (pretty sure), Shady Sands... Takes a PBU to spot a PBU a mile away, I guess.
Nope, this is my first TL account.
|
On August 24 2012 23:28 TheToast wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2012 14:03 Shady Sands wrote:On August 24 2012 14:00 BLinD-RawR wrote:On August 24 2012 13:56 Shady Sands wrote:On August 24 2012 13:10 Aerisky wrote:
Actually PBU doesn't equate to an autoban, if that's what you're thinking. There are a lot of PBUs running around by the grace of the TL admins (myself included). The term doesn't necessarily imply that they are always automatically banned upon being discovered or identified. Megaliskuu is another one, there was an account revealed as fanatacist or something and there are lots more but I can't recall all of them. Some of them just request to come back after a while has gone by and are pretty good posters, all things considered. Who were you? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=Z3kk Referring to Aerisky. I remember your post claiming you were Z3kk. Surprised you haven't figured out who I used to be yet. Goddamn I love being right. ABL thread is the ultimate in PBU detection. Anyone who finds this thread and starts posting regularly within a month or two of joining is 99.99999% sure to be a PB&U. Especially when they start playing PBU mafia and watching for "ban traps". Show nested quote +On August 24 2012 13:30 jpak wrote:On August 24 2012 13:13 TheToast wrote:On August 24 2012 13:10 Aerisky wrote:
Actually PBU doesn't equate to an autoban, if that's what you're thinking. There are a lot of PBUs running around by the grace of the TL admins (myself included). The term doesn't necessarily imply that they are always automatically banned upon being discovered or identified. Megaliskuu is another one, there was an account revealed as fanatacist or something and there are lots more but I can't recall all of them. Some of them just request to come back after a while has gone by and are pretty good posters, all things considered. I'm beginning to realize that half the ABL "regulars" are PBUs. Blind-Rawr, anacletus, you, Opshot (pretty sure), Shady Sands... Takes a PBU to spot a PBU a mile away, I guess. Nope, this is my first TL account.
Well, technically your future PBU account was already banned, so whilst that is your first account, I'm not sure you qualify as not a PBU.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=32696¤tpage=1231#24603
On April 25 2012 07:02 TL.net Bot wrote:
TheBread was just banned by motbob.
That account was created on 2012-04-25 07:00:45 and had 0 posts.
Reason: Future Previously Banned User.
|
Requesting a 2 day temp ban (I can still watch streams right?Seriously...don't take my streams o.o).
I cant stop myself from posting in these dumb ass gun threads.
User was temp banned for this post.
|
Ladies and gentlemen, my first report leading to a ban (I think):
On August 24 2012 03:51 Headshothank wrote:
What is rape
Oh baby, don't hurt me
Don't hurt me no more
What is rape
Oh baby, don't hurt me
Don't hurt me no more
I'm sorry I had to
User was temp banned for this post.
From the "What is Rape?" thread (which surprisingly has turned into an actual conversation, rather than garbage).
Feels good 
|
Oh my god, why did I even walk into that hellhole.
This is me, walking back out before I break my hot streak.
|
On August 24 2012 15:05 arb wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2012 14:18 Aerisky wrote:On August 24 2012 14:02 koreasilver wrote:On August 24 2012 14:00 BLinD-RawR wrote:On August 24 2012 13:56 Shady Sands wrote:On August 24 2012 13:10 Aerisky wrote:
Actually PBU doesn't equate to an autoban, if that's what you're thinking. There are a lot of PBUs running around by the grace of the TL admins (myself included). The term doesn't necessarily imply that they are always automatically banned upon being discovered or identified. Megaliskuu is another one, there was an account revealed as fanatacist or something and there are lots more but I can't recall all of them. Some of them just request to come back after a while has gone by and are pretty good posters, all things considered. Who were you? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=Z3kk rofl my very first rage PM I received in my forum history was from this guy. so bad. You're confusing me for someone else; check your PMs again (if I'm wrong, sorry and could please you forward me that PM, ty  ). I'm pretty sure I have never sent a rage PM in my life. I also registered a year and a half after you. Also for the record I completely dissociate myself from my old posts etc (not that I'm able to detach myself voluntarily, but I renounce them). And stop derailing this thread guys... OUCH Vorgrim. Yeah he can go a bit overboard sometimes with his criticism of what other people say, I guess. I think I got megalisk his first perma ban on his first account. He still gives me hell for it haha. Has that rape thread calmed down or did it get closed? There was a warning/ban on almost every page for it when iw as checking earlier
My first perm was all me spamming in all caps, but you did get me bans before that 
Also to add to discussion, PBUs are usually allowed back after some time..as long as you weren't a malicious user..I just said lots of stupid shit all the time, but nothing serious.
|
Hnnngg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-06-25 05:31:41 and had 1065 posts.
Reason: Bad poster.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=Hnnngg
He posted this among other posts into the What is rape thread.
On August 25 2012 03:50 Hnnngg wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2012 03:47 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:42 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:40 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:38 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:34 imallinson wrote:On August 25 2012 03:29 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:24 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:19 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:17 KwarK wrote:
[quote]
You said that the way to avoid being raped was to allow the threat of rape to strip you of your liberties. Being safe rather than sorry. Guess how many times I've been forced to penetrate (I'm male). I won't bother with the guessing, 0! Because I don't make mistakes regarding who I associate with. Thus, I don't suffer the negative consequences. I walk home drunk by myself, regardless of how many times/people ask if they can help. So women who find themselves in any position in which they are vulnerable with a man have made a mistake? Rapists. Do. Not. Wear. Labels. Around 6% of college men will, in anonymous surveys, willingly admit to being rapists. You are advocating that women adopt a systematic policy of non interaction with men and those that don't have neglected their personal safety regarding rape. You cannot strip away the freedom of half of the population like that. Not half the populace, all of it. 100% of people who drive should wear seatbelts. 100% of people who are sexually active should wear condoms. Standard safety procedure stuff. And 100% of the population should not interact with the other sex? That seems like a pretty bad solution to the problem. There is no solution. Only precautions you can take to avoid stuff. Do you feel bad for people who don't wear seatbelts and become quadriplegic? I don't, wear your seatbelt. You said, "100% of the population should not interact with the other sex". That's not exactly what I proposed. I'm saying that if you're piss-ass drunk and you let a stranger walk you home, into your house, up to your bed, and they force your penis inside their vagina, then you brought it upon yourself. On August 25 2012 03:37 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:36 Zoesan wrote:
I think the point he's trying to make is more "be careful around strangers". They're not always strangers >< In most cases they aren't. Don't become friends with rapists. 100% of my friends are not rapists. Because of course rapists have brands on their foreheads that read "I RAPE PEOPLE" You're being utterly absurd. Anything worth doing isn't easy. You want to be spoonfed information about people like whether or not they rape people? There are different amounts of trust you should put in people. I trust my friends because I know they won't rape me. They've passed their rites. Strangers I don't trust, no matter how sexy/muscular they are. I've never been in a situation where consent could be misconstrued because I don't put myself in those situations. On August 25 2012 03:41 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:38 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:34 imallinson wrote:On August 25 2012 03:29 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:24 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:19 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:17 KwarK wrote:
[quote]
You said that the way to avoid being raped was to allow the threat of rape to strip you of your liberties. Being safe rather than sorry. Guess how many times I've been forced to penetrate (I'm male). I won't bother with the guessing, 0! Because I don't make mistakes regarding who I associate with. Thus, I don't suffer the negative consequences. I walk home drunk by myself, regardless of how many times/people ask if they can help. So women who find themselves in any position in which they are vulnerable with a man have made a mistake? Rapists. Do. Not. Wear. Labels. Around 6% of college men will, in anonymous surveys, willingly admit to being rapists. You are advocating that women adopt a systematic policy of non interaction with men and those that don't have neglected their personal safety regarding rape. You cannot strip away the freedom of half of the population like that. Not half the populace, all of it. 100% of people who drive should wear seatbelts. 100% of people who are sexually active should wear condoms. Standard safety procedure stuff. And 100% of the population should not interact with the other sex? That seems like a pretty bad solution to the problem. There is no solution. Only precautions you can take to avoid stuff. Do you feel bad for people who don't wear seatbelts and become quadriplegic? I don't, wear your seatbelt. You said, "100% of the population should not interact with the other sex". That's not exactly what I proposed. I'm saying that if you're piss-ass drunk and you let a stranger walk you home, into your house, up to your bed, and they force your penis inside their vagina, then you brought it upon yourself. On August 25 2012 03:37 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:36 Zoesan wrote:
I think the point he's trying to make is more "be careful around strangers". They're not always strangers >< In most cases they aren't. Don't become friends with rapists. 100% of my friends are not rapists. Majority of rape isn't done by strangers, the situation I described was acquaintance rape. Also rapists don't wear labels, chances are reasonably good one of your friends is a rapist. So it's impossible to tell before a rape is occurring whether someone is a rapist? I suppose it's also impossible to tell before you're being murdered that the person you're murdering might have some tendency to murder people. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_BernardoWhen the detectives asked Bernardo why he thought he was being investigated for the rapes, he admitted that he did resemble the composite. The detectives concluded that such a well-educated, well-adjusted, congenial young man could not be responsible for the vicious crimes. Regarding one of the more prolific serial rapists and killers. But I guess the standard you hold the average woman to is higher than those of the detectives who deal with serial rapists as their job. His father was abusive and convicted of a crime. Big red flag. His mom was a slut. Big red flag. I wouldn't associate with that person, ever. User was banned for this post.
+ Show Spoiler +Also a big fuck you to the people that kept going off topic and making the warning at the top the way it is, it's fucking annoying.
|
On August 25 2012 04:52 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +Hnnngg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-06-25 05:31:41 and had 1065 posts.
Reason: Bad poster. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=HnnnggHe posted this among other posts into the What is rape thread. Show nested quote +On August 25 2012 03:50 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:47 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:42 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:40 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:38 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:34 imallinson wrote:On August 25 2012 03:29 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:24 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:19 Hnnngg wrote:
[quote]
Being safe rather than sorry. Guess how many times I've been forced to penetrate (I'm male).
I won't bother with the guessing, 0! Because I don't make mistakes regarding who I associate with. Thus, I don't suffer the negative consequences. I walk home drunk by myself, regardless of how many times/people ask if they can help. So women who find themselves in any position in which they are vulnerable with a man have made a mistake? Rapists. Do. Not. Wear. Labels. Around 6% of college men will, in anonymous surveys, willingly admit to being rapists. You are advocating that women adopt a systematic policy of non interaction with men and those that don't have neglected their personal safety regarding rape. You cannot strip away the freedom of half of the population like that. Not half the populace, all of it. 100% of people who drive should wear seatbelts. 100% of people who are sexually active should wear condoms. Standard safety procedure stuff. And 100% of the population should not interact with the other sex? That seems like a pretty bad solution to the problem. There is no solution. Only precautions you can take to avoid stuff. Do you feel bad for people who don't wear seatbelts and become quadriplegic? I don't, wear your seatbelt. You said, "100% of the population should not interact with the other sex". That's not exactly what I proposed. I'm saying that if you're piss-ass drunk and you let a stranger walk you home, into your house, up to your bed, and they force your penis inside their vagina, then you brought it upon yourself. On August 25 2012 03:37 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:36 Zoesan wrote:
I think the point he's trying to make is more "be careful around strangers". They're not always strangers >< In most cases they aren't. Don't become friends with rapists. 100% of my friends are not rapists. Because of course rapists have brands on their foreheads that read "I RAPE PEOPLE" You're being utterly absurd. Anything worth doing isn't easy. You want to be spoonfed information about people like whether or not they rape people? There are different amounts of trust you should put in people. I trust my friends because I know they won't rape me. They've passed their rites. Strangers I don't trust, no matter how sexy/muscular they are. I've never been in a situation where consent could be misconstrued because I don't put myself in those situations. On August 25 2012 03:41 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:38 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:34 imallinson wrote:On August 25 2012 03:29 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:24 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:19 Hnnngg wrote:
[quote]
Being safe rather than sorry. Guess how many times I've been forced to penetrate (I'm male).
I won't bother with the guessing, 0! Because I don't make mistakes regarding who I associate with. Thus, I don't suffer the negative consequences. I walk home drunk by myself, regardless of how many times/people ask if they can help. So women who find themselves in any position in which they are vulnerable with a man have made a mistake? Rapists. Do. Not. Wear. Labels. Around 6% of college men will, in anonymous surveys, willingly admit to being rapists. You are advocating that women adopt a systematic policy of non interaction with men and those that don't have neglected their personal safety regarding rape. You cannot strip away the freedom of half of the population like that. Not half the populace, all of it. 100% of people who drive should wear seatbelts. 100% of people who are sexually active should wear condoms. Standard safety procedure stuff. And 100% of the population should not interact with the other sex? That seems like a pretty bad solution to the problem. There is no solution. Only precautions you can take to avoid stuff. Do you feel bad for people who don't wear seatbelts and become quadriplegic? I don't, wear your seatbelt. You said, "100% of the population should not interact with the other sex". That's not exactly what I proposed. I'm saying that if you're piss-ass drunk and you let a stranger walk you home, into your house, up to your bed, and they force your penis inside their vagina, then you brought it upon yourself. On August 25 2012 03:37 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:36 Zoesan wrote:
I think the point he's trying to make is more "be careful around strangers". They're not always strangers >< In most cases they aren't. Don't become friends with rapists. 100% of my friends are not rapists. Majority of rape isn't done by strangers, the situation I described was acquaintance rape. Also rapists don't wear labels, chances are reasonably good one of your friends is a rapist. So it's impossible to tell before a rape is occurring whether someone is a rapist? I suppose it's also impossible to tell before you're being murdered that the person you're murdering might have some tendency to murder people. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_BernardoWhen the detectives asked Bernardo why he thought he was being investigated for the rapes, he admitted that he did resemble the composite. The detectives concluded that such a well-educated, well-adjusted, congenial young man could not be responsible for the vicious crimes. Regarding one of the more prolific serial rapists and killers. But I guess the standard you hold the average woman to is higher than those of the detectives who deal with serial rapists as their job. His father was abusive and convicted of a crime. Big red flag. His mom was a slut. Big red flag. I wouldn't associate with that person, ever. User was banned for this post. + Show Spoiler +Also a big fuck you to the people that kept going off topic and making the warning at the top the way it is, it's fucking annoying.
Fuck yeah , was waiting for that.
|
PauseBreak was just temp banned for 1 week by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-04-18 12:18:12 and had 118 posts.
Reason: Twenty minutes after a warning for balance whining and you do it again? This is your third mod action on balance whining in 118 posts by the way.
I've said it before and I will say it again: balance whiners never seem to learn.
On August 25 2012 03:56 PauseBreak wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2012 03:54 Kreb wrote:
Fitzys macro make me sad :<
He was floating 1k + minerals all game when he was like 80 supply, and its been steadily rising, now up to 3.7k. Don't worry man, he's Zerg. He can make a lot of mistakes. Just make Winestors and BL. Wow, and Major was by far the better player. User was temp banned for this post.
His other mod actions:
On July 09 2012 12:16 PauseBreak wrote:http://sc2ranks.com/stats/league/am/1/allActually, if you want to easily get to Platinum, Diamond, Masters (and a few exceptions), GM league you just stop playing Terran and play as Zerg. The metagame right now, you can have one hand on the keyboard and the other eating chips while playing as Zerg because they attack, defend, and win games by hitting the 'a' key and left clicking. User was warned for this post
On August 25 2012 03:19 PauseBreak wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2012 03:18 Ryps wrote:
I would have never imagined that zerg could beat that terran army, infestors are pretty damn gooooood. Yeah, they are grossly op. User was warned for this post
On August 18 2012 12:29 PauseBreak wrote:
If she plays as Zerg she'll have no problems getting into Masters.
User was warned for this post
On August 10 2012 08:37 PauseBreak wrote:Show nested quote +On August 10 2012 keglu wrote:
Dont realyy know what are you trying to sayt but few facts:
Korean TvZ is 50%
International TvZ is 44,7% and this includes results from Korea
Excluding Korean data from International graph we have 40,7% TvZ - Its Terran winratio in tournament TvZ played outside of Korea in July 2012(includes Koreans playing in foreign tournaments).
This. Show nested quote +On August 10 2012 Cereb wrote:
Stop complaining. The game is ridiculously well balanced compare to anything else out there. :Facepalm: User was warned for this post
|
When I saw that thread title (the rape thread), I immediately thought that that thread would attract an inordinate number of idiots who think with their dicks instead of their brains. I clicked on it anyway but immediately realized my mistake and pressed the back button. I'm sure I would've just lost my temper conversing with the people that got banned.
|
On August 25 2012 04:52 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +Hnnngg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-06-25 05:31:41 and had 1065 posts.
Reason: Bad poster. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=HnnnggHe posted this among other posts into the What is rape thread. Show nested quote +On August 25 2012 03:50 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:47 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:42 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:40 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:38 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:34 imallinson wrote:On August 25 2012 03:29 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:24 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:19 Hnnngg wrote:
[quote]
Being safe rather than sorry. Guess how many times I've been forced to penetrate (I'm male).
I won't bother with the guessing, 0! Because I don't make mistakes regarding who I associate with. Thus, I don't suffer the negative consequences. I walk home drunk by myself, regardless of how many times/people ask if they can help. So women who find themselves in any position in which they are vulnerable with a man have made a mistake? Rapists. Do. Not. Wear. Labels. Around 6% of college men will, in anonymous surveys, willingly admit to being rapists. You are advocating that women adopt a systematic policy of non interaction with men and those that don't have neglected their personal safety regarding rape. You cannot strip away the freedom of half of the population like that. Not half the populace, all of it. 100% of people who drive should wear seatbelts. 100% of people who are sexually active should wear condoms. Standard safety procedure stuff. And 100% of the population should not interact with the other sex? That seems like a pretty bad solution to the problem. There is no solution. Only precautions you can take to avoid stuff. Do you feel bad for people who don't wear seatbelts and become quadriplegic? I don't, wear your seatbelt. You said, "100% of the population should not interact with the other sex". That's not exactly what I proposed. I'm saying that if you're piss-ass drunk and you let a stranger walk you home, into your house, up to your bed, and they force your penis inside their vagina, then you brought it upon yourself. On August 25 2012 03:37 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:36 Zoesan wrote:
I think the point he's trying to make is more "be careful around strangers". They're not always strangers >< In most cases they aren't. Don't become friends with rapists. 100% of my friends are not rapists. Because of course rapists have brands on their foreheads that read "I RAPE PEOPLE" You're being utterly absurd. Anything worth doing isn't easy. You want to be spoonfed information about people like whether or not they rape people? There are different amounts of trust you should put in people. I trust my friends because I know they won't rape me. They've passed their rites. Strangers I don't trust, no matter how sexy/muscular they are. I've never been in a situation where consent could be misconstrued because I don't put myself in those situations. On August 25 2012 03:41 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:38 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:34 imallinson wrote:On August 25 2012 03:29 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:24 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:19 Hnnngg wrote:
[quote]
Being safe rather than sorry. Guess how many times I've been forced to penetrate (I'm male).
I won't bother with the guessing, 0! Because I don't make mistakes regarding who I associate with. Thus, I don't suffer the negative consequences. I walk home drunk by myself, regardless of how many times/people ask if they can help. So women who find themselves in any position in which they are vulnerable with a man have made a mistake? Rapists. Do. Not. Wear. Labels. Around 6% of college men will, in anonymous surveys, willingly admit to being rapists. You are advocating that women adopt a systematic policy of non interaction with men and those that don't have neglected their personal safety regarding rape. You cannot strip away the freedom of half of the population like that. Not half the populace, all of it. 100% of people who drive should wear seatbelts. 100% of people who are sexually active should wear condoms. Standard safety procedure stuff. And 100% of the population should not interact with the other sex? That seems like a pretty bad solution to the problem. There is no solution. Only precautions you can take to avoid stuff. Do you feel bad for people who don't wear seatbelts and become quadriplegic? I don't, wear your seatbelt. You said, "100% of the population should not interact with the other sex". That's not exactly what I proposed. I'm saying that if you're piss-ass drunk and you let a stranger walk you home, into your house, up to your bed, and they force your penis inside their vagina, then you brought it upon yourself. On August 25 2012 03:37 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:36 Zoesan wrote:
I think the point he's trying to make is more "be careful around strangers". They're not always strangers >< In most cases they aren't. Don't become friends with rapists. 100% of my friends are not rapists. Majority of rape isn't done by strangers, the situation I described was acquaintance rape. Also rapists don't wear labels, chances are reasonably good one of your friends is a rapist. So it's impossible to tell before a rape is occurring whether someone is a rapist? I suppose it's also impossible to tell before you're being murdered that the person you're murdering might have some tendency to murder people. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_BernardoWhen the detectives asked Bernardo why he thought he was being investigated for the rapes, he admitted that he did resemble the composite. The detectives concluded that such a well-educated, well-adjusted, congenial young man could not be responsible for the vicious crimes. Regarding one of the more prolific serial rapists and killers. But I guess the standard you hold the average woman to is higher than those of the detectives who deal with serial rapists as their job. His father was abusive and convicted of a crime. Big red flag. His mom was a slut. Big red flag. I wouldn't associate with that person, ever. User was banned for this post. + Show Spoiler +Also a big fuck you to the people that kept going off topic and making the warning at the top the way it is, it's fucking annoying.
What a dick.
User was banned for this post.
|
On August 25 2012 05:08 Hnnnggg wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2012 04:52 Cokefreak wrote:Hnnngg was just banned by Empyrean.
That account was created on 2011-06-25 05:31:41 and had 1065 posts.
Reason: Bad poster. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/profile.php?user=HnnnggHe posted this among other posts into the What is rape thread. On August 25 2012 03:50 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:47 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:42 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:40 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:38 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:34 imallinson wrote:On August 25 2012 03:29 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:24 KwarK wrote:
[quote]
So women who find themselves in any position in which they are vulnerable with a man have made a mistake? Rapists. Do. Not. Wear. Labels. Around 6% of college men will, in anonymous surveys, willingly admit to being rapists. You are advocating that women adopt a systematic policy of non interaction with men and those that don't have neglected their personal safety regarding rape. You cannot strip away the freedom of half of the population like that. Not half the populace, all of it. 100% of people who drive should wear seatbelts. 100% of people who are sexually active should wear condoms. Standard safety procedure stuff. And 100% of the population should not interact with the other sex? That seems like a pretty bad solution to the problem. There is no solution. Only precautions you can take to avoid stuff. Do you feel bad for people who don't wear seatbelts and become quadriplegic? I don't, wear your seatbelt. You said, "100% of the population should not interact with the other sex". That's not exactly what I proposed. I'm saying that if you're piss-ass drunk and you let a stranger walk you home, into your house, up to your bed, and they force your penis inside their vagina, then you brought it upon yourself. On August 25 2012 03:37 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:36 Zoesan wrote:
I think the point he's trying to make is more "be careful around strangers". They're not always strangers >< In most cases they aren't. Don't become friends with rapists. 100% of my friends are not rapists. Because of course rapists have brands on their foreheads that read "I RAPE PEOPLE" You're being utterly absurd. Anything worth doing isn't easy. You want to be spoonfed information about people like whether or not they rape people? There are different amounts of trust you should put in people. I trust my friends because I know they won't rape me. They've passed their rites. Strangers I don't trust, no matter how sexy/muscular they are. I've never been in a situation where consent could be misconstrued because I don't put myself in those situations. On August 25 2012 03:41 KwarK wrote:On August 25 2012 03:38 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:34 imallinson wrote:On August 25 2012 03:29 Hnnngg wrote:On August 25 2012 03:24 KwarK wrote:
[quote]
So women who find themselves in any position in which they are vulnerable with a man have made a mistake? Rapists. Do. Not. Wear. Labels. Around 6% of college men will, in anonymous surveys, willingly admit to being rapists. You are advocating that women adopt a systematic policy of non interaction with men and those that don't have neglected their personal safety regarding rape. You cannot strip away the freedom of half of the population like that. Not half the populace, all of it. 100% of people who drive should wear seatbelts. 100% of people who are sexually active should wear condoms. Standard safety procedure stuff. And 100% of the population should not interact with the other sex? That seems like a pretty bad solution to the problem. There is no solution. Only precautions you can take to avoid stuff. Do you feel bad for people who don't wear seatbelts and become quadriplegic? I don't, wear your seatbelt. You said, "100% of the population should not interact with the other sex". That's not exactly what I proposed. I'm saying that if you're piss-ass drunk and you let a stranger walk you home, into your house, up to your bed, and they force your penis inside their vagina, then you brought it upon yourself. On August 25 2012 03:37 Elsid wrote:On August 25 2012 03:36 Zoesan wrote:
I think the point he's trying to make is more "be careful around strangers". They're not always strangers >< In most cases they aren't. Don't become friends with rapists. 100% of my friends are not rapists. Majority of rape isn't done by strangers, the situation I described was acquaintance rape. Also rapists don't wear labels, chances are reasonably good one of your friends is a rapist. So it's impossible to tell before a rape is occurring whether someone is a rapist? I suppose it's also impossible to tell before you're being murdered that the person you're murdering might have some tendency to murder people. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_BernardoWhen the detectives asked Bernardo why he thought he was being investigated for the rapes, he admitted that he did resemble the composite. The detectives concluded that such a well-educated, well-adjusted, congenial young man could not be responsible for the vicious crimes. Regarding one of the more prolific serial rapists and killers. But I guess the standard you hold the average woman to is higher than those of the detectives who deal with serial rapists as their job. His father was abusive and convicted of a crime. Big red flag. His mom was a slut. Big red flag. I wouldn't associate with that person, ever. User was banned for this post. + Show Spoiler +Also a big fuck you to the people that kept going off topic and making the warning at the top the way it is, it's fucking annoying. What a dick.
Nice to meet you friend Have a nice day!
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/97rPD.jpg)
